Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Maken Tosch
DUST University Ivy League
9085
|
Posted - 2014.08.17 02:17:00 -
[61] - Quote
ThePlayerkyle13 wrote:PoP SoTa wrote:For the love of god, stop using Youtube as a source. No one is going to take it seriously. If this is real link the real damn article.
i hate posters who speak of politics then link videos that cut footages or messages, it's so out of context its brutally dishonest. Did you even look at the links? Of course you didn't because it was from RT America news source. This is the internet, news sources are everywhere on it, information is stored in it, you are soo cynical & judgmental...
I suggest you watch PBS News. It's the ONLY non-biased news station in the nation. Democrats and Republicans hate that station because it's unbiased and it's unbiased because it's publicly funded. It's not like CNN or FOX where they are privately funded.
On Twitter: @HilmarVeigar #greenlightlegion #dust514 players are waiting.
|
Maken Tosch
DUST University Ivy League
9085
|
Posted - 2014.08.17 02:18:00 -
[62] - Quote
RogueTrooper 2000AD wrote:This is starting to smell slightly reptilian and with notes of Tinfoilinati.
My tinfoilhattery is better than your tinfoilhattery.
On Twitter: @HilmarVeigar #greenlightlegion #dust514 players are waiting.
|
Monty Mole Clone
Shiv M
172
|
Posted - 2014.08.17 02:21:00 -
[63] - Quote
RogueTrooper 2000AD wrote:This is starting to smell slightly reptilian and with notes of Tinfoilinati.
wheres david icke when you need him
deader than A line flares with pockets in the knees
|
RogueTrooper 2000AD
Neckbeard Absolution
211
|
Posted - 2014.08.17 03:06:00 -
[64] - Quote
Maken Tosch wrote:RogueTrooper 2000AD wrote:This is starting to smell slightly reptilian and with notes of Tinfoilinati.
My tinfoilhattery is better than your tinfoilhattery.
Yeah well mine was made by ancient alien astronauts.
So tongue in cheek that my tongue is in your mouth.
|
Maken Tosch
DUST University Ivy League
9086
|
Posted - 2014.08.17 12:19:00 -
[65] - Quote
RogueTrooper 2000AD wrote:Maken Tosch wrote:RogueTrooper 2000AD wrote:This is starting to smell slightly reptilian and with notes of Tinfoilinati.
My tinfoilhattery is better than your tinfoilhattery. Yeah well mine was made by ancient alien astronauts.
Eric Von Deniken doesn't think it's of other worldly origin.
On Twitter: @HilmarVeigar #greenlightlegion #dust514 players are waiting.
|
ThePlayerkyle13
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar DARKSTAR ARMY
160
|
Posted - 2014.08.17 12:20:00 -
[66] - Quote
Maken Tosch wrote:ThePlayerkyle13 wrote:PoP SoTa wrote:For the love of god, stop using Youtube as a source. No one is going to take it seriously. If this is real link the real damn article.
i hate posters who speak of politics then link videos that cut footages or messages, it's so out of context its brutally dishonest. Did you even look at the links? Of course you didn't because it was from RT America news source. This is the internet, news sources are everywhere on it, information is stored in it, you are soo cynical & judgmental... I suggest you watch PBS News. It's the ONLY non-biased news station in the nation. Democrats and Republicans hate that station because it's unbiased and it's unbiased because it's publicly funded. It's not like CNN or FOX where they are privately funded.
I watch PBS & RT news sources, I think there're both good news sources, RT gets reports on what's happening in Ukraine, unlike other news sources they either not mention it or twist the news up.
I also watch AMTV, it's only on YouTube doing live streams & uploading reports on current government agenda...
Don't F**K with Gamers Angry Joe style
|
Joel II X
Dah Gods O Bacon
3083
|
Posted - 2014.08.20 00:48:00 -
[67] - Quote
Does the US want to participate in a war to get plenty of funding? Yes.
Will they want to waste their own money by killing each other? No.
We're not THAT dumb (I think). |
Void Echo
Total Extinction
2700
|
Posted - 2014.08.20 06:35:00 -
[68] - Quote
Joel II X wrote:Does the US want to participate in a war to get plenty of funding? Yes.
Will they want to waste their own money by killing each other? No.
We're not THAT dumb (I think).
that's what they want you to think....
Closed Beta Vet.
PSN: Helix-Void_Echo
Only the strongest can do Good and the weakest do Evil- Void Echo
|
GLOBAL fils'de RAGE
Consolidated Dust
13
|
Posted - 2014.08.20 16:02:00 -
[69] - Quote
Bojo The Mighty wrote:Foundation Seldon wrote:Totally not a sensationalist headline for this thread.
No, despite the polarization of Republican and Democrats in the US I do not believe Civil War in this country is even remotely possible given the current political situation. If you have evidence to the contrary then please stop dicking around and post it. Especially since many of the states who you would suspect of secession heavily rely on Federal funding. Louisiana, Mississippi, are all states that rely on taxes nationally.
Unlike States such as Ma. NY, CT. Vt. Penn. NJ. Cal. Was. Ore. that are 100 billion in debt, because they promised money to the southern states in the 1960's to support welfare states.
|
GLOBAL fils'de RAGE
Consolidated Dust
13
|
Posted - 2014.08.20 16:03:00 -
[70] - Quote
Maken Tosch wrote:ThePlayerkyle13 wrote:PoP SoTa wrote:For the love of god, stop using Youtube as a source. No one is going to take it seriously. If this is real link the real damn article.
i hate posters who speak of politics then link videos that cut footages or messages, it's so out of context its brutally dishonest. Did you even look at the links? Of course you didn't because it was from RT America news source. This is the internet, news sources are everywhere on it, information is stored in it, you are soo cynical & judgmental... I suggest you watch PBS News. It's the ONLY non-biased news station in the nation. Democrats and Republicans hate that station because it's unbiased and it's unbiased because it's publicly funded. It's not like CNN or FOX where they are privately funded.
HAHAHAHA!
|
|
TechMechMeds
Level 5 Forum Warrior
5254
|
Posted - 2014.08.20 16:16:00 -
[71] - Quote
It is funny how people bicker over the news.
Working as intended lol, masks the real enemy nicely.
"Oh, look!,
There's, uh, two women f ing a polar bear".
"Don't tell me those things".
|
Booby Tuesdays
Tuesdays With Boobies
782
|
Posted - 2014.08.20 23:50:00 -
[72] - Quote
Honestly, if it was the olden days, most of our Government would have been thrown out or hanged by now. Burn it down and start over again. Thomas Jefferson said it best, "When government fears the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny".
If we are going to have a Civil War OP, then it will be the people versus Marshal Law, as opposed to the left versus the right. That fight will come after any type of war with the governing body, imho.
Melee Weapon of Choice: Nokia-3310 Prof. V
|
Maken Tosch
DUST University Ivy League
9100
|
Posted - 2014.08.21 04:32:00 -
[73] - Quote
GLOBAL fils'de RAGE wrote:Maken Tosch wrote:ThePlayerkyle13 wrote:PoP SoTa wrote:For the love of god, stop using Youtube as a source. No one is going to take it seriously. If this is real link the real damn article.
i hate posters who speak of politics then link videos that cut footages or messages, it's so out of context its brutally dishonest. Did you even look at the links? Of course you didn't because it was from RT America news source. This is the internet, news sources are everywhere on it, information is stored in it, you are soo cynical & judgmental... I suggest you watch PBS News. It's the ONLY non-biased news station in the nation. Democrats and Republicans hate that station because it's unbiased and it's unbiased because it's publicly funded. It's not like CNN or FOX where they are privately funded. HAHAHAHA!
It's funny because it's true.
But you know what else is funny? Mitt Romney once wanted PBS to be shut down. But somehow people took that as Mitt wanting to shutdown Sesame Street. Even Big Bird had beef with him on Twitter.
By the way, I may have to modify my previous statement about the public funding part. It is publicly funded but only to an extent. Private donations as well as funding from the Corporation of Public Broadcasting make up the rest of the funding. But it's still largely unbiased especially with its decentralized nature and doesn't normally deal with interrupting regularly scheduled programs. Again, it's nothing like Fox or CNN.
http://www.theguardian.com/world/shortcuts/2012/oct/04/big-bird-mitt-romney-pbs http://www.pbs.org/producing/funding/
On Twitter: @HilmarVeigar #greenlightlegion #dust514 players are waiting.
|
Maken Tosch
DUST University Ivy League
9100
|
Posted - 2014.08.21 04:34:00 -
[74] - Quote
TechMechMeds wrote:It is funny how people bicker over the news.
Working as intended lol, masks the real enemy nicely.
Looking at a series of talking faces squawking over each other like a bunch of cracked-up parrots is most amusing.
On Twitter: @HilmarVeigar #greenlightlegion #dust514 players are waiting.
|
Void Echo
Total Extinction
2700
|
Posted - 2014.08.21 05:17:00 -
[75] - Quote
Maken Tosch wrote:TechMechMeds wrote:It is funny how people bicker over the news.
Working as intended lol, masks the real enemy nicely. Looking at a series of talking faces squawking over each other like a bunch of cracked-up parrots is most amusing.
well, its a pretty good distraction from whats going on behind closed doors, that's how this fucktart of a president got into office.
Closed Beta Vet.
PSN: Helix-Void_Echo
Only the strongest can do Good and the weakest do Evil- Void Echo
|
TechMechMeds
Level 5 Forum Warrior
5268
|
Posted - 2014.08.21 16:23:00 -
[76] - Quote
What I am about to say is purely to open eyes.
In the UK, when we get foods from the USA, we have to have a sticker put over the top of the ingredients that shows the REAL amount of ingredients that are in the product.
I don't know if you guys knew this but I was angered by the amount of crap that is in a lot of your foodstuffs that guaranteed, millions won't even be aware of ever.
It is shocking seriously, your government OKs this sht.
Free market capitalism at its finest, not freedom.
"Oh, look!,
There's, uh, two women f ing a polar bear".
"Don't tell me those things".
|
TechMechMeds
Level 5 Forum Warrior
5269
|
Posted - 2014.08.21 16:34:00 -
[77] - Quote
The whole thing is a ponzi scheme.
I CBA to go until it but I'm sure at least some of you understand that.
The bottom line is that nothing NEEDS to be the way it is, it just is because it keeps certain people in power who are, or at least must be sociopathic.
Think about what kind of person you'd have to be to actually want to support the system we are in.
I'm no communist, but sht stinks big time.
And fk the news, 99% of it is bollocks. Iv talked to people in RL from these flashpoint locations and most of what you watch/read in the news is hyped up and skewed bullsht.
You are only going to learn through travelling and going to places and seeing for yourself.
"Oh, look!,
There's, uh, two women f ing a polar bear".
"Don't tell me those things".
|
TechMechMeds
Level 5 Forum Warrior
5270
|
Posted - 2014.08.21 16:55:00 -
[78] - Quote
Maken Tosch wrote:ThePlayerkyle13 wrote:PoP SoTa wrote:For the love of god, stop using Youtube as a source. No one is going to take it seriously. If this is real link the real damn article.
i hate posters who speak of politics then link videos that cut footages or messages, it's so out of context its brutally dishonest. Did you even look at the links? Of course you didn't because it was from RT America news source. This is the internet, news sources are everywhere on it, information is stored in it, you are soo cynical & judgmental... I suggest you watch PBS News. It's the ONLY non-biased news station in the nation. Democrats and Republicans hate that station because it's unbiased and it's unbiased because it's publicly funded. It's not like CNN or FOX where they are privately funded.
Aye, BBC can be OK for being informed of things that are happening as well but I take news as more if a notification of something happening. Info not pay attention to any details because you can't tell if its hyped bollocks or not.
The BBC is definitely one of the best in the world, the journalists are 9/10 times actually where the sht is going down, not in some studio that's bottom feeding information from other news stations.
"Oh, look!,
There's, uh, two women f ing a polar bear".
"Don't tell me those things".
|
Maken Tosch
DUST University Ivy League
9106
|
Posted - 2014.08.21 18:10:00 -
[79] - Quote
TechMechMeds wrote:Maken Tosch wrote:ThePlayerkyle13 wrote:PoP SoTa wrote:For the love of god, stop using Youtube as a source. No one is going to take it seriously. If this is real link the real damn article.
i hate posters who speak of politics then link videos that cut footages or messages, it's so out of context its brutally dishonest. Did you even look at the links? Of course you didn't because it was from RT America news source. This is the internet, news sources are everywhere on it, information is stored in it, you are soo cynical & judgmental... I suggest you watch PBS News. It's the ONLY non-biased news station in the nation. Democrats and Republicans hate that station because it's unbiased and it's unbiased because it's publicly funded. It's not like CNN or FOX where they are privately funded. Aye, BBC can be OK for being informed of things that are happening as well but I take news as more if a notification of something happening. I dont not pay attention to any details because you can't tell if its hyped bollocks or not. The BBC is definitely one of the best in the world, the journalists are 9/10 times actually where the sht is going down, not in some studio that's bottom feeding information from other news stations for quick ratings.
I did watch the BBC as well, but stopped watching it after a while because all the flashy graphics and their studio reminds me too much of CNN.
On Twitter: @HilmarVeigar #greenlightlegion #dust514 players are waiting.
|
TechMechMeds
Level 5 Forum Warrior
5270
|
Posted - 2014.08.21 18:24:00 -
[80] - Quote
Maken Tosch wrote:TechMechMeds wrote:Maken Tosch wrote:ThePlayerkyle13 wrote:PoP SoTa wrote:For the love of god, stop using Youtube as a source. No one is going to take it seriously. If this is real link the real damn article.
i hate posters who speak of politics then link videos that cut footages or messages, it's so out of context its brutally dishonest. Did you even look at the links? Of course you didn't because it was from RT America news source. This is the internet, news sources are everywhere on it, information is stored in it, you are soo cynical & judgmental... I suggest you watch PBS News. It's the ONLY non-biased news station in the nation. Democrats and Republicans hate that station because it's unbiased and it's unbiased because it's publicly funded. It's not like CNN or FOX where they are privately funded. Aye, BBC can be OK for being informed of things that are happening as well but I take news as more if a notification of something happening. I dont not pay attention to any details because you can't tell if its hyped bollocks or not. The BBC is definitely one of the best in the world, the journalists are 9/10 times actually where the sht is going down, not in some studio that's bottom feeding information from other news stations for quick ratings. I did watch the BBC as well, but stopped watching it after a while because all the flashy graphics and their studio reminds me too much of CNN.
Hehe, fair play.
"Oh, look!,
There's, uh, two women f ing a polar bear".
"Don't tell me those things".
|
|
TechMechMeds
Level 5 Forum Warrior
5306
|
Posted - 2014.08.21 18:25:00 -
[81] - Quote
Maken Tosch wrote:TechMechMeds wrote:Maken Tosch wrote:ThePlayerkyle13 wrote:PoP SoTa wrote:For the love of god, stop using Youtube as a source. No one is going to take it seriously. If this is real link the real damn article.
i hate posters who speak of politics then link videos that cut footages or messages, it's so out of context its brutally dishonest. Did you even look at the links? Of course you didn't because it was from RT America news source. This is the internet, news sources are everywhere on it, information is stored in it, you are soo cynical & judgmental... I suggest you watch PBS News. It's the ONLY non-biased news station in the nation. Democrats and Republicans hate that station because it's unbiased and it's unbiased because it's publicly funded. It's not like CNN or FOX where they are privately funded. Aye, BBC can be OK for being informed of things that are happening as well but I take news as more if a notification of something happening. I dont not pay attention to any details because you can't tell if its hyped bollocks or not. The BBC is definitely one of the best in the world, the journalists are 9/10 times actually where the sht is going down, not in some studio that's bottom feeding information from other news stations for quick ratings. I did watch the BBC as well, but stopped watching it after a while because all the flashy graphics and their studio reminds me too much of CNN.
Hehe, double post.
https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=172432&find=unread
|
Travis Stanush
Haus of Triage
182
|
Posted - 2014.08.22 16:00:00 -
[82] - Quote
Civil War in America? Hehe if only we could be that lucky... Short answer is a resounding NO Long answer is that no one wants to give up the comforts they currently have be it the elite of this country or the lowest class seriously a war here would destroy all of our infrastructure, our current quality of life.
The American people as a whole are content with the current situation. Who wants to give up their nice house, cars, and THINGS in general for something they didn't even really notice? That is the greatest obstacle the war there is. Realistically as long as the quality of life for the majority is unaffected there will be be no change.
No I will not show you where they touched me!!!
|
TechMechMeds
Level 5 Forum Warrior
5306
|
Posted - 2014.08.22 16:02:00 -
[83] - Quote
Travis Stanush wrote:Civil War in America? Hehe if only we could be that lucky... Short answer is a resounding NO Long answer is that no one wants to give up the comforts they currently have be it the elite of this country or the lowest class seriously a war here would destroy all of our infrastructure, our current quality of life.
The American people as a whole are content with the current situation. Who wants to give up their nice house, cars, and THINGS in general for something they didn't even really notice? That is the greatest obstacle the war there is. Realistically as long as the quality of life for the majority is unaffected there will be be no change.
Does the fact that the USA is divided into states cause many issues?.
that is something i don't know anything about really.
https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=172432&find=unread
|
Travis Stanush
Haus of Triage
182
|
Posted - 2014.08.22 16:46:00 -
[84] - Quote
TechMechMeds wrote:Travis Stanush wrote:Civil War in America? Hehe if only we could be that lucky... Short answer is a resounding NO Long answer is that no one wants to give up the comforts they currently have be it the elite of this country or the lowest class seriously a war here would destroy all of our infrastructure, our current quality of life.
The American people as a whole are content with the current situation. Who wants to give up their nice house, cars, and THINGS in general for something they didn't even really notice? That is the greatest obstacle the war there is. Realistically as long as the quality of life for the majority is unaffected there will be be no change. Does the fact that the USA is divided into states cause many issues?. that is something i don't know anything about really.
No it doesn't cause any real issues. The federal government ( national) is partly composed of representative of each state (regional) now the historic backgrounds of these states can cause issues, but not the variety the can cause a outright war.
No I will not show you where they touched me!!!
|
GLOBAL fils'de RAGE
Consolidated Dust
15
|
Posted - 2014.08.22 17:18:00 -
[85] - Quote
TechMechMeds wrote:Travis Stanush wrote:Civil War in America? Hehe if only we could be that lucky... Short answer is a resounding NO Long answer is that no one wants to give up the comforts they currently have be it the elite of this country or the lowest class seriously a war here would destroy all of our infrastructure, our current quality of life.
The American people as a whole are content with the current situation. Who wants to give up their nice house, cars, and THINGS in general for something they didn't even really notice? That is the greatest obstacle the war there is. Realistically as long as the quality of life for the majority is unaffected there will be be no change. Does the fact that the USA is divided into states cause many issues?. that is something i don't know anything about really.
Our founders knew the saying that absolute power corrupts absolutely so they designed a system that had a weak national gov. ( Washington DC), and strong state government. They knew that keeping power local would provide the people immediate recourse if they descented authority.
Taxation up until the early 20th century was not a legal function of the federal government, but the liberals instituted the IRS our national taxation department in DC.
The inflow of tax revenue made DC very powerful and the corruption of power began.
We are slowly becoming a socialist welfare state at the federal level- renamed progressivism ..lol!
We are DOOMED to become like Europe! High taxation, high unemployement and institutionalised stupidity.
The liberal states such as California, New York are billions of dollars in debt. Washington is up to 17 trillion dollars in debt, and we have unfunded liabilities in tge 150 trillion dollar range. We borrow 4 billion dollars a day from foreign investors, and spend anothe 8 billion dollars each day.
We are cannibals that eat our businesses with the highest corporate tax rate in the world, a rate 2x the UK's.
States need to stand up to the feds and remind the what our constitution says and that the federal government only exists because the states allow it, and the people, and that is not a collective definition as you europeans see it, but it is the individual that has power-liberty and unalienable rights.
|
TechMechMeds
Level 5 Forum Warrior
5315
|
Posted - 2014.08.22 17:44:00 -
[86] - Quote
GLOBAL fils'de RAGE wrote:TechMechMeds wrote:Travis Stanush wrote:Civil War in America? Hehe if only we could be that lucky... Short answer is a resounding NO Long answer is that no one wants to give up the comforts they currently have be it the elite of this country or the lowest class seriously a war here would destroy all of our infrastructure, our current quality of life.
The American people as a whole are content with the current situation. Who wants to give up their nice house, cars, and THINGS in general for something they didn't even really notice? That is the greatest obstacle the war there is. Realistically as long as the quality of life for the majority is unaffected there will be be no change. Does the fact that the USA is divided into states cause many issues?. that is something i don't know anything about really. Our founders knew the saying that absolute power corrupts absolutely so they designed a system that had a weak national gov. ( Washington DC), and strong state government. They knew that keeping power local would provide the people immediate recourse if they descented authority. Taxation up until the early 20th century was not a legal function of the federal government, but the liberals instituted the IRS our national taxation department in DC. The inflow of tax revenue made DC very powerful and the corruption of power began. We are slowly becoming a socialist welfare state at the federal level- renamed progressivism ..lol! We are DOOMED to become like Europe! High taxation, high unemployement and institutionalised stupidity. The liberal states such as California, New York are billions of dollars in debt. Washington is up to 17 trillion dollars in debt, and we have unfunded liabilities in tge 150 trillion dollar range. We borrow 4 billion dollars a day from foreign investors, and spend anothe 8 billion dollars each day. We are cannibals that eat our businesses with the highest corporate tax rate in the world, a rate 2x the UK's. States need to stand up to the feds and remind the what our constitution says and that the federal government only exists because the states allow it, and the people, and that is not a collective definition as you europeans see it, but it is the individual that has power-liberty and unalienable rights.
Ah fair play but that is why the UK does not completely want to be part of the rest of Europe. Please do not stick us in with your generalisation as that is all it is.
I also have American ancestors. They were among the first who colonised America, fought in the revolution and either side of the civil war and then some came back shortly after. If you know of a town called valeene, that is a town/city that people in my family helped set up and build, the name may have changed though by now.
I got a completely random email off of a long lost relative in America who gave his condolences for my great uncle George dying, that was very strange.
Likewise, you guys always look at the UK as part of Europe when in fact we are not 100% part of it and enjoy many things that are simply lacking over there and nearly everyone opposes officially becoming a part of it. We do not believe that combining our debt with theirs to pay it off in this paradox will solve anything and we like our GBP. Its stronger than the whole of europe combined, why the fk would we want to join people who are bad at lol economics .
The whole thing is a nasty paradox as i am sure you are aware.
you are aware that the whole western worlds economy would be fked if you guys stopped borrowing?, its called a ponzi scheme buddy, we are all fked together at the behest of fat cats lol. That was set up after WW2 if i remember correctly.
In the UK we all pay tax and this goes towards our fire service, hospitals, police, army etc, etc. No one has to worry about not being able to afford hospital treatment etc, so tax isn't always bad if its used correctly and our politicians earn a reasonable wage actually. David Cameron is on about 140K a year which is pretty reasonable if you ask me. The bankers make a killing though, a few million+bonuses.
They are still just a bunch of tw@s who are more concerned with bickering like slags on their periods in Parliament though. It is painful to watch the houses of Parliament live seriously, bickering like idiots for popularity. you should watch it sometimes lol, its embarrassing.
Our unemployment isn't that bad either and our welfare is setup in a way that only those who don't help themselves will suffer and be homeless. If you see a homeless person in the UK, 99.99% guarantee that person has done anything to help themselves. Also if people owe money here, it is almost impossible to get your house taken off you, we have laws that protect people from that and if its that bad, can actually get it written off.
the only people who get screwed over here are people who deserve it pretty much. they either fk up without a care or they don't help themselves.
There's no such thing as can't here.
Anyway i have had so much coffee today, i hope you find that interesting lol
https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=172432&find=unread
|
GLOBAL fils'de RAGE
Consolidated Dust
16
|
Posted - 2014.08.22 18:40:00 -
[87] - Quote
Paternally both my grand parents where from Puritan ancestory immigrated to Boston in 1630. Maternally one was also Puritan/Norman and one "First French" early 1620's immigrated to Arcadia Nova Scotia.
My paternal ancestor's father was the sherrif of Rutland England in approx. 1619 and a Cambridge prof at death. Both of his grandfathers where MP's under queen Elizabeth, maternal name was Laurence Chadderton, from Lancashire and help translate the KJV Bible. Paternally the name was Archdeacon Robert Johnson born in Stamford.
Sir. John Fitz John my first known ancestor presented himself to his norman fellow Robert of Scottland and was renamed, because Norman heraldic names where nonsensical outside of Normandy. The scottish King game him lands in Lincolnshire and Lancashire and was tasked with the protection of the Templar Highway. Sir John was only 20 years of age and had 20 knights and 200 men at arms when he had returned from the crusades.
We assume since his name ties him to Rounne fr. he was from a 1066 norman family. |
Travis Stanush
Haus of Triage
182
|
Posted - 2014.08.22 18:49:00 -
[88] - Quote
GLOBAL fils'de RAGE wrote:Paternally both my grand parents where from Puritan ancestory immigrated to Boston in 1630. Maternally one was also Puritan/Norman and one "First French" early 1620's immigrated to Arcadia Nova Scotia.
My paternal ancestor's father was the sherrif of Rutland England in approx. 1619 and a Cambridge prof at death. Both of his grandfathers where MP's under queen Elizabeth, maternal name was Laurence Chadderton, from Lancashire and help translate the KJV Bible. Paternally the name was Archdeacon Robert Johnson born in Stamford.
Sir. John Fitz John my first known ancestor presented himself to his norman fellow Robert of Scottland and was renamed, because Norman heraldic names where nonsensical outside of Normandy. The scottish King game him lands in Lincolnshire and Lancashire and was tasked with the protection of the Templar Highway. Sir John was only 20 years of age and had 20 knights and 200 men at arms when he had returned from the crusades.
We assume since his name ties him to Rounne fr. he was from a 1066 norman family. Umm ok.... Thanks for the family history?
No I will not show you where they touched me!!!
|
TechMechMeds
Level 5 Forum Warrior
5320
|
Posted - 2014.08.22 18:52:00 -
[89] - Quote
GLOBAL fils'de RAGE wrote:Paternally both my grand parents where from Puritan ancestory immigrated to Boston in 1630. Maternally one was also Puritan/Norman and one "First French" early 1620's immigrated to Arcadia Nova Scotia.
My paternal ancestor's father was the sherrif of Rutland England in approx. 1619 and a Cambridge prof at death. Both of his grandfathers where MP's under queen Elizabeth, maternal name was Laurence Chadderton, from Lancashire and help translate the KJV Bible. Paternally the name was Archdeacon Robert Johnson born in Stamford.
Sir. John Fitz John my first known ancestor presented himself to his norman fellow Robert of Scottland and was renamed, because Norman heraldic names where nonsensical outside of Normandy. The scottish King game him lands in Lincolnshire and Lancashire and was tasked with the protection of the Templar Highway. Sir John was only 20 years of age and had 20 knights and 200 men at arms when he had returned from the crusades.
We assume since his name ties him to Rounne fr. he was from a 1066 norman family.
Hehe.
Norman scumbag!.
Nah im joking.
My name pre dates the Norman invasion but no doubt my lineage suffered a lot of pillage. The UK is a great place, that's why buggers constantly tried to take it, it was a nice place to go away from the nightmares of the rest of the world during ancient times and in many respects, still is. This is why so many migrate here and i am proud that we are officially a multicultural society, there's no discrimination where functioning as a human being is concerned.
My mothers maiden name is Wood but obviously my name is of my fathers which is also a very old name. My mums side of the family has viking in them where as my dads is 'British' (No such thing as pure British if you go back far enough).
Anyway im off to play dust. That was a very interesting read and very interesting that a fellow American bothered to look into where he/she has come from. I love history.
I am from the East Anglia part of the UK.
Ps. Does Valeene exist still in the USA?, there may be a chance that i have some kind of ownership of some kind, not that I'd pursue it.
https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=172432&find=unread
|
TechMechMeds
Level 5 Forum Warrior
5320
|
Posted - 2014.08.22 18:53:00 -
[90] - Quote
Travis Stanush wrote:GLOBAL fils'de RAGE wrote:Paternally both my grand parents where from Puritan ancestory immigrated to Boston in 1630. Maternally one was also Puritan/Norman and one "First French" early 1620's immigrated to Arcadia Nova Scotia.
My paternal ancestor's father was the sherrif of Rutland England in approx. 1619 and a Cambridge prof at death. Both of his grandfathers where MP's under queen Elizabeth, maternal name was Laurence Chadderton, from Lancashire and help translate the KJV Bible. Paternally the name was Archdeacon Robert Johnson born in Stamford.
Sir. John Fitz John my first known ancestor presented himself to his norman fellow Robert of Scottland and was renamed, because Norman heraldic names where nonsensical outside of Normandy. The scottish King game him lands in Lincolnshire and Lancashire and was tasked with the protection of the Templar Highway. Sir John was only 20 years of age and had 20 knights and 200 men at arms when he had returned from the crusades.
We assume since his name ties him to Rounne fr. he was from a 1066 norman family. Umm ok.... Thanks for the family history?
It was most interesting.
*Terrance and Philip voice*
fk you buddy!.
https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=172432&find=unread
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |