MN Assault
High Speed + High HP = FoTM; sustained and disproportionately high usage rates in Pubs and PC; extreme mobility is rolebleeding Scouts; first-hand observations; Rattati has mentioned reigning them in (so I think safe to assume there's a need to reign them in).

Armor Plates
High-slot diversity was recently achieved; low-slot diversity remains in a sub-optimal state. As per daily usage rates, brick-related modules have occupied 9 of the Top 10 slots each and every day for the past 6 months. The only low-slot module which appears in the Top 10 other than Brick is the KinCat, which coincidentally offsets penalty of stacking brick.

Blaster Turrets
Primarily first-hand observations. It is too effective at wiping out infantry at too great a range; it is too good in its AI capacity to simultaneously excel at AV. In my opinion, an anti-infantry blaster tank shouldn't stand a chance against an anti-vehicle missile or rail tank. I'd freely defer to reasonable pilots on this, but if pressed for suggestion I'd propose nerfing its dispersion (so mowing down infantry with impunity while hardened would take more time/effort), I'd propose nerfing its maximum range or accuracy at range (so popping infantry at longish range wouldn't happen), and I'd propose a less lenient overheat mechanic (to leave it at disadvantage against missile HAVs and to limit the amount of infantry casualties it can inflict in a given hardened cycle).

1. Relative to what? Agreed on wiggle wiggle.

2. Correct; brick affords users more utility than other low-slot modules; hence the brick meta. Whether or not we should reign in brick or buff all else is debatable.

3. Thanks for the tip.

4. Large Blaster turrets are killing infantry all the time. This is why you find Blaster HAVs parked near hostile CRUs. They're also pretty good at popping infantry at range. I guess I'd have to concede on whether or not Large Blaster Turrets are supposed to be anti-infantry, though they're certainly filling that role.