|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Spkr4theDead
Red Star.
3141
   |
Posted - 2015.03.29 06:51:00 -
[1] - Quote
Breakin Stuff wrote:Takahiro Kashuken wrote:noise you assume a lot about my intentions, objectives, awareness and methods. you never ask questions, merely tell me what I want and intend. your fantasy of who/what I am and what I want are at odds with reality. Until you correct this, and start getting on the same page as the rest of the playerbase, I have no respect or use for your input.
You're a spreadsheet warrior and don't play the game. It's all in how you have no idea what tanks and turrets are like. Everything I see you type is basically stating "I have no idea what I'm talking about."
Nope. Confirming that pilot input is not, and never was, valued. - Breakin Stuff
|
Spkr4theDead
Red Star.
3141
|
Posted - 2015.03.29 06:53:00 -
[2] - Quote
Derpty Derp wrote:Breakin Stuff wrote:[I merely wish to stop the HAV nerf/buff routine by setting the current madrugar as a benchmark and bringing the gunnlogi back in line to it, and setting some acceptable parameters for AV. I don't see a problem with the current Gunnlogi... Its numbers shouldn't add up to the same as the Madruga, the better mobility more than makes up for it. Other than armour reps, the tanks are quite well balanced. (in my opinion.)
The Gunnlogi is garbage. There's literally no reason to use it. Anything the Gunnlogi can do, the Madrugar can do 100x better.
Nope. Confirming that pilot input is not, and never was, valued. - Breakin Stuff
|
Spkr4theDead
Red Star.
3145
|
Posted - 2015.03.29 20:05:00 -
[3] - Quote
Shinobi MumyoSakanagare ZaShigurui wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:
The Gunnlogi is garbage. There's literally no reason to use it. Anything the Gunnlogi can do, the Madrugar can do 100x better.
I don't know about that , I think it has more to do with the driver . .
It's not the driver, the tank is really really bad. An armor tank can tap my Gunnlogi and I lose a ton of shield.
This has happened to me the very first day of Echo: I was driving a Gunnlogi forward at regular speed; Taka was backing his Madrugar up. We hit, no NOS was involved, and my Gunnlogi was vaporized.
It's not the driver, it's the tank. It's in a really bad place right now. It needs to be buffed to the Madrugar's level so there's some variety. The problem with the tanks is that only one hull is superior. It starts at armor, things get changed, then shield is superior, and with Echo armor is back to being superior.
Nope. Confirming that pilot input is not, and never was, valued. - Breakin Stuff
|
Spkr4theDead
Red Star.
3145
|
Posted - 2015.03.29 21:36:00 -
[4] - Quote
True Adamance wrote:
I hate agreeing with you but the Gunnlogi really is lacking compared to the Madrugar.
Funny how everyone hates agreeing with me. Is it because I will not accept compromise? Probably
Don't really care.
Nope. Confirming that pilot input is not, and never was, valued. - Breakin Stuff
|
Spkr4theDead
Red Star.
3145
|
Posted - 2015.03.29 22:06:00 -
[5] - Quote
Pokey Dravon wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:True Adamance wrote:
I hate agreeing with you but the Gunnlogi really is lacking compared to the Madrugar.
Funny how everyone hates agreeing with me. Is it because I will not accept compromise? Probably Don't really care. Just as a general statement, typically people dislike agreeing with assholes, even if they are right from time to time.
Explain to me how I'm an *******.
Nope. Confirming that pilot input is not, and never was, valued. - Breakin Stuff
|
Spkr4theDead
Red Star.
3145
|
Posted - 2015.03.29 22:30:00 -
[6] - Quote
Pokey Dravon wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:Pokey Dravon wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:True Adamance wrote:
I hate agreeing with you but the Gunnlogi really is lacking compared to the Madrugar.
Funny how everyone hates agreeing with me. Is it because I will not accept compromise? Probably Don't really care. Just as a general statement, typically people dislike agreeing with assholes, even if they are right from time to time. Explain to me how I'm an *******. Hey I said as a general statment, but if the shoe fits feel free to put it on and lace that ***** up. 
That's not an explanation.
Nope. Confirming that pilot input is not, and never was, valued. - Breakin Stuff
|
Spkr4theDead
Red Star.
3145
|
Posted - 2015.03.30 00:56:00 -
[7] - Quote
True Adamance wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:
That's not an explanation.
It's the way you present yourself. Your zeal and passion for the subject is commendable but the manner by which you communicate it has you come off as an *******. Does this suit. E.G- CCP Rattati asks for HAV feed back. True Adamance tells CCP Rattati that Armour Boosters are "Stupid and need to die in a fire". CCP Rattati thinks True Adamance is an *******.
So me explaining why an idea is bad is being an a**hole? That's some logic you have there.
Nope. Confirming that pilot input is not, and never was, valued. - Breakin Stuff
|
Spkr4theDead
Red Star.
3145
|
Posted - 2015.03.30 00:57:00 -
[8] - Quote
Pokey Dravon wrote:True Adamance wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:
That's not an explanation.
It's the way you present yourself. Your zeal and passion for the subject is commendable but the manner by which you communicate it has you come off as an *******. Does this suit. E.G- CCP Rattati asks for HAV feed back. True Adamance tells CCP Rattati that Armour Boosters are "Stupid and need to die in a fire". CCP Rattati thinks True Adamance is an *******. Assholes communicate with unnecessary negativity which adds nothing to what they're saying other than making it come off as toxic. More specifically the amount of negativity often outweighs the amount of actual useful feedback. Assholes also disregard most if not all feedback from others, immediately jumping to negativity. It's not even that they refuse to compromise, more so they they refuse to even entertain the idea that they may be wrong.
See post above this, I never knew explaining why an idea is bad is being an unreasonable a**hole. Someone, please explain this to me.
Nope. Confirming that pilot input is not, and never was, valued. - Breakin Stuff
|
Spkr4theDead
Red Star.
3145
|
Posted - 2015.03.30 03:15:00 -
[9] - Quote
Happy Violentime wrote:Takahiro Kashuken wrote:Breakin Stuff wrote:Why should a light vehicle stand up to heavy AV. One of the primary reasons for nonstop AV on the field to hit tanks rather than escalation to AV to deal with hardeened vehicles is the fact that an LAV is immune to small arms fire and REQUIRES the deployment of forge guns, swarms, plasma cannons and AV grenades. It's a jeep. The LAV we have now and the stupidity we have now is because this is treated as though it were this. Kicker is all AV players are like this. It is why the LAV is dead It is why the DS is dead It is why the ADS is dead All AV has to be a nuclear warhead to combat the HAV and because of that it kills every other role dead, where as if vehicles cancelled each other out it would be more fairer as a whole since a LAV can out manouver a HAV and an ADS can fly above and a HAV has range etc. Only way it may change is if AV weapons become a % modifier so it for example it does 20% damage to a vehicle so for each vehicle that 20% is a different number but then that requires another overhaul and more changes. Disclaimer: The above post is respectful, contains no ranting, contains no personal attacks, contains no trolling, contains no racism, contains no discrimination, contains no profanity, contains no spamming. This post is an opinion and is related to DUST514 Do you know the problem with HAV's they're too good at killing infantry. I mean who puts a huge assault rifle on top of a tank??? If hav's were mainly focused on vehicle vs vehicle combat then AV could be toned down. But nope you tankers just love your blaster turrets.
If we had the Gal AR as a turret, it would be more accurate than the current blaster.
The greatest challenge in this game is one pilot against another. You wouldn't know that because you've never used a tank.
Nope. Confirming that pilot input is not, and never was, valued. - Breakin Stuff
|
|
|
| |
|