DUST Search - What are you looking for in CPM1?

All Channels

General Discussions

What are you looking for in CPM1?

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 :: [one page]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Jade Dragonis GRIM MARCH D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E 317	Posted - 2014.03.08 10:39:00 - [1] - Quote Hi all, Just wondering what you will be looking for in the CPM1 Candidate your going to vote for? Folloe me on Youtube
Sana Rayya WASTELAND JUNK REMOVAL Top Men. 951	Posted - 2014.03.08 10:44:00 - [2] - Quote How much the player still plays, how long they have been playing for, and whether they are actually skilled at DUST or not. I see a lot of current CPMs that have fewer than 1 mil lifetime warpoints and under 2.0 KDRs, then wonder how they could have any grasp of what needs changing in DUST when they clearly spend 90% of their free time trolling the forums and 10% in game.
jenza aranda BetaMax. 2949	Posted - 2014.03.08 10:45:00 - [3] - Quote People who are already doing the job more or less and already contributing to the benefit of the community. Dust 514 101 // Dust 514 Wiki
Cat Merc Ahrendee Mercenaries General Tso's Alliance 7207	Posted - 2014.03.08 10:46:00 - [4] - Quote Any cat person. Shield regeneration bonus for Gallente Assault is about as useful as Sharpshooter for Nova Knives. DUST514514
Jade Dragonis GRIM MARCH D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E 317	Posted - 2014.03.08 10:51:00 - [5] - Quote jenza aranda wrote: People who are already doing the job more or less and already contributing to the benefit of the community. How much input did the CPM0 have in the white paper? Folloe me on Youtube
KGB Sleep 822	Posted - 2014.03.08 11:02:00 - [6] - Quote Someone who plays the game. A lot of these "contributing entities" DON'T PLAY they just theorycraft. Because beer, that's why.
True Adamance Praetoriani Classiarii Templares Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris 8010	Posted - 2014.03.08 11:05:00 - [7] - Quote To me its nothing more than a clear cut purpose in deciding to run for CPM. What they want to achieve not just for us as players but also for themselves. I wouldn't even consider a CPM who thinks they are better than the player base because of something so arbitrary as KDR, WP, or Time Played. To me its resolve, a person who can go the distance and is willing to communicate with the rest of the community as well as the Devs to create what Dust 514 should be. Its something that cannot be exclusively be achieved by PC corp players (half of them arrogant pricks or self serving narcissists), or by FW players, or by EVE players, or by lower ranked corp players. I also don't think you have to have fancy numbers etc to be qualified to run as a CPM. Vision is enough. I suppose there is a very specific type of person who could last the year long term of CPM 1 (I am entirely excluding CPM0 from this comment as I have had so little contact with them besides Hans who was willing to come to the community for feed back) and not only that but a specific kind of person who can be willing to come down from their CPM position to work with the player base. "War is not hell, far from it. War is beautiful. War is divine." - Grand Admiral Mekioth Sarum
Vulcanus Lightbringer Eyniletti Rangers Minmatar Republic 319	Posted - 2014.03.08 11:27:00 - [8] - Quote What I want more than anything for CPM1 is someone who can persuade CCP to open the development process more, and let us know earlier and in more detail what changes are coming and let the community dissect changes before they're committed to being released.
jenza aranda BetaMax. 2951	Posted - 2014.03.08 12:21:00 - [9] - Quote Jade Dragonis wrote: jenza aranda wrote: People who are already doing the job more or less and already contributing to the benefit of the community. How much input did the CPM0 have in the white paper? a lot. Dust 514 101 // Dust 514 Wiki
Jade Dragonis GRIM MARCH D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E 318	Posted - 2014.03.08 12:23:00 - [10] - Quote jenza aranda wrote: Jade Dragonis wrote: jenza aranda wrote: People who are already doing the job more or less and already contributing to the benefit of the community. How much input did the CPM0 have in the white paper? a lot. Thanks. Didn't want to make a false statement. Folloe me on Youtube

Zeylon Rho Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore 3772	Posted - 2014.03.08 12:27:00 - [11] - Quote Vulcanus Lightbringer wrote: What I want more than anything for CPM1 is someone who can persuade CCP to open the development process more, and let us know earlier and in more detail what changes are coming and let the community dissect changes before they're committed to being released. Whatever you think of CPM0, I think they already made efforts to do that. A CPM candidate telling us they'll "convince CCP" of anything is probably a non-starter qualification-wise. Dren and Templar equipment stats, wrong since release.
jenza aranda BetaMax. 2952	Posted - 2014.03.08 12:29:00 - [12] - Quote KGB Sleep wrote: Someone who plays the game. A lot of these "contributing entities" DON'T PLAY they just theorycraft. if you think being on the CPM means playing a lot of dust you are greatly mistaken. A lot of the more important work is almost entirely theorycrafting as the stuff hasnt been made yet. Dust 514 101 // Dust 514 Wiki
DeeJay One Guardian Solutions DARKSTAR ARMY 213	Posted - 2014.03.08 12:30:00 - [13] - Quote Sana Rayya wrote: I see a lot of current CPMs that have fewer than 1 mil lifetime warpoints and under 2.0 KDRs, then wonder how they could have any grasp of what needs changing in DUST when they clearly spend 90% of their free time trolling the forums and 10% in game. Frankly being a CPM/CSM eats up your game time a lot, as it is usually like taking a half time job in addition to your current job (and sometimes it's a full time job even). That, and the fact that appearing in any game with your main toon usually ends up with everyone shooting at the CPM. Also KDR is a crap metric in team based games (I, for one, had the most fun playing in squads with my repair tools on constantly ;) Oh, and if their time was set up the other way around, mainly 90% in game, 10% in the forums, all would whine, that the CPM isn't on the forums - you can't please anyone.
The Attorney General 2418	Posted - 2014.03.08 12:36:00 - [14] - Quote I'll vote for someone who is most likely to break the NDA and give us that peak under the hood we all need but that CCP doesn't want to give out. That and someone who isn't afraid to tell CCP to stop being muppets and learn to iterate. Mr. Hybrid Vayu.
DeeJay One Guardian Solutions DARKSTAR ARMY 213	Posted - 2014.03.08 12:55:00 - [15] - Quote The Attorney General wrote: I'll vote for someone who is most likely to break the NDA and give us that peak under the hood we all need but that CCP doesn't want to give out. That and someone who isn't afraid to tell CCP to stop being muppets and learn to iterate. I'll doubt if he manages to beat the shortest CPM/CSM membership ever by Mittens ;)
Rynoceros Rise Of Old Dudes 3048	Posted - 2014.03.08 12:58:00 - [16] - Quote The Attorney General wrote: I'll vote for someone who is most likely to break the NDA and give us that peak under the hood we all need but that CCP doesn't want to give out. That and someone who isn't afraid to tell CCP to stop being muppets and learn to iterate. This. I GÖú Kittens.
crazy space 1 GunFall Mobilization 2194	Posted - 2014.03.08 12:59:00 - [17] - Quote Me
Vulcanus Lightbringer Eyniletti Rangers Minmatar Republic 320	Posted - 2014.03.08 12:59:00 - [18] - Quote Zeylon Rho wrote: Vulcanus Lightbringer wrote: What I want more than anything for CPM1 is someone who can persuade CCP to open the development process more, and let us know earlier and in more detail what changes are coming and let the community dissect changes before they're committed to being released. Whatever you think of CPM0, I think they already made efforts to do that. A CPM candidate telling us they'll "convince CCP" of anything is probably a non-starter qualification-wise. Of course, but I want the community to have more input still. Like when the new dropsuit stats were first being mentioned and CCP's idea was to remove the sidearm for scouts in exchange for an additional equipment slot. The community said "bad idea", and CCP listened. I want more of that, especially when it comes to balancing weapons and gear. Fundamentally, I just want CCP to stop being so secretive. Take the release of 1.8 as an example, the amount of times Logibro or Saberwing has denied to give us a specific date is just ridiculous. It's either the 18th or the 25th if they're still on schedule, yet they're treating it like all the fresh water in the world will disappear if they gave us a date.
Jade Dragonis GRIM MARCH D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E 319	Posted - 2014.03.08 13:57:00 - [19] - Quote The Attorney General wrote: I'll vote for someone who is most likely to break the NDA and give us that peak under the hood we all need but that CCP doesn't want to give out. That and someone who isn't afraid to tell CCP to stop being muppets and learn to iterate. Well Im sure there will be some that say that they are willing to break the NDA. Although once CCP's lawyers get in touch they will back down because NDA's are binding contracts and caan lead to very expensive lawsuits. But if someone is that brave then we will see what we see. Folloe me on Youtube
jenza aranda BetaMax. 2955	Posted - 2014.03.08 18:06:00 - [20] - Quote Jade Dragonis wrote: The Attorney General wrote: I'll vote for someone who is most likely to break the NDA and give us that peak under the hood we all need but that CCP doesn't want to give out. That and someone who isn't afraid to tell CCP to stop being muppets and learn to iterate. Well Im sure there will be some that say that they are willing to break the NDA. Although once CCP's lawyers get in touch they will back down because NDA's are binding contracts and caan lead to very expensive lawsuits. But if someone is that brave then we will see what we see. especially as we are required to disclose our real name, address and passport... Dust 514 101 // Dust 514 Wiki

Proto Annihilator Fraternity of St. Venefice Amarr Empire 23	Posted - 2014.03.08 18:17:00 - [21] - Quote I doubt they serve any real purpose. If the SP refund does not go through it will confirm that for me. Representing us has to be a hard job because everyone cries about everything. The changes CCP makes seem rooted in some far off ideal that we just don't see in-game. I do not feel represented beyond what I do myself on the forums and with support tickets. I would be looking for a representative that has some transparency. Not that they can show us the results of their efforts. They could however show us the means they are using to represent us and participate more in the community. If this is a sham at least we could see the wasted effort and that would earn my respect.
jenza aranda BetaMax. 2960	Posted - 2014.03.08 18:30:00 - [22] - Quote Proto Annihilator wrote: I doubt they serve any real purpose. If the SP refund does not go through it will confirm that for me. Representing us has to be a hard job because everyone cries about everything. The changes CCP makes seem rooted in some far off ideal that we just don't see in-game. I do not feel represented beyond what I do myself on the forums and with support tickets. I would be looking for a representative that has some transparency. Not that they can show us the results of their efforts. They could however show us the means they are using to represent us and participate more in the community. If this is a sham at least we could see the wasted effort and that would earn my respect. you know nothing Jon Snow. Dust 514 101 // Dust 514 Wiki
Proto Annihilator Fraternity of St. Venefice Amarr Empire 23	Posted - 2014.03.08 18:32:00 - [23] - Quote jenza aranda wrote: Proto Annihilator wrote: I doubt they serve any real purpose. If the SP refund does not go through it will confirm that for me. Representing us has to be a hard job because everyone cries about everything. The changes CCP makes seem rooted in some far off ideal that we just don't see in-game. I do not feel represented beyond what I do myself on the forums and with support tickets. I would be looking for a representative that has some transparency. Not that they can show us the results of their efforts. They could however show us the means they are using to represent us and participate more in the community. If this is a sham at least we could see the wasted effort and that would earn my respect. you know nothing Jon Snow. I know what I want. Its not you. If only you had a nickle for everytime you've heard that, eh jenza.
Sgt Kirk Fatal Absolution General Tso's Alliance 4963	Posted - 2014.03.08 18:36:00 - [24] - Quote Primary Requirements: Doesn't put his/her ideas higher over the communities. Respectful to the community for the most part. - The only time I want them being an ******* or a smart ass is when they were provoked first. After that, fair game. Too many idiots on these forums anyway. Communicates with the player base - Doesn't even have to be about CPM things just be active. Actually play the game - I know that CPM doesn't require much out of playing the game but this ties more into the previous point. *Be familiar with the game - ties into the last two post. Have EVE/lore knowledge Have common sense - A need for any figure. Know what an FPS players want while knowing when to stay away from generic fps simplification. Did I mention one should play the game? Secondary Requirements:* Be Gallente - What better race to have in such a high influential position than a True Gallentean? Have a sense of Humor. - Some of these people are like the digital manifestation of Hank Hill on these forums. *1st Official Role Playing Gallente Asshole* -Title Awarded by True Adamance
G Torq ALTA B2O 466	Posted - 2014.03.08 18:38:00 - [25] - Quote jenza aranda wrote: Proto Annihilator wrote: I doubt they serve any real purpose. If the SP refund does not go through it will confirm that for me. Representing us has to be a hard job because everyone cries about everything. The changes CCP makes seem rooted in some far off ideal that we just don't see in-game. I do not feel represented beyond what I do myself on the forums and with support tickets. I would be looking for a representative that has some transparency. Not that they can show us the results of their efforts. They could however show us the means they are using to represent us and participate more in the community. If this is a sham at least we could see the wasted effort and that would earn my respect. you know nothing Jon Snow. Trying to tell him to do that thing with his tongue again? (yeah, TV-series ref, instead of the books - shoot me) Team Fairy DUST HTTP://Dust.Thang.DK/ - DUST514 Fitting Tool based on DUST SDE
Joseph Ridgeson WarRavens League of Infamy 689	Posted - 2014.03.08 18:42:00 - [26] - Quote It is an odd question because we, as the community, don't really get to see the CPM's input. For all we know, the CSM/CPM could entirely be a marketing thing for CCP to say to the community/journalists "we care about our community and player base extensively. We even have a player elected committee to give input on the game from the eyes of a player rather than a developer and to act as more natural liaisons between CCP and the players than an employee would be." Yes, that sounds freaking amazing but we can't look into the gears of CCP and see where the CPM/CSM's influence has spread for the betterment of the players. I am not saying that it is true, only that it is hard to see the influence of out elected committees. CPM can say "we had a lot of influence in X" but for all anyone knows they have never been able to push CCP in a way for the betterment of the players, which is the exact reason behind there being an elected body. And I know it would be impossible to really show "here is what the CPM pushed through because the community wanted it" rather than "here is what CCP did for their own reasons." It is a no-win scenario. For me, I am less interested in someone who is "good at the game" and more so someone who understands the game and plays it. I would want someone who isn't a jerk and conducts themselves like a human being. Some of the CSM's in EVE have been the biggest butt goblins to every type on a keyboard and loomed over the community in a "do YOU have a seat on the council? You don't know what you are talking about." That cannot be allowed to happen in DUST. What I want is someone that isn't a jerk, is well reasoned in their beliefs, is willing to change their opinion given evidence, will not resist something that they see as a 'good thing for the game' because it won't be good for their play style, plays the game actively, and is willing to inform the community as much as they can without breaking NDA. I wouldn't want someone who would break the NDA on the CPM because it could push CCP away from having a CPM and does damage. I am sure any CPM member has heard things that would set the forums afire that are now never happening. Imagine if someone leaked an idea that was in it's early thought phase; in CCP's case, probably written on a cocktail napkin and not really given too much thought on just yet. "We were thinking about removing AV and Vehicles from the game." If that got released before it was anything other than a drunken thought rather than an actual plan, players would get upset probably over nothing. Perhaps a CPM member could answer this: how many things have you heard suggested for the game that almost immediately got thrown on the fire of bad ideas? How many of those ideas would get players angry/happy when they were announced/discarded?
Vrain Matari Mikramurka Shock Troop Minmatar Republic 1753	Posted - 2014.03.08 19:39:00 - [27] - Quote DeeJay One wrote: Sana Rayya wrote: I see a lot of current CPMs that have fewer than 1 mil lifetime warpoints and under 2.0 KDRs, then wonder how they could have any grasp of what needs changing in DUST when they clearly spend 90% of their free time trolling the forums and 10% in game. Frankly being a CPM/CSM eats up your game time a lot, as it is usually like taking a half time job in addition to your current job (and sometimes it's a full time job even). That, and the fact that appearing in any game with your main toon usually ends up with everyone shooting at the CPM. Also KDR is a crap metric in team based games (I, for one, had the most fun playing in squads with my repair tools on constantly ;) Oh, and if their time was set up the other way around, mainly 90% in game, 10% in the forums, all would whine, that the CPM isn't on the forums - you can't please anyone. There are many desirable qualities we'd want to see in a CPM council member, but i'd like to use your post to concentrate on strictly the value of players' in-game experience in vetting candidates. I agree with you DeeJay, and Jenza is ofc right wrt the absolute necessity for theorycrafting when involved in the development process. Also, any reasonable person realizes the demands on the CPM are very high and would expect in-game time to be severely curtailed for a sitting member of the council. But what about the experience they bring to the position? There is a fundamental sense in which Sana Rayya is correct. Hands-on experience counts and it counts for a lot. I ideally want to see candidates that have thousands of hours in-game, in all game modes, across multiple builds. I want them to have a vast experience base in DUST and preferably in EVE because integration will definitely be a big item on CPM1's agenda. Why is a big experience base desirable? Because it is the best defense in spotting game-harming content, in critiquing poorly-designed systems and in having a feel for what might work or be worth exploring. To speak to Jenza's point, the experience base powerfully and beneficially informs the theorycrafting process. Experience across several DUST builds and in EVE gives a Councillor a common vocabulary with CCP and the playerbase and facilitates communication and understanding. Personally i also want a player who has been able to demonstrate solid performance in-game. I'm not talking about KDR rockstars here(tho there's nothing wrong with that), but rather about peeps who have obviously thought about the challenges that DUST presents to a player and have demonstrated the ability to meet that challenge and perform well. There are many ways to contribute to one's team in DUST. I want candidates who are capable of doing so in a wide variety of conditions. That tells us they understand the dynamics of the game and are creative and flexible enough to adapt and perform in multiple roles. So that's basically why I value time in game and reasonable career stats. The other kind of experience i want a candidate to have is forum experience. I want to see that they've been involved and active in the conversation, and for some time. I want their past posts to demonstrate that they've always been working to move DUST ahead and provide worthwhile feedback. I want to see than making observations and involved in back-and-forth conversations about DUST content. I want to see how they pose questions, respond to questions and work to synthesize answers with other posters. I'm not talking about attitude or ego or dickheadedness here, that's an important separate topic, but is not part of this conversation - i'm talking about game-focused dialog and productive, creative, rational contribution and conversation. I want to see a person who makes the effort and has the ability to wrap their head around another person's point of view and engage in productive communication. My primary tool in voting for a candidate will be mining their past posts for Dust content and productive conversation. As an aside to this, Jenza's criteria of 'What have you done for the DUST community?' feels a little off to me. The are many reasons players engage in extra-DUSTular activities, and while there's much to be admired and respected about the efforts of many peeps to contribute something extra to our greater community, not all of them speak to a focus on the development of the game and it role in New Eden. It's peeps who've focused on these things that i'd really prefer to see on the council. So i'd modify Jenza's criteria to be: 'What have you done for the community that focuses specifically on issues of game development?' For me, he best answer to that question is if a candidate can demonstrate that they've been actively involved for many months/years in productive dialog focused on DUST/New Eden's development and eventual world domination ;) That's it for experience. There are other even more important criteria, but experience as indicated above is high up on my list. Good luck to all the candidates. I support SP rollover.
Vrain Matari Mikramurka Shock Troop Minmatar Republic 1753	Posted - 2014.03.08 19:44:00 - [28] - Quote Sgt Kirk wrote: Primary Requirements: Doesn't put his/her ideas higher over the communities. Respectful to the community for the most part. - The only time I want them being an ******* or a smart ass is when they were provoked first. After that, fair game. Too many idiots on these forums anyway. Communicates with the player base - Doesn't even have to be about CPM things just be active. Actually play the game - I know that CPM doesn't require much out of playing the game but this ties more into the previous point. *Be familiar with the game - ties into the last two post. Have EVE/lore knowledge Have common sense - A need for any figure. Know what an FPS players want while knowing when to stay away from generic fps simplification. Did I mention one should play the game? Secondary Requirements:* Be Gallente - What better race to have in such a high influential position than a True Gallentean? Have a sense of Humor. - Some of these people are like the digital manifestation of Hank Hill on these forums. P.S. A CPM should also know how to format a post. This is an example of how not to make a post. +1 Sgt Kirk. That's a nice concise list of important points with good prioritization. I was afraid to make such a list myself for fear of how long i would ramble on ;) Well done. I support SP rollover.
darkiller240 WarRavens League of Infamy 537	Posted - 2014.03.08 19:51:00 - [29] - Quote jenza aranda wrote: People who are already doing the job more or less and already contributing to the benefit of the community. well id say only 2 interact with the communaty the other 3 i dont even know "Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results." - Albert Einstein
Asha Starwind DUST University Ivy League 471	Posted - 2014.03.08 20:00:00 - [30] - Quote Someone who isn't looking at the position as only a means to further their own agenda. 32db Mad Bomber.

Vrain Matari Mikramurka Shock Troop Minmatar Republic 1753	Posted - 2014.03.08 20:04:00 - [31] - Quote Joseph Ridgeson wrote: ...rational, reasonable, eloquent things.... +1. Good points and well written. Another great set of criteria for CPM candidates. I support SP rollover.
Aeon Amadi Edimmu Warfighters Gallente Federation 5165	Posted - 2014.03.08 20:27:00 - [32] - Quote I've yet to find anyone I want to vote for (which is bad because I've told other players that if I couldn't find someone I wanted to vote for, let alone seven representatives, I would wind up running myself...). I certainly know more about what I don't want in a candidate than what I do want. What I would like to see in a candidate is someone that doesn't fall into the usual non-sense of "I will represent everyone in the community". This is, to put it bluntly, bullshit. It is impossible to do this and if you don't believe me try delegating any AV vs Tank argument at any stage of Dust 514's lifespan. I don't want a candidate that will be vocal as hell during election season and then absolutely silent after elected. If I wanted this, I'd look toward the CSM for my candidates. I don't want a candidate that is a push-over but at the same time I don't want a candidate that will stubbornly stick to their beliefs no matter what is provided as evidence to them. This isn't to say that all evidence provided is 100% irrefutable and factual but it should at least cross the candidate for consideration before they retort with their counter argument. I don't want a candidate that is "an advocate for 'x'". Seriously, if you're playing the role of advocate for scouts... or heavies... or tankers... You're not free-form enough to represent the community as a whole and will probably be bias against that playstyle's counters, despite what you may say. I don't want a candidate that is vindictive toward "flavor of the month" players or players from "district locking" corporations. If you're bias against a certain group due to short-comings in the game's mechanics you're on a sure path to bias when presented information later on. Players should not feel punishment for taking advantage of what the game has to offer at the time, this is like getting angry at people who take advantage of coupons at a grocery store. Just a few things I feel rather strongly about. /shrug Useful Links //forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=133588 //forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=134182
The Robot Devil Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance 1904	Posted - 2014.03.08 20:58:00 - [33] - Quote Sgt Kirk wrote: Primary Requirements: Doesn't put his/her ideas higher over the communities. Respectful to the community for the most part. - The only time I want them being an ******* or a smart ass is when they were provoked first. After that, fair game. Too many idiots on these forums anyway. Communicates with the player base - Doesn't even have to be about CPM things just be active. Actually play the game - I know that CPM doesn't require much out of playing the game but this ties more into the previous point. *Be familiar with the game - ties into the last two post. Have EVE/lore knowledge Have common sense - A need for any figure. Know what an FPS players want while knowing when to stay away from generic fps simplification. Have a sense of Humor. - Some of these people are like the digital manifestation of Hank Hill on these forums. Nice list. I think the sense of humor is dead on. Call me fanboy or whatever but I think patients is needed also, sometimes the rush to do something is very intense. An understanding that the NDA is there for a reason. I am more looking for a group than an individual. The group needs to work together smoothly and be able, as a whole, to touch every part of the game. "You people voted for Hubert Humphrey, and you killed Jesus." Raoul Duke
One Eyed King Eyniletti Rangers Minmatar Republic 478	Posted - 2014.03.08 21:03:00 - [34] - Quote Someone looking for balance, and ensuring that there is a suit for every playstyle and a role for every suit. I would like to see an end to the days when a logi can do everything better than the suits intended for specific roles can. Looking for the scout hangout?
Iron Wolf Saber Den of Swords 13314	Posted - 2014.03.08 21:04:00 - [35] - Quote Sana Rayya wrote: How much the player still plays, how long they have been playing for, and whether they are actually skilled at DUST or not. I see a lot of current CPMs that have fewer than 1 mil lifetime warpoints and under 2.0 KDRs, then wonder how they could have any grasp of what needs changing in DUST when they clearly spend 90% of their free time trolling the forums and 10% in game. You do realize most of us have alts right? CPM 0 Secretary Omni-Soldier, Forum Warrior, Annoying Artist \\= Advanced Caldari Assault // Unlocked
Iron Wolf Saber Den of Swords 13314	Posted - 2014.03.08 21:10:00 - [36] - Quote Proto Annihilator wrote: I doubt they serve any real purpose. If the SP refund does not go through it will confirm that for me. Representing us has to be a hard job because everyone cries about everything. The changes CCP makes seem rooted in some far off ideal that we just don't see in-game. I do not feel represented beyond what I do myself on the forums and with support tickets. I would be looking for a representative that has some transparency. Not that they can show us the results of their efforts. They could however show us the means they are using to represent us and participate more in the community. If this is a sham at least we could see the wasted effort and that would earn my respect. Now look here, had you been paying any attention what-so-ever, you'd know we'd been batting for a respec in 1.8. If CCP Says no its no and there is nothing you me and we the CPM can really do about it because there may be reasons well above and beyond everyone's control including CCP on making things happen. CPM 0 Secretary Omni-Soldier, Forum Warrior, Annoying Artist \\= Advanced Caldari Assault // Unlocked
Rasatsu Much Crying Old Experts 1121	Posted - 2014.03.08 21:16:00 - [37] - Quote The whole CPM thing needs to be purged with fire considering they support respecs. Unless it is just a clever scheme to make us all win DUST...
Mossellia Delt Militaires Sans Jeux 1019	Posted - 2014.03.08 21:36:00 - [38] - Quote I'd like to take the time right now, while I'm at work mind you, to take some time out of your playing and join the chat chsnnel in my signature. Then when I'm online, which I am quiet a lot and in many timezones prime times' squad up with myself or the other candidates and actually talk to us. I myself will make the time to play with you, the community so you can at least get to know me a bit. If after you get to know me a bit and ask questions and you don't like who I am or what type of person I am, then by all means, don't vote for me, but I bet you will want me representing you after we hang out. Feel free adding me on Skype as well, I'd love to talk to any of you, even face to face in a video chat if you'd like. My Skype is Moss-Delt I understand I can't get to the whole community this way, but I'd like to do my best in that manner. Join the Channel - CPM1 Candidates - Get to know who's running. Delt for CPM1
Galvan Nized Deep Space Republic 775	Posted - 2014.03.08 22:04:00 - [39] - Quote Someone who plays, someone invested in Dust, someone who thinks the players actually deserve a voice. I want someone who actually fights for feedback and listens to the playerbase when we give feedback. I want them to stop CCP from not listening, stop leaving things unchanged despite feedback. I want them to be willing to fight CCP on behalf of the players, not lay down and and only be in it for the trip to Iceland.
Stefan Stahl Seituoda Taskforce Command Caldari State 450	Posted - 2014.03.08 22:56:00 - [40] - Quote Anyone that can perhaps make some guys at CCP, like, google a tutorial on game design, maybe? Failing that somebody who can send them a link to the videos by the Extra Credits folks. That'd be a start. On a more serious note, as far as I'm aware, there are few opportunities for community feedback via CPM as long as CCP's internal processes lack the required quality. Maybe I'd vote for someone who doesn't have idealistic views of the CPM's capabilities, then.

THEAMAZING POTHEAD Nyain San Renegade Alliance 1045	Posted - 2014.03.08 23:06:00 - [41] - Quote Someone whose not garbage(decent player) Someone whose got a lot of SP to get proto stuff and run it ALOT. Someone whose preferably in a PC corp, but thats not mandatory really. But MOST IMPORTANTLY- Someone who ISN'T biased, as in he won't complain that railguns are OP because he flies dropships. He won't say tanks aren't OP because he runs madrugars. He won't say PC is broken because he can't get in. He won't say the RR is OP because he uses the CR. Someone who will say "I run this as my main, not my alt suit/wep/whatever but I run it ALL the time, and I can say its OP for X,Y, and Z, and I would like to know if the community shares these thoughts and believe its worth pushing CCP for over these other issues of X,Y, and Z" Your post is making me facepalm very hard right now.
Vrain Matari Mikramurka Shock Troop Minmatar Republic 1760	Posted - 2014.03.10 14:39:00 - [42] - Quote Rasatsu wrote: The whole CPM thing needs to be purged with fire considering they support respecs. Unless it is just a clever scheme to make us all win DUST... I admire the hard line you're taking on this. I've bucked myself, and i hate myself for it - but i hate CCP more ;) I support SP rollover.
Kigurosaka Laaksonen DUST University Ivy League 548	Posted - 2014.03.10 14:51:00 - [43] - Quote myself DUST 514 Recruit Code - https://dust514.com/recruit/zluCyb/ EVE Buddy Invite - Too damn long. Ask me for it.


Pages: 1 2 :: [one page]

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online/DUST514, the EVE/DUST514 logo, EVE/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to OMG Labs to use EVE Online/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, OMG Labs. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.