Agree. What about proposed buffs?

Lies

Bolt pistol needs its AA removed

nerefing wiggle will correct minassault

As of Hotfix 1.1.2; listed in no particular order:

Items
* MN Assault
* Armor Plates
* Scrambler Rifle
* Large Blaster Turrets
* Armor Hardeners

Mechanics
* Wiggle Wiggle
* Team-shared Active Scans

You just showed why min assaults need to keep their stamina. Its their mobility is the defining feature

If HP and Mobility were inversely related, mobility would be a defining characteristic of low-HP units.

You gave no reasoning for anything. Can you logically explain why any of that should take a Nerf?

If HP and Mobility were inversely related, mobility would be a defining characteristic of low-HP units.

As of Hotfix 1.1.2; listed in no particular order:

Items
* MN Assault
* Armor Plates
* Scrambler Rifle
* Large Blaster Turrets
* Armor Hardeners

Mechanics
* Wiggle Wiggle
* Team-shared Active Scans

I'm going to ask why on several things not necessarily the ones you might expect though.

MN Assault?
Armour Plates?
And the Large Blaster Turret?

I mean I know that I despite the Large Blaster Turret despite using it since it barely represents a main tank gun but I have to ask why it specifically merits a nerf in the balance pass.

Specifically what about it do you feel needs to be nerfed?

Bolt pistol needs its AA removed

It has the same AA numbers and bullet magnetism as the scrambler pistol.

You try killing with the burst, even ridiculous AA won't save that disgrace

It certainly isn't the best sidearm, but I'd take a Burst ScP over a MagSec or Ion Pistol any day :-)

MN Assault
High Speed + High HP = FoTM; sustained and disproportionately high usage rates in Pubs and PC; extreme mobility is rolebleeding Scouts; first-hand observations; Rattati has mentioned reigning them in (so I think safe to assume there's a need to reign them in).

Armor Plates
High-slot diversity was recently achieved; low-slot diversity remains in a sub-optimal state. As per daily usage rates, brick-related modules have occupied 9 of the Top 10 slots each and every day for the past 6 months. The only low-slot module which appears in the Top 10 other than Brick is the KinCat, which coincidentally offsets penalty of stacking brick.

Blaster Turrets
Primarily first-hand observations. It is too effective at wiping out infantry at too great a range; it is too good in its AI capacity to simultaneously excel at AV. In my opinion, an anti-infantry blaster tank shouldn't stand a chance against an anti-vehicle missile or rail tank. I'd freely defer to reasonable pilots on this, but if pressed for suggestion I'd propose nerfing its dispersion (so mowing down infantry with impunity while hardened would take more time/effort), I'd propose nerfing its maximum range or accuracy at range (so popping infantry at longish range wouldn't happen), and I'd propose a less lenient overheat mechanic (to leave it at disadvantage against missile HAVs and to limit the amount of infantry casualties it can inflict in a given hardened cycle).

1. Min Assaults are relatively easy to kill at a distance, and the only thing that would need to change imo is its silly ability to dodge most bullets by simply strafing them.

2. The problem with plates seems to be similarly in vehicles where there's nothing really useful to put in those slots other than plates. Also, simply nerfing them because they are currently the most useful is kinda misguided.

3. I don't have much expirence with vehicles (yet, I'm getting there). From what I see, if a infantry is caught in the open, or not even trying to dodge the bullets, dying is common. From my infantry play, I can see that is the case; even going as far as staying in closed off areas or in inaccessible areas from the HAV (with AV for maximum effect) will get the HAV to go away. If you're dying to blasters, stay under cover being a fatty, or just quit scrubbing.

4. Also, a LARGE turret is AV. There is no such thing as an AI large turret; that is nonsense. As for your needs, no. Any less accuracy and it will be forced in to fight at pretty much point blank. Heating has already been needed twice, it doesn't need any more in that field.

2. Correct; brick affords users more utility other low-slot modules. Whether or not we should reign in brick or buff all else is debatable.

MN Assault
High Speed + High HP = FoTM; sustained and disproportionately high usage rates in Pubs and PC; extreme mobility is rolebleeding Scouts; first-hand observations; Rattati has mentioned reigning them in (so I think safe to assume there's a need to reign them in).

Armor Plates
High-slot diversity was recently achieved; low-slot diversity remains in a sub-optimal state. As per daily usage rates, brick-related modules have occupied 9 of the Top 10 slots each and every day for the past 6 months. The only low-slot module which appears in the Top 10 other than Brick is the KinCat, which coincidentally offsets penalty of stacking brick.

Blaster Turrets
Primarily first-hand observations. It is too effective at wiping out infantry at too great a range; it is too good in its AI capacity to simultaneously excel at AV. In my opinion, an anti-infantry blaster tank shouldn't stand a chance against an anti-vehicle missile or rail tank. I'd freely defer to reasonable pilots on this, but if pressed for suggestion I'd propose nerfing its dispersion (so mowing down infantry with impunity while hardened would take more time/effort), I'd propose nerfing its maximum range or accuracy at range (so popping infantry at longish range wouldn't happen) and I'd propose a less lenient overheat mechanic (to leave it at disadvantage against missile HAVs and to limit the amount of infantry casualties it can inflict between hardened cycles).

It has the same AA numbers and bullet magnetism as the scrambler pistol.

[...]
Tank Feedback Inbound......Framing Pines........ Insinuating Pathos.......

1. My thoughts in regards to the Minmatar Assault can be summised as one simple question. "Is the it being over used because its core statistics allow it to do so or is it being used because it is able to break Dust's poor hit detection, gains a bonus to an arguable over performing anti-armour rifle in an anti-armour meta, and remains a versatible 4/4 suit?"

2. Low slots issue I can understand though nerfing armour modules will not see a wider use of low slot modules instead it will cement the value of tank modules in the low slots. If anything rather than nerf them we need to be able to incentivise the use of other modules however at this time I cannot think of any such changes.

3. Tank Feedback Inbound......Framing Pines........ Insinuating Pathos.......

It also has 3-4x the damage