Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Himiko Kuronaga
Fatal Absolution General Tso's Alliance
2929
|
Posted - 2014.02.10 22:46:00 -
[31] - Quote
Sigberct Amni wrote:Himiko Kuronaga wrote:Saying you talked with a Goon is like saying you talked with an Englishman. There's a lot of them. Doesn't mean much.
I think in the grand Goon hierarchy being the CEO of Goonfeet is just above Spai and just below Good Spai. I'm sure Mrs. Nature and Mr. Hiel are so very offended by your jab at their relevance. Surely you have crushed goon dreams on this day~ Please tell us more about relevance oh mighty space warrior(-ess?)
You're right.
No one should be compared to an Englishman. |
Samahiel
Goonfeet Special Planetary Emergency Response Group
237
|
Posted - 2014.02.10 23:41:00 -
[32] - Quote
Himiko Kuronaga wrote:
You're right.
No one should be compared to an Englishman.
"He IS an Englishman!" |
Michael Arck
Onuoto Uakan Huogaatsu
3149
|
Posted - 2014.02.11 00:24:00 -
[33] - Quote
Interesting. They don't want mercs ship boarding but view the future slaveminers, ahem, mercenaries as just as a labor force and that being their only chief commodity? If we are good for labor, we are good for sabotaging their ships. It's only fair we have that ability. Not to be only given the option to be their slave workers.
Alot of times, I disagree with Goonfleet perspectives.
Hnolai ki tuul, ti sei oni a tiu.
For the State!!
[email protected]
|
Samahiel
Goonfeet Special Planetary Emergency Response Group
238
|
Posted - 2014.02.11 00:46:00 -
[34] - Quote
Michael Arck wrote:Interesting. They don't want mercs ship boarding but view the future slaveminers, ahem, mercenaries as just as a labor force and that being their only chief commodity? If we are good for labor, we are good for sabotaging their ships. It's only fair we have that ability. Not to be only given the option to be their slave workers.
Alot of times, I disagree with Goonfleet perspectives.
Sabotage would be labor? I'm not quite sure what you're trying to get at with his one. I'm pro sabotaging just about everything but ships only because ships present some gameplay issues that I feel make them unworkable. You solves those and I'm all for it.
To quote myself from the comment section:
Quote:My main issue is that EVE battles are spontaneous, unpredictable, and fast. I don't feel mechanically that a Dust battle can be properly staged with two teams forming, deploying, and fighting in the time your typical titan gank takes. Maybe for a battle like HED or 6-VDT where everything was staged ahead of time and based around a timer, but in heavy time dilation a typical twenty minute dust match's effect would be applied 3-4 hours later. Furthermore battles like B-R and Asakai were based on spur of the moment exploitation of unpredictable mistakes. |
Michael Arck
Onuoto Uakan Huogaatsu
3150
|
Posted - 2014.02.11 01:03:00 -
[35] - Quote
What I said was simple. If EVE pilots wants us to be their slave labor to mine goods masked in the dressing of skirmish match to obtain goods, we should also be able to attack stations in EVE. In other words, it seems that from the interview, its okay to benefit from the mercs but anything that causes disruption or affect the EVE universe is frowned upon. I've read that many times when it comes to EVE players viewing Dust mercs...just a commodity and nothing more. We should be able to instigate matters in space and affect them as we choose. Not to be just common workhorses for capsuleers that's dressed as some common objective game when really we are just mining for goods. Allow both universes to affect each other.
I signed up for the war, not to mine goods for EVE players to profit on. Give us more meaning than your common footstool.
Hnolai ki tuul, ti sei oni a tiu.
For the State!!
[email protected]
|
Onesimus Tarsus
1172
|
Posted - 2014.02.11 01:06:00 -
[36] - Quote
Michael Arck wrote:What I said was simple. If EVE pilots wants us to be their slave labor to mine goods masked in the dressing of skirmish match to obtain goods, we should also be able to attack stations in EVE. In other words, it seems that from the interview, its okay to benefit from the mercs but anything that causes disruption or affect the EVE universe is frowned upon. I've read that many times when it comes to EVE players viewing Dust mercs...just a commodity and nothing more. We should be able to instigate matters in space and affect them as we choose. Not to be just common workhorses for capsuleers that's dressed as some common objective game when really we are just mining for goods. Allow both universes to affect each other.
I signed up for the war, not to mine goods for EVE players to profit on. Give us more meaning than your common footstool.
Yeah, just make it so that by some mechanic, when we do (A.) during a battle as opposed to (B.), a ship blows up in EvE. It ain't rocket surgery.
Spock, the Rock, Doc Ock and Hulk Hogan.
|
Heathen Bastard
The Bastard Brigade
913
|
Posted - 2014.02.11 01:11:00 -
[37] - Quote
I would actually like to see manufacturing be a thing for dust mercs. Not talking like having us building titans or anything, like having us make our own guns and vehicles on a small scale. But first we need a market.
OH! and that titan building thing you guys do. Maybe some kind of game mode where the mercs have to sabotage/steal the materials from a shipyard that can be instigated quietly(like from one of those fancy black-ops ships) with a minimal number of clones(like a sqaud or two). if the ship or clones are spotted, then the owner of the station gets an alert, if it goes off without a hitch, then they just log in to missing parts. if the clones or ship are spotted, several defensive gates get put in place that have to be either hacked or blasted open, and automated defenses(small turrets) are activated and they can hire their own mercs to fight.
If you hear the words "WORTH IT!" look about, something hilarious just happened.
|
Michael Arck
Onuoto Uakan Huogaatsu
3150
|
Posted - 2014.02.11 01:20:00 -
[38] - Quote
But seriously how can you say manufacturing and mercenary in the same sentence? The two don't even go together. Mercenaries commonly work below radar and do the dirtiest of war, committing to contracts that provide a nice paycheck when you complete a job that no other law abiding military faction would do.
So how come we need to manufacture? That's morphing from a merc fighting for his sovereignty or money gain to EVE's common workhorse. We are designed for the purpose of war...anything else, we just seem like the Arcadians in 300, bringing farmers to intense battles
Hnolai ki tuul, ti sei oni a tiu.
For the State!!
[email protected]
|
True Adamance
Praetoriani Classiarii Templares Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
6894
|
Posted - 2014.02.11 01:23:00 -
[39] - Quote
Michael Arck wrote:But seriously how can you say manufacturing and mercenary in the same sentence? The two don't even go together. Mercenaries commonly work below radar and do the dirtiest of war, committing to contracts that provide a nice paycheck when you complete a job that no other law abiding military faction would do.
So how come we need to manufacture? That's morphing from a merc fighting for his sovereignty or money gain to EVE's common workhorse. We are designed for the purpose of war...anything else, we just seem like the Arcadians in 300, bringing farmers to intense battles
Why do you say that. Our merc companies are called corporations for a reason. We can be part of alliance and conglomerates, why If we felt competent enough would be not stake out a planet or asteroid belt, harvest its goodies and in our own manufactories produces weapons and armours?
I know I certainly would if I were a merc....as it happens I am not.
"Just know that though our enemies may only #YOLO, through God's grace we can #YOLF at his side." - Disciple of Kesha
|
Michael Arck
Onuoto Uakan Huogaatsu
3150
|
Posted - 2014.02.11 01:29:00 -
[40] - Quote
True Adamance wrote:Michael Arck wrote:But seriously how can you say manufacturing and mercenary in the same sentence? The two don't even go together. Mercenaries commonly work below radar and do the dirtiest of war, committing to contracts that provide a nice paycheck when you complete a job that no other law abiding military faction would do.
So how come we need to manufacture? That's morphing from a merc fighting for his sovereignty or money gain to EVE's common workhorse. We are designed for the purpose of war...anything else, we just seem like the Arcadians in 300, bringing farmers to intense battles Why do you say that. Our merc companies are called corporations for a reason. We can be part of alliance and conglomerates, why If we felt competent enough would be not stake out a planet or asteroid belt, harvest its goodies and in our own manufactories produces weapons and armours? I know I certainly would if I were a merc....as it happens I am not.
Because I don't want to be just some EVE's players workhorse. I want respect from EVE pilots and right now they view Dust mercs as commodities. That's no different than a toaster oven in your kitchen. I am a mercenary. I came here for the war and to kill...not to mine for goodies. They have other people who can do that. I'm pretty sure that they do. Because, you know, miners mine goods, while mercenaries just fight for contracts or certain beliefs.
Hnolai ki tuul, ti sei oni a tiu.
For the State!!
