DUST Search - Why the hate for DNS?

Free Beers wrote:

Cogadh Draco wrote:

I don't hate DNS or anyone having to do with it, a lot of us shouldn't. However, a lot of people don't like the fact that DNS(mainly Niyan San/Chan) basically removed 1/3 of the multiplayer aspect of DUST514. Now I do agree with a lot of people that CCP needs to expand how many planets one can fight over in PC, but DNS taking it so far as to remove a lot of the competition from the current PC to attempt to motivate CCP to add more planets? This is how it looks like, and quite a few people on voice chat say the same thing in game, but was it really THAT necessary?

You know i was against the 100% **** but what we realized after we started it is that there are very few top corps in dust and that they CAN take what they want. This isn't a product of how good the dns corps are. Its a true reflection of how bad the rest of the corps are. Only teams doing anything against dns are WTF and OH which are both vet players with lots of PC exp and the only reason they are in it is because they are self locking their districts to force clone pack attacks.

If you add more districts it wont make the game better because you will get just a herd of average corps that try to farm isk instead of fight. pc 1.0 needs to be dumped 100% owning **** and passive isk need to be gone from dust forever.


Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Cogadh Draco WarRavens Final Resolution. 19	Posted - 2014.04.28 03:19:00 - [1] - Quote I don't hate DNS or anyone having to do with it, a lot of us shouldn't. However, a lot of people don't like the fact that DNS(mainly Niyan San/Chan) basically removed 1/3 of the multiplayer aspect of DUST514. Now I do agree with a lot of people that CCP needs to expand how many planets one can fight over in PC, but DNS taking it so far as to remove a lot of the competition from the current PC to attempt to motivate CCP to add more planets? This is how it looks like, and quite a few people on voice chat say the same thing in game, but was it really THAT necessary?
Cogadh Draco WarRavens Final Resolution. 19	Posted - 2014.04.28 19:26:00 - [2] - Quote Free Beers wrote: Cogadh Draco wrote: I don't hate DNS or anyone having to do with it, a lot of us shouldn't. However, a lot of people don't like the fact that DNS(mainly Niyan San/Chan) basically removed 1/3 of the multiplayer aspect of DUST514. Now I do agree with a lot of people that CCP needs to expand how many planets one can fight over in PC, but DNS taking it so far as to remove a lot of the competition from the current PC to attempt to motivate CCP to add more planets? This is how it looks like, and quite a few people on voice chat say the same thing in game, but was it really THAT necessary? You know i was against the 100% ** but what we realized after we started it is that there are very few top corps in dust and that they CAN take what they want. This isn't a product of how good the dns corps are. Its a true reflection of how bad the rest of the corps are. Only teams doing anything against dns are WTF and OH which are both vet players with lots of PC exp and the only reason they are in it is because they are self locking their districts to force clone pack attacks. If you add more districts it wont make the game better because you will get just a herd of average corps that try to farm isk instead of fight. pc 1.0 needs to be dumped 100% owning ** and passive isk need to be gone from dust forever. Hmm, true true, but then again I never really cared for PC. I just went in there, did as I told and got my payout. Sure every corp has it's weaknesses/strengths and each held to their own for a while(while snoozing on isk distrcts). However, DNS rebellion(Niyan San/Chan mostly) didn't really kick off until 1.8(or whatever patch for cloak, racial heavies, new sidearms) was introed. Or did this whole GWWI(Galactic World War 1) start long before? In any event DNS got the stacked deck(corps) in this gamble and won with a straight flush. I kinda like it being on the sidelines watching the aftermath of their war going bad lol.
Cogadh Draco WarRavens Final Resolution. 19	Posted - 2014.04.28 19:39:00 - [3] - Quote Thor Odinson42 wrote: Arirana wrote: Emperor1349 wrote: I'm sure its because instead of "dominating" PC the corps within DNS blued up with each other to play iskfarm514. Seriously **** you guys, not the alliance or the corps within, the individual mercs, grow a pair and quit farming isk. With your m/kb hooked up with XMI so you have auto aim like a ds3 on a mouse. Get out of here with this crap you sound like Metallica crying about losing fans after they sued them. Just the opinion of a troll, I haven't played dust in weeks so my comments are invalid. Why you crying bro? complains about isk farm, his corp was one of the first to lock up so they could farm in peace Sometimes you gotta stop pointing fingers and question your own innocence Small difference in the two, but we are guilty of that. At the time it was more about holding the territory and a flow of ISK until mechanics were changed and participation from the community increased. But participation only decreased. Well now that it's prettymuch pub matches left(if you don't wanna rick your isk in PCs), it's really boring... Not mentioning the REPETITION OF THE SAME F%#&ING MAPS OVER AND OVER!!!