|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
843-Vika
BurgezzE.T.F
General Tso's Alliance
127
   |
Posted - 2014.07.25 16:26:00 -
[1] - Quote
Atiim wrote:ACT1ON BASTARD wrote:Atiim wrote:When the game becomes perfectly balanced, then sure. Itll only be balanced when people stop saying things are op. Its an endless cycle.What would be an absolute balanced game to you? Well,
- When every item has to make a proportionate sacrifice for each gain.
- When every weapon has a TTK involving a reasonable tradeoff between range and DPS.
- When every role is perfectly viable, with none being completely superior than the other.
- When every weapon is perfectly viable, and all perform reasonably well within it's intended niche.
- When every item has a purpose, and a use in a preferred situation.
- When every tactic/item has a reasonably successful counter barring itself.
- When no Dropsuit can fit both PRO Modules & PRO Weaponry without sacrifices.
- WP/D Matchmaking
That's a perfectly balanced game.
He will be happy when this game is just as bad as CoD |
843-Vika
BurgezzE.T.F
General Tso's Alliance
127
|
Posted - 2014.07.25 19:41:00 -
[2] - Quote
Atiim wrote:843-Vika wrote:
He will be happy when this game is just as bad as CoD
And how does any of that relate to CoD?
Because most of the QQes came for games like CoD where its a twitch shooter and its usually " i shot you first so you die first "
and they have no skill or gun game, so they cry that stuff is OP or become FoTM chasers.
I will admit that there have been times when there have been things in game that were broken and needed to be fixed but not as much as twitch shooters cry and whine about |
843-Vika
BurgezzE.T.F
General Tso's Alliance
130
|
Posted - 2014.07.26 15:05:00 -
[3] - Quote
Atiim wrote:843-Vika wrote:Atiim wrote:843-Vika wrote:
He will be happy when this game is just as bad as CoD
And how does any of that relate to CoD? Because most of the QQes came for games like CoD where its a twitch shooter and its usually " i shot you first so you die first " and they have no skill or gun game, so they cry that stuff is OP or become FoTM chasers. I will admit that there have been times when there have been things in game that were broken and needed to be fixed but not as much as twitch shooters cry and whine about Do you have actual evidence proving that the majority of players that complain about items being overpowered come from twitch shooters such as Call of Duty? If so, may I see your sources?
how ong after open beta and game release did the forums go from constructive feed back to QQ threads like " The Ar is to weak, I shoot at people and they still kill me" or "tank are to strong, i can't kill them" etc etc etc.
This is only after the time when every one else that plays an FPS like CoD or BF or any other FPS ( just rolled out of bed so can't think of others ), so when i say twitch fps gamers are the core of the QQers because Dust 514 is not a twitch shooter, so they suck at it and either QQ untill they get the nerf or buff, or just become FoTM chasers.
People are QQing because they want the game to adapt to them, instead of adapt to the game, and that causes everyone else to suffer.
|
843-Vika
BurgezzE.T.F
General Tso's Alliance
148
|
Posted - 2014.07.28 19:23:00 -
[4] - Quote
Abraham Baby Fish wrote:Luna McDuffing wrote:I'm all for balancing and tweaks because it makes for a better experience. For example reducing the power of the combat rifle y two percent and raising the assault by 3%. I still prefer the combat rifle. The scout dampening nerf was also needed. The cloak was way overpower with the 25% across the board. The way it is now makes sense and by the way I use the caldari scout and occasionally the minmatar scout. Yes, I'm all for things like that. What I disagree on is when something is taken away. I think they changed their minds on the ammar logi but, taking away the sidearm would had make me very mad. I don't use anything ammar but I found it unfair. I rather they have two suit types 1 with a side arm and one without than taking ht sidearm away. The list of examples go on and on. You skill into certain suits or weapons for a reason. I don't think is fair to take what made your setup special after you spent so much time building it base on the rules they originally set up. coalichicas en el foro ingles
english please, espically since this is english forums....if you can't respect us enough to post in way we understand then STFU and GTFO |
843-Vika
BurgezzE.T.F
General Tso's Alliance
148
|
Posted - 2014.07.28 20:00:00 -
[5] - Quote
Soraya Xel wrote:I support nerfing everything.
Then go back to CoD and leave the real gamers alone |
843-Vika
BurgezzE.T.F
General Tso's Alliance
149
|
Posted - 2014.07.28 22:46:00 -
[6] - Quote
Abraham Baby Fish wrote:843-Vika wrote:Abraham Baby Fish wrote:Luna McDuffing wrote:I'm all for balancing and tweaks because it makes for a better experience. For example reducing the power of the combat rifle y two percent and raising the assault by 3%. I still prefer the combat rifle. The scout dampening nerf was also needed. The cloak was way overpower with the 25% across the board. The way it is now makes sense and by the way I use the caldari scout and occasionally the minmatar scout. Yes, I'm all for things like that. What I disagree on is when something is taken away. I think they changed their minds on the ammar logi but, taking away the sidearm would had make me very mad. I don't use anything ammar but I found it unfair. I rather they have two suit types 1 with a side arm and one without than taking ht sidearm away. The list of examples go on and on. You skill into certain suits or weapons for a reason. I don't think is fair to take what made your setup special after you spent so much time building it base on the rules they originally set up. coalichicas en el foro ingles english please, espically since this is english forums....if you can't respect us enough to post in way we understand then STFU and GTFO "espically"
whoop dee doo, I miss spelled 1 word |
|
|
| |
|