DUST Search - Hmg spin up time.

All Channels

General Discussions

Hmg spin up time.

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 :: [one page]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
HOWDIDHEKILLME Dying to Reload 189	Posted - 2014.06.10 16:46:00 - [1] - Quote With such high damage and rate of fire. Shouldn't there be a .1 - .2 sec spin up time similar to the rail rifle? Seems like there should be. Lonewolf till I die
TunRa Fatal Absolution General Tso's Alliance 634	Posted - 2014.06.10 16:49:00 - [2] - Quote Read the description of the HMG. You took my gif, back to FoxFour
HOWDIDHEKILLME Dying to Reload 189	Posted - 2014.06.10 17:05:00 - [3] - Quote Counter rotating drives aligning? I've loaded a phalanx... That's not how they work.. Btw, No gun gets more accurate as it fires lol. Lonewolf till I die
Chunky Munkey Amarr Templars Amarr Empire 4823	Posted - 2014.06.10 17:16:00 - [4] - Quote HOWDIDHEKILLME wrote: Counter rotating drives aligning? I've loaded a phalanx... That's not how they work.. Btw, No gun gets more accurate as it fires lol. Have you loaded a sci-fi gun? RIP Stinky Sleeve. RIP Dust514. See you on Destiny. PSN: GSDSteVB
Cyrius Li-Moody 0uter.Heaven 5720	Posted - 2014.06.10 17:38:00 - [5] - Quote It's like we're living in the future. Youtuber. Your friendly neighborhood whiskey-fueled merc.
HOWDIDHEKILLME Dying to Reload 189	Posted - 2014.06.10 17:41:00 - [6] - Quote Chunky Munkey wrote: HOWDIDHEKILLME wrote: Counter rotating drives aligning? I've loaded a phalanx... That's not how they work.. Btw, No gun gets more accurate as it fires lol. Have you loaded a sci-fi gun? Thanks troll Lonewolf till I die
Iron Wolf Saber Den of Swords 15422	Posted - 2014.06.10 17:43:00 - [7] - Quote HOWDIDHEKILLME wrote: Counter rotating drives aligning? I've loaded a phalanx... That's not how they work.. Btw, No gun gets more accurate as it fires lol. To be honest we have no idea how minmatar build things. I mean what they still consider to be bottom of the heap trash pile of eve tech is still leagues beyond ours. The simple fact they're heafting this nearly fighter sized minigun around is rather scary. CPM 0 Secretary Omni-Soldier, Forum Warrior, Annoying Artist \\= Advanced Gallente Logistics =// Unlocked
Chunky Munkey Amarr Templars Amarr Empire 4824	Posted - 2014.06.10 17:45:00 - [8] - Quote HOWDIDHEKILLME wrote: Chunky Munkey wrote: HOWDIDHEKILLME wrote: Counter rotating drives aligning? I've loaded a phalanx... That's not how they work.. Btw, No gun gets more accurate as it fires lol. Have you loaded a sci-fi gun? Thanks troll I'm not trolling, I'm pointing out that the technology is not the same, and as such, your objection is moot. RIP Stinky Sleeve. RIP Dust514. See you on Destiny. PSN: GSDSteVB
Arkena Wyrnspire Fatal Absolution 14367	Posted - 2014.06.10 17:49:00 - [9] - Quote Ssssh, you'll attract the tears of fat people. You have long since made your choice. What you make now is a mistake.
HOWDIDHEKILLME Dying to Reload 189	Posted - 2014.06.10 17:57:00 - [10] - Quote Arkena Wyrnspire wrote: Ssssh, you'll attract the tears of fat people. To late... I was pointing out that a gun of this type would have spin up time. "But it's space age" is a stupid response. And so is a troll response from a cpm. Almost pointless talking to anyone on the forums since it's filled with trolls, go get some vag assclowns. Lonewolf till I die

Powerh8er Ganking Jugend 438	Posted - 2014.06.10 18:37:00 - [11] - Quote Why would a gunpowder projectile weapon need a spin up time? Heavies are useless enough as it is, stop trying to nerf them further.
Arkena Wyrnspire Fatal Absolution 14369	Posted - 2014.06.10 18:48:00 - [12] - Quote Powerh8er wrote: Why would a gunpowder projectile weapon need a spin up time? Heavies are useless enough as it is, stop trying to nerf them further. If you think heavies are 'useless' you are terrible. Also, it's perfectly reasonable for a rotary barrel weapon to have a spin-up time mechanically. It being 'gunpowder' has nothing to do with it. You have long since made your choice. What you make now is a mistake.
low genius The Sound Of Freedom 1970	Posted - 2014.06.10 18:56:00 - [13] - Quote HOWDIDHEKILLME wrote: With such high damage and rate of fire. Shouldn't there be a .1 - .2 sec spin up time similar to the rail rifle? Seems like there should be. it used to have one. did you start playing dust after it was cancelled? eatsbabies cienfuegos steward of the renegade alliance.
Scheneighnay McBob The Last of DusT. General Tso's Alliance 5209	Posted - 2014.06.10 19:07:00 - [14] - Quote HOWDIDHEKILLME wrote: Arkena Wyrnspire wrote: Ssssh, you'll attract the tears of fat people. To late... I was pointing out that a gun of this type would have spin up time. "But it's space age" is a stupid response. And so is a troll response from a cpm. Almost pointless talking to anyone on the forums since it's filled with trolls, go get some vag assclowns. So, everyone who disagrees with you is trolling? péñpâ¦pé+pâìpââpâêpü«tÄïµºÿpüïpéÅpüäpüä pé¦pâ+pé¦pâ½pâäpâ¬pâ¦pé¦pâ¼pâ+pâêpü»sñ¬S+ïpéè
TunRa Fatal Absolution General Tso's Alliance 634	Posted - 2014.06.10 19:12:00 - [15] - Quote HOWDIDHEKILLME wrote: Counter rotating drives aligning? I've loaded a phalanx... That's not how they work.. Btw, No gun gets more accurate as it fires lol. You do release half the guns in this game don't exist? There is no gun that shoots lasers and their are no guns that shoot heated plasma. The only guns that could exist are the rail guns since we have military prototypes of those guns today. Point is the description says unlike earlier models the HMG requires no spool up time. You took my gif, back to FoxFour
HOWDIDHEKILLME Dying to Reload 191	Posted - 2014.06.10 19:21:00 - [16] - Quote Actually we do have lasers... They put holes in quarters at 100m. A German even built one himself. Lonewolf till I die
Gavr1Io Pr1nc1p 384	Posted - 2014.06.10 19:21:00 - [17] - Quote Powerh8er wrote: Heavies are useless enough as it is, stop trying to nerf them further. man...i just don't know what to say... Heavies are more overpowered than scouts, and require no skill or aiming or really any basic proficiency in an FPS game to use them. Sure, there are some great heavies out there (no offense to you guys), but the vast majority of the heavy player base lacks any sort of concept of skills or tactics, and rely on their suits superiority to win in most situations. 26-2 ambush with militia minmitar heavy, no relevant skills 9-3 proto minmitar scout Scount OP nurf it to grownd
Cat Merc Onslaught Inc RISE of LEGION 10269	Posted - 2014.06.10 19:24:00 - [18] - Quote Well, Valve did a similar thing because they recognized that the HMG in Team Fortress 2 takes barely any skill to operate compared to other weapons, so they forced a spin up time to move the skill from aiming to predicting enemy aggression. Feline overlord of all humans - CAT MERC
HOWDIDHEKILLME Dying to Reload 191	Posted - 2014.06.10 19:26:00 - [19] - Quote Arkena Wyrnspire wrote: Powerh8er wrote: Why would a gunpowder projectile weapon need a spin up time? Heavies are useless enough as it is, stop trying to nerf them further. If you think heavies are 'useless' you are terrible. Also, it's perfectly reasonable for a rotary barrel weapon to have a spin-up time mechanically. It being 'gunpowder' has nothing to do with it. Thanks for understanding the concept. It's like people have never seen guns or understand engineering in any way. It's not like we're using unicorn guns filled with monkey butts. Lonewolf till I die
KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf Dominion of the Supreme Emperor God-King KAGEHOSHI 11085	Posted - 2014.06.10 19:27:00 - [20] - Quote "A multi-barrel, rotary drive machine gun, the HMG is a singularly devastating anti-infantry weapon. Eschewing the advantages of a lighter frame in favor of stopping power, the exponentially increased heat and vibration produced by this Boundless Creation developed weapon makes it almost unbearable to fire. Yet despite this fact, its above average hit ratio and extreme rate of fire has earned it the nickname GÇ£Death's Engine.GÇ¥ Unlike earlier models, the weapon requires no spool up time; rounds are expelled the instant the trigger is pressed. This comes at the cost of initially reduced accuracy as the counter-rotating drives slowly align. Once fully aligned, however, the HMG produces a pinpoint stream of gunfire with unmatched killing potential." (source) Why doesn't it have a spoolup time? because it was built to not have a spoolup time. Gû¦Supreme emperor god-kingpÇÉKAGEH¦PSHIpÇæ// Lord of threads // Forum altGû+

Powerh8er Ganking Jugend 438	Posted - 2014.06.10 19:28:00 - [21] - Quote Gavr1Io Pr1nc1p wrote: Powerh8er wrote: Heavies are useless enough as it is, stop trying to nerf them further. man...i just don't know what to say... Heavies are more overpowered than scouts, and require no skill or aiming or really any basic proficiency in an FPS game to use them. Sure, there are some great heavies out there (no offense to you guys), but the vast majority of the heavy player base lacks any sort of concept of skills or tactics, and rely on their suits superiority to win in most situations. Pub matches against newbs, yes. any other time heavies are useless.
Iron Wolf Saber Den of Swords 15427	Posted - 2014.06.10 19:35:00 - [22] - Quote HOWDIDHEKILLME wrote: Counter rotating drives aligning? I've loaded a phalanx... That's not how they work.. Btw, No gun gets more accurate as it fires lol. I mean look at the V8 Kriss https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pnKd6iXHTQg I mean the mere concept of how to do this didn't exist back then and this weapon's accuracy is highly reliant on the gun firing in the first place. I mean why didn't 1800's guns use this mechanism? Or 1600 hundreds bluss. CPM 0 Secretary Omni-Soldier, Forum Warrior, Annoying Artist \\= Advanced Gallente Logistics =// Unlocked
Jacques Cayton II Capital Acquisitions LLC General Tso's Alliance 833	Posted - 2014.06.10 19:53:00 - [23] - Quote HOWDIDHEKILLME wrote: With such high damage and rate of fire. Shouldn't there be a .1 - .2 sec spin up time similar to the rail rifle? Seems like there should be. Sci Fi shooter. Do you really think we could shoot plasma out of a rifle without it melting? We fight for the future of the State not our personal goals
HOWDIDHEKILLME Dying to Reload 191	Posted - 2014.06.10 19:59:00 - [24] - Quote Iron Wolf Saber wrote: HOWDIDHEKILLME wrote: Counter rotating drives aligning? I've loaded a phalanx... That's not how they work.. Btw, No gun gets more accurate as it fires lol. I mean look at the V8 Kriss https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pnKd6iXHTQg I mean the mere concept of how to do this didn't exist back then and this weapon's accuracy is highly reliant on the gun firing in the first place. I mean why didn't 1800's guns use this mechanism? Or 1600 hundreds smoothbores? There is also smarter scopes coming out that correct their calculations between shots. While the gun itself is not getting more accurate the scope is. Finally; this is a video game and trying to balance based off reality is just silly and that itself is generally considered trolling which should be meet with just as much amount of trolling. Then change the description to... It's made out of dragon teeth ( they don't have mass, didn't you know that?)and shoots unicorn dicks while your at it. I was asking a simple question about the physics. Here's another question to have a dumb answer to... Why clones, when robots will be far superior to biological bodies ( in the future ) and if the technology to transfer consciousness is around how fast would drone robot control be. Btw the new scope won't fire the gun till your on target, exacto rounds are guided in flight, and even in the future mass will still have mass, that's what my question was about. To bad a cpm can't even understand it and goes straight to trolling. Lonewolf till I die
HOWDIDHEKILLME Dying to Reload 191	Posted - 2014.06.10 20:01:00 - [25] - Quote Jacques Cayton II wrote: HOWDIDHEKILLME wrote: With such high damage and rate of fire. Shouldn't there be a .1 - .2 sec spin up time similar to the rail rifle? Seems like there should be. Sci Fi shooter. Do you really think we could shoot plasma out of a rifle without it melting? It wasn't a question about the forge gun. Lonewolf till I die
HOWDIDHEKILLME Dying to Reload 191	Posted - 2014.06.10 20:14:00 - [26] - Quote http://youtu.be/iqDCCTCYTNI much more relevant http://youtu.be/ViL4bAUGuGY Wearing a Sarcos suit you could even carry it Not sci fi. Lonewolf till I die
Xocoyol Zaraoul Superior Genetics 1942	Posted - 2014.06.10 20:16:00 - [27] - Quote HOWDIDHEKILLME wrote: Arkena Wyrnspire wrote: Ssssh, you'll attract the tears of fat people. To late... I was pointing out that a gun of this type would have spin up time. "But it's space age" is a stupid response. And so is a troll response from a cpm. Almost pointless talking to anyone on the forums since it's filled with trolls, go get some vag assclowns. Would it make you feel better if we just made it an automatic single-barrel cannon, instead of a rotary as it is now? Wanting to nerf something for the sole stated reason of realism is also a stupid thing to say. This is not a simulator, this is a game. If you want the spool-up for balance reasons then that is another thing to say... "You see those red dots over there? Go and shoot them until you see a +50 on the screen" - Arkena Wyrnspire
HOWDIDHEKILLME Dying to Reload 191	Posted - 2014.06.10 20:18:00 - [28] - Quote Arkena Wyrnspire wrote: Powerh8er wrote: Why would a gunpowder projectile weapon need a spin up time? Heavies are useless enough as it is, stop trying to nerf them further. If you think heavies are 'useless' you are terrible. Also, it's perfectly reasonable for a rotary barrel weapon to have a spin-up time mechanically. It being 'gunpowder' has nothing to do with it. The only person that understood the question... Thanks arkena. Lonewolf till I die
Chunky Munkey Amarr Templars Amarr Empire 4828	Posted - 2014.06.10 20:22:00 - [29] - Quote HOWDIDHEKILLME wrote: Arkena Wyrnspire wrote: Ssssh, you'll attract the tears of fat people. To late... I was pointing out that a gun of this type would have spin up time. "But it's space age" is a stupid response. And so is a troll response from a cpm. Almost pointless talking to anyone on the forums since it's filled with trolls, go get some vag assclowns. "Waaah, people don't agree with me!" RIP Stinky Sleeve. RIP Dust514. See you on Destiny. PSN: GSDSteVB
HOWDIDHEKILLME Dying to Reload 191	Posted - 2014.06.10 20:22:00 - [30] - Quote Responses remind meme of a song by drunk heavy... For all the heavys out there. http://youtu.be/im4Tb_AXQig Lonewolf till I die

HOWDIDHEKILLME Dying to Reload 191	Posted - 2014.06.10 20:24:00 - [31] - Quote Chunky Munkey wrote: HOWDIDHEKILLME wrote: Arkena Wyrnspire wrote: Ssssh, you'll attract the tears of fat people. To late... I was pointing out that a gun of this type would have spin up time. "But it's space age" is a stupid response. And so is a troll response from a cpm. Almost pointless talking to anyone on the forums since it's filled with trolls, go get some vag assclowns. "Waaah, people don't agree with me!" Waaaaah I didn't understand the question but I still need to stop someone who I assume is trying to nerf my gun Lonewolf till I die
True Adamance Praetoriani Classiarii Templares Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris 10553	Posted - 2014.06.10 20:29:00 - [32] - Quote HOWDIDHEKILLME wrote: Iron Wolf Saber wrote: HOWDIDHEKILLME wrote: Counter rotating drives aligning? I've loaded a phalanx... That's not how they work.. Btw, No gun gets more accurate as it fires lol. I mean look at the V8 Kriss https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pnKd6iXHTQg I mean the mere concept of how to do this didn't exist back then and this weapon's accuracy is highly reliant on the gun firing in the first place. I mean why didn't 1800's guns use this mechanism? Or 1600 hundreds smoothbores? There is also smarter scopes coming out that correct their calculations between shots. While the gun itself is not getting more accurate the scope is. Finally; this is a video game and trying to balance based off reality is just silly and that itself is generally considered trolling which should be meet with just as much amount of trolling. Then change the description to... It's made out of dragon teeth ( they don't have mass, didn't you know that?)and shoots unicorn dicks while your at it. I was asking a simple question about the physics. Here's another question to have a dumb answer to... Why clones, when robots will be far superior to biological bodies ( in the future ) and if the technology to transfer consciousness is around how fast would drone robot control be. Btw the new scope won't fire the gun till your on target, exacto rounds are guided in flight, and even in the future mass will still have mass, that's what my question was about. To bad a cpm can't even understand it and goes straight to trolling. Clone bodies are likely cheaper than drones. "You are weak Ouryon....weakness serves not the Empire. I shall teach you strength." -Yurius of the Brutor to Ouryon
HOWDIDHEKILLME Dying to Reload 191	Posted - 2014.06.10 20:33:00 - [33] - Quote True Adamance wrote: HOWDIDHEKILLME wrote: Iron Wolf Saber wrote: HOWDIDHEKILLME wrote: Counter rotating drives aligning? I've loaded a phalanx... That's not how they work.. Btw, No gun gets more accurate as it fires lol. I mean look at the V8 Kriss https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pnKd6iXHTQg I mean the mere concept of how to do this didn't exist back then and this weapon's accuracy is highly reliant on the gun firing in the first place. I mean why didn't 1800's guns use this mechanism? Or 1600 hundreds smoothbores? There is also smarter scopes coming out that correct their calculations between shots. While the gun itself is not getting more accurate the scope is. Finally; this is a video game and trying to balance based off reality is just silly and that itself is generally considered trolling which should be meet with just as much amount of trolling. Then change the description to... It's made out of dragon teeth ( they don't have mass, didn't you know that?)and shoots unicorn dicks while your at it. I was asking a simple question about the physics. Here's another question to have a dumb answer to... Why clones, when robots will be far superior to biological bodies ( in the future ) and if the technology to transfer consciousness is around how fast would drone robot control be. Btw the new scope won't fire the gun till your on target, exacto rounds are guided in flight, and even in the future mass will still have mass, that's what my question was about. To bad a cpm can't even understand it and goes straight to trolling. Clone bodies are likely cheaper than drones. Hopefully or I'll feel bad about suiciding every time one gets tired or hungry. Lonewolf till I die
Powerh8er Ganking Jugend 438	Posted - 2014.06.10 20:34:00 - [34] - Quote HOWDIDHEKILLME wrote: Arkena Wyrnspire wrote: Powerh8er wrote: Why would a gunpowder projectile weapon need a spin up time? Heavies are useless enough as it is, stop trying to nerf them further. If you think heavies are 'useless' you are terrible. Also, it's perfectly reasonable for a rotary barrel weapon to have a spin-up time mechanically. It being 'gunpowder' has nothing to do with it. The only person that understood the question... Thanks arkena. The barrels spin to prevent overheating, why would they spin if no bullets are going through the barrel? It would be very unefficent as a weapon if they did, the first gatling gun ever had no spin up time, why would a sci-fi minigun need it? Im terrible huh? Well, you seem kinda stupid.
HOWDIDHEKILLME Dying to Reload 191	Posted - 2014.06.10 20:36:00 - [35] - Quote Powerh8er wrote: HOWDIDHEKILLME wrote: Arkena Wyrnspire wrote: Powerh8er wrote: Why would a gunpowder projectile weapon need a spin up time? Heavies are useless enough as it is, stop trying to nerf them further. If you think heavies are 'useless' you are terrible. Also, it's perfectly reasonable for a rotary barrel weapon to have a spin-up time mechanically. It being 'gunpowder' has nothing to do with it. The only person that understood the question... Thanks arkena. The barrels spin to prevent overheating, why would they spin if no bullets are going through the barrel? It would be very unefficent as a weapon if they did, the first gatling gun ever had no spin up time, why would a sci-fi minigun need it? Im terrible huh? Well, you seem kinda stupid. And it was hand cranked and operated by 2 men Lonewolf till I die
HOWDIDHEKILLME Dying to Reload 213	Posted - 2014.06.10 20:39:00 - [36] - Quote I should rename this topic " I want heavy rage " Lonewolf till I die
Powerh8er Ganking Jugend 438	Posted - 2014.06.10 20:47:00 - [37] - Quote HOWDIDHEKILLME wrote: I should rename this topic " I want heavy rage " It has nothing to with rage, i just want some logic into the game. I used to be MG man in the force so i reaaally like machine guns and i want the HMG in dust to resemble an actually machinegun just a fraction and not turn into a broken gun again because of some forum diva getting killed once too often by it.
Chunky Munkey Amarr Templars Amarr Empire 4828	Posted - 2014.06.10 20:55:00 - [38] - Quote HOWDIDHEKILLME wrote: Chunky Munkey wrote: HOWDIDHEKILLME wrote: Arkena Wyrnspire wrote: Ssssh, you'll attract the tears of fat people. To late... I was pointing out that a gun of this type would have spin up time. "But it's space age" is a stupid response. And so is a troll response from a cpm. Almost pointless talking to anyone on the forums since it's filled with trolls, go get some vag assclowns. "Waaah, people don't agree with me!" Waaaaah I didn't understand the question but I still need to stop someone who I assume is trying to nerf my gun I don't play anymore, so you can believe me when I say I have no vested interests in keeping the HMG spool-up-free. Not that I think your suggestion has a chance of being passed anyway. The the rebuttal to your argument has already been posted: the technology is not the same. Claiming that Dust's HMG should have spool up because its closest real-life equivalent does, is no different from claiming that electric cars should have CO emissions because standard combustion engines do. You're simply shouting over anyone who tells you that the weapon is designed differently. RIP Stinky Sleeve. RIP Dust514. See you on Destiny. PSN: GSDSteVB
HOWDIDHEKILLME Dying to Reload 213	Posted - 2014.06.10 20:56:00 - [39] - Quote Powerh8er wrote: HOWDIDHEKILLME wrote: I should rename this topic " I want heavy rage " It has nothing to with rage, i just want some logic into the game. I used to be MG man in the force so i reaaally like machine guns and i want the HMG in dust to resemble an actually machinegun just a fraction and not turn into a broken gun again because of some forum diva getting killed once too often by it. Don't mind them actually I use a rr at range so they hardly ever kill me... I do think that scouts shouldn't be able to run through the stream of bullets once it's firing tho. Seems silly. I was not expecting such stupid comments tho. As a mg you might have also mentioned that modern gatlings don't overheat before they exhaust their ammo supply, and not just 300-400 rounds more like 2000-10000. Lonewolf till I die
HOWDIDHEKILLME Dying to Reload 213	Posted - 2014.06.10 20:57:00 - [40] - Quote Chunky Munkey wrote: HOWDIDHEKILLME wrote: Chunky Munkey wrote: HOWDIDHEKILLME wrote: Arkena Wyrnspire wrote: Ssssh, you'll attract the tears of fat people. To late... I was pointing out that a gun of this type would have spin up time. "But it's space age" is a stupid response. And so is a troll response from a cpm. Almost pointless talking to anyone on the forums since it's filled with trolls, go get some vag assclowns. "Waaah, people don't agree with me!" Waaaaah I didn't understand the question but I still need to stop someone who I assume is trying to nerf my gun I don't play anymore, so you can believe me when I say I have no vested interests in keeping the HMG spool-up-free. Not that I think your suggestion has a chance of being passed anyway. The the rebuttal to your argument has already been posted: the technology is not the same. Claiming that Dust's HMG should have spool up because its closest real-life equivalent does, is no different from claiming that electric cars should have CO emissions because standard combustion engines do. You're simply shouting over anyone who tells you that the weapon is designed differently. Didn't know you could hear me shouting. If you don't play why are you on the forums? Go outside neck beard. Lonewolf till I die

Defy Gravity 424	Posted - 2014.06.10 21:10:00 - [41] - Quote No. If I kill you in game, look for a confirmation that says "I Just Killed You"
boba's fetta Dead Man's Game 674	Posted - 2014.06.10 21:41:00 - [42] - Quote fat suit here. spool time is bad for heavyies. heres why scout + shotgun. spool up time would leave us with even less defence against this tactic. id much rather see a range reduction the boundless has stupid range. (im a decent heavy by no means good but im not the bottom of the pond crap you see in some games.)
Chunky Munkey Amarr Templars Amarr Empire 4828	Posted - 2014.06.10 22:51:00 - [43] - Quote HOWDIDHEKILLME wrote: Chunky Munkey wrote: HOWDIDHEKILLME wrote: Chunky Munkey wrote: "Waaah, people don't agree with me!" Waaaaah I didn't understand the question but I still need to stop someone who I assume is trying to nerf my gun I don't play anymore, so you can believe me when I say I have no vested interests in keeping the HMG spool-up-free. Not that I think your suggestion has a chance of being passed anyway. The the rebuttal to your argument has already been posted: the technology is not the same. Claiming that Dust's HMG should have spool up because its closest real-life equivalent does, is no different from claiming that electric cars should have CO emissions because standard combustion engines do. You're simply shouting over anyone who tells you that the weapon is designed differently. Didn't know you could hear me shouting. If you don't play why are you on the forums? Go outside neck beard. Oh, ouch. Your words cut deeply Mr Internet Stranger. RIP Stinky Sleeve. RIP Dust514. See you on Destiny. PSN: GSDSteVB
Fizzer94 L.O.T.I.S. 2752	Posted - 2014.06.11 00:15:00 - [44] - Quote HOWDIDHEKILLME wrote: . Here's another question to have a dumb answer to... Why clones, when robots will be far superior to biological bodies ( in the future ) and if the technology to transfer consciousness is around how fast would drone robot control be. Biomass is cheaper than unessesary robot bodies. Our bodies aren't doing any of the work, its the dropsuits that do the work. The bodies are just "filler". It just so happens that a filler made of biomass is cheaper than a filler made of silicon and tritanium alloys. Just like everything else in New Eden... It's cheaper and more efficient. My best match on Dust, 23/6/4 Placon.
Miokai Zahou The Southern Legion Final Resolution. 292	Posted - 2014.06.11 00:42:00 - [45] - Quote This topic has all the signs of a butthurt scout RE spammer who just found out that re's are getting nerfed and now wants to complain about it via a HMG spool up time nerf. Short answer: no. Long answer: hell no. Noob isn't really a status, it's the online equivalent of a 5-year old calling you a poopy fart head.
Iron Wolf Saber Den of Swords 15436	Posted - 2014.06.11 02:23:00 - [46] - Quote HOWDIDHEKILLME wrote: Iron Wolf Saber wrote: HOWDIDHEKILLME wrote: Counter rotating drives aligning? I've loaded a phalanx... That's not how they work.. Btw, No gun gets more accurate as it fires lol. I mean look at the V8 Kriss https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pnKd6iXHTQg I mean the mere concept of how to do this didn't exist back then and this weapon's accuracy is highly reliant on the gun firing in the first place. I mean why didn't 1800's guns use this mechanism? Or 1600 hundreds smoothbores? There is also smarter scopes coming out that correct their calculations between shots. While the gun itself is not getting more accurate the scope is. Finally; this is a video game and trying to balance based off reality is just silly and that itself is generally considered trolling which should be meet with just as much amount of trolling. Then change the description to... It's made out of dragon teeth ( they don't have mass, didn't you know that?)and shoots unicorn dicks while your at it. I was asking a simple question about the physics. Here's another question to have a dumb answer to... Why clones, when robots will be far superior to biological bodies ( in the future ) and if the technology to transfer consciousness is around how fast would drone robot control be. Btw the new scope won't fire the gun till your on target, exacto rounds are guided in flight, and even in the future mass will still have mass, that's what my question was about. To bad a cpm can't even understand it and goes straight to trolling. or how about you can for once suspend the notion of belief and understand that eve tech is 50k years in the future and these guns are not built anything like the way you or I have been familiar with. I mean 500 years ago people never thought an auto loading cannon was feasible and today we got them semi-automatic and very unnatural to be muzzleloading such things. The lore provided makes more than perfect sense because if its a pressure based system then it would still make the HMG emp proof. Amarrians are known assholes in their subjugation methods and minmatar fighting needs evolved from such. I mean what if you precious phalanx no longer punched through any missile's armor (while unlikely anytime soon) but if the situation did occur the rules of war usually forces a change in tech to counter the newer threats. For example most phalanx cannons fire tungsten rounds, a metal we only have about 50 more years worth of left. What is going to be in store for the phalanx then? Early retirement? Round replacement like depleted uranium maybe? The mind boggles, what would guns look like 50, 100, 500 years from now? For example your phalanx cannons are already given the 'out of date' status there is a highly known and predictable way to defeat them now and most militaries are aware of it, which is why they're now they're marrying the radar system to the evolved sea sparrow launcher instead of the tungsten based cannon system. As for robots in eve? We already tried robots, they got too smart and consider us food and non-sentient even. Wrong scope system; we're talking smart guns/scopes which is about 40x cheaper because it doesn't require special rounds or even a special 'gun' (the smart guns come with the system built into the stock but still much more relatively cheaper than any smart 'bullet') It makes a pretty accurate first guess and it autocorrects between firings. Doesn't turn anyone into a sniper instantly but it makes any marksman already much more deadlier. CPM 0 Secretary Omni-Soldier, Forum Warrior, Annoying Artist \\= Advanced Gallente Logistics =// Unlocked
Glyd Path Nec Tributis 117	Posted - 2014.06.11 02:47:00 - [47] - Quote HOWDIDHEKILLME wrote: With such high damage and rate of fire. Shouldn't there be a .1 - .2 sec spin up time similar to the rail rifle? Seems like there should be. Have you used an HMG? Because it doesn't seem like you have any actual experience with the weapon. You are just spewing misinformation and QQs. If you were to use the weapon there is a spin up time. It is ~.5 seconds. The gun fires wildly inaccurate rounds until the weapon is up to speed. While this might not mesh with your limited understanding of the world it is a very common solution in video game HMGs. They are a devastating weapon and the half second or so allows the target to try to respond, dive to cover or kill the HMG user before they die. Learn how video games work. Learn the methods for how they achieve balance. Real guns are not wildly inaccurate. Video games guns are weirdly incorrect, even more so in dust, and much of it is to provide balance between weapons. Never forget that dust balance is possibly the worst in the entire history of video games and certainly in FPS genre games. Each release includes the developers FOTM and negates months of effort by their customers. At least with the lone developer remaining we shouldn't get the wild directional changes that were the hallmark of dust. One developer can only do so much, which we can be thankful for. At least we have one and his attitude is better than the entire rest of the team has been in the past. Nobody at CCP cares because we ain't Legionnaires.
HOWDIDHEKILLME Dying to Reload 214	Posted - 2014.06.11 03:02:00 - [48] - Quote Holy **** there are a lot of heavys in the forums Lonewolf till I die
HOWDIDHEKILLME Dying to Reload 214	Posted - 2014.06.11 03:05:00 - [49] - Quote Miokai Zahou wrote: This topic has all the signs of a butthurt scout RE spammer who just found out that re's are getting nerfed and now wants to complain about it via a HMG spool up time nerf. Short answer: no. Long answer: hell no. Lol how many times did I blow your ******** ass up in one round? Lonewolf till I die
Miokai Zahou The Southern Legion Final Resolution. 296	Posted - 2014.06.11 06:00:00 - [50] - Quote HOWDIDHEKILLME wrote: Miokai Zahou wrote: This topic has all the signs of a butthurt scout RE spammer who just found out that re's are getting nerfed and now wants to complain about it via a HMG spool up time nerf. Short answer: no. Long answer: hell no. Lol how many times did I blow your ******** ass up in one round? Admittedly you where getting your ass hand on a golden platter by me to many times and it was glories. Then came the re spam and I still won dust. Noob isn't really a status, it's the online equivalent of a 5-year old calling you a poopy fart head.

Velociraptor antirrhopus Kang Lo Directorate Gallente Federation 180	Posted - 2014.06.11 06:42:00 - [51] - Quote Yeah, there should also be shotguns with infinite damage that can OHKO anything. GTFO. My thoughts on Hotfix Alpha: First I noticed a scout running from my AR. Then a heavy. Then a COMBAT RIFLE USER. CCP +1
Himiko Kuronaga Fatal Absolution General Tso's Alliance 4397	Posted - 2014.06.11 12:35:00 - [52] - Quote HOWDIDHEKILLME wrote: With such high damage and rate of fire. Shouldn't there be a .1 - .2 sec spin up time similar to the rail rifle? Seems like there should be. No, there shouldn't be. Not unless you change its role to be a long-range killing tool. Spin up time directly contradicts its use as a close range superiority weapon. And it doesn't have high damage. It has very weak damage, in fact. The rate of fire is the only thing it has going for it.


Pages: 1 2 :: [one page]

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online/DUST514, the EVE/DUST514 logo, EVE/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to OMG Labs to use EVE Online/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, OMG Labs. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.