|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 5 post(s) |
CEOPyrex CloneA
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar
DARKSTAR ARMY
609
   |
Posted - 2014.02.17 21:28:00 -
[1] - Quote
Luk Manag wrote:CEO Pyrex agrees with Judge. While utterly dominating in a Domination (Assault Dropship), he lamented on the level of risk a prototype railtaink represents. He cited all of the rigorous evidence, because you guys think tanks should have less range and be prevented from pointing up... silly. I'm fine with removing redlines, but don't nerf the only real counter for the Dropship.
No you are wrong, so wrong, in fact you are so far from being right that you had a make a two day trip to get to this conclusion (reasonably priced motel stop over - pool was crap - AC a little disappointing)
Red line railgun tanks are VERY broken indeed, why should you have all the power and almost no risk at all. that to me smacks of 'im alright Jack' and protectionism.
Frankly CCP are not showing much leadership or collaboration on this topic either, almost 3 months of 1.7 with very little sight of 1.8 coming except (before fanfest maybe) that means there is a potential 6 months between patches and that to me says this game is no longer important or valued by CCP and is being kept alive by a skeleton crew to keep the 1.6m GBP PA it perhaps makes going.
CCP need to wake up and realize they have a rough diamond here that with the right level of effort would make good money, what we see instead is a focus on a tech demo game which requires the user to shell out -ú200 for a pair of goggles that are already technically obsolete, a WOD franchise that apparently is now going to be a bit like DAYZ (way to bandwagon onto a game that itself is already dead) and a cash cow that is about to be totally overtaken by Star Citizen and Elite Dangerous, both games with incredible pedigrees already.
Seriously CCP are you asleep at the wheel?
|
CEOPyrex CloneA
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar
DARKSTAR ARMY
612
|
Posted - 2014.02.19 21:07:00 -
[2] - Quote
Luk Manag wrote:Ad-hominem? I don't think that applies when the claim is evidence based. It's more like a Dust Meme.
Railguns do more damage, but HP and resistance values were modified so the dropship is tougher than ever. It was easier to one-shot a dropship pre 1.7, and while it may be true that railguns do more damage, the fact that dropships are more survivable now makes the statement about damage a misdirection. The whole video was the unsubstantiated fluff (with some excellent examples of team support - btw Judge, thanks for the videos). It had nice graphs, sure, but you could have just said. "I don't like how tanks are able to shoot up in the air."
Look how stupid you are, seriously.
The evidence is pretty clear, the case is practically open and shut, your little attempt to 'cloud' the issue has failed. |
|
|
| |
|