|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Son-Of A-Gun
Onslaught Inc
RISE of LEGION
1433
   |
Posted - 2014.11.06 07:50:00 -
[1] - Quote
LOL = this thread.
Poor kid. Learning something new can be embarrassing sometimes. 
But now you know, and knowing is half the battle.
*Que G.I. Joe theme song*
{:)}{3GÇó>
|
Son-Of A-Gun
Onslaught Inc
RISE of LEGION
1433
|
Posted - 2014.11.06 07:57:00 -
[2] - Quote
GLOBAL fils'de RAGE wrote:Xocoyol Zaraoul wrote:As an Electrical Engineer, I disagree with your premise that you can magically accelerate something with no consequences. Not only will you have recoil from the projectile being pushed forward as the basic laws dictate, but you'll also also have to deal with the consequences of internal pressure on the rails themselves pushing at one another. There are three rails, two parallel and the required third rail nestled between the two in an orthogonal configuration, all of which will exhibit recoil. Stop reading/watching bad science fiction  US NAVAL Academy, Annapolis has a 94 page PDF describing why a rail gun has very little recoil.
Low recoil and no recoil are two very different things, especially when you are accelerating an object to more than 3000 m/h in a fraction of a second. *facepalm* Are people really still tying to argue against this?
{:)}{3GÇó>
|
Son-Of A-Gun
Onslaught Inc
RISE of LEGION
1433
|
Posted - 2014.11.06 08:18:00 -
[3] - Quote
sir RAVEN WING wrote:3, Sorry Saber, but I ask the question "Why does the AR have 0.5 recoil? (Number was a guess.)
1. Because particles (plasma) are REALLY light weight.
2. Because particles like to travel REALLY fast on there own. All you got to do is point them in the right direction/guide them.
{:)}{3GÇó>
|
Son-Of A-Gun
Onslaught Inc
RISE of LEGION
1433
|
Posted - 2014.11.06 08:45:00 -
[4] - Quote
GLOBAL fils'de RAGE wrote:Son-Of A-Gun wrote:sir RAVEN WING wrote:3, Sorry Saber, but I ask the question "Why does the AR have 0.5 recoil? (Number was a guess.) 1. Because particles (plasma) are REALLY light weight. 2. Because particles like to travel REALLY fast on there own. All you got to do is point them in the right direction/guide them. plasma would cool mid flight and more importantly plasma carries very little mass and would not hurt much.
Yes, in atmosphere, plasma would cool very quickly, but plasma also travels at roughly 3 million miles per hour. So, good bet that in 71 meter its probably still pretty ****ing hot. Also mass is not the important thing here temperature is. With a current upward limit, achievable by science, of around 100 million kelvin, the important part is how much energy a particle can impart when it impacts the atoms in your body. Its basically really tinny/fast moving fire.
{:)}{3GÇó>
|
|
|
| |
|