|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 8 post(s) |
ReGnYuM
Kameira Lodge
Amarr Empire
3613
   |
Posted - 2015.03.31 13:31:00 -
[1] - Quote
Fizzer XCIV wrote:Breakin Stuff wrote:CUSE TOWN333 wrote:CCP Rattati wrote:Arkena Wyrnspire wrote:o_O
Buff TAR and nerf SCR? Really?
That seems pretty odd. why does it seem odd? because every player in the game right now knows the Tac Ar is the better choice then the scrambler. no amount of data mineing could leave you that blind to balance. Considering I haven'tbeen killed by a tac ar in months I have to consider that statement as suspect. Doesn't mean it isn't better than the ScR. The only advantage that ScR has over TacAR is charge shot, a more predictable recoil pattern, and a few more meters of range. Literally everything is better on TacARs... Everything. Damage/DPS. Damage per Mag. Fitting Costs. Better hipfire accuracy. No heat. Less Recoil. Better Damage profile. Doesn't need Amassault to be competitive.
Your Kidding me right?
The ScR is way superior to the TAR in CQC combat. The TAR and ScR are literally night and day in CQC performance.
|
ReGnYuM
Kameira Lodge
Amarr Empire
3615
|
Posted - 2015.03.31 14:55:00 -
[2] - Quote
Fizzer XCIV wrote:ReGnYuM wrote:Fizzer XCIV wrote:
Doesn't mean it isn't better than the ScR.
The only advantage that ScR has over TacAR is charge shot, a more predictable recoil pattern, and a few more meters of range.
Literally everything is better on TacARs... Everything.
Damage/DPS.
Damage per Mag.
Fitting Costs.
Better hipfire accuracy.
No heat.
Less Recoil.
Better Damage profile.
Doesn't need Amassault to be competitive.
Your Kidding me right? The ScR is way superior to the TAR in CQC combat. The TAR and ScR are literally night and day in CQC performance. How so? The Tac has a tighter hipfire, more damage per shot, and effectively more rounds in the mag. They both have identical RoF... Stick to shooting, ReG.
I have you ever used the TAR in CQC?
It is preposterous that we're actually having this debate.
|
ReGnYuM
Kameira Lodge
Amarr Empire
3615
|
Posted - 2015.03.31 15:03:00 -
[3] - Quote
Anyway, to stay on topic.
CCP Rattati wrote:The weapon obviously works too well in CQC.
I see three ways
Increase heat cost, so that you have less followup shots to spam
increase hip fire kick, with compounding so the 3rd shot in succession is way off
Increase charge shot multiplier, decrease normal damage = preserve dps, rewarding accuracy
I vote
Quote: increase hip fire kick, with compounding so the 3rd shot in succession is way off
The ScR is clearly a High DPS ranged weapon. It should not be viable in CQC to the point that sacrificing Tank or DPS for a Higher tiered side arm should be a real consideration.
I feel that if I'm able to get into a viable Hipfire range (20m or less), with AR,ACR,CR,and ARR then the terms of engagement are in my favour against any ScR user. |
ReGnYuM
Kameira Lodge
Amarr Empire
3617
|
Posted - 2015.03.31 15:45:00 -
[4] - Quote
Mexxx Dust-Slayer wrote:Kalante Schiffer wrote:These where three quick videos i was able to make yesterday. Two vs Regular basic and advanced players. And another one against more experienced players. Viziam vs Basic and Adv players #1Viziam vs Basic and Adv players #2Viziam vs Proto playersI had another one against proto players but that one had the audio not synced with what was happening. Ill try to re upload it later. So yeah after trying it out a few matches it does not look pretty. My Tac AR diffidently takes more out of me when i use it. Everything is in caps, I assume you play on a monitor? Maybe if there was an anit-armour rifle that deadly then maybe amarr sentinels wouldn't be so popular in PC
I think he is playing on 480p, and yes the CR use to be a great anti-heavy weapon until Amarr sent got their resistance bonus  |
|
|
| |
|