DUST Search - Get rid of the warning sound

All Channels

General Discussions

Get rid of the warning sound

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 :: [one page]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
The dark cloud The Rainbow Effect Negative-Feedback 2243	Posted - 2014.02.24 11:22:00 - [1] - Quote The warning sound for proximity mines needs to go. Its allready easy enough to spot them if you pay attention but this makes it even worse by alerting the driver to not move any further. In my opinion a passive explosive scanner module should do the job and not be a inbuilt feature. I shall show you a world, a world which you cant imagine, a world full off butthurt n00bs at the other end of my gun
Takahiro Kashuken Red Star. EoN. 2687	Posted - 2014.02.24 11:39:00 - [2] - Quote Nope Not until i can have an explosive detector that i can put on my suit Intelligence is OP
TheD1CK Dead Man's Game 724	Posted - 2014.02.24 11:47:00 - [3] - Quote Explosive detector ???? Not really necessary when you can clearly see the PE Explosive traps are easy to avoid, you hardly need a detector as well ... I didn't realize that PE made that sound until recently..... It's not good , there is already an impossible task of AV And while HAV's stack hardeners .... We get mines that don't detonate correctly and make a warning sound To implement a detector, when you could just use your eyes is pointless... Plasma Cannon will have its chance if AR/HAV 514 is ever fixed
COVERT SUBTERFUGE PSU GHOST SYNDICATE DARKSTAR ARMY 342	Posted - 2014.02.24 11:48:00 - [4] - Quote Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Nope Not until i can have an explosive detector that i can put on my suit Equip a scanner. Yes, 20,000 years in the future, advances in technology made it necessary for mines to have sound. Subterfuge and terrorist GOD in the making Proud Minmatar - Alt of THE GREY CARDINAL Love the Art of War
Takahiro Kashuken Red Star. EoN. 2687	Posted - 2014.02.24 12:02:00 - [5] - Quote COVERT SUBTERFUGE wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Nope Not until i can have an explosive detector that i can put on my suit Equip a scanner. Yes, 20,000 years in the future, advances in technology made it necessary for mines to have sound. Cant use a scanner in a vehicle, vehicle scanners do not pick up RE/Proxy mines either Also my HAV makes mines make a sound by calling out there names Intelligence is OP
Alternate Insano SUICIDE SPITE SQUAD 160	Posted - 2014.02.24 12:13:00 - [6] - Quote Is this another 'your crutch is OP but mine is OK' thread? What am I saying, this is DUST, of course it is. DUST 514 Super Scrub Level 262 Forum Troll Play, or play not. There is no balance.
Tailss Prower 501ST JFW StrikerZ Unit 187	Posted - 2014.02.24 12:19:00 - [7] - Quote COVERT SUBTERFUGE wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Nope Not until i can have an explosive detector that i can put on my suit Equip a scanner. Yes, 20,000 years in the future, advances in technology made it necessary for mines to have sound. Its the tank that detects and makes sounds not the mines
Tailss Prower 501ST JFW StrikerZ Unit 187	Posted - 2014.02.24 12:22:00 - [8] - Quote TheD1CK wrote: Explosive detector ???? Not really necessary when you can clearly see the PE Explosive traps are easy to avoid, you hardly need a detector as well ... I didn't realize that PE made that sound until recently..... It's not good , there is already an impossible task of AV And while HAV's stack hardeners .... We get mines that don't detonate correctly and make a warning sound To implement a detector, when you could just use your eyes is pointless... They don't alway render right away and im pretty sure hardner stacking was a simply mistake which they will fix but let me make you an offer i'll glady give up my warning sounds when you lose your ability to equipment spam
Monkey MAC Rough Riders.. 2037	Posted - 2014.02.24 12:24:00 - [9] - Quote Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Nope Not until i can have an explosive detector that i can put on my suit Active Scanner Combat Engineer in training. Monkey Mac - Forum Warrior of the Trees Lvl 2.
Monkey MAC Rough Riders.. 2037	Posted - 2014.02.24 12:28:00 - [10] - Quote Tailss Prower wrote: TheD1CK wrote: Explosive detector ???? Not really necessary when you can clearly see the PE Explosive traps are easy to avoid, you hardly need a detector as well ... I didn't realize that PE made that sound until recently..... It's not good , there is already an impossible task of AV And while HAV's stack hardeners .... We get mines that don't detonate correctly and make a warning sound To implement a detector, when you could just use your eyes is pointless... They don't alway render right away and im pretty sure hardner stacking was a simply mistake which they will fix but let me make you an offer i'll glady give up my warning sounds when you lose your ability to equipment spam Seems fair, equipment only stays active so long as you are wearing the fit to which the equipment belongs. Combat Engineer in training. Monkey Mac - Forum Warrior of the Trees Lvl 2.

Chunky Munkey Amarr Templars Amarr Empire 3247	Posted - 2014.02.24 12:43:00 - [11] - Quote The dark cloud wrote: The warning sound for proximity mines needs to go. Its allready easy enough to spot them if you pay attention but this makes it even worse by alerting the driver to not move any further. In my opinion a passive explosive scanner module should do the job and not be a inbuilt feature. Meh. Unless you're moving at a snail's pace, it's usually already too late once you hear the beeping. Your momentum has sealed your fate. No.
Tailss Prower 501ST JFW StrikerZ Unit 188	Posted - 2014.02.24 12:58:00 - [12] - Quote Chunky Munkey wrote: The dark cloud wrote: The warning sound for proximity mines needs to go. Its allready easy enough to spot them if you pay attention but this makes it even worse by alerting the driver to not move any further. In my opinion a passive explosive scanner module should do the job and not be a inbuilt feature. Meh. Unless you're moving at a snail's pace, it's usually already too late once you hear the beeping. Your momentum has sealed your fate. yeah thats what tends to get me but I like how some are smart and put it in a path I took alot in that match and catches me off gaurd but once I take that first hit or death I tend to keep an eye out afterwards
Repe Susi Rautaleijona Top Men. 1040	Posted - 2014.02.24 13:03:00 - [13] - Quote What is actually the detection range of the tank when it notices the mines? I don't use a tank so I don't know. Another: (and this one is stupid) Does the vehicle need to have physical contact to the proximity mines before they explode? But I agree with the OP. Get rid of the sound. It would be nice to once get a tank with proximities. There's two-fold problem with them: HAV's detect them too easily. LAV's run over them too fast. Life is pleasant. Death is peaceful. It's the transition that's troublesome. ~ Isaac Asimov
Tailss Prower 501ST JFW StrikerZ Unit 188	Posted - 2014.02.24 13:06:00 - [14] - Quote Repe Susi wrote: What is actually the detection range of the tank when it notices the mines? I don't use a tank so I don't know. Another: (and this one is stupid) Does the vehicle need to have physical contact to the proximity mines before they explode? But I agree with the OP. Get rid of the sound. It would be nice to once get a tank with proximities. There's two-fold problem with them: HAV's detect them too easily. LAV's run over them too fast. it can vary sometimes around 20-30m away and you will hear warning and no you don't have to make contact as sometimes they will indeed go off from you just being near them
Lanius Pulvis Bullet Cluster Legacy Rising 154	Posted - 2014.02.24 13:16:00 - [15] - Quote Monkey MAC wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Nope Not until i can have an explosive detector that i can put on my suit Active Scanner Scanners don't pick up explosives. Not new, just new to you.
Takahiro Kashuken Red Star. EoN. 2687	Posted - 2014.02.24 13:31:00 - [16] - Quote Monkey MAC wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Nope Not until i can have an explosive detector that i can put on my suit Active Scanner Like i said doesnt work in vehicles Intelligence is OP
Monkey MAC Rough Riders.. 2038	Posted - 2014.02.24 13:35:00 - [17] - Quote Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Nope Not until i can have an explosive detector that i can put on my suit Active Scanner Like i said doesnt work in vehicles You didn't say that orginally, you said that you could put on your suit. not you could put on your suit and use in your vehicle. And no you can't have that, work with your infantry like a good little tanker. Combat Engineer in training. Monkey Mac - Forum Warrior of the Trees Lvl 2.
Takahiro Kashuken Red Star. EoN. 2687	Posted - 2014.02.24 13:58:00 - [18] - Quote Monkey MAC wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Nope Not until i can have an explosive detector that i can put on my suit Active Scanner Like i said doesnt work in vehicles You didn't say that orginally, you said that you could put on your suit. not you could put on your suit and use in your vehicle. And no you can't have that, work with your infantry like a good little tanker. I can put it on my pilot suit which works in tandem with the vehicle Intelligence is OP
Monkey MAC Rough Riders.. 2038	Posted - 2014.02.24 14:04:00 - [19] - Quote Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Nope Not until i can have an explosive detector that i can put on my suit Active Scanner Like i said doesnt work in vehicles You didn't say that orginally, you said that you could put on your suit. not you could put on your suit and use in your vehicle. And no you can't have that, work with your infantry like a good little tanker. I can put it on my pilot suit which works in tandem with the vehicle Once again, this obviously going to take time. 1) You did not ask for that 2) That completly negates the whole point of removing the sound in the first place how easy do you want it? 3) If you actually particpated in team work with friendly infantry it wouldn't be a problem. Combat Engineer in training. Monkey Mac - Forum Warrior of the Trees Lvl 2.
Takahiro Kashuken Red Star. EoN. 2687	Posted - 2014.02.24 14:07:00 - [20] - Quote Monkey MAC wrote: Once again, this obviously going to take time. 1) You did not ask for that 2) That completly negates the whole point of removing the sound in the first place how easy do you want it? 3) If you actually particpated in team work with friendly infantry it wouldn't be a problem. Add explosives detector to pilot suit Pilot suit gets in vehicle and becomes one with the vehicle Now on the HUD it highlights where explosives are to you and anyone else in the vehicle Profit Intelligence is OP

ResistanceGTA D.A.R.K L.E.G.I.O.N D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E 299	Posted - 2014.02.24 14:12:00 - [21] - Quote Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: Once again, this obviously going to take time. 1) You did not ask for that 2) That completly negates the whole point of removing the sound in the first place how easy do you want it? 3) If you actually particpated in team work with friendly infantry it wouldn't be a problem. Add explosives detector to pilot suit Pilot suit gets in vehicle and becomes one with the vehicle Now on the HUD it highlights where explosives are to you and anyone else in the vehicle Profit Wow.. I liked a Red Star post... But, Yea, once the pilot suit comes out, explosives detectors would be a logical addition, though it could be a handy piece of equipment for infantry as well, though remotes on objectives are pretty simple to see, usually. Of course, I'm assuming you mean within a certain radius, not just in general when you say it shows them on the HUD. xSivartx is my Heavy. There are many like him, but he is my own... So, other Logi's back off, those are my Warpoints!
Monkey MAC Rough Riders.. 2039	Posted - 2014.02.24 14:13:00 - [22] - Quote Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: Once again, this obviously going to take time. 1) You did not ask for that 2) That completly negates the whole point of removing the sound in the first place how easy do you want it? 3) If you actually particpated in team work with friendly infantry it wouldn't be a problem. Add explosives detector to pilot suit Pilot suit gets in vehicle and becomes one with the vehicle Now on the HUD it highlights where explosives are to you and anyone else in the vehicle Profit So now we have to show you exactly where our traps are, bloody hell, I didn't think anyone could want it any easier. How about no, instead improve PE to 2shot all tanks without having stack 72 RE's nearby, which are easily visible. Combat Engineer in training. Monkey Mac - Forum Warrior of the Trees Lvl 2.
Takahiro Kashuken Red Star. EoN. 2688	Posted - 2014.02.24 14:18:00 - [23] - Quote Monkey MAC wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: Once again, this obviously going to take time. 1) You did not ask for that 2) That completly negates the whole point of removing the sound in the first place how easy do you want it? 3) If you actually particpated in team work with friendly infantry it wouldn't be a problem. Add explosives detector to pilot suit Pilot suit gets in vehicle and becomes one with the vehicle Now on the HUD it highlights where explosives are to you and anyone else in the vehicle Profit So now we have to show you exactly where our traps are, bloody hell, I didn't think anyone could want it any easier. How about no, instead improve PE to 2shot all tanks without having stack 72 RE's nearby, which are easily visible. MAG did it and i dont remember anyone complaining about that feature Intelligence is OP
Monkey MAC Rough Riders.. 2041	Posted - 2014.02.24 14:20:00 - [24] - Quote Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: Once again, this obviously going to take time. 1) You did not ask for that 2) That completly negates the whole point of removing the sound in the first place how easy do you want it? 3) If you actually particpated in team work with friendly infantry it wouldn't be a problem. Add explosives detector to pilot suit Pilot suit gets in vehicle and becomes one with the vehicle Now on the HUD it highlights where explosives are to you and anyone else in the vehicle Profit So now we have to show you exactly where our traps are, bloody hell, I didn't think anyone could want it any easier. How about no, instead improve PE to 2shot all tanks without having stack 72 RE's nearby, which are easily visible. MAG did it and i dont remember anyone complaining about that feature Were tanks easy to blow up in MAG? Yes? That's why. Combat Engineer in training. Monkey Mac - Forum Warrior of the Trees Lvl 2.
Takahiro Kashuken Red Star. EoN. 2688	Posted - 2014.02.24 14:24:00 - [25] - Quote Monkey MAC wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: Once again, this obviously going to take time. 1) You did not ask for that 2) That completly negates the whole point of removing the sound in the first place how easy do you want it? 3) If you actually particpated in team work with friendly infantry it wouldn't be a problem. Add explosives detector to pilot suit Pilot suit gets in vehicle and becomes one with the vehicle Now on the HUD it highlights where explosives are to you and anyone else in the vehicle Profit So now we have to show you exactly where our traps are, bloody hell, I didn't think anyone could want it any easier. How about no, instead improve PE to 2shot all tanks without having stack 72 RE's nearby, which are easily visible. MAG did it and i dont remember anyone complaining about that feature Were tanks easy to blow up in MAG? Yes? That's why. It was an APC not a tank You couldnt improve it in any way either But you could improve your AV such as with the RPG Also if you had PL/OIC and was a damn good driver like me you could keep it alive all game and get over 100 kill assists with it or keep the target vehicle alive in acq until the gate went down Good times I do this in DUST but now its OP :( Intelligence is OP
Monkey MAC Rough Riders.. 2041	Posted - 2014.02.24 14:32:00 - [26] - Quote Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: So now we have to show you exactly where our traps are, bloody hell, I didn't think anyone could want it any easier. How about no, instead improve PE to 2shot all tanks without having stack 72 RE's nearby, which are easily visible. MAG did it and i dont remember anyone complaining about that feature Were tanks easy to blow up in MAG? Yes? That's why. It was an APC not a tank You couldnt improve it in any way either But you could improve your AV such as with the RPG Also if you had PL/OIC and was a damn good driver like me you could keep it alive all game and get over 100 kill assists with it or keep the target vehicle alive in acq until the gate went down Good times I do this in DUST but now its OP :( So you had a troop transport, thats different. If we had MAV's I'd expect them to come with countermeasures like dropships(MAAV's) should have. This is because they aren't offensive vehicles therefore the threat is not the vehicle itself, but what it carries. And APC is near pointless if it isn't dropping of troops. Combat Engineer in training. Monkey Mac - Forum Warrior of the Trees Lvl 2.
Vermaak Doe SVER True Blood General Tso's Alliance 1479	Posted - 2014.02.24 14:37:00 - [27] - Quote Fix scanners to pick up explosives Remove warning sound ??? Profit. "Always fight dirty, the victor writes history" Eve toon: Drake Doe, professional hero tackler, full time pretzel boy
Tailss Prower 501ST JFW StrikerZ Unit 188	Posted - 2014.02.24 14:41:00 - [28] - Quote Monkey MAC wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: Once again, this obviously going to take time. 1) You did not ask for that 2) That completly negates the whole point of removing the sound in the first place how easy do you want it? 3) If you actually particpated in team work with friendly infantry it wouldn't be a problem. Add explosives detector to pilot suit Pilot suit gets in vehicle and becomes one with the vehicle Now on the HUD it highlights where explosives are to you and anyone else in the vehicle Profit So now we have to show you exactly where our traps are, bloody hell, I didn't think anyone could want it any easier. How about no, instead improve PE to 2shot all tanks without having stack 72 RE's nearby, which are easily visible. MAG did it and i dont remember anyone complaining about that feature Were tanks easy to blow up in MAG? Yes? That's why. But you forget 1 very important thing and that is that this is dust not mag and also you couldn't build fittings as well on mag as you can on dust and your vehicles didn't cost you game money to use which in dust it does and by the way saying you want PE's to 2 shot tanks is wanting to make tank killing easier than for us to have a warning system that alot of the time doens't even work until it's too late but then again most of you might not even know that
Drapedup Drippedout 0uter.Heaven 471	Posted - 2014.02.24 14:42:00 - [29] - Quote Monkey MAC wrote: Seems fair, equipment only stays active so long as you are wearing the fit to which the equipment belongs. Not true with Remotes (unless hot fixed in past two weeks). I'm not sure about PE's, but probably the same. They last until destroyed, regardless of suit changes. Pro-fit Prophet "Gimme yo lunch money"
Takahiro Kashuken Red Star. EoN. 2688	Posted - 2014.02.24 14:44:00 - [30] - Quote Monkey MAC wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: So now we have to show you exactly where our traps are, bloody hell, I didn't think anyone could want it any easier. How about no, instead improve PE to 2shot all tanks without having stack 72 RE's nearby, which are easily visible. MAG did it and i dont remember anyone complaining about that feature Were tanks easy to blow up in MAG? Yes? That's why. It was an APC not a tank You couldnt improve it in any way either But you could improve your AV such as with the RPG Also if you had PL/OIC and was a damn good driver like me you could keep it alive all game and get over 100 kill assists with it or keep the target vehicle alive in acq until the gate went down Good times I do this in DUST but now its OP :( So you had a troop transport, thats different. If we had MAV's I'd expect them to come with countermeasures like dropships(MAAV's) should have. This is because they aren't offensive vehicles therefore the threat is not the vehicle itself, but what it carries. And APC is near pointless if it isn't dropping of troops. But on my person i had an explosives detector which highlighted mines and also claymores when i was in the vehicle So why not on my pilot suit? Intelligence is OP

Monkey MAC Rough Riders.. 2042	Posted - 2014.02.24 14:46:00 - [31] - Quote Tailss Prower wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: So now we have to show you exactly where our traps are, bloody hell, I didn't think anyone could want it any easier. How about no, instead improve PE to 2shot all tanks without having stack 72 RE's nearby, which are easily visible. MAG did it and i dont remember anyone complaining about that feature Were tanks easy to blow up in MAG? Yes? That's why. But you forget 1 very important thing and that is that this is dust not mag and also you couldn't build fittings as well on mag as you can on dust and your vehicles didn't cost you game money to use which in dust it does and by the way saying you want PE's to 2 shot tanks is wanting to make tank killing easier than for us to have a warning system that alot of the time doens't even work until it's too late but then again most of you might not even know that The fact yoj can modify a vehicle does not mean the point is invalid, howevercas Takihiro admitted the ability wasn't on a tank, which is an offensive vehicle but on an APC which is a logistics vehicle, giving such an ability to a MAV would not be a problem and would encojrage tanks to participate in team work. Combat Engineer in training. Monkey Mac - Forum Warrior of the Trees Lvl 2.
Monkey MAC Rough Riders.. 2042	Posted - 2014.02.24 14:47:00 - [32] - Quote Drapedup Drippedout wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: Seems fair, equipment only stays active so long as you are wearing the fit to which the equipment belongs. Not true with Remotes (unless hot fixed in past two weeks). I'm not sure about PE's, but probably the same. They last until destroyed, regardless of suit changes. No im saying thats how it should happen. Combat Engineer in training. Monkey Mac - Forum Warrior of the Trees Lvl 2.
Monkey MAC Rough Riders.. 2042	Posted - 2014.02.24 14:54:00 - [33] - Quote Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: [quote=Monkey MAC] It was an APC not a tank You couldnt improve it in any way either But you could improve your AV such as with the RPG Also if you had PL/OIC and was a damn good driver like me you could keep it alive all game and get over 100 kill assists with it or keep the target vehicle alive in acq until the gate went down Good times I do this in DUST but now its OP :( So you had a troop transport, thats different. If we had MAV's I'd expect them to come with countermeasures like dropships(MAAV's) should have. This is because they aren't offensive vehicles therefore the threat is not the vehicle itself, but what it carries. And APC is near pointless if it isn't dropping of troops. But on my person i had an explosives detector which highlighted mines and also claymores when i was in the vehicle So why not on my pilot suit? You know Taki the key to a good arguement is to give all the knformation at the start. So ill say again were mag vehicles easy to blow up? Thats why there were countermeasures. Combat Engineer in training. Monkey Mac - Forum Warrior of the Trees Lvl 2.
Takahiro Kashuken Red Star. EoN. 2688	Posted - 2014.02.24 15:01:00 - [34] - Quote Monkey MAC wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: [quote=Monkey MAC] It was an APC not a tank You couldnt improve it in any way either But you could improve your AV such as with the RPG Also if you had PL/OIC and was a damn good driver like me you could keep it alive all game and get over 100 kill assists with it or keep the target vehicle alive in acq until the gate went down Good times I do this in DUST but now its OP :( So you had a troop transport, thats different. If we had MAV's I'd expect them to come with countermeasures like dropships(MAAV's) should have. This is because they aren't offensive vehicles therefore the threat is not the vehicle itself, but what it carries. And APC is near pointless if it isn't dropping of troops. But on my person i had an explosives detector which highlighted mines and also claymores when i was in the vehicle So why not on my pilot suit? You know Taki the key to a good arguement is to give all the knformation at the start. So ill say again were mag vehicles easy to blow up? Thats why there were countermeasures. They could be hard to blow up, get the right driver and your chasing it all day Anyways my infantry guy had an explosive detector on his person which worked when he drove any vehicle and all mines would show up So why not on my pilot suit? Intelligence is OP
Operative 1171 Aajli Bragian Order Amarr Empire 1308	Posted - 2014.02.24 15:07:00 - [35] - Quote The dark cloud wrote: The warning sound for proximity mines needs to go. Its allready easy enough to spot them if you pay attention but this makes it even worse by alerting the driver to not move any further. In my opinion a passive explosive scanner module should do the job and not be a inbuilt feature. Yes, please make REs even easier and more OP for the ppl that derive enjoyment out of them. **** the rest of the game or balance. I want to be completely invisible all the time no matter what as a sniper as well. Rommel, you magnificent bastard, I read your book!
Monkey MAC Rough Riders.. 2044	Posted - 2014.02.24 15:10:00 - [36] - Quote Operative 1171 Aajli wrote: The dark cloud wrote: The warning sound for proximity mines needs to go. Its allready easy enough to spot them if you pay attention but this makes it even worse by alerting the driver to not move any further. In my opinion a passive explosive scanner module should do the job and not be a inbuilt feature. Yes, please make REs even easier and more OP for the ppl that derive enjoyment out of them. **** the rest of the game or balance. I want to be completely invisible all the time no matter what as a sniper as well. Remote Explosives are OP now? What next locus grenades? Combat Engineer in training. Monkey Mac - Forum Warrior of the Trees Lvl 2.
Monkey MAC Rough Riders.. 2044	Posted - 2014.02.24 15:13:00 - [37] - Quote Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: [quote=Takahiro Kashuken] So you had a troop transport, thats different. If we had MAV's I'd expect them to come with countermeasures like dropships(MAAV's) should have. This is because they aren't offensive vehicles therefore the threat is not the vehicle itself, but what it carries. And APC is near pointless if it isn't dropping of troops. But on my person i had an explosives detector which highlighted mines and also claymores when i was in the vehicle So why not on my pilot suit? You know Taki the key to a good arguement is to give all the knformation at the start. So ill say again were mag vehicles easy to blow up? Thats why there were countermeasures. They could be hard to blow up, get the right driver and your chasing it all day Anyways my infantry guy had an explosive detector on his person which worked when he drove any vehicle and all mines would show up So why not on my pilot suit? You already have easy enough, you don't need more modules to make your more immune to more damage. You will not stop till until your tank is invinicble will you? You tell us to use tactics, then you want traps nerfed? I'm done here, pigeons and chessboards and all that jazz. Combat Engineer in training. Monkey Mac - Forum Warrior of the Trees Lvl 2.
Taurion Bruni D3M3NT3D M1NDZ The Umbra Combine 214	Posted - 2014.02.24 15:18:00 - [38] - Quote Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Nope Not until i can have an explosive detector that i can put on my suit its called an active scanner btw. and I believe that proprieties should not have a warning sound, it ruins the whole surprise aspect and makes the vehicles that much harder to kill Pilot // Logistics
Nothing Certain Villore Sec Ops Gallente Federation 272	Posted - 2014.02.24 15:48:00 - [39] - Quote Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Nope Not until i can have an explosive detector that i can put on my suit I'd go with your tank, but not your suit. Because, that's why.
Nothing Certain Villore Sec Ops Gallente Federation 272	Posted - 2014.02.24 15:52:00 - [40] - Quote Operative 1171 Aajli wrote: The dark cloud wrote: The warning sound for proximity mines needs to go. Its allready easy enough to spot them if you pay attention but this makes it even worse by alerting the driver to not move any further. In my opinion a passive explosive scanner module should do the job and not be a inbuilt feature. Yes, please make REs even easier and more OP for the ppl that derive enjoyment out of them. **** the rest of the game or balance. I want to be completely invisible all the time no matter what as a sniper as well. Proximity mines are no RE's and how are they OP? Because, that's why.

Spkr4theDead Red Star. EoN. 1878	Posted - 2014.02.24 19:02:00 - [41] - Quote Takahiro Kashuken wrote: They could be hard to blow up, get the right driver and your chasing it all day Anyways my infantry guy had an explosive detector on his person which worked when he drove any vehicle and all mines would show up So why not on my pilot suit? He just finds it unfair that you're smarter than him. I may be missing something, but I'm pretty sure that I didn't call for a tank nerf before Uprising 1.7. - Atiim
Spkr4theDead Red Star. EoN. 1878	Posted - 2014.02.24 19:17:00 - [42] - Quote TheD1CK wrote: Explosive detector ???? Not really necessary when you can clearly see the PE Explosive traps are easy to avoid, you hardly need a detector as well ... I didn't realize that PE made that sound until recently..... It's not good , there is already an impossible task of AV And while HAV's stack hardeners .... We get mines that don't detonate correctly and make a warning sound To implement a detector, when you could just use your eyes is pointless... If it's impossible, you're doing it wrong. I may be missing something, but I'm pretty sure that I didn't call for a tank nerf before Uprising 1.7. - Atiim
Fox Gaden Immortal Guides 2601	Posted - 2014.02.24 19:21:00 - [43] - Quote Lets see how things are after 1.8 with the V/AV balance. If Swarm Launchers and AV grenades were a bit more effective, that beeping could be used to restrict which way a tank will choose to go, to lead it into an ambush. Fox Gaden: DUST Wall of Fame, 2014
Spkr4theDead Red Star. EoN. 1878	Posted - 2014.02.24 19:24:00 - [44] - Quote Dunno why so many people have a problem with AV. I don't have a problem destroying tanks with a forge. I also don't feel that I'm being cheated if I don't destroy the red tank. If I make it run away, that's good enough for me. I may be missing something, but I'm pretty sure that I didn't call for a tank nerf before Uprising 1.7. - Atiim
Fox Gaden Immortal Guides 2604	Posted - 2014.02.25 11:11:00 - [45] - Quote Spkr4theDead wrote: Dunno why so many people have a problem with AV. I don't have a problem destroying tanks with a forge. I also don't feel that I'm being cheated if I don't destroy the red tank. If I make it run away, that's good enough for me. Yet another person saying: GÇ£Swarm Launchers are fine because I can kill tanks with my Forge Gun!GÇ¥ How many times have we heard that this patch? Fox Gaden: DUST Wall of Fame, 2014
Tailss Prower 501ST JFW StrikerZ Unit 190	Posted - 2014.02.25 11:17:00 - [46] - Quote Fox Gaden wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Dunno why so many people have a problem with AV. I don't have a problem destroying tanks with a forge. I also don't feel that I'm being cheated if I don't destroy the red tank. If I make it run away, that's good enough for me. Yet another person saying: GÇ£Swarm Launchers are fine because I can kill tanks with my Forge Gun!GÇ¥ How many times have we heard that this patch? I can kill tanks just fine with my swarms
Fox Gaden Immortal Guides 2604	Posted - 2014.02.25 11:21:00 - [47] - Quote Tailss Prower wrote: Fox Gaden wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Dunno why so many people have a problem with AV. I don't have a problem destroying tanks with a forge. I also don't feel that I'm being cheated if I don't destroy the red tank. If I make it run away, that's good enough for me. Yet another person saying: GÇ£Swarm Launchers are fine because I can kill tanks with my Forge Gun!GÇ¥ How many times have we heard that this patch? I can kill tanks just fine with my swarms Who do you have getting the Tanks into low Armor, and what weapon do they use? Fox Gaden: DUST Wall of Fame, 2014
Monkey MAC Rough Riders.. 2056	Posted - 2014.02.25 11:22:00 - [48] - Quote Fox Gaden wrote: Tailss Prower wrote: Fox Gaden wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Dunno why so many people have a problem with AV. I don't have a problem destroying tanks with a forge. I also don't feel that I'm being cheated if I don't destroy the red tank. If I make it run away, that's good enough for me. Yet another person saying: GÇ£Swarm Launchers are fine because I can kill tanks with my Forge Gun!GÇ¥ How many times have we heard that this patch? I can kill tanks just fine with my swarms Who do you have getting the Tanks into low Armor, and what weapon do they use? Tanker with a rail gun. Combat Engineer in training. Monkey Mac - Forum Warrior of the Trees Lvl 2.
KA24DERT TeamPlayers Negative-Feedback 509	Posted - 2014.03.01 17:52:00 - [49] - Quote +1 for removing the proximity warning sound.
Meeko Fent Kirkinen Risk Control Caldari State 1839	Posted - 2014.03.01 20:50:00 - [50] - Quote Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Nope Not until i can have an explosive detector that i can put on my suit You Do. Look where your walking. They'll pop up on the HUD, and their quite noticeable anyway. Looking for a Interesting Character Name? Why Not Zoidberg?

Archbot W a r F o r g e d 65	Posted - 2014.03.02 01:39:00 - [51] - Quote No. As a tank driver, I run into them anyways. Sometimes I may not react in time, other times there would be a situation where I'd rather run them over than be in the position I am, getting battered by FGs, SLs, turrets, etc. Taking this feature out will not change much. Having this feature in place can actually benefit infantry. You're preventing a tank from entering an area. Ya¦Åu-Å Å-ÅGèéGäîGä¦Gä¦Gä¦-ìY
Meeko Fent Kirkinen Risk Control Caldari State 1844	Posted - 2014.03.02 03:57:00 - [52] - Quote Archbot wrote: No. As a tank driver, I run into them anyways. Sometimes I may not react in time, other times there would be a situation where I'd rather run them over than be in the position I am, getting battered by FGs, SLs, turrets, etc. Taking this feature out will not change much. Having this feature in place can actually benefit infantry. You're preventing a tank from entering an area. Or just blow him the hell up. Proxies Plus Remotes. Instant Minefield. Looking for a Interesting Character Name? Why Not Zoidberg?


Pages: 1 2 :: [one page]

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online/DUST514, the EVE/DUST514 logo, EVE/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to OMG Labs to use EVE Online/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, OMG Labs. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.