Actually, the Militia Assault Rail Rifle (that is on the Frontline Suits that new players use) has a 0.01 second spool-up time. It was made this way to make it easier for new players.

that's exactly what I was referring to, knowing this it makes more sense to move that across the board to the other variants

it would make it easier for new players to get into it, going from .01 to .3 is a huge difference

the charge up for the rr and even the magsec put these weapons at a disadvantage in almost all situations

shields are already at a disadvantage and making the weapons that are meant to be good against armor a charge up time puts them at further disadvantage, I find myself having more fun with the mlt assault rr then the regular assault rr

I have used it, quite extensively

the kick is easily manageable unlike that of the rr which goes all over the place instead of being linear

in CQC you can manage to unload a full click quite easily but its not meant to be used in QCQ so that argument is quite invalid

if the rr worked more like the AR I would not mind the kick at all, the damage would have to be amped up due to the charge up such as that of the bolt pistol but adjusted so that the dps would stay about the same with the charge being taken into consideration

The difference between the TAC AR kick and the RR kick is that one applies after each shot, while the other applies after half a clip.

You can manage the TAC AR recoil, but you cannot do that while also tracking people and sustaining full fire rate. I have yet to meet someone who can.

And that argument is completely valid if you compare it to the ARR/RR, since it can actually do work in CQC. It's not perfect, but it's miles better than the TAC.

The feeling I'm getting in this thread is that some of these people don't know what they are talking about.

Should I waste my time here is the question?

Previous response to Logical post say no.

ADSing with an ARR is horribly inaccurate; that much I know. I think it's silly that a CR ADSing has better damage application that an ARR at the same range, despite the ARR suposedly being a longer-range rifle than the CR. The reasons why the ARR is bad in ADS are too much unpredictable kick (it should be linear IMO) and the sights being a bit off and awkward. It doesn't shoot exactly where you aim: it's more like it shoots at the base of the sights.

The difference between the TAC AR kick and the RR kick is that one applies after each shot, while the other applies after half a clip.

You can manage the TAC AR recoil, but you cannot do that while also tracking people and sustaining full fire rate. I have yet to meet someone who can.

And that argument is completely valid if you compare it to the ARR/RR, since it can actually do work in CQC. It's not perfect, but it's miles better than the TAC.

Cal weapons are long range (relative term) weapons. So, no. They would become more effective at close range and Gal would be even stronger by using one.

If caldari weaponry is suppost to be the ones with the longest range....


why can a scr or ar reach my optimal range when im using a ARR