[email protected]
|
|
Tolen Rosas
Kang Lo Directorate Gallente Federation
358
|
Posted - 2014.02.11 01:50:00 -
[41] - Quote
Prius Vecht wrote:Was thinking: solution might be to start shipboarding in PVE against NPC ships.
i agree with this. still want it in pvp tho |
BAD FURRY
SVER True Blood Public Disorder.
462
|
Posted - 2014.02.11 01:59:00 -
[42] - Quote
Dusters Blog wrote:'In the aftermath of some of the best discussion ever on the Dust forum [aka the thread that wont go away] Our blog recently had a sitdown with the infamous Goons and talked Dust, good times were had by all. Bombs were dropped. See our blog tomorrow for our sitdown with TEST.' read the rest here: http://tinyurl.com/kk4c8mm
the best one you ever did was this
Yes i am a Undead Hell Wolf ... nice to meat you!
|
Samahiel
Goonfeet Special Planetary Emergency Response Group
240
|
Posted - 2014.02.11 04:49:00 -
[43] - Quote
Now that I am back from the bar and being social I can catch up again.
Michael Arck wrote:What I said was simple. If EVE pilots wants us to be their slave labor to mine goods masked in the dressing of skirmish match to obtain goods, we should also be able to attack stations in EVE. In other words, it seems that from the interview, its okay to benefit from the mercs but anything that causes disruption or affect the EVE universe is frowned upon. I've read that many times when it comes to EVE players viewing Dust mercs...just a commodity and nothing more. We should be able to instigate matters in space and affect them as we choose. Not to be just common workhorses for capsuleers that's dressed as some common objective game when really we are just mining for goods. Allow both universes to affect each other.
I signed up for the war, not to mine goods for EVE players to profit on. Give us more meaning than your common footstool.
I have no idea how you're getting any of that from what I wrote. I specifically said, outside of a few nifty examples, that I don't think dust mercenaries should produce items. By labor I ment shooting people in the face. They're mercenaries who kill things, not miners, not industrialists, not research scientist.
I'm also arguing for that dust needs to fit into a strategic framework of decisions. So, pretty much the opposite of the strawman you seem to be shouting at.
Michael Arck wrote:Because I don't want to be just some EVE's players workhorse. I want respect from EVE pilots and right now they view Dust mercs as commodities. That's no different than a toaster oven in your kitchen. I am a mercenary. I came here for the war and to kill...not to mine for goodies. They have other people who can do that. I'm pretty sure that they do. Because, you know, miners mine goods, while mercenaries just fight for contracts or certain beliefs.
I think mercs should be mercs who sell the labor of they're mercing. so I think we're in agreement, but you misunderstood the semantics of what I was saying.
Heathen Bastard wrote:OH! and that titan building thing you guys do. Maybe some kind of game mode where the mercs have to sabotage/steal the materials from a shipyard that can be instigated quietly(like from one of those fancy black-ops ships) with a minimal number of clones(like a sqaud or two). if the ship or clones are spotted, then the owner of the station gets an alert, if it goes off without a hitch, then they just log in to missing parts. if the clones or ship are spotted, several defensive gates get put in place that have to be either hacked or blasted open, and automated defenses(small turrets) are activated and they can hire their own mercs to fight.
Now here's a good constructive idea that's not bad game design or couched in paranoid schizophrenia.
Edit #whatever I've been drinking
The entire point of everything I've been saying is that Dust needs the ability to stand on it's own; we need a sense of agency and purpose in what we do; and that the things we offer eve need to be short cuts, dirty tricks, or strategic alternatives to established gameplay and that resource gathering isn't the way to go about it. |
Killar-12
The Corporate Raiders Top Men.
2291
|
Posted - 2014.02.11 05:06:00 -
[44] - Quote
Michael Arck wrote:True Adamance wrote:Michael Arck wrote:But seriously how can you say manufacturing and mercenary in the same sentence? The two don't even go together. Mercenaries commonly work below radar and do the dirtiest of war, committing to contracts that provide a nice paycheck when you complete a job that no other law abiding military faction would do.
So how come we need to manufacture? That's morphing from a merc fighting for his sovereignty or money gain to EVE's common workhorse. We are designed for the purpose of war...anything else, we just seem like the Arcadians in 300, bringing farmers to intense battles Why do you say that. Our merc companies are called corporations for a reason. We can be part of alliance and conglomerates, why If we felt competent enough would be not stake out a planet or asteroid belt, harvest its goodies and in our own manufactories produces weapons and armours? I know I certainly would if I were a merc....as it happens I am not. Because I don't want to be just some EVE's players workhorse. I want respect from EVE pilots and right now they view Dust mercs as commodities. That's no different than a toaster oven in your kitchen. I am a mercenary. I came here for the war and to kill...not to mine for goodies. They have other people who can do that. I'm pretty sure that they do. Because, you know, miners mine goods, while mercenaries just fight for contracts or certain beliefs. Capsuleers look at each other as commodities... Stations/POSes seem better than ships in the sens that they're more manageable, and the one's keeping the servers up...
Listen
I'll change the song every week
|
Michael Arck
Onuoto Uakan Huogaatsu
3161
|
Posted - 2014.02.11 05:23:00 -
[45] - Quote
Killar-12 wrote:Michael Arck wrote:True Adamance wrote:Michael Arck wrote:But seriously how can you say manufacturing and mercenary in the same sentence? The two don't even go together. Mercenaries commonly work below radar and do the dirtiest of war, committing to contracts that provide a nice paycheck when you complete a job that no other law abiding military faction would do.
So how come we need to manufacture? That's morphing from a merc fighting for his sovereignty or money gain to EVE's common workhorse. We are designed for the purpose of war...anything else, we just seem like the Arcadians in 300, bringing farmers to intense battles Why do you say that. Our merc companies are called corporations for a reason. We can be part of alliance and conglomerates, why If we felt competent enough would be not stake out a planet or asteroid belt, harvest its goodies and in our own manufactories produces weapons and armours? I know I certainly would if I were a merc....as it happens I am not. Because I don't want to be just some EVE's players workhorse. I want respect from EVE pilots and right now they view Dust mercs as commodities. That's no different than a toaster oven in your kitchen. I am a mercenary. I came here for the war and to kill...not to mine for goodies. They have other people who can do that. I'm pretty sure that they do. Because, you know, miners mine goods, while mercenaries just fight for contracts or certain beliefs. Capsuleers look at each other as commodities... Stations/POSes seem better than ships in the sens that they're more manageable, and the one's keeping the servers up...
That still doesn't excuse how often times we looked upon as insignificant commodities that are workhorses for pilots in space.
Hnolai ki tuul, ti sei oni a tiu.
For the State!!
[email protected]
|
Samahiel
Goonfeet Special Planetary Emergency Response Group
240
|
Posted - 2014.02.11 05:27:00 -
[46] - Quote
Michael Arck wrote: That still doesn't excuse how often times we looked upon as insignificant commodities that are workhorses for pilots in space.
I'm sorry some of the feel that way, and that it bothers you. That is not the core of what I am saying however. Nor is it the foundation on which I have constructed any of my ideas. |
Killar-12
The Corporate Raiders Top Men.
2291
|
Posted - 2014.02.11 05:29:00 -
[47] - Quote
Michael Arck wrote:Killar-12 wrote:Michael Arck wrote:True Adamance wrote:Michael Arck wrote:But seriously how can you say manufacturing and mercenary in the same sentence? The two don't even go together. Mercenaries commonly work below radar and do the dirtiest of war, committing to contracts that provide a nice paycheck when you complete a job that no other law abiding military faction would do.
So how come we need to manufacture? That's morphing from a merc fighting for his sovereignty or money gain to EVE's common workhorse. We are designed for the purpose of war...anything else, we just seem like the Arcadians in 300, bringing farmers to intense battles Why do you say that. Our merc companies are called corporations for a reason. We can be part of alliance and conglomerates, why If we felt competent enough would be not stake out a planet or asteroid belt, harvest its goodies and in our own manufactories produces weapons and armours? I know I certainly would if I were a merc....as it happens I am not. Because I don't want to be just some EVE's players workhorse. I want respect from EVE pilots and right now they view Dust mercs as commodities. That's no different than a toaster oven in your kitchen. I am a mercenary. I came here for the war and to kill...not to mine for goodies. They have other people who can do that. I'm pretty sure that they do. Because, you know, miners mine goods, while mercenaries just fight for contracts or certain beliefs. Capsuleers look at each other as commodities... Stations/POSes seem better than ships in the sens that they're more manageable, and the one's keeping the servers up... That still doesn't excuse how often times we looked upon as insignificant commodities that are workhorses for pilots in space. EVE pilots are weirdos(Myself included) getting their respect doesn't bother me getting paid (or given gear as reimbursement) does, that's why I joined Top Men, we're decent DUST side but EVE side we're at our full power. trust me a Station would be more managable of a battle than would one on a ship especially with Ti-Di.
Listen
I'll change the song every week
|
Samahiel
Goonfeet Special Planetary Emergency Response Group
240
|
Posted - 2014.02.11 05:33:00 -
[48] - Quote
Killar-12 wrote:EVE pilots are weirdos(Myself included ) getting their respect doesn't bother me getting paid (or given gear as reimbursement) does, that's why I joined Top Men, we're decent DUST side but EVE side we're at our full power. trust me a Station would be more managable of a battle than would one on a ship especially with Ti-Di.
Imagine a dust fight in 10% Ti-Di. Imagine a Rail Rifle that fires a round every 1.3 seconds and takes 32 seconds to reload.
With gameplay like that, is it any wonder we capsuleers are a bit warped? |
Heathen Bastard
The Bastard Brigade
917
|
Posted - 2014.02.11 05:33:00 -
[49] - Quote
In the end, it's not about one side being better than the other, it's just that there needs to be some kind of symbiosis between capsuleers and mercs. We don't steal their ships, they don't start exploding planets with titan bombardments.
And yes, we do provide the raw labor part of the economy, the labor is killing things and hacking stuff. They need to implement the "new eden feel" into it as well, that fundamental feeling of "can I trust this guy or am I going to end up shivved and stuck behind enemy lines in nullsec with titans being hotdropped on my ass". That well, sabotage. Entire wars have been won and lost based on single ships getting destroyed because they got separated from their escort, or entire alliances collapsing due to a single poorly timed logistical failure.
We could be that logistical failure. Imagine a titan pilot trying to get back to his safety bubble only to find that some punk mercs shut it off only moments before? That kind of crap would make headlines! The QQ would be enormous! Imagine the kind of pay you could rake in for (in the idea I posted earlier) robbing a shipyard blind. Hell, imagine the demand for work from EVE since they'd be getting a direct benefit from it.
If you hear the words "WORTH IT!" look about, something hilarious just happened.
|
Samahiel
Goonfeet Special Planetary Emergency Response Group
240
|
Posted - 2014.02.11 05:35:00 -
[50] - Quote
Heathen Bastard wrote:In the end, it's not about one side being better than the other, it's just that there needs to be some kind of symbiosis between capsuleers and mercs. We don't steal their ships, they don't start exploding planets with titan bombardments.
And yes, we do provide the raw labor part of the economy, the labor is killing things and hacking stuff. They need to implement the "new eden feel" into it as well, that fundamental feeling of "can I trust this guy or am I going to end up shivved and stuck behind enemy lines in nullsec with titans being hotdropped on my ass". That well, sabotage. Entire wars have been won and lost based on single ships getting destroyed because they got separated from their escort, or entire alliances collapsing due to a single poorly timed logistical failure.
We could be that logistical failure. Imagine a titan pilot trying to get back to his safety bubble only to find that some punk mercs shut it off only moments before? That kind of crap would make headlines! The QQ would be enormous! Imagine the kind of pay you could rake in for (in the idea I posted earlier) robbing a shipyard blind. Hell, imagine the demand for work from EVE since they'd be getting a direct benefit from it.
This is a good post and some good ideas. |
|
Samahiel
Goonfeet Special Planetary Emergency Response Group
240
|
Posted - 2014.02.11 05:47:00 -
[51] - Quote
Actually a good example of what a typical titan kill looks like is this killmail. https://zkillboard.com/detail/32243466/
This titan was in my fleet when he died. We were in harpies camping in Test survivors trying to evac their assets before they became trapped in 6VDT. Our FC joked about bringing in a titan to drive by DD a carrier that was playing undock games with us, and the bridging titan in our staging system thought it would be funny to jump into system and do just that. The FC was pretty on the ball and got the titan to the safety of a staging pos in system immediately, then chewed the guy out for being dumb.
Later that night, we decided to use that titan as a bridge to get us home so he logged in at the pos and we all kept him at range. Unknown to us, a spy had noticed him enter system. Just as soon as the fleet bridge out, and he lacked the cap to jump, they warped in dreads and battleships to bump him out of the safety of the POS shield. Their spy of course new the password.
Having neither the capacity to jump out before being pointed, nor the forsight to fit a cyno to bring in reinforcements, he was immediately pointed by heavy inderdictors and neuted by battleships. Having a bridging instead of a combat fit, the dreads quickly chewed through his tank and he was dead within minutes while we all listened helplessly on comms.
Titans die very rarely. When they die they die quickly, and almost always alone to small tactical mistakes. All though Goonswarms External, Internal, and Secret motto has always been Death2ALLsupers, I do not think that dust boarding parties have the time or the opportunity to participate in this particular type of fight. I'd rather focus our energies on more productive avenues. |
Prius Vecht
Red and Silver Hand Amarr Empire
325
|
Posted - 2014.02.11 06:08:00 -
[52] - Quote
Agree that the time dilation problem has to be resolved first. PVE boarding until then. |
Heathen Bastard
The Bastard Brigade
918
|
Posted - 2014.02.11 06:37:00 -
[53] - Quote
as far as I understand it, EVE's combat is so alpha focused that anything short of "Major combat" involving massive amounts of ships that damn near break the servers tends to end within minutes. it'd be tough to put out a contract, get mercs, and load them in in that amount of time.
But then again, all I've ever done is trial accounts and single combat when I either had the drop on them or massively outgunned them, and had the drop on them. at least in the small ship game, it's not necessarily about "sustainable" dps, it's all about being able to punch them into the foorboards on your first volley, before they can activate any of their modules.
If you hear the words "WORTH IT!" look about, something hilarious just happened.
|
Himiko Kuronaga
Fatal Absolution General Tso's Alliance
2932
|
Posted - 2014.02.11 08:44:00 -
[54] - Quote
I don't think the TiDi issue itself is unsolvable. But ship boarding should probably be limited to super capitals like Titans.
I do think there needs to be a special condition that makes the slowness of time being passed less relevant to a Dust teams presence on the ship itself.
For example, if a Doomsday is fired a titan becomes momentarily vulnerable to boarding and the Dust team is given a 10 minute game if the boarding attempt is made fast enough eve-side. Within that game you could have all kinds of secondary objectives, none of which mean outright hijacking of the ship but possibly sabotaging certain subsystems/planting bombs to cripple it to the point it is an easy target for the fleet to kill.
All acts of sabotage go into effect the moment the Titan "recovers" from its Doomsday cycle.
As for how teams deploy, CCP implements a system that locks multiple teams into the fleet system in a certain order, which the fleet commander can set. Each specific team can be set to defense or offense, and the system would automatically deploy these teams whenever a boarding attempt is made on either side. |
Samahiel
Goonfeet Special Planetary Emergency Response Group
252
|
Posted - 2014.02.11 18:06:00 -
[55] - Quote
Heathen Bastard wrote:But then again, all I've ever done is trial accounts and single combat when I either had the drop on them or massively outgunned them, and had the drop on them. at least in the small ship game, it's not necessarily about "sustainable" dps, it's all about being able to punch them into the foorboards on your first volley, before they can activate any of their modules.
Sorta. It's not about sustained DPS in the sense of cap stability. Most ship of the line battleships can choose to either maneuver or fire, but not both, and are typically fit for volley fire.You're not trying to overcome the targets module activation speed though, local tank is trivial to alpha with even a handful of ships. Your main concern is their remote logistics, so it's about being able to either strike before their space priests can lock and heal them, or do so much damage they can't keep up.
But it's not all alpha fleets and there are some high DPS grinding fleets out there. Angel fleets using Taloses, Baltec fleets of blaster megathrons, Welpfleet using Hurricanes or Tempest, and Waterboarding fleets of brawling Dominixes. The general idea behind these fleets is high sustained DPS and a ton of ewar/neuts for chewing through large chunks of HP while breaking rep chains. Typically for fighting capitals with are almost impossible to alpha off the field.
|
Ayures II
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
427
|
Posted - 2014.02.11 18:14:00 -
[56] - Quote
Prius Vecht wrote:Was thinking: solution might be to start shipboarding in PVE against NPC ships.
I could see this possibly working in incursions against moms. |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |