| Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
True Adamance
Praetoriani Classiarii Templares
Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
17858
   |
Posted - 2015.03.29 22:34:00 -
[31] - Quote
Spkr4theDead wrote:
That's not an explanation.
It's the way you present yourself. Your zeal and passion for the subject is commendable but the manner by which you communicate it has you come off as an *******.
Does this suit.
E.G- CCP Rattati asks for HAV feed back. True Adamance tells CCP Rattati that Armour Boosters are "Stupid and need to die in a fire". CCP Rattati thinks True Adamance is an *******.
Raphael: I'm warning you. Do not leave me here. I will find you.
Castiel: Maybe one day. Today you're my little bitch
|
Derpty Derp
Dead Man's Game
955
|
Posted - 2015.03.29 22:43:00 -
[32] - Quote
I currently use the Gunni more than the Maddi, I like the better handling... The only Maddi's that win are stacking reps with hardeners, everything else is fair game (& even the scrub tanks go down if you catch them off guard/stupid.) |
Pokey Dravon
OSG Planetary Operations
Covert Intervention
5610
|
Posted - 2015.03.29 22:47:00 -
[33] - Quote
True Adamance wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:
That's not an explanation.
It's the way you present yourself. Your zeal and passion for the subject is commendable but the manner by which you communicate it has you come off as an *******. Does this suit. E.G- CCP Rattati asks for HAV feed back. True Adamance tells CCP Rattati that Armour Boosters are "Stupid and need to die in a fire". CCP Rattati thinks True Adamance is an *******.
Assholes communicate with unnecessary negativity which adds nothing to what they're saying other than making it come off as toxic. More specifically the amount of negativity often outweighs the amount of actual useful feedback. Assholes also disregard most if not all feedback from others, immediately jumping to negativity. It's not even that they refuse to compromise, more so they they refuse to even entertain the idea that they may be wrong.
"That little s**t Pokey..." --CCP Rattati, Biomassed Episode 032
Dust514 // Podcast
www.biomassed.net
|
True Adamance
Praetoriani Classiarii Templares
Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
17859
|
Posted - 2015.03.29 22:50:00 -
[34] - Quote
Derpty Derp wrote:I currently use the Gunni more than the Maddi, I like the better handling... The only Maddi's that win are stacking reps with hardeners, everything else is fair game (& even the scrub tanks go down if you catch them off guard/stupid.)
It's still bloody hard to peel apart a double repped and single hardened Maddy without serious flanking, enemy stupidity, and luck.
Raphael: I'm warning you. Do not leave me here. I will find you.
Castiel: Maybe one day. Today you're my little bitch
|
Pokey Dravon
OSG Planetary Operations
Covert Intervention
5610
|
Posted - 2015.03.29 22:52:00 -
[35] - Quote
True Adamance wrote:Derpty Derp wrote:I currently use the Gunni more than the Maddi, I like the better handling... The only Maddi's that win are stacking reps with hardeners, everything else is fair game (& even the scrub tanks go down if you catch them off guard/stupid.) It's still bloody hard to peel apart a double repped and single hardened Maddy without serious flanking, enemy stupidity, and luck.
Shield Boosters in general should have similar if not higher HP/minute as compared to armor repairers.
Also some of the fitting cost for shield modules are absurd.
"That little s**t Pokey..." --CCP Rattati, Biomassed Episode 032
Dust514 // Podcast
www.biomassed.net
|
Spkr4theDead
Red Star.
3145
|
Posted - 2015.03.30 00:56:00 -
[36] - Quote
True Adamance wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:
That's not an explanation.
It's the way you present yourself. Your zeal and passion for the subject is commendable but the manner by which you communicate it has you come off as an *******. Does this suit. E.G- CCP Rattati asks for HAV feed back. True Adamance tells CCP Rattati that Armour Boosters are "Stupid and need to die in a fire". CCP Rattati thinks True Adamance is an *******.
So me explaining why an idea is bad is being an a**hole? That's some logic you have there.
Nope. Confirming that pilot input is not, and never was, valued. - Breakin Stuff
|
Spkr4theDead
Red Star.
3145
|
Posted - 2015.03.30 00:57:00 -
[37] - Quote
Pokey Dravon wrote:True Adamance wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:
That's not an explanation.
It's the way you present yourself. Your zeal and passion for the subject is commendable but the manner by which you communicate it has you come off as an *******. Does this suit. E.G- CCP Rattati asks for HAV feed back. True Adamance tells CCP Rattati that Armour Boosters are "Stupid and need to die in a fire". CCP Rattati thinks True Adamance is an *******. Assholes communicate with unnecessary negativity which adds nothing to what they're saying other than making it come off as toxic. More specifically the amount of negativity often outweighs the amount of actual useful feedback. Assholes also disregard most if not all feedback from others, immediately jumping to negativity. It's not even that they refuse to compromise, more so they they refuse to even entertain the idea that they may be wrong.
See post above this, I never knew explaining why an idea is bad is being an unreasonable a**hole. Someone, please explain this to me.
Nope. Confirming that pilot input is not, and never was, valued. - Breakin Stuff
|
True Adamance
Praetoriani Classiarii Templares
Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
17864
|
Posted - 2015.03.30 01:16:00 -
[38] - Quote
Spkr4theDead wrote:Pokey Dravon wrote:True Adamance wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:
That's not an explanation.
It's the way you present yourself. Your zeal and passion for the subject is commendable but the manner by which you communicate it has you come off as an *******. Does this suit. E.G- CCP Rattati asks for HAV feed back. True Adamance tells CCP Rattati that Armour Boosters are "Stupid and need to die in a fire". CCP Rattati thinks True Adamance is an *******. Assholes communicate with unnecessary negativity which adds nothing to what they're saying other than making it come off as toxic. More specifically the amount of negativity often outweighs the amount of actual useful feedback. Assholes also disregard most if not all feedback from others, immediately jumping to negativity. It's not even that they refuse to compromise, more so they they refuse to even entertain the idea that they may be wrong. See post above this, I never knew explaining why an idea is bad is being an unreasonable a**hole. Someone, please explain this to me.
Did you deliberately not read that or can you not comprehend why responding to a point with excessive negativity and insults might make you come off as a bit of an *******?
Raphael: I'm warning you. Do not leave me here. I will find you.
Castiel: Maybe one day. Today you're my little bitch
|
Pokey Dravon
OSG Planetary Operations
Covert Intervention
5615
|
Posted - 2015.03.30 01:31:00 -
[39] - Quote
True Adamance wrote:Did you deliberately not read that or can you not comprehend why responding to a point with excessive negativity and insults might make you come off as a bit of an *******?
Classic Speaker, Classic. Never fails to make giggle in delight.
"That little s**t Pokey..." --CCP Rattati, Biomassed Episode 032
Dust514 // Podcast
www.biomassed.net
|
Happy Violentime
OMFGZOMBIESRUN
964
|
Posted - 2015.03.30 01:48:00 -
[40] - Quote
Takahiro Kashuken wrote:Breakin Stuff wrote:Why should a light vehicle stand up to heavy AV. One of the primary reasons for nonstop AV on the field to hit tanks rather than escalation to AV to deal with hardeened vehicles is the fact that an LAV is immune to small arms fire and REQUIRES the deployment of forge guns, swarms, plasma cannons and AV grenades. It's a jeep. The LAV we have now and the stupidity we have now is because this is treated as though it were this. Kicker is all AV players are like this. It is why the LAV is dead It is why the DS is dead It is why the ADS is dead All AV has to be a nuclear warhead to combat the HAV and because of that it kills every other role dead, where as if vehicles cancelled each other out it would be more fairer as a whole since a LAV can out manouver a HAV and an ADS can fly above and a HAV has range etc. Only way it may change is if AV weapons become a % modifier so it for example it does 20% damage to a vehicle so for each vehicle that 20% is a different number but then that requires another overhaul and more changes. Disclaimer: The above post is respectful, contains no ranting, contains no personal attacks, contains no trolling, contains no racism, contains no discrimination, contains no profanity, contains no spamming. This post is an opinion and is related to DUST514
Do you know the problem with HAV's they're too good at killing infantry. I mean who puts a huge assault rifle on top of a tank??? If hav's were mainly focused on vehicle vs vehicle combat then AV could be toned down.
But nope you tankers just love your blaster turrets. |
|
|
Thaddeus Reynolds
Facepunch Security
235
|
Posted - 2015.03.30 01:59:00 -
[41] - Quote
Happy Violentime wrote:Takahiro Kashuken wrote:Breakin Stuff wrote:Why should a light vehicle stand up to heavy AV. One of the primary reasons for nonstop AV on the field to hit tanks rather than escalation to AV to deal with hardeened vehicles is the fact that an LAV is immune to small arms fire and REQUIRES the deployment of forge guns, swarms, plasma cannons and AV grenades. It's a jeep. The LAV we have now and the stupidity we have now is because this is treated as though it were this. Kicker is all AV players are like this. It is why the LAV is dead It is why the DS is dead It is why the ADS is dead All AV has to be a nuclear warhead to combat the HAV and because of that it kills every other role dead, where as if vehicles cancelled each other out it would be more fairer as a whole since a LAV can out manouver a HAV and an ADS can fly above and a HAV has range etc. Only way it may change is if AV weapons become a % modifier so it for example it does 20% damage to a vehicle so for each vehicle that 20% is a different number but then that requires another overhaul and more changes. Disclaimer: The above post is respectful, contains no ranting, contains no personal attacks, contains no trolling, contains no racism, contains no discrimination, contains no profanity, contains no spamming. This post is an opinion and is related to DUST514 Do you know the problem with HAV's they're too good at killing infantry. I mean who puts a huge assault rifle on top of a tank??? If hav's were mainly focused on vehicle vs vehicle combat then AV could be toned down. But nope you tankers just love your blaster turrets.
Only reason I switched away from my railgun to the blaster is that the blaster is just better now...Railgun got an unneeded nerf, and now the blaster is now better for AV...AI is a nice side-effect (although, check out the discussions on possible ways to change the blaster turret and missile turrets...like the giant PLCs, or Giant Shotguns etc etc...to make them better at AV, while nerfing their AV)
Khanid Logi and Tanker, sometimes AV Heavy or Sniper.
Vehicle Re-vamp Proposal
|
Spkr4theDead
Red Star.
3145
|
Posted - 2015.03.30 03:15:00 -
[42] - Quote
Happy Violentime wrote:Takahiro Kashuken wrote:Breakin Stuff wrote:Why should a light vehicle stand up to heavy AV. One of the primary reasons for nonstop AV on the field to hit tanks rather than escalation to AV to deal with hardeened vehicles is the fact that an LAV is immune to small arms fire and REQUIRES the deployment of forge guns, swarms, plasma cannons and AV grenades. It's a jeep. The LAV we have now and the stupidity we have now is because this is treated as though it were this. Kicker is all AV players are like this. It is why the LAV is dead It is why the DS is dead It is why the ADS is dead All AV has to be a nuclear warhead to combat the HAV and because of that it kills every other role dead, where as if vehicles cancelled each other out it would be more fairer as a whole since a LAV can out manouver a HAV and an ADS can fly above and a HAV has range etc. Only way it may change is if AV weapons become a % modifier so it for example it does 20% damage to a vehicle so for each vehicle that 20% is a different number but then that requires another overhaul and more changes. Disclaimer: The above post is respectful, contains no ranting, contains no personal attacks, contains no trolling, contains no racism, contains no discrimination, contains no profanity, contains no spamming. This post is an opinion and is related to DUST514 Do you know the problem with HAV's they're too good at killing infantry. I mean who puts a huge assault rifle on top of a tank??? If hav's were mainly focused on vehicle vs vehicle combat then AV could be toned down. But nope you tankers just love your blaster turrets.
If we had the Gal AR as a turret, it would be more accurate than the current blaster.
The greatest challenge in this game is one pilot against another. You wouldn't know that because you've never used a tank.
Nope. Confirming that pilot input is not, and never was, valued. - Breakin Stuff
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |