Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Knightshade Belladonna
Mannar Focused Warfare Gallente Federation
1141
|
Posted - 2015.04.18 12:18:00 -
[31] - Quote
Shamarskii Simon wrote:Knightshade Belladonna wrote:. It might not be the best game , but it's it's(wtf) own game , and ccp is it's own company. Not tryna grammar **** but... It just grinded my gears a little bit to understand (too many it is, and i just woke up *yawn*) "It's its own game. CCP is its own company." Just the wrong "its" yu were using, nothing wrong w/ that. Now to the real reason why I quoted you. It IS its own game, that connects with another game BY CCP... In a weird way. In the end, without tranquility... Dust wouldn't be dust. Giving Dust "away" to non CCP gives the chance for somethings to screw up.. It also means lots of copyrighted material would change reeeeal quick. tl;dr - In the end, thats the end of dust... It'll change so much, that it wouldn't be dust. Change engines shure, change developers? No no no.
lol, thanks , it killed me to type it.I was like how the hell do I convey this without it looking ****** up , ahh **** it!
I still didn't get to fully explain myself by what I meant with it either. Dust , as like Eve is meant to be a persistent universe that continues and grows and wages war , full of conquest and defeat. Political mumbo jumbo meetings , big hats sitting in a war room discussing the future while meat is fed to the grinder..for years, and more years. It is sad that it had to start out on the ps3, but it had to start out somewhere. Knowing how CCP already rolls before dust launched , i knew we would get things slowly over a span of years.
They do not want Dust , Dust 2 , Dust 3 , Dust 4... just Dust, to co-exist with their other special kid Eve Online..which has continued to be it's own game since 2003 , and has more years to come. That is an excellent track record for a single game, and i love it. This is why CCP most always will have my respect, even if this did not turn out how they wanted it. They want to take their work serious for the long run , that won't happen here now being on the ps3. However it laid out plenty of ground work for it to maybe happen in the future. I would rather them fail , and say they tried , and had this awesome vision they attempted..than to squander it all by bringing in an outside group who will take away plenty of what makes it special, have no clue on the story and backdrop , to rush out some shiny shooter , that they will want to make a sequel of next year after. |
Sequal's Back
Dead Man's Game RUST415
530
|
Posted - 2015.04.18 12:20:00 -
[32] - Quote
Knightshade Belladonna wrote:well , on another engine , (probably on pc too) ccp had a lot of other stuff. They have tested it, it existed , it just never made it here. Can't recall what it was they were testing on, but if it was attempted on the ps3 it would have melted them all.
It even had 64 v 64 battles ( may have even tried 128 v 128) and had a goal of 256 on each side ( that **** would be crazy) , that they tested and supposedly it worked Yep, but it never happened :)
That's exactly what I was saying, they never do what they say they'll do ^^
Fix the game before trying to add anything else.
(Hint: hit detection, lags, glitches,.. you've got some work :) )
|
Knightshade Belladonna
Mannar Focused Warfare Gallente Federation
1141
|
Posted - 2015.04.18 12:22:00 -
[33] - Quote
Sequal's Back wrote:Knightshade Belladonna wrote:well , on another engine , (probably on pc too) ccp had a lot of other stuff. They have tested it, it existed , it just never made it here. Can't recall what it was they were testing on, but if it was attempted on the ps3 it would have melted them all.
It even had 64 v 64 battles ( may have even tried 128 v 128) and had a goal of 256 on each side ( that **** would be crazy) , that they tested and supposedly it worked Yep, but it never happened :) That's exactly what I was saying, they never do what they say they'll do ^^
would you rather they released it and all of us need to buy another ps3 with a 50 dollar ooops rebate? |
Knightshade Belladonna
Mannar Focused Warfare Gallente Federation
1141
|
Posted - 2015.04.18 12:26:00 -
[34] - Quote
Something else , just because someone says we would like to see...does not mean we will make. Not saying they have not said we will make, but there is a lot that people seem to think was promised, that never really was..they just shared their vision with us..fk them for being upfront right! |
The Lion ElJonson
1st Legion The Dark Angels Learning Alliance
133
|
Posted - 2015.04.18 15:16:00 -
[35] - Quote
Star Wars Battlefield 5, ok im in the mood. The game is being rushed to be released just before the movie, its bf reduced from 64 players to 40. fans of the previous four battlefront titles will miss the space battles, Battlefield is DICE's baby, nothing can come close like medal of honour warfighter, remember that? Battlefield 4 was broke, did they even hint there could be trouble beforehand? The Devs themselves have stated they made a star wars game they can enjoy as fans, not the game fans wanted, your campaign is the multiplyer maps but with bots. Its gone from two factions in two timelines to two factions in one time line. No levelution so no star destroyers falling out of the sky. Did you know Battlefront 3 had an alpha years ago? well DICE did and ignored it. Now i get the problems a game thats free and managed by a small team of devs like Dust but when you buy a new gen console and battlefield 4 premium to find out DICE and EA did what they did and are lying and passing the blame to each other and then go buying the next flashy waterd down product they dazzle in front of you without seeing if it actually works well , i have to wish you all the best.
Fool me once shame on you, fool me twice.........
The chat channel 'player trade' is open for adding contacts and placing item advertisements in game.
|
Flint Beastgood III
GunFall Mobilization
1670
|
Posted - 2015.04.18 15:19:00 -
[36] - Quote
Cypher Nil wrote:Flint Beastgood III wrote:My god, the nth post about the new trailer. It doesn't even show you anything. emm except the gameplay? the entire trailer is rendered in the engine. what your looking at is what the game will actually look like.
"Look like" maybe, but play like? I wanna see gameplay... that is not gameplay, don't delude yourself.
'LR4-Trading' Protester
|
The Lion ElJonson
1st Legion The Dark Angels Learning Alliance
134
|
Posted - 2015.04.18 15:24:00 -
[37] - Quote
Flint Beastgood III wrote:Cypher Nil wrote:Flint Beastgood III wrote:My god, the nth post about the new trailer. It doesn't even show you anything. emm except the gameplay? the entire trailer is rendered in the engine. what your looking at is what the game will actually look like. "Look like" maybe, but play like? I wanna see gameplay... that is not gameplay, don't delude yourself.
so i don't know if its actually right but DICE is saying its the gameplay from a cinematic view, wouldn't someone actually have to be playing it to record the cinematic? If so then weres the footage of him playing the game?
some Jedi mind tricks going on here
The chat channel 'player trade' is open for adding contacts and placing item advertisements in game.
|
DR DEESE NUTS
78
|
Posted - 2015.04.18 15:35:00 -
[38] - Quote
20v20? That better be for ground and sky each so it well really be 40v40. It's star wars there needs to be huge battles with big explosions in space.
The USS m`dick
|
Flint Beastgood III
GunFall Mobilization
1672
|
Posted - 2015.04.18 16:41:00 -
[39] - Quote
The Lion ElJonson wrote:Flint Beastgood III wrote:Cypher Nil wrote:Flint Beastgood III wrote:My god, the nth post about the new trailer. It doesn't even show you anything. emm except the gameplay? the entire trailer is rendered in the engine. what your looking at is what the game will actually look like. "Look like" maybe, but play like? I wanna see gameplay... that is not gameplay, don't delude yourself. so i don't know if its actually right but DICE is saying its the gameplay from a cinematic view, wouldn't someone actually have to be playing it to record the cinematic? If so then weres the footage of him playing the game? some Jedi mind tricks going on here
^
'LR4-Trading' Protester
|
J0LLY R0G3R
And the ButtPirates
2704
|
Posted - 2015.04.18 17:36:00 -
[40] - Quote
Taskanoss wrote:Sequal's Back wrote:gustavo acosta wrote:Hype train for Battlefront is dead. No substantial story-mode, no space battles, railed at-ats, pre-announced DLC, 8 maps, 4 planets., and no clone wars maps. There's a reason why EA is the worst company in the world.
The reason you feel that your ideas are knocked down so easily is because you're too narcissistic to consider what you say could be wrong, or what others say will not be in accordance with your opinion. Forums are meant to provoke thought, it's not a circlejerk where idiots tell each other how right they are. EA is far from being the worst company in the world, it's one of the wealthiest in the videogame sector which represent a LOT of money. It just has a DLC policy, which sucks, but everybody's still buying cause EA knows how to advertise, and make things look better than what they actually are. EA is the Michael Bay of game developers, they know how to make big explosions and get money, but lack depth. CCP is the like Christopher Nolan starting out his directing career, great ideas with a niche audience.
Lol no. Just no. Would you like a tissue?
The ButtPirates Now Accepting Applications. XD
TheYoutube
|
|
Sequal's Back
Dead Man's Game RUST415
531
|
Posted - 2015.04.18 18:03:00 -
[41] - Quote
Knightshade Belladonna wrote:Sequal's Back wrote:Knightshade Belladonna wrote:well , on another engine , (probably on pc too) ccp had a lot of other stuff. They have tested it, it existed , it just never made it here. Can't recall what it was they were testing on, but if it was attempted on the ps3 it would have melted them all.
It even had 64 v 64 battles ( may have even tried 128 v 128) and had a goal of 256 on each side ( that **** would be crazy) , that they tested and supposedly it worked Yep, but it never happened :) That's exactly what I was saying, they never do what they say they'll do ^^ would you rather they released it and all of us need to buy another ps3 with a 50 dollar ooops rebate? What? No. I'd rather have them do xhat they say they'll do that's simple.
Fix the game before trying to add anything else.
(Hint: hit detection, lags, glitches,.. you've got some work :) )
|
Knightshade Belladonna
Mannar Focused Warfare Gallente Federation
1147
|
Posted - 2015.04.18 19:18:00 -
[42] - Quote
Sequal's Back wrote:Knightshade Belladonna wrote:Sequal's Back wrote:Knightshade Belladonna wrote:well , on another engine , (probably on pc too) ccp had a lot of other stuff. They have tested it, it existed , it just never made it here. Can't recall what it was they were testing on, but if it was attempted on the ps3 it would have melted them all.
It even had 64 v 64 battles ( may have even tried 128 v 128) and had a goal of 256 on each side ( that **** would be crazy) , that they tested and supposedly it worked Yep, but it never happened :) That's exactly what I was saying, they never do what they say they'll do ^^ would you rather they released it and all of us need to buy another ps3 with a 50 dollar ooops rebate? What? No. I'd rather have them do xhat they say they'll do that's simple.
They dreamed big , and it hurt them. Had the hopes of the pro's , the resources and talent of the drop outs ( console development). Aside from starting new ( which I guess is what legion was meant to be? never even looked into it.) there isn't much they can do now. A few things here and there , but we can't still be holding onto their dreams and our wants as this has been realized for a while now. I'm just happy they still give it attention, and with that , maybe the dream still lives , and one day it connects us. They have plenty of time. They do not have super computers and servers running eve with a skill tree and progression that takes like 35 years to complete for nothing. It might be another 5 years, who knows, or never.. |
LUGMOS
Corrosive Synergy Rise Of Legion.
3589
|
Posted - 2015.04.18 19:43:00 -
[43] - Quote
Kinda disappointed by the trailer TBH...
It looks shiny, but all that's different is a force field thing and better graphics. The trailer didn't show ****, just like CCP trailers.
I hope there's more customization though.
Shotguns are made of a Scandium-Ruthenium-Boron enhanced alloy
First to PM me with common name wins
|
Vicious Minotaur
2307
|
Posted - 2015.04.18 19:45:00 -
[44] - Quote
[Insert idiotic comment about EA being literally HitIer]
I am a minotaur.
a+üa¦ëa¦ëa¦ëa¦ëa¦ëa¦ëa¦ëa¦ëa¦ëa¦ëa¦ëa¦ëa¦ëa¦ëa¦ëa¦ëa¦ëa¦ëa¦ëa¦ëa+üa¦ça¦ça¦ça¦ça¦ça¦ça¦ça¦ça¦ça¦ça¦ça¦ça¦ça¦ça¦ça¦ça¦ça¦ça¦ça¦ça+üa+¦a+¦a+¦a+¦a+¦a+¦a+¦a+¦a+¦a+¦a+¦a+¦a+¦a+¦a+¦a+¦a+¦a+¦a+¦a+¦a+üa¦ëa¦ëa¦ëa¦ëa¦ëa¦ëa¦ëa¦ëa¦ëa¦ëa¦ëa¦ëa¦ëa¦ëa¦ëa¦ëa¦ëa¦ëa¦ëa¦ëa+üa¦ëa¦ëa¦ëa¦ëa¦ëa¦ëa¦ëa¦ëa¦ëa¦ëa¦ëa¦ëa¦ëa¦ëa¦ëa¦ëa¦ë
|
TEBOW BAGGINS
1733
|
Posted - 2015.04.18 19:49:00 -
[45] - Quote
i liked that note that said "actual footage from gameplay engine" when it was clearly a cutscene...
also everything EA touches generally has turned to ****.. i mean yea EA's got all bells and whistles in place, they make a billion dollars, but that doesn't mean they're games do not suck in some major way. all EA does these days is live in activisions shadow and they have a desperate feel about their games trying to emulate the success of COD. |
The Lion ElJonson
1st Legion The Dark Angels Learning Alliance
136
|
Posted - 2015.04.18 20:23:00 -
[46] - Quote
They actually had a release date for that trailer., a release date.
The chat channel 'player trade' is open for adding contacts and placing item advertisements in game.
|
soulreaper73
PFB Pink Fluffy Bunnies
1285
|
Posted - 2015.04.18 21:46:00 -
[47] - Quote
Georgia Xavier wrote:Well considering dice is owned by EA it will be full of micro-transactions. Trailer doesn't always equal to actual gameplay. A good example is battlefield 4, it looked cool and everything but for the first few months the game was full of bugs and server failures because EA actually rushed BF4 several months earlier just to hog more money. Dust is special, it's a crappy game in the perspective of a lot of people but it isn't a parasite compared to EA.
"That gun is $4.99 if you want to use it so pay up! What's that? You don't have bullets? Well for an extra $1.99 you can get a mag! Order now and it will come with its own unique camo paint!" this is how EA sounds like to me
Baka, you could pay for the guns if you wanted to in bf3 and bf4 but did not have to do so. The only guns you would consider being bought, were ones that came with the dlc and even then, you had to unlock them by completing assignments.
|
Sequal's Back
Dead Man's Game RUST415
532
|
Posted - 2015.04.18 22:12:00 -
[48] - Quote
Knightshade Belladonna wrote:Sequal's Back wrote:Knightshade Belladonna wrote:Sequal's Back wrote:Knightshade Belladonna wrote:well , on another engine , (probably on pc too) ccp had a lot of other stuff. They have tested it, it existed , it just never made it here. Can't recall what it was they were testing on, but if it was attempted on the ps3 it would have melted them all.
It even had 64 v 64 battles ( may have even tried 128 v 128) and had a goal of 256 on each side ( that **** would be crazy) , that they tested and supposedly it worked Yep, but it never happened :) That's exactly what I was saying, they never do what they say they'll do ^^ would you rather they released it and all of us need to buy another ps3 with a 50 dollar ooops rebate? What? No. I'd rather have them do xhat they say they'll do that's simple. They dreamed big , and it hurt them. Had the hopes of the pro's , the resources and talent of the drop outs ( console development). Aside from starting new ( which I guess is what legion was meant to be? never even looked into it.) there isn't much they can do now. A few things here and there , but we can't still be holding onto their dreams and our wants as this has been realized for a while now. I'm just happy they still give it attention, and with that , maybe the dream still lives , and one day it connects us. They have plenty of time. They do not have super computers and servers running eve with a skill tree and progression that takes like 35 years to complete for nothing. It might be another 5 years, who knows, or never.. I like you ^^ Hoping is beautiful. But it's CCP. I'm waiting for the next company who'll do what they failed to do. But it wont be a CCP project that's for sure (maybe Star Citizen who knows??) !
Fix the game before trying to add anything else.
(Hint: hit detection, lags, glitches,.. you've got some work :) )
|
Sequal's Back
Dead Man's Game RUST415
532
|
Posted - 2015.04.18 22:16:00 -
[49] - Quote
The Lion ElJonson wrote:They actually had a release date for that trailer., a release date. Do you mean... No SoonTM?
Fix the game before trying to add anything else.
(Hint: hit detection, lags, glitches,.. you've got some work :) )
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |