DUST Search - What is your tank personality?

All Channels

General Discussions

What is your tank personality?

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
calisk galern BurgezzE.T.F General Tso's Alliance 2169	Posted - 2014.03.17 17:32:00 - [31] - Quote Lorhak Gannarsein wrote: calisk galern wrote: i am not a tanker, i'm an anti-tanker. yin to your yang rail to your face the joker to your dark knight. I make sure the blueberries can have an infantry match once in awhile even if i can't. if tankers ever stop deciding the out come of every match i'll never touch the stupid things again. Does this include Uprising? If so, you're gonna have a bad time. O.o? yes it includes uprising we've been in uprising for nearly a year, and I've been killing tank regularly for this whole year.
Snaps Tremor DUST University Ivy League 400	Posted - 2014.03.17 17:42:00 - [32] - Quote And a special category for the OP, "Player who cried like a fat baby about everything to do with tanks for a solid year and a half on the forums, before returning to posting worthless **** waving threads when tanks went back to invincible tier."
ROCKO THE HELLHOUND Ultramarine Corp 21	Posted - 2014.03.17 17:44:00 - [33] - Quote well, during closed beta and at the beginning of open beta i started out as Fat-Bro - but it was at the end of chromosome when i reached and never abandoned anymore the balance of keeping at least half of my SP in vehicles (34mio. so far - before current event bonuses). and since i think that you simply cannot be a "Real Pro-Tanker" in Dust514 without having/ successful pretending to have a massive ego and arrogant altitude - and since i am quite successful managing to have that too - i pick whatever entitelment i want b****es, cuz this is World of Tanks 514 yada, yada! :)
Michael-J-Fox Richards Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance 79	Posted - 2014.03.17 17:45:00 - [34] - Quote im a hipster tanker. i had always been vehicle heavy but when 1.7 dropped i never touched tanks again, once the masses got into em i got out. i call 1.7 c u n t s in new eden, and thats the post ironic use of the word thats both offensive and curiously anodyne http://i40.tinypic.com/33w8wtd.jpg http://i60.tinypic.com/29w7g29.jpg Assault Dropship Pilot
Harpyja Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance 1301	Posted - 2014.03.17 17:53:00 - [35] - Quote I believe it was before Chromosome when large missiles had infinite range and zero dispersion? Because I believe that's when I first stepped into the pilot's seat of a tank. So I'm "Old school" "By His light, and His will" - The Scriptures, Gheinok the First, 12:32
Operative 1171 Aajli Bragian Order Amarr Empire 1565	Posted - 2014.03.17 18:01:00 - [36] - Quote Charlotte O'Dell wrote: Did you tank from Pre-Chrome to 1.0? "Old School Tanker" Did you respec out of tanks in 1.1? "Fair Weather Tanker" Did you Keep at least half of your SP in tanks from 1.2-1.6? "True Blue Tanker", "Honey Badger", "Die Hard Tanker", "Tanker" Did you spec into tanks during 1.7? "FOTM Fagg0t", "KDR Wh0re", "Scrub Tanker", "Fake Tanker" Now that we have these titles defined, stop calling those who should be called: "FOTM Fagg0t", "KDR Wh0re", "Scrub Tanker", or "Fake Tanker" one of us! I made a shield tanker and an armor tanker char when I first started playing, which was a month before Uprising was released. I then recreated my shield tanker on its own account for the sake of passive sp just before 1.7. I love tanks in RL as well as this game, but I suck at using missiles to overcoming rails and double hardened maddies. I am pretty good at evading rails and missiles when on my maddy with a blaster. I reluctantly specced into rails and suck at using those. I can surprisingly one shot infantry with missiles. What does that make me? Rommel, you magnificent bastard, I read your book!
Leadfoot10 Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance 823	Posted - 2014.03.17 18:06:00 - [37] - Quote Coming from the BF series where I always played a tanker, I've been playing with tanks since I started this game more than a year ago. Frankly, tanking was extremely un-fun pre-1.7, so I went assault/logi for the past year, only playing with tanks occasionally on my alt. Since 1.7, I've played much more as tanks have become entirely fun again, and I expect I'll spend quite a bit of my saved up SP into tanks for 1.8 allowing me to play both assault and tanker in PCs on my main. If those reading this thread would like to label and/or demean me for the above behavior, please be my guest.
DAMIOS82 ACME SPECIAL FORCES RISE of LEGION 85	Posted - 2014.03.17 18:32:00 - [38] - Quote I would say i'm a Old school fair weather true blue tanker called my precious... I started out as a sniper/hvy/tanker in closed beta, then specced out of hvy and tanks to try other stuff, just to roll back into them, then with the last vehicle respec, got out of tanks again to finish my full hvy training, just to start all over again in tanks. I just can't help it.. they keep on calling me my precious...
Baal Omniscient L.O.T.I.S. D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E 1160	Posted - 2014.03.17 19:20:00 - [39] - Quote I have toyed with tanks in every build since replication, but I have never been a 100% dedicated HAV pilot. I suppose I'm what you'd call a "Tinker Tanker". MAG ~ Raven
Scheherazade VII 341	Posted - 2014.03.17 19:28:00 - [40] - Quote Charlotte O'Dell wrote: Did you tank from Pre-Chrome to 1.0? "Old School Tanker" Did you respec out of tanks in 1.1? "Fair Weather Tanker" Did you Keep at least half of your SP in tanks from 1.2-1.6? "True Blue Tanker", "Honey Badger", "Die Hard Tanker", "Tanker" Did you spec into tanks during 1.7? "FOTM Fagg0t", "KDR Wh0re", "Scrub Tanker", "Fake Tanker" Now that we have these titles defined, stop calling those who should be called: "FOTM Fagg0t", "KDR Wh0re", "Scrub Tanker", or "Fake Tanker" one of us! I specced ZERO SP into 1.7, which is what I guess you meant to put. Otherwise, I'm in a whole different world to all you scrubs for not even being mentioned on the list

Charlotte O'Dell Sooper Speshul Ponee Fors 2178	Posted - 2014.03.17 20:25:00 - [41] - Quote Snaps Tremor wrote: And a special category for the OP, "Player who cried like a fat baby about everything to do with tanks for a solid year and a half on the forums, before returning to posting worthless **** waving threads when tanks went back to invincible tier." But I'm good and you're not. Charlotte O'Dell is the highest level unicorn!
KalOfTheRathi Nec Tributis 1022	Posted - 2014.03.17 20:39:00 - [42] - Quote Got into tanking seriously in Chromosome. Wanted to respec somewhere else after 1.0 but man, everything else sucked rocks. So SP went back into tanks. And the same occurred in 1.7, didn't want to but getting shredded by the OP day 1 Combat and Rail rifles made the game too dull to continue. Guess what? Yep, back into tanks. And so it goes.
Atiim Living Like Larry Schwag 5830	Posted - 2014.03.17 20:39:00 - [43] - Quote Asha Starwind wrote: LAV pilot is not on your list. LAV = poor man's tank Aye, but Logistics LAV is the wise man's tank. AV > HAV > INF > AV \| Not: HAV > AV GëÑ INF [s]Text[/s] <-------- That's how you make a strike-through -HAND
Spkr4theDead Red Star. EoN. 1922	Posted - 2014.03.17 20:46:00 - [44] - Quote I started trying tanking with around 2 months or so left in Chromosome. I had STD tanks for some weeks before Uprising. I've been tanking since then, and also forced myself to use a keyboard during Chrome as well. Far superior to a DS3 for tanking. I may be missing something, but I'm pretty sure that I didn't call for a tank nerf before Uprising 1.7. - Atiim
Spkr4theDead Red Star. EoN. 1922	Posted - 2014.03.17 20:47:00 - [45] - Quote Heathen Bastard wrote: I re-specced from scouting into tanks in 1.1 and am just now hitting half invested in dropsuits because I'm disgusted with what they did to tanks in 1.8. Uh............. 1.8 isn't out yet............ I may be missing something, but I'm pretty sure that I didn't call for a tank nerf before Uprising 1.7. - Atiim
Spkr4theDead Red Star. EoN. 1922	Posted - 2014.03.17 20:49:00 - [46] - Quote PARKOUR PRACTIONER wrote: 1.7 militia tanker only to counter tank spam. My Sica will 2-shot any EZ-mode blaster tank. I only target installations and other tanks. My KD/R is 0.47 so I'm not a KD/R wh0re. So I guess I am a 'Fake Tanker.' I don't blast helpless infantry so I'm not a scrub tanker. I never run from a tank fight or get out when I'm about too die, I die with my tank. And if theres no enemy tanks or we already have 2 tanks on the field I'll recall my tank. I take revenge on tankers blasting helpless infantry, and I REALLY like blowing sh!t up! Infantry doesn't explode when you shoot it, vehicles do. I will pop you tank duna. I WILL. I killed duna 3 times in a domination. He's really bad. I may be missing something, but I'm pretty sure that I didn't call for a tank nerf before Uprising 1.7. - Atiim
Spkr4theDead Red Star. EoN. 1922	Posted - 2014.03.17 20:52:00 - [47] - Quote Lynn Beck wrote: This character? Never touched em. My tanker alt? Since 1.3, specced his first 500k into armor reps. Took me till 5 million SP to be able to survive 4 militia swarm shots. Sad to say though, that build was really BS when my triple carapice hardener, 180poly and efficient heavy rep couldnmt survive 3 proto swarm shots and an av nade. That was when i put it down for a while, as i lost my 900k tank to a 120k swarm fit, instantly. Were you tanking in Chromosome? I may be missing something, but I'm pretty sure that I didn't call for a tank nerf before Uprising 1.7. - Atiim
Spkr4theDead Red Star. EoN. 1922	Posted - 2014.03.17 20:54:00 - [48] - Quote Atiim wrote: Good God. I'm a Die Hard Tanker D: Are you in a coma? I may be missing something, but I'm pretty sure that I didn't call for a tank nerf before Uprising 1.7. - Atiim
Spkr4theDead Red Star. EoN. 1922	Posted - 2014.03.17 20:54:00 - [49] - Quote calisk galern wrote: i am not a tanker, i'm an anti-tanker. yin to your yang rail to your face the joker to your dark knight. I make sure the blueberries can have an infantry match once in awhile even if i can't. if tankers ever stop deciding the out come of every match i'll never touch the stupid things again. So according to you, we're not allowed to use what we skilled into? I may be missing something, but I'm pretty sure that I didn't call for a tank nerf before Uprising 1.7. - Atiim
xxwhitedevilxx M Maphia Clan Corporation 1893	Posted - 2014.03.17 20:55:00 - [50] - Quote oh dear, I'm an old school tanker then? ^.- Started in Codex with that Super Missile Launcher Sagaris, when missile launcher were not simply effective against infatry, they were super effective :D In chromosome, assault only with a tanker alt. >Bastard I : "Cce me ne... futt! XD"

Spkr4theDead Red Star. EoN. 1922	Posted - 2014.03.17 20:57:00 - [51] - Quote Snaps Tremor wrote: And a special category for the OP, "Player who cried like a fat baby about everything to do with tanks for a solid year and a half on the forums, before returning to posting worthless **** waving threads when tanks went back to invincible tier." Surprisingly enough, even when AV was OP, infantry still made threads here complaining that they couldn't solo some tankers. Remember: when infantry complained about contact grenades, they were nerfed into the ground. When tankers complained about AV grenades, infantry said "LOL HTFU" and that was that. I may be missing something, but I'm pretty sure that I didn't call for a tank nerf before Uprising 1.7. - Atiim
Atiim Living Like Larry Schwag 5843	Posted - 2014.03.18 13:42:00 - [52] - Quote Snaps Tremor wrote: And a special category for the OP, "Player who cried like a fat baby about everything to do with tanks for a solid year and a half on the forums, before returning to posting worthless **** waving threads when tanks went back to invincible tier." But then there wouldn't need to be any other categories. AV > HAV > INF > AV \| Not: HAV > AV GëÑ INF [s]Text[/s] <-------- That's how you make a strike-through -HAND
Atiim Living Like Larry Schwag 5843	Posted - 2014.03.18 13:44:00 - [53] - Quote Spkr4theDead wrote: Snaps Tremor wrote: And a special category for the OP, "Player who cried like a fat baby about everything to do with tanks for a solid year and a half on the forums, before returning to posting worthless **** waving threads when tanks went back to invincible tier." Surprisingly enough, even when AV was OP, infantry still made threads here complaining that they couldn't solo some tankers. Remember: when infantry complained about contact grenades, they were nerfed into the ground. When tankers complained about AV grenades, infantry said "LOL HTFU" and that was that. Dropsuits couldn't survive them and repair the dame in less than 8s. HAVs could. Dropsuits couldn't avoid them by staying away from CQC at all times. HAVs could. AV > HAV > INF > AV \| Not: HAV > AV GëÑ INF [s]Text[/s] <-------- That's how you make a strike-through -HAND
Lorhak Gannarsein Science For Death 2176	Posted - 2014.03.18 14:00:00 - [54] - Quote Atiim wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Snaps Tremor wrote: And a special category for the OP, "Player who cried like a fat baby about everything to do with tanks for a solid year and a half on the forums, before returning to posting worthless **** waving threads when tanks went back to invincible tier." Surprisingly enough, even when AV was OP, infantry still made threads here complaining that they couldn't solo some tankers. Remember: when infantry complained about contact grenades, they were nerfed into the ground. When tankers complained about AV grenades, infantry said "LOL HTFU" and that was that. Dropsuits couldn't survive them and repair the dame in less than 8s. HAVs could. I have a GalLogi fitting that can basically do it Dropsuits couldn't avoid them by staying away from CQC at all times. HAVs could. I'm pretty sure that my rifle has always had longer range than your grenade. Dishonest arguments anyway, considering how straightforward it was to rush a tank in a LAV and destroy it with AV grenades. Real men do it with missiles. "True says I have to let Lorhak yell at people in PIE GC from now on."
Atiim Living Like Larry Schwag 5847	Posted - 2014.03.18 14:04:00 - [55] - Quote So your GalLogi has only 40HP of armor? Wow. I'm pretty sure my Blaster has always had longer range than AV grenades. If you let people drive up to you in a LAV and toss grenades at you, your a bad. AV > HAV > INF > AV \| Not: HAV > AV GëÑ INF [s]Text[/s] <-------- That's how you make a strike-through -HAND
Lorhak Gannarsein Science For Death 2176	Posted - 2014.03.18 14:04:00 - [56] - Quote calisk galern wrote: Lorhak Gannarsein wrote: calisk galern wrote: i am not a tanker, i'm an anti-tanker. yin to your yang rail to your face the joker to your dark knight. I make sure the blueberries can have an infantry match once in awhile even if i can't. if tankers ever stop deciding the out come of every match i'll never touch the stupid things again. Does this include Uprising? If so, you're gonna have a bad time. O.o? yes it includes uprising we've been in uprising for nearly a year, and I've been killing tank regularly for this whole year. Maybe I wasn't clear, sorry. What I meant to say is that if you considered that tanks were 'deciding the outcome of matches' even during post-Chromo pre-1.7 you have no choice and will have that forge in your grip for the rest of eternity. Real men do it with missiles. "True says I have to let Lorhak yell at people in PIE GC from now on."
Lorhak Gannarsein Science For Death 2176	Posted - 2014.03.18 14:13:00 - [57] - Quote Atiim wrote: So your GalLogi has only 40HP of armor? Wow. I'm pretty sure my Blaster has always had longer range than AV grenades. If you let people drive up to you in a LAV and toss grenades at you, your a bad. My GalLogi has 23.75 hp/s repair. Amusingly effective in conjunction with the implausible range of a Kaalakiota RR. First of all, there are more turrets than simply blasters. Second of all, I don't and never have. It is, however, entirely possible in my personal experience, to set up a position where a tank MUST retreat. LogiLAVs and AV nades made it easy. Finally. 'If you let people run up to you and throw contact grenades at you then your [sic] a bad'. I mean, really. If I want to contribute to the team, I have to put myself in a position where I can easily be destroyed by AV nades. You imply that I'm doing something wrong by being on a position where I can be naded. But you seem to have an issue with tanks being used for nothing more than kill-farming machines. I've had my GalLogi since it existed. I experienced contact nades directly. As far as I'm concerned AV grenades were far more devastating. I regret that swarm launchers have been nerfed so hard. It is a shame that the PLC is such a gimp. The forge gun could possibly use some charge time back. AV nades can get nerfed harder for all I care. Real men do it with missiles. "True says I have to let Lorhak yell at people in PIE GC from now on."
ratamaq doc Onslaught Inc RISE of LEGION 470	Posted - 2014.03.18 14:29:00 - [58] - Quote The vast majority of tanks I've driven have been the ones I've hacked. Makes no difference to me the type. They all blow up in the redline the same. YouTube
calisk galern BurgezzE.T.F General Tso's Alliance 2172	Posted - 2014.03.18 14:58:00 - [59] - Quote Spkr4theDead wrote: calisk galern wrote: i am not a tanker, i'm an anti-tanker. yin to your yang rail to your face the joker to your dark knight. I make sure the blueberries can have an infantry match once in awhile even if i can't. if tankers ever stop deciding the out come of every match i'll never touch the stupid things again. So according to you, we're not allowed to use what we skilled into? not if I have any say in it. I'm operating within the confines of the game, if you bring tanks to my house I will blow them up one way or another. if you want to cry about SP, I needed to invest my sp into tanks as well, so it's not like you are alone for wasted sp.
calisk galern BurgezzE.T.F General Tso's Alliance 2172	Posted - 2014.03.18 15:01:00 - [60] - Quote Lorhak Gannarsein wrote: calisk galern wrote: Lorhak Gannarsein wrote: calisk galern wrote: i am not a tanker, i'm an anti-tanker. yin to your yang rail to your face the joker to your dark knight. I make sure the blueberries can have an infantry match once in awhile even if i can't. if tankers ever stop deciding the out come of every match i'll never touch the stupid things again. Does this include Uprising? If so, you're gonna have a bad time. O.o? yes it includes uprising we've been in uprising for nearly a year, and I've been killing tank regularly for this whole year. Maybe I wasn't clear, sorry. What I meant to say is that if you considered that tanks were 'deciding the outcome of matches' even during post-Chromo pre-1.7 you have no choice and will have that forge in your grip for the rest of eternity. nah up until 1.7, tanks didn't interfere with matches as much, I would blow up tanks that did but it was rare I ever "needed" to kill a tank, they did their damage but we could operate around 1 or 2 tanks. in 1.7 tanks "need" to be removed for the rest of the roles to operate properly, now it's 6 tanks and their blaster murder everyone even tanks, and even if you kill them they come back in seconds, you need dedicated "removers".



Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online/DUST514, the EVE/DUST514 logo, EVE/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to OMG Labs to use EVE Online/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, OMG Labs. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.