DUST Search - Stop nerfing things

843-Vika wrote:

Abraham Baby Fish wrote:

Luna McDuffing wrote:

I'm all for balancing and tweaks because it makes for a better experience. For example reducing the power of the combat rifle y two percent and raising the assault by 3%. I still prefer the combat rifle. The scout dampening nerf was also needed. The cloak was way overpower with the 25% across the board. The way it is now makes sense and by the way I use the caldari scout and occasionally the minmatar scout. Yes, I'm all for things like that. What I disagree on is when something is taken away. I think they changed their minds on the ammar logi but, taking away the sidearm would had make me very mad. I don't use anything ammar but I found it unfair. I rather they have two suit types 1 with a side arm and one without than taking ht sidearm away. The list of examples go on and on. You skill into certain suits or weapons for a reason. I don't think is fair to take what made your setup special after you spent so much time building it base on the rules they originally set up.

coalichicas en el foro ingles

english please, espically since this is english forums....if you can't respect us enough to post in way we understand then STFU and GTFO


Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Joel II X Dah Gods O Bacon 2725	Posted - 2014.07.28 20:48:00 - [1] - Quote Atiim wrote: ACT1ON BASTARD wrote: Atiim wrote: When the game becomes perfectly balanced, then sure. Itll only be balanced when people stop saying things are op. Its an endless cycle.What would be an absolute balanced game to you? Well, When every item has to make a proportionate sacrifice for each gain. When every weapon has a TTK involving a reasonable tradeoff between range and DPS. When every role is perfectly viable, with none being completely superior than the other. When every weapon is perfectly viable, and all perform reasonably well within it's intended niche. When every item has a purpose, and a use in a preferred situation. When every tactic/item has a reasonably successful counter barring itself. When no Dropsuit can fit both PRO Modules & PRO Weaponry without sacrifices. WP/D Matchmaking That's a perfectly balanced game. Even I, who has not finished his own game yet, understands this. Dammit, CCP. You are getting paid to do this.
Joel II X Dah Gods O Bacon 2725	Posted - 2014.07.28 20:50:00 - [2] - Quote 843-Vika wrote: Abraham Baby Fish wrote: Luna McDuffing wrote: I'm all for balancing and tweaks because it makes for a better experience. For example reducing the power of the combat rifle y two percent and raising the assault by 3%. I still prefer the combat rifle. The scout dampening nerf was also needed. The cloak was way overpower with the 25% across the board. The way it is now makes sense and by the way I use the caldari scout and occasionally the minmatar scout. Yes, I'm all for things like that. What I disagree on is when something is taken away. I think they changed their minds on the ammar logi but, taking away the sidearm would had make me very mad. I don't use anything ammar but I found it unfair. I rather they have two suit types 1 with a side arm and one without than taking ht sidearm away. The list of examples go on and on. You skill into certain suits or weapons for a reason. I don't think is fair to take what made your setup special after you spent so much time building it base on the rules they originally set up. coalichicas en el foro ingles english please, espically since this is english forums....if you can't respect us enough to post in way we understand then STFU and GTFO If that is the case, then improve your writing skills. Your typing as well.