| Pages: 1 2 [3] :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Disturbingly Bored
Forum Warfare
1983
   |
Posted - 2014.03.10 16:10:00 -
[61] - Quote
Plenty of people have correctly mentioned the HMG not getting nerfed with the rifles is a problem.
I think it needs a nerf to stay balanced. And it's a safe bet that it'll get one, sooner or later. If damage gets nerfed, though, I see another problem.
Reducing damage-per-bullet would make the HMG overheat more often than it does today (more bullets to kill the same guy), which I think would be too much of a nerf.
For the sane-minded HMG users who care, I think we should rally for a reduction to ROF.
Bring the normal HMG ROF down to 2200, and the Burst HMG down to 4200, and I think we'd have balance relatively like what we have in the game today. (That's about 8-9% less DPS than what we have now, same nerf as the rifles.)
I used to own the FAT GAT until this --> [ASCII Art removed - draconian forum overlord CCP Logibro]
|
Asher Night
Dark Tengu
502
|
Posted - 2014.03.10 16:13:00 -
[62] - Quote
Jacques Cayton II wrote:Asher Night wrote:Jacques Cayton II wrote:Asher Night wrote:Jacques Cayton II wrote:
so you guys wanna nerf the hmg for doing its role wow my mind is blown
So you guys wanna ban the nuclear bomb for doing its role wow my mind is blown So you guys wanna ban the flamethrower from modern warfare for doing its role wow my mind is blown So you guys wanna ban chemical weapons for doing their role wow my mind is blown So you guys wanna ban hollow point rounds from conventional warfare for doing its role wow my mind is blown You must have a pretty small mind, boy. If it does it's job too well it gets nerfed even in real life. This is a video game, dumbass. It's supposed to be fair competition. I've been playing with a militia heavy and basic AR/CR and can honestly say even at militia it seems like it takes way less effort and strategy to play as than anything else. How is that fair when your opponent has to try harder, and invest more SP to match you? I'm building up a nice collage of pictures of my scores, too. If you can't play as a heavy, you literally suck at life. Lolz did you just say the flamethrower did a great job. It burned people alive and tended to explode. No it didn't do its job right and was banned because of its cruel way of death. The nuclear bomb wasn't banned it's still in use dur. Chemical weapons only fear opposing countries we have mop gear for Chem attacks. And hollow point rounds weren't banned are you high? Don't bring real life into a video game asshat Wow, you clearly have no idea what you're talking about and have missed the entire point of my post. Are you half ******** or just 100% stupid? The real question are you? Your obviously mad yet you wine and complain about something you can't even test. Only speculate. Congrats your supper cool and here's a cookie for being a swell guy
I really hope english isn't your first language because you suck at it. By the way, you havr no idea what the geneva convention is, do you? The fact that you said all those methods of war are perfectly fine shows you have no idea what the U.N is, that the geneva convention ever existed.
100% Tactical Scout Corporation
|
Asher Night
Dark Tengu
502
|
Posted - 2014.03.10 16:24:00 -
[63] - Quote
castba wrote:Asher Night wrote:Jacques Cayton II wrote:
so you guys wanna nerf the hmg for doing its role wow my mind is blown
So you guys wanna ban the nuclear bomb for doing its role wow my mind is blown So you guys wanna ban the flamethrower from modern warfare for doing its role wow my mind is blown So you guys wanna ban chemical weapons for doing their role wow my mind is blown So you guys wanna ban hollow point rounds from conventional warfare for doing its role wow my mind is blown You must have a pretty small mind, boy. If it does it's job too well it gets nerfed even in real life. This is a video game, dumbass. It's supposed to be fair competition. I've been playing with a militia heavy and basic AR/CR and can honestly say even at militia it seems like it takes way less effort and strategy to play as than anything else. How is that fair when your opponent has to try harder, and invest more SP to match you? I'm building up a nice collage of pictures of my scores, too. If you can't play as a heavy, you literally suck at life. Post is irrelevant. Comparing RL to a sci-fi video game is irrelevant Playing with an AR/CR on a heavy frame is NOT the same as playing with an HMG. Side note - calling someone names in an argument can be an effective way of diverting attention from the lack of substance in one's statements... but not on this occasion.
Calling something irrelevent does not actually make it irrrelevent. Calling some one a dumbass when they are being stupid does not mean you are trying to distract people - it means you are calling a person stupid. Quit being paranoid and calling out nonsensical accusations.
It is a fair comparison. If the weapon is too destructive, it doesn't get used. Believe it or not, situations in video games can mimic real life. Not that hard to believe. The heavy itself is OP in that it simply has -too- much more power than other frames. Doesn't matter what weapon you use, it has too mich more of an advantage in a fight, caught off guard or not.
100% Tactical Scout Corporation
|
Orion Vahid
Molon Labe.
General Tso's Alliance
260
|
Posted - 2014.03.13 00:21:00 -
[64] - Quote
Asher Night wrote:castba wrote:Asher Night wrote:Jacques Cayton II wrote:
so you guys wanna nerf the hmg for doing its role wow my mind is blown
So you guys wanna ban the nuclear bomb for doing its role wow my mind is blown So you guys wanna ban the flamethrower from modern warfare for doing its role wow my mind is blown So you guys wanna ban chemical weapons for doing their role wow my mind is blown So you guys wanna ban hollow point rounds from conventional warfare for doing its role wow my mind is blown You must have a pretty small mind, boy. If it does it's job too well it gets nerfed even in real life. This is a video game, dumbass. It's supposed to be fair competition. I've been playing with a militia heavy and basic AR/CR and can honestly say even at militia it seems like it takes way less effort and strategy to play as than anything else. How is that fair when your opponent has to try harder, and invest more SP to match you? I'm building up a nice collage of pictures of my scores, too. If you can't play as a heavy, you literally suck at life. Post is irrelevant. Comparing RL to a sci-fi video game is irrelevant Playing with an AR/CR on a heavy frame is NOT the same as playing with an HMG. Side note - calling someone names in an argument can be an effective way of diverting attention from the lack of substance in one's statements... but not on this occasion. Calling something irrelevent does not actually make it irrrelevent. Calling some one a dumbass when they are being stupid does not mean you are trying to distract people - it means you are calling a person stupid. Quit being paranoid and calling out nonsensical accusations. It is a fair comparison. If the weapon is too destructive, it doesn't get used. Believe it or not, situations in video games can mimic real life. Not that hard to believe. The heavy itself is OP in that it simply has -too- much more power than other frames. Doesn't matter what weapon you use, it has too mich more of an advantage in a fight, caught off guard or not.
"Heavy has too much power. Caught off guard or not"
You being bad at the game doesn't mean Heavy is OP. |
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 [3] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |