| Pages: 1 [2]  :: one page | 
      
      
        | Author | Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) | 
      
      
        |  ResistanceGTA
 D.A.R.K L.E.G.I.O.N
 D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
 
 602
 
 
      | Posted - 2014.03.21 21:18:00 -
          [31] - Quote 
 Did you got to college? There is no evidence actually presented, nothing actually backing up your claims except maybe some anecdotal evidence. If you maybe had a survey, or some analytical work done, then I would gladly jump in, but, you have none.
 
 xSivartx is my Heavy. There are many like him, but he is my own... So, other Logi's back off, those are my Warpoints! | 
      
      
        |  MarasdF Loron
 Fatal Absolution
 General Tso's Alliance
 
 253
 
 
      | Posted - 2014.03.21 21:22:00 -
          [32] - Quote 
 
 ResistanceGTA wrote:Did you got to college? There is no evidence actually presented, nothing actually backing up your claims except maybe some anecdotal evidence. If you maybe had a survey, or some analytical work done, then I would gladly jump in, but, you have none. My survey and analytical work is my stalking experience here on the forums, I read a lot, but I'm not gonna go and search every post ever posted. Besides, it's Dust forums, who cares about "proof" or "evidence"? Wild claims are the way to go here.
 
 R.I.P. Pre-1.7 tanks, you will be missed. | 
      
      
        |  Zahle Undt
 Bullet Cluster
 Legacy Rising
 
 1060
 
 
      | Posted - 2014.03.21 21:29:00 -
          [33] - Quote 
 
 ResistanceGTA wrote:Did you got to college? There is no evidence actually presented, nothing actually backing up your claims except maybe some anecdotal evidence. If you maybe had a survey, or some analytical work done, then I would gladly jump in, but, you have none. 
 I think you missed the point, to me the OP is about getting people out of these separate corners we have boxed ourselves into. Being either infantry or vehicle and finding some common ground to balance things so we aren't always at odds with each other like a bunch of f*cking politicians. Yes it is all opinion, but its a good message to me at least
 
 Most tankers are like sand people. They frighten easily, but will quickly return...and in greater numbers. | 
      
      
        |  Smooth Assassin
 Stardust Incorporation
 IMMORTAL REGIME
 
 1015
 
 
      | Posted - 2014.03.21 21:31:00 -
          [34] - Quote 
 
 Takron Nistrom wrote:No sources? Seems like another opinion thread. Nothing busted here folks. Keep moving. Clearly he has linked a video from the judge and clearly you have been lazy enough to just write this post without thinking.
 
 Assassination is my thing. | 
      
      
        |  True Adamance
 Praetoriani Classiarii Templares
 Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
 
 8613
 
 
      | Posted - 2014.03.21 21:55:00 -
          [35] - Quote 
 
 Zahle Undt wrote:ResistanceGTA wrote:Did you got to college? There is no evidence actually presented, nothing actually backing up your claims except maybe some anecdotal evidence. If you maybe had a survey, or some analytical work done, then I would gladly jump in, but, you have none. I think you missed the point, to me the OP is about getting people out of these separate corners we have boxed ourselves into. Being either infantry or vehicle and finding some common ground to balance things so we aren't always at odds with each other like a bunch of f*cking politicians. Yes it is all opinion, but its a good message to me at least 
 Yeah we really need to get out of these established archetypes of AVers and HAVers...... I think most sane HAV pilots want to achieve a workable balance between AV and all vehicles.
 
 "Get thine Swag out of my face! Next you'll be writing #YOLOswagforJamyl in all your posts!" -Dagger Two | 
      
      
        |  Zahle Undt
 Bullet Cluster
 Legacy Rising
 
 1060
 
 
      | Posted - 2014.03.21 22:11:00 -
          [36] - Quote 
 
 True Adamance wrote:Zahle Undt wrote:ResistanceGTA wrote:Did you got to college? There is no evidence actually presented, nothing actually backing up your claims except maybe some anecdotal evidence. If you maybe had a survey, or some analytical work done, then I would gladly jump in, but, you have none. I think you missed the point, to me the OP is about getting people out of these separate corners we have boxed ourselves into. Being either infantry or vehicle and finding some common ground to balance things so we aren't always at odds with each other like a bunch of f*cking politicians. Yes it is all opinion, but its a good message to me at least Yeah we really need to get out of these established archetypes of AVers and HAVers...... I think most sane HAV pilots want to achieve a workable balance between AV and all vehicles. 
 I think the same thing about sane infantry. I think most of the Dust community falls into that category of wanting things truly balanced. Somehow though (just like US politics) the extremists on either side get us pulled into one camp or the other, but imbalance just isn't fun for anybody. Redline match sucks no matter which side of it you're on, its just profitable suckage if you are on the stomping side of it. If vehicles can't be taken out by AV or if AV takes out vehicles too easily its noo challenge and less fun either way.
 
 Balance is not your role sucks for months and then is OP for months and then is nerfed to suck again and so on. Balance is everyone's role is viable.
 
 Most tankers are like sand people. They frighten easily, but will quickly return...and in greater numbers. | 
      
      
        |  CLONE117
 True Pros Forever
 
 731
 
 
      | Posted - 2014.03.21 22:13:00 -
          [37] - Quote 
 so judges video of him failing to kill a hardened vehicle with proto swarms.
 killing off the cycled and stacked resists could work for av but at the same time this can create a problem with active vehicle damage mods.
 in terms of balance.
 though just last night on the ociania server a single player spamming such maddies and gunlogis didnt really help him against me. during his moments of active hardeners my sqd which had av with my large std blaster could barely penetrate the hardeners. the second they deactivated though the tanks died within seconds. which im thinking is part of ccps windows of opportunity system.bringing hardeners to better function around that system could be better. though changing hardeners also means we will need to change damage mods and such. the guy spamming them lost over 15 of them through 2 matches. he probably shouldnt have called his tanks down in front of 2 sicas.
 | 
      
      
        |  MarasdF Loron
 Fatal Absolution
 General Tso's Alliance
 
 258
 
 
      | Posted - 2014.03.22 07:52:00 -
          [38] - Quote 
 
 CLONE117 wrote:so judges video of him failing to kill a hardened vehicle with proto swarms.killing off the cycled and stacked resists could work for av but at the same time this can create a problem with active vehicle damage mods.
 in terms of balance.
 though just last night on the ociania server a single player spamming such maddies and gunlogis didnt really help him against me. during his moments of active hardeners my sqd which had av with my large std blaster could barely penetrate the hardeners. the second they deactivated though the tanks died within seconds. which im thinking is part of ccps windows of opportunity system.bringing hardeners to better function around that system could be better. though changing hardeners also means we will need to change damage mods and such. the guy spamming them lost over 15 of them through 2 matches. he probably shouldnt have called his tanks down in front of 2 sicas.
 So you failed to see the part where he is flying and swarms are doing 75 dmg per missile to him.
 Also I don't care about his performance in matches, all I care about was that stuff in his video balanced or not, and it was not balanced.
 
 R.I.P. Pre-1.7 tanks, you will be missed. | 
      
      
        |  Regis Blackbird
 DUST University
 Ivy League
 
 128
 
 
      | Posted - 2014.03.22 09:01:00 -
          [39] - Quote 
 
 Black SlaverX wrote:If CCP nerfed large blaster turrets(like 20% efficiency versus infantry), all infantry QQ about tanks would stop instantly. Yep. Yes it would. Look I guarantee you it would. 
 I do not know exactly how (since i am no expert of tanks), but i agree with the above statement of nerfing the large blaster turret.
 It would actually have some additional benefits, like forcing the tankers to have small turrets (extra seats) to effectively deal with infantry, which I believe will take care of the complaints that it takes multiple AV to take out one tank.
 
 If there are 3 people in the tank, why should it not take 3 people to take it out, right?
 | 
      
      
        |  Lynn Beck
 Wake N' Bake Inc
 Top Men.
 
 875
 
 
      | Posted - 2014.03.22 09:52:00 -
          [40] - Quote 
 Give blaster an inaccuracy.
 
 Give blaster full dmg to vehicles, and nore DPS than this BS caldai supremacist agenda CCP has going.
 
 Rails are your sniper weapon, not the dedicated vehicle R@pist.
 
 I refuse to gve honor to your 'god' so therefore i dual tank. Also i feel itchy. Anybody got a tube of Rust-It? | 
      
        |  |  | 
      
      
        | Pages: 1 [2]  :: one page | 
      
      
        | First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |