These threads will end when someone in CCP grows a brain and decide is a good idea to give their players a Respec option they can use every 2-3 months...

Then , no one will have to cry their stuff has been nerfed
Then, all the FOTM chasers will make obvious whats broken in no time for CCP to fix
Then. every player can test every fit and dropsuit and weapon to decide what truly they want to become
Then, no matter what CCP f***s up, players will be able to play the game at full while they fix it back


Then we will have peace in the kingdom...

Said Spkr4TheDead.

Well,

• When every item has to make a proportionate sacrifice for each gain.
• When every weapon has a TTK involving a reasonable tradeoff between range and DPS.
• When every role is perfectly viable, with none being completely superior than the other.
• When every weapon is perfectly viable, and all perform reasonably well within it's intended niche.
• When every item has a purpose, and a use in a preferred situation.
• When every tactic/item has a reasonably successful counter barring itself.
• When no Dropsuit can fit both PRO Modules & PRO Weaponry without sacrifices.
• WP/D Matchmaking

That's a perfectly balanced game.

Good idea but itll fail for the reason that itll be vetter geared towards high SP player because theyll still get more sp back than low SP players. So in conclusion to fix the refund gap lower the sp that higher SP players get back to at least slow the combinations.

Because most of the QQes came for games like CoD where its a twitch shooter and its usually " i shot you first so you die first "
and they have no skill or gun game, so they cry that stuff is OP or become FoTM chasers.

I will admit that there have been times when there have been things in game that were broken and needed to be fixed but not as much as twitch shooters cry and whine about

Do you have actual evidence proving that the majority of players that complain about items being overpowered come from twitch shooters such as Call of Duty?

If so, may I see your sources?

I'm all for balancing and tweaks because it makes for a better experience. For example reducing the power of the combat rifle y two percent and raising the assault by 3%. I still prefer the combat rifle. The scout dampening nerf was also needed. The cloak was way overpower with the 25% across the board. The way it is now makes sense and by the way I use the caldari scout and occasionally the minmatar scout. Yes, I'm all for things like that. What I disagree on is when something is taken away. I think they changed their minds on the ammar logi but, taking away the sidearm would had make me very mad. I don't use anything ammar but I found it unfair. I rather they have two suit types 1 with a side arm and one without than taking ht sidearm away. The list of examples go on and on. You skill into certain suits or weapons for a reason. I don't think is fair to take what made your setup special after you spent so much time building it base on the rules they originally set up.

coalichicas en el foro ingles

I support nerfing everything.

Then go back to CoD and leave the real gamers alone

Well,

• When every item has to make a proportionate sacrifice for each gain.
• When every weapon has a TTK involving a reasonable tradeoff between range and DPS.
• When every role is perfectly viable, with none being completely superior than the other.
• When every weapon is perfectly viable, and all perform reasonably well within it's intended niche.
• When every item has a purpose, and a use in a preferred situation.
• When every tactic/item has a reasonably successful counter barring itself.
• When no Dropsuit can fit both PRO Modules & PRO Weaponry without sacrifices.
• WP/D Matchmaking

That's a perfectly balanced game.

english please, espically since this is english forums....if you can't respect us enough to post in way we understand then STFU and GTFO

english please, espically since this is english forums....if you can't respect us enough to post in way we understand then STFU and GTFO

"espically"

whoop dee doo, I miss spelled 1 word

Stop it! This games already somewhat balanced. And no more op threads either youre confusing the hell out of the devs, im sure.

they've been confused this entire time it's why their new development strategy is 100% dependent on "feedback" aka noob rants and nerf calls. good luck with this message because i've been saying it for 2+ years now.

Well,

• When every item has to make a proportionate sacrifice for each gain.
• When every weapon has a TTK involving a reasonable tradeoff between range and DPS.
• When every role is perfectly viable, with none being completely superior than the other.
• When every weapon is perfectly viable, and all perform reasonably well within it's intended niche.
• When every item has a purpose, and a use in a preferred situation.
• When every tactic/item has a reasonably successful counter barring itself.
• When no Dropsuit can fit both PRO Modules & PRO Weaponry without sacrifices.
• WP/D Matchmaking

That's a perfectly balanced game.