DUST Search - Rail rifles and recoil: why it makes zero sense

All Channels

General Discussions

Rail rifles and recoil: why it makes zero sense

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] 2 :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Sev Alcatraz 657	Posted - 2014.11.06 06:51:00 - [1] - Quote Recoil (in fully automatic rifles) is caused from the bolt retracting picking up another round and firing again rapidly, yes the gas exiting the gun would cause a bit of kick but not much. A railgun that uses magnetic could has no bolt (probably some inconsevable loading system we could never build) and if there is no gas exiting the the and no bolt flying back to pick up new rounds how the hell does the gun have recoil, especially if it's open rails there is literally no way it can have recoil
Xocoyol Zaraoul Superior Genetics 2658	Posted - 2014.11.06 06:51:00 - [2] - Quote As an Electrical Engineer, I disagree with your premise that you can magically accelerate something with no consequences. Not only will you have recoil from the projectile being pushed forward as the basic laws dictate, but you'll also also have to deal with the consequences of internal pressure on the rails themselves pushing at one another. There are three rails, two parallel and the required third rail nestled between the two in an orthogonal configuration, all of which will exhibit recoil. Stop reading/watching bad science fiction "You see those red dots over there? Go and shoot them until you see a +50 on the screen" - Arkena Wyrnspire
Kensai Dragon DUST University Ivy League 42	Posted - 2014.11.06 06:56:00 - [3] - Quote F=ma Fundamental rule in Newtonian physics. By propelling the projectile forward you also propel the rifle backwards. Instead of gas you use magnetic flux.
Arkena Wyrnspire Fatal Absolution 18736	Posted - 2014.11.06 06:56:00 - [4] - Quote Do you have any clue how physics works? There is a mass being accelerated in one direction. This means that a force is being exerted on it. This, in turn, means that there is a reaction force in the other direction, i.e on the gun. You can't accelerate something in one direction without something accelerating in the other. That just doesn't work. You have long since made your choice. What you make now is a mistake.
Fizzer XCIV Heaven's Lost Property 820	Posted - 2014.11.06 06:57:00 - [5] - Quote Basic physics... One of the LAWS OF PHYSICS for fucks sake. How are there people that are so stupid? Swag-suit4lyfe!
Lynn Beck Delta Vanguard 6 2189	Posted - 2014.11.06 06:59:00 - [6] - Quote Because magnetism is a magic thing, it wipes computers, it moves things without having to touch them(why i first thought they didn't have recoil) and finally MAGIC. General John Ripper -BAM! I'm Emeril Lagasse. This message was approved by the 'Nobody Loved You' Foundation
Iron Wolf Saber Den of Swords 17626	Posted - 2014.11.06 07:01:00 - [7] - Quote https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UBnoM3TwD0U IRL Railgun works on the same principals of sci-tech railguns. Notice the Recoil as it fires the 11kg shell. Also in thoery weaponized lasers have recoil as well. Now if you want to talk about where newtonian physics begins to fail. You should look up the E-Drive to which there is currently no scientific law that can explain it working. http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2014-07/31/nasa-validates-impossible-space-drive CPM 1 Omni-Soldier, Forum Warrior \\= Prototype Forge Gun=// Unlocked
Spectral Clone Abandoned Privilege Top Men. 3042	Posted - 2014.11.06 07:03:00 - [8] - Quote Isaac Newton wrote: First law: When viewed in an inertial reference frame, an object either remains at rest or continues to move at a constant velocity, unless acted upon by an external force. Second law: F = ma The vector sum of the forces F on an object is equal to the mass m of that object multiplied by the acceleration vector a of the object. Third law: When one body exerts a force on a second body, the second body simultaneously exerts a force equal in magnitude and opposite in direction on the first body. Go back 2 school kiddo. :\| EVE: Legion, also known as: Schroedinger's Game, EVE: Limbo, or just "Not-a-game-yet".
Fizzer XCIV Heaven's Lost Property 821	Posted - 2014.11.06 07:06:00 - [9] - Quote Science experiment: Take one magnet, place it on a flat nonmetallic surface. Take another magnet, push the other magnet around with it. Notice how the magnet pushes back? ***** RECOIL! WHAT IS THIS ***** MAGIC! OMG! HOW CAN IT DO THAT, MAGNETS HAVE NO RECOIL! FIZZER MUST BE USING MAGIC! ALL THE RAILGUNS IVE EVER SEEN IN insert nonsensical SciFi media here DONT HAVE RECOIL, THEREFORE IT MUST BE THAT WAY IN THE REAL WORLD! OMG! Swag-suit4lyfe!
Killar-12 The Corporate Raiders Top Men. 3396	Posted - 2014.11.06 07:09:00 - [10] - Quote newton's third law... http://evil-guide.tripod.com/

Lloyd Orfay SHAKING BABIES FACTION WARFARE ALLIANCE 178	Posted - 2014.11.06 07:16:00 - [11] - Quote Every actual has an equal and opposite reaction. Let me "educate" you
GLOBAL fils'de RAGE Consolidated Dust 29	Posted - 2014.11.06 07:24:00 - [12] - Quote Xocoyol Zaraoul wrote: As an Electrical Engineer, I disagree with your premise that you can magically accelerate something with no consequences. Not only will you have recoil from the projectile being pushed forward as the basic laws dictate, but you'll also also have to deal with the consequences of internal pressure on the rails themselves pushing at one another. There are three rails, two parallel and the required third rail nestled between the two in an orthogonal configuration, all of which will exhibit recoil. Stop reading/watching bad science fiction US NAVAL Academy, Annapolis has a 94 page PDF describing why a rail gun has very little recoil.
GLOBAL fils'de RAGE Consolidated Dust 29	Posted - 2014.11.06 07:26:00 - [13] - Quote Killar-12 wrote: newton's third law... wrong, the rails both push and pull the projectile.
GLOBAL fils'de RAGE Consolidated Dust 29	Posted - 2014.11.06 07:27:00 - [14] - Quote Fizzer XCIV wrote: Science experiment: Take one magnet, place it on a flat nonmetallic surface. Take another magnet, push the other magnet around with it. Notice how the magnet pushes back? ***** RECOIL! WHAT IS THIS ***** MAGIC! OMG! HOW CAN IT DO THAT, MAGNETS HAVE NO RECOIL! FIZZER MUST BE USING MAGIC! ALL THE RAILGUNS IVE EVER SEEN IN insert nonsensical SciFi media here DONT HAVE RECOIL, THEREFORE IT MUST BE THAT WAY IN THE REAL WORLD! OMG! wrong
Son-Of A-Gun Onslaught Inc RISE of LEGION 1433	Posted - 2014.11.06 07:50:00 - [15] - Quote LOL = this thread. Poor kid. Learning something new can be embarrassing sometimes. But now you know, and knowing is half the battle. Que G.I. Joe theme song {:)}{3GÇó>
Slave of MORTE Eyniletti Rangers Minmatar Republic 41	Posted - 2014.11.06 07:54:00 - [16] - Quote Real rail guns also over heat Yet another slave of Mortedeamor
Slave of MORTE Eyniletti Rangers Minmatar Republic 41	Posted - 2014.11.06 07:56:00 - [17] - Quote Also rail guns in rl have a 2 stage barrel for? they are firing a metal missile at mach9 2.4 kilometers per second ..There is insane recoil also insane heat production ..If rr were realistic not only would it recoil drastically when hip fired it would overheat Yet another slave of Mortedeamor
Son-Of A-Gun Onslaught Inc RISE of LEGION 1433	Posted - 2014.11.06 07:57:00 - [18] - Quote GLOBAL fils'de RAGE wrote: Xocoyol Zaraoul wrote: As an Electrical Engineer, I disagree with your premise that you can magically accelerate something with no consequences. Not only will you have recoil from the projectile being pushed forward as the basic laws dictate, but you'll also also have to deal with the consequences of internal pressure on the rails themselves pushing at one another. There are three rails, two parallel and the required third rail nestled between the two in an orthogonal configuration, all of which will exhibit recoil. Stop reading/watching bad science fiction US NAVAL Academy, Annapolis has a 94 page PDF describing why a rail gun has very little recoil. Low recoil and no recoil are two very different things, especially when you are accelerating an object to more than 3000 m/h in a fraction of a second. facepalm Are people really still tying to argue against this? {:)}{3GÇó>
Slave of MORTE Eyniletti Rangers Minmatar Republic 41	Posted - 2014.11.06 07:58:00 - [19] - Quote GLOBAL fils'de RAGE wrote: Xocoyol Zaraoul wrote: As an Electrical Engineer, I disagree with your premise that you can magically accelerate something with no consequences. Not only will you have recoil from the projectile being pushed forward as the basic laws dictate, but you'll also also have to deal with the consequences of internal pressure on the rails themselves pushing at one another. There are three rails, two parallel and the required third rail nestled between the two in an orthogonal configuration, all of which will exhibit recoil. Stop reading/watching bad science fiction US NAVAL Academy, Annapolis has a 94 page PDF describing why a rail gun has very little recoil. Yet when you watch it it does in fact have recoil significantly less than older projectile weapons sure but it's there Yet another slave of Mortedeamor
sir RAVEN WING Huogikku Corporation Heiian Conglomerate 119	Posted - 2014.11.06 08:03:00 - [20] - Quote 1, I don't believe you... 2, Fizzer, you looked at other's comments and began to overreact, so thank for shutting up... 3, Sorry Saber, but I ask the question "Why does the AR have 0.5 recoil? (Number was a guess.) "We have a Phoenix,a Rat, and a Frame. So far the Rat has taken our cheese and replaced it with a diamond called Dust."

sir RAVEN WING Huogikku Corporation Heiian Conglomerate 119	Posted - 2014.11.06 08:13:00 - [21] - Quote Slave of MORTE wrote: GLOBAL fils'de RAGE wrote: Xocoyol Zaraoul wrote: As an Electrical Engineer, I disagree with your premise that you can magically accelerate something with no consequences. Not only will you have recoil from the projectile being pushed forward as the basic laws dictate, but you'll also also have to deal with the consequences of internal pressure on the rails themselves pushing at one another. There are three rails, two parallel and the required third rail nestled between the two in an orthogonal configuration, all of which will exhibit recoil. Stop reading/watching bad science fiction US NAVAL Academy, Annapolis has a 94 page PDF describing why a rail gun has very little recoil. Yet when you watch it it does in fact have recoil significantly less than older projectile weapons sure but it's there and yet the AR has no recoil :p (little to no recoil I mean) "We have a Phoenix,a Rat, and a Frame. So far the Rat has taken our cheese and replaced it with a diamond called Dust."
Son-Of A-Gun Onslaught Inc RISE of LEGION 1433	Posted - 2014.11.06 08:18:00 - [22] - Quote sir RAVEN WING wrote: 3, Sorry Saber, but I ask the question "Why does the AR have 0.5 recoil? (Number was a guess.) 1. Because particles (plasma) are REALLY light weight. 2. Because particles like to travel REALLY fast on there own. All you got to do is point them in the right direction/guide them. {:)}{3GÇó>
GLOBAL fils'de RAGE Consolidated Dust 31	Posted - 2014.11.06 08:33:00 - [23] - Quote Son-Of A-Gun wrote: sir RAVEN WING wrote: 3, Sorry Saber, but I ask the question "Why does the AR have 0.5 recoil? (Number was a guess.) 1. Because particles (plasma) are REALLY light weight. 2. Because particles like to travel REALLY fast on there own. All you got to do is point them in the right direction/guide them. plasma would cool mid flight and more importantly plasma carries very little mass and would not hurt much.
sir RAVEN WING Huogikku Corporation Heiian Conglomerate 119	Posted - 2014.11.06 08:35:00 - [24] - Quote GLOBAL fils'de RAGE wrote: Son-Of A-Gun wrote: sir RAVEN WING wrote: 3, Sorry Saber, but I ask the question "Why does the AR have 0.5 recoil? (Number was a guess.) 1. Because particles (plasma) are REALLY light weight. 2. Because particles like to travel REALLY fast on there own. All you got to do is point them in the right direction/guide them. plasma would cool mid flight and more importantly plasma carries very little mass and would not hurt much. But a bullet would! "We have a Phoenix,a Rat, and a Frame. So far the Rat has taken our cheese and replaced it with a diamond called Dust."
Fizzer XCIV Heaven's Lost Property 825	Posted - 2014.11.06 08:45:00 - [25] - Quote sir RAVEN WING wrote: 1, I don't believe you... 2, Fizzer, you looked at other's comments and began to overreact, so thank for shutting up... 3, Sorry Saber, but I ask the question "Why does the AR have 0.5 recoil? (Number was a guess.) u wot m8 u lookin 4 a fite ill bash ye fookin ead in m8 I posted literally seconds after they posted! When I started writing, there were only 1 reply! I only overreacted, **********! I didn't see **! You don't know me! Swag-suit4lyfe!
Son-Of A-Gun Onslaught Inc RISE of LEGION 1433	Posted - 2014.11.06 08:45:00 - [26] - Quote GLOBAL fils'de RAGE wrote: Son-Of A-Gun wrote: sir RAVEN WING wrote: 3, Sorry Saber, but I ask the question "Why does the AR have 0.5 recoil? (Number was a guess.) 1. Because particles (plasma) are REALLY light weight. 2. Because particles like to travel REALLY fast on there own. All you got to do is point them in the right direction/guide them. plasma would cool mid flight and more importantly plasma carries very little mass and would not hurt much. Yes, in atmosphere, plasma would cool very quickly, but plasma also travels at roughly 3 million miles per hour. So, good bet that in 71 meter its probably still pretty ****ing hot. Also mass is not the important thing here temperature is. With a current upward limit, achievable by science, of around 100 million kelvin, the important part is how much energy a particle can impart when it impacts the atoms in your body. Its basically really tinny/fast moving fire. {:)}{3GÇó>
Jack McReady DUST University Ivy League 1583	Posted - 2014.11.06 08:49:00 - [27] - Quote GLOBAL fils'de RAGE wrote: Son-Of A-Gun wrote: sir RAVEN WING wrote: 3, Sorry Saber, but I ask the question "Why does the AR have 0.5 recoil? (Number was a guess.) 1. Because particles (plasma) are REALLY light weight. 2. Because particles like to travel REALLY fast on there own. All you got to do is point them in the right direction/guide them. plasma would cool mid flight and more importantly plasma carries very little mass and would not hurt much. the weapon utilizes a magnetic field to fire a charge at extremely high velocity at a target. it first processes the charge and turns it into a ball of plasma, held together by a strong electromagnetic containment field. This ball is then accelerated out of the weapon by the same method as a railgun, but the containment field quickly dissipates once the ball leaves the barrel of the gun. the containment field dissipates before the high speed projectile has a chance to cool down. eve lore, deal with it.
Ryme Intrinseca 1962	Posted - 2014.11.06 10:05:00 - [28] - Quote Sev Alcatraz wrote: Recoil (in fully automatic rifles) is caused from the bolt retracting picking up another round and firing again rapidly, yes the gas exiting the gun would cause a bit of kick but not much. A railgun that uses magnetic could has no bolt (probably some inconsevable loading system we could never build) and if there is no gas exiting the the and no bolt flying back to pick up new rounds how the hell does the gun have recoil, especially if it's open rails there is literally no way it can have recoil Also, in real life: Low kick weapons are made full auto High kick weapons are made burst/semi auto In Dust: Low kick weapons are made burst/semi auto (CR, ScR) High kick weapons are made full auto (AR, RR)
postapo wastelander Wasteland Desert Rangers 573	Posted - 2014.11.06 10:37:00 - [29] - Quote Sev Alcatraz wrote: Recoil (in fully automatic rifles) is caused from the bolt retracting picking up another round and firing again rapidly, yes the gas exiting the gun would cause a bit of kick but not much. A railgun that uses magnetic could has no bolt (probably some inconsevable loading system we could never build) and if there is no gas exiting the the and no bolt flying back to pick up new rounds how the hell does the gun have recoil, especially if it's open rails there is literally no way it can have recoil Like Physic, Mechanic, Electrotech, Jurry Rigger and Tinker (slighly philosopher, Theosopher aswell) i can tell you it makes sence. If you shoot projectile what have some mass in really big speed, that mass react in law of conservation of energy. Ergo rail of two ends will responce with recoil equal to gauss line covered by projectile. Just check rail and gauss cannons on YT if you dont trust, how they are mounted "Nanohives, repairs or droplinks, just ask me on field i can tink anything"
Cat Merc Onslaught Inc RISE of LEGION 13040	Posted - 2014.11.06 10:51:00 - [30] - Quote To anyone still arguing this, I would like to question your education. I could answer you why this is stupid from my 7th grade physics classes. Heck, I could tell something is fishy even before that, I just couldn't explain it. Feline overlord of all humans - CAT MERC n+ÅS¦¦Gùò GÇ+GÇ+ GùòS¦¦n++



Pages: [1] 2 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online/DUST514, the EVE/DUST514 logo, EVE/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to OMG Labs to use EVE Online/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, OMG Labs. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.