Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Knight Soiaire
Fatal Absolution
4894
|
Posted - 2014.02.02 13:39:00 -
[31] - Quote
Being a likeable person is usually a good platform, no one wants to share their ideas or cooperate with an *******.
Fatal Absolution Operation - LVL 5
Fatal Absolution Pro. - LVL 5
FOTM Abuser, outta mah way Nyain San!
|
Radar R4D-47
0uter.Heaven Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
400
|
Posted - 2014.02.02 18:30:00 -
[32] - Quote
Mossellia Delt wrote:
Do you think your phone will be enough for this position? Do you have any sort of plan to buy a computer for this should you be elected?
I have plans to buy a computer to continue my eve career. My phone is always connected to the internet and always on my person its what I use for these forums. I can think of no better tool. |
Tech De Ra
Electronic Sports League
314
|
Posted - 2014.02.02 21:22:00 -
[33] - Quote
Radar R4D-47 wrote:Mossellia Delt wrote:
Do you think your phone will be enough for this position? Do you have any sort of plan to buy a computer for this should you be elected?
I have plans to buy a computer to continue my eve career. My phone is always connected to the internet and always on my person its what I use for these forums. I can think of no better tool.
What Delt means is that the CPM members use skype to have conference calls with shanghai devs, a phone is not really the ideal tool for that
Tech De Ra for CPM1
|
Radar R4D-47
0uter.Heaven Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
405
|
Posted - 2014.02.02 21:27:00 -
[34] - Quote
Interesting.... Well as I said I plan on getting a new laptop. Could do so now if I want such a miser. By next month I will have one. |
Killar-12
The Corporate Raiders Top Men.
2142
|
Posted - 2014.02.02 21:33:00 -
[35] - Quote
Now we're getting what we were asking about yesterday... nice.
A-Teams win Battles B-Teams win Campaigns C-Teams win Wars
|
Killar-12
The Corporate Raiders Top Men.
2145
|
Posted - 2014.02.03 02:15:00 -
[36] - Quote
A few questions In what ways would you wish to see the Connection between capsuleers and infantry expanded?
How high on your list of priorities is having dust able to perform a constant framrate of say 30 FPS?
Would you wish for the return of Corporation Battles or rather the introduction of Team Deploy for Factional warfare?
I'm sure to come up with more questions, but these seem to be ones that many people have so I put them here
it's copy pasted into most of the Candidate's threads...
A-Teams win Battles B-Teams win Campaigns C-Teams win Wars
|
Radar R4D-47
0uter.Heaven Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
419
|
Posted - 2014.02.03 06:09:00 -
[37] - Quote
Killar-12 wrote:A few questions In what ways would you wish to see the Connection between capsuleers and infantry expanded?
Some kind of market integration where superior items can be created by utilizing both games. Interest from both parties will give capsullers and infantry common goals to work towards.
How high on your list of priorities is having dust able to perform a constant framrate of say 30 FPS?
I don't see much frame rate drop anymore from the game. They have nearly optimized the game as well as they can I believe. Maintaining a high fps reduces QQ we have currently. Most people I have ever squaded with feel that they lose a 1v1 due to a sudden framedrop or a lag spike. As far as priority goes its not something that can be suddenly fixed because so many thing account for the issues. So fairly low but maintaing optimal performance between updates is a priority.
Would you wish for the return of Corporation Battles or rather the introduction of Team Deploy for Factional warfare?
0.H was queue syncing FW fine last night got 6 matches in a row with little difficulty. Corporation Battles by far are the most important aspect of dust that needs brought back. PFC is a joke compared to what corporation battles were used for.
I'm sure to come up with more questions, but these seem to be ones that many people have so I put them here
it's copy pasted into most of the Candidate's threads...
|
Reiki Jubo
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
347
|
Posted - 2014.02.03 11:33:00 -
[38] - Quote
Mossellia Delt wrote:Noticed the lack of anything in the ways of NPE. Since that is the biggest issue currently, I find that frightning.
this. too many mentions of elite players and top tier talent. how would tryharding help u on the CPM? i vote no. |
Killar-12
The Corporate Raiders Top Men.
2157
|
Posted - 2014.02.03 14:06:00 -
[39] - Quote
Radar R4D-47 wrote:Killar-12 wrote:A few questions In what ways would you wish to see the Connection between capsuleers and infantry expanded?
Some kind of market integration where superior items can be created by utilizing both games. Interest from both parties will give capsullers and infantry common goals to work towards.
How high on your list of priorities is having dust able to perform a constant framrate of say 30 FPS?
I don't see much frame rate drop anymore from the game. They have nearly optimized the game as well as they can I believe. Maintaining a high fps reduces QQ we have currently. Most people I have ever squaded with feel that they lose a 1v1 due to a sudden framedrop or a lag spike. As far as priority goes its not something that can be suddenly fixed because so many thing account for the issues. So fairly low but maintaing optimal performance between updates is a priority.
Would you wish for the return of Corporation Battles or rather the introduction of Team Deploy for Factional warfare?
0.H was queue syncing FW fine last night got 6 matches in a row with little difficulty. Corporation Battles by far are the most important aspect of dust that needs brought back. PFC is a joke compared to what corporation battles were used for.
I'm sure to come up with more questions, but these seem to be ones that many people have so I put them here
it's copy pasted into most of the Candidate's threads... 1 Hmm
2 copy pasta from pre PC Frps fix
3 0.H has experience with Qsyncing, what about newer guys, I'd reckon it'd be easier to get them to TD than to try and back them out when something messes up.
CB's would be great
A-Teams win Battles B-Teams win Campaigns C-Teams win Wars
|
Fox Gaden
Immortal Guides
2397
|
Posted - 2014.02.03 15:28:00 -
[40] - Quote
Lets look beyond the fame and consider RadarGÇÖs qualifications and track record. Lets also stop getting hung up on stuff he did not say in his original post. There have been a number of candidates who I did not really have a feel for until at least the second page of their candidacy thread.
The fact that Radar is the CEO of a top PC Corp says a lot more than just making him a celebrity. It says that he has the social skills for people to want to follow his lead. It says he has the organizational skills to keep his corp functioning. It says that he can handle a position of responsibility. There are several CEOGÇÖs of large Corps who have announced their intention to run for CPM, so these strengths are not unique to Radar, but they should not be discounted either.
I think it is important to have the perspective of the competitive Planetary Conquest players represented on the CPM by at least one candidate, as they are an important segment of the DUST Community. The ability to represent that segment of the community is an important point in favour of each of the candidates who have run competitive PC Corps, or at least have the skills to play at that level.
What starts to make Radar stand out is his experience as a successful Field Commander, as well as his experience with such a wide variety of weapons and play styles. To be a good Field Commander you need to be able to see the big picture. You also need to have a good understanding of most if not all the roles on the battlefield and how they work together. Need I go into how important it is for a member of the CPM to able to see the big picture, and understanding a wide range of play styles?
RadarGÇÖs platform of being able to provide a truly balanced perspective on balance may not be as sexy as some of the other issues, but balance is going to be something that will remain an issue to one degree or anther as long at this game exists. Having a CPM who can see both sides of a balance debate is important!
Radar has also stated that player retention is an important issue for him. He has had friends leave the game and he wants to make the game unique and interesting enough to lure them back. While he relates to the issue on a personal level, it is one of the great issues that DUST faces. What does CCP need to do to make this game attract and retain the interest of a larger player base? The New Player experience is part of that, but making sure there are aspects of the game that keep more hard core players is part of it too.
We donGÇÖt want people voting for Radar just because he is a celebrity, but we should not be dismissing him as a celebrity either. We need to take a serious look at what he brings to the table and treat him just like any other candidate.
Fox Gaden: DUST Wall of Fame, 2014
|
|
Radar R4D-47
0uter.Heaven Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
420
|
Posted - 2014.02.03 15:47:00 -
[41] - Quote
Reiki Jubo_ wrote: "As a CEO of a powerful corporation my name draws players to me. I opened a squad in finder it filled in 28seconds."
please explain how this has anything to do with the cpm? u dont even have a computer bro?
I was asked how other then using my own corporation and the forums I would reach out to the community. That was an example of a way to meet players. Squadfinder is a tool ccp has given everyone. In my own corp I preach to open squadfinder every time you create a squad. |
Jaysyn Larrisen
OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention
714
|
Posted - 2014.02.03 18:34:00 -
[42] - Quote
Radar,
I posed the question below to Canari when he announced his candidacy and I put the same question to you. I have noticed the majority of the candidates are leaders in elite corps (I.e. the upper 10%) and some have deserved reputations as outstanding or even elite level solo players. This is not a bad thing...however, it begs the question of how you and some of the other candidates will represent the majority of players not in your level of corp or skill.
You are in a position of leadership in one of the top Corps / Alliances in the game. Much of the conversation in the forums relates to the disparity in ISK, PC, general opportunities between the small upper tier and everyone else. Can you please elaborate on how you intend to represent the rest of the community, i.e. the other 90%? How we will know you aren't soley shaping things for the elites?
"Third star to the right...straight ahead 'till morning."
|
Canari Elphus
Ancient Exiles. Renegade Alliance
1111
|
Posted - 2014.02.03 20:21:00 -
[43] - Quote
A lot has been talked about in regards to new players.
Taking off my candidate hat and asking as a veteran, how do you wish to see this game evolve for veterans to give them new experiences in Dust? How do you feel that you can increase competition between top corporations without sacrificing the experience of new players?
Canari Elphus for CPM1
|
Radar R4D-47
0uter.Heaven Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
421
|
Posted - 2014.02.03 20:56:00 -
[44] - Quote
Jaysyn Larrisen wrote: This is not a bad thing...however, it begs the question of how you and some of the other candidates will represent the majority of players not in your level of corp or skill.
You are in a position of leadership in one of the top Corps / Alliances in the game. Much of the conversation in the forums relates to the disparity in ISK, PC, general opportunities between the small upper tier and everyone else. Can you please elaborate on how you intend to represent the rest of the community, i.e. the other 90%? How we will know you aren't soley shaping things for the elites?
An interesting question to be sure. If I understand the entire CPM election it will be a panel or players representing the community. Currently in the CPM we have now we lack that player who has exception skills in FPS. Representing the other 90% o the community is usually based off what the Top 10% do.
Everyone complains about certain OP weapons because the Elite players use them and slaughter. Community complains about the isk disparity because the top 10% control PC. I'm not saying my views would be solely based upon the top 10%. However careful attention must be paid to how these players react as the community typically follow their actions.
My goals would be to reduce that disparity by giving the 10% something to do outside pub matches. Thus giving the 90% room to grow and eventually we will see the gap reduce. A pub match made for Elite level talent would go a long way to not only increase competition For upper talent but give the rest of the community a chance to enjoy the game.
Bringing me back to the 90% is as easy as reading general discussions, squading with new people, creating a channel like irc for players to voice their concerns to the CPM while in game. Creating a thread like my 0uter.Heaven thread. A thread to come vent after your hours of dusting.
Engaging the community in my opinion is simple. I would not solely represent the top tier talent in the game nor try to build the game for those players. I would be able to easily represent their concerns however and use the concerns in coordination with the views of the majority. |
Radar R4D-47
0uter.Heaven Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
421
|
Posted - 2014.02.03 21:17:00 -
[45] - Quote
Canari Elphus wrote:A lot has been talked about in regards to new players.
Taking off my candidate hat and asking as a veteran, how do you wish to see this game evolve for veterans to give them new experiences in Dust? How do you feel that you can increase competition between top corporations without sacrificing the experience of new players? I want to see racial balance and weapon balance. No FotM things. Diversify the battlefield and give all weapons the ability to thrive. Give suits bonuses that are specific and amplify a certain play style. Rebalance all the modules so caldari can fit shields easily but have to sacrifice a lot to fit armour. Vice versa for gallente.
I grow tired of PC's constant redundancy. Every build there is things far superior to others. All the corps spec into them and use the same tactics as every other corp to win. Then it comes down to individual talent that each corp can field. Usually the corp that starts to get hot gobbles up that talent quickly. Thus we have stagnant play due to all the competition playing for the same team.
I feel to increase competition between corps we need a game mode other then PC to Team Deploy into (Corporation Battles). The squad cup was also a great experience for all players that got a chance to play. Smaller numbers increase team play and allow for greater variability between squad setups.
Giving game modes that are resevered for solo players and squad deploy modes would drastically improve the enjoyment of dust for new and old players. I know it is frustrating playing a against one of the Top Tier corps squad while solo is awful. Equally Frustrating while playing some kind of team based mode and having teammates that have no idea what they are doing. |
Canari Elphus
Ancient Exiles. Renegade Alliance
1111
|
Posted - 2014.02.03 21:22:00 -
[46] - Quote
Radar R4D-47 wrote:Canari Elphus wrote:A lot has been talked about in regards to new players.
Taking off my candidate hat and asking as a veteran, how do you wish to see this game evolve for veterans to give them new experiences in Dust? How do you feel that you can increase competition between top corporations without sacrificing the experience of new players? I want to see racial balance and weapon balance. No FotM things. Diversify the battlefield and give all weapons the ability to thrive. Give suits bonuses that are specific and amplify a certain play style. Rebalance all the modules so caldari can fit shields easily but have to sacrifice a lot to fit armour. Vice versa for gallente. I grow tired of PC's constant redundancy. Every build there is things far superior to others. All the corps spec into them and use the same tactics as every other corp to win. Then it comes down to individual talent that each corp can field. Usually the corp that starts to get hot gobbles up that talent quickly. Thus we have stagnant play due to all the competition playing for the same team. I feel to increase competition between corps we need a game mode other then PC to Team Deploy into (Corporation Battles). The squad cup was also a great experience for all players that got a chance to play. Smaller numbers increase team play and allow for greater variability between squad setups. Giving game modes that are resevered for solo players and squad deploy modes would drastically improve the enjoyment of dust for new and old players. I know it is frustrating playing against one of the Top Tier corps squad while solo is awful. Equally Frustrating while playing some kind of team based mode and having teammates that have no idea what they are doing.
Are you looking to take the focus away from PC and replace it with something else or to add another avenue for team play?
Canari Elphus for CPM1
|
Radar R4D-47
0uter.Heaven Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
421
|
Posted - 2014.02.03 21:41:00 -
[47] - Quote
Pc is supposed to be the End -game content. Currently it is the only way to have a truly competitive battle. I want to offer different means of gameplay for CCP to look at rather then focus on a gamemode that is extremely time intensive and politically charged. This will give the players that feel left out of PC a chance to engage in competitive battles without the aforementioned challenges of PC. In turn offering more competitive game modes will ideally offer the casual player a chance to enjoy the game without getting spawn trapped by the top tier talent. As those players will be playing the competitive modes. |
Canari Elphus
Ancient Exiles. Renegade Alliance
1112
|
Posted - 2014.02.03 21:48:00 -
[48] - Quote
Radar R4D-47 wrote:Pc is supposed to be the End -game content. Currently it is the only way to have a truly competitive battle. I want to offer different means of gameplay for CCP to look at rather then focus on a gamemode that is extremely time intensive and politically charged. This will give the players that feel left out of PC a chance to engage in competitive battles without the aforementioned challenges of PC. In turn offering more competitive game modes will ideally offer the casual player a chance to enjoy the game without getting spawn trapped by the top tier talent. As those players will be playing the competitive modes.
Fair enough, thanks for explaining your view.
Canari Elphus for CPM1
|
Jaysyn Larrisen
OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention
717
|
Posted - 2014.02.03 22:40:00 -
[49] - Quote
Radar R4D-47 wrote: An interesting question to be sure. If I understand the entire CPM election it will be a panel or players representing the community. Currently in the CPM we have now we lack that player who has exception skills in FPS. Representing the other 90% o the community is usually based off what the Top 10% do.
Everyone complains about certain OP weapons because the Elite players use them and slaughter. Community complains about the isk disparity because the top 10% control PC. I'm not saying my views would be solely based upon the top 10%. However careful attention must be paid to how these players react as the community typically follow their actions.
My goals would be to reduce that disparity by giving the 10% something to do outside pub matches. Thus giving the 90% room to grow and eventually we will see the gap reduce. A pub match made for Elite level talent would go a long way to not only increase competition For upper talent but give the rest of the community a chance to enjoy the game.
Bringing me back to the 90% is as easy as reading general discussions, squading with new people, creating a channel like irc for players to voice their concerns to the CPM while in game. Creating a thread like my 0uter.Heaven thread. A thread to come vent after your hours of dusting.
Engaging the community in my opinion is simple. I would not solely represent the top tier talent in the game nor try to build the game for those players. I would be able to easily represent their concerns however and use the concerns in coordination with the views of the majority.
Radar,
Thanks for the response and your candor. The underlined portions of your response are frankly what have me concerned. I'm not so sure that the community takes their lead from the elites so much as has to work around whatever you want to do.
Consider this...when informing CCP of potential options for weapon and equipment tweaks could you honestly say you can take into account the average player? Their skill level is likely to be drastically lower than yours; mechanics you and other members of 0uter Heaven can easily manipulate and overcome might be beyond most of them. Not poking...just asking.
I do really like your stance on providing different opportunities to new and veteran players that give them options and flexibility..that's definetly a bonus.
Again, not trolling at all. I'm just asking pointed questions to the person that might be representing me as they voice community feedback and ideas to CCP.
"Third star to the right...straight ahead 'till morning."
|
Radar R4D-47
0uter.Heaven Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
422
|
Posted - 2014.02.03 22:55:00 -
[50] - Quote
Jaysyn Larrisen wrote: Consider this...when informing CCP of potential options for weapon and equipment tweaks could you honestly say you can take into account the average player? Their skill level is likely to be drastically lower than yours; mechanics you and other members of 0uter Heaven can easily manipulate and overcome might be beyond most of them. Not poking...just asking.
Weapon Feedback isn't my only stance on wanting to be CPM. I would never try to give my corporation an edge by trying to convince CCP to change something that would in turn benefit my corporation over others. Take 1.7 for instance this was a great build for bringing a better connection of Eve and dust. That being said it was absolutely awful for the Proficiency 5 alliance. We had no Eve presence at all and our adaptation was not very swift. Yet I would still have pushed for this development of the game despite the negative impact it would have on my corporation. Now take 1.8 0.H has some very talented scouts. This build looks to be giving scouts some needed love. I advocate against this buff on scouts even though I think it may be beneficial to my corporation. My actions will never be to further the goals of my corporation but to further the game and growth of its community. |
|
Jaysyn Larrisen
OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention
719
|
Posted - 2014.02.03 23:05:00 -
[51] - Quote
Thanks for responding and making your position on this clear; it's a touchy topic and you handled it well. Good luck in the election.
"Third star to the right...straight ahead 'till morning."
|
Radar R4D-47
0uter.Heaven Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
424
|
Posted - 2014.02.05 05:53:00 -
[52] - Quote
Got me a laptop! Disaster diverted all is safe in the CPM world.
|
Shiyou Hidiyoshi
Ancient Exiles. Renegade Alliance
133
|
Posted - 2014.02.05 07:06:00 -
[53] - Quote
Honky (Radar) has played A LOT of Dust and knows A LOT about Dust. If people are concerned about "elitist" crap then look at Kane aka NF. He has been on the CPM for a long time, yet I don't really hear about "elitist" stuff coming from him. Elitist in my opinion is EVERYONE who has over 10 mil SP because they have played for months through crap. They know how the game works (most) but many don't know what Radar knows. Radar has the experience of running a corp, playing different roles, PC, and playing A LOT of Dust. Check the leaderboards, Radar is VERY high up there showing that he has in game experience. I would rather elect someone in a strong corp that many new players/scrubs/idiots hate, than some random person that barely anyone knows who view any and every strong corp as evil. When Radar is in a match, people know his name and praise/curse him out. Would you rather elect someone who has walked the walk and has done many things in the game or some random person who most never heard of until now?
My theme song
Dad (CCP Logibro) please love me! cries - Yoshi
|
Shiyou Hidiyoshi
Ancient Exiles. Renegade Alliance
133
|
Posted - 2014.02.05 07:13:00 -
[54] - Quote
By the way, I may be in AE but I have finally reached 17.5 mil SP after getting the game on 05/14/13. I have walked down the road of constantly getting stomped, so I know how it is as a fresh blueberry and as a good player in a strong corp. So I say in my experience, Radar is a good candidate who has the potential of doing a lot as a CPM weenie head. Good luck Honky O7
My theme song
Dad (CCP Logibro) please love me! cries - Yoshi
|
Tolen Rosas
Kang Lo Directorate Gallente Federation
316
|
Posted - 2014.02.05 11:47:00 -
[55] - Quote
no offense but pretty sure u are the worst candidate I have seen so far Radar.
dont believe u really got a computer either. |
Radar R4D-47
0uter.Heaven Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
426
|
Posted - 2014.02.05 14:51:00 -
[56] - Quote
Tolen Rosas wrote:no offense but pretty sure u are the worst candidate I have seen so far Radar.
dont believe u really got a computer either. Thank you for your input care to elaborate? |
D3LTA Blitzkrieg II
0uter.Heaven Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
70
|
Posted - 2014.02.05 18:10:00 -
[57] - Quote
Tolen Rosas wrote:no offense but pretty sure u are the worst candidate I have seen so far Radar.
dont believe u really got a computer either.
Radar has more experience on the competitive side of DUST than all the CPM1 candidates combined. Sense the start of PC hes shown full comprehension of both meta game and ground game. Armed with the experience and skills necessary to successfully run a top corp, hes sure to give a voice to all the veterans out there.
With all the SP and ISK gathered there's got to be a higher purpose for all dusties. And your chance to leave your mark on New Eden in form of district holding is a rather unique feature only found in DUST. CPM needs a candidate with PC experience that can see this unique game mode come to fruition. |
Reiki Jubo
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
358
|
Posted - 2014.02.05 21:58:00 -
[58] - Quote
D3LTA Blitzkrieg II wrote:Tolen Rosas wrote:no offense but pretty sure u are the worst candidate I have seen so far Radar.
dont believe u really got a computer either. Radar has more experience on the competitive side of DUST than all the CPM1 candidates combined. Sense the start of PC hes shown full comprehension of both meta game and ground game. Armed with the experience and skills necessary to successfully run a top corp, hes sure to give a voice to all the veterans out there. With all the SP and ISK gathered there's got to be a higher purpose for all dusties. And your chance to leave your mark on New Eden in form of district holding is a rather unique feature only found in DUST. CPM needs a candidate with PC experience that can see this unique game mode come to fruition.
oh great, now he told guys in his corp to get in here and help |
Radar R4D-47
0uter.Heaven Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
481
|
Posted - 2014.02.06 12:03:00 -
[59] - Quote
i actually havent told any of them. Slightly disapointed to see one of my corp mates posting here. |
Zatara Rought
Fatal Absolution
2086
|
Posted - 2014.02.06 23:54:00 -
[60] - Quote
Radar R4D-47 wrote:i actually havent told any of them. Slightly disapointed to see one of my corp mates posting here.
You're disappointed to see one of your corp mates posting here?
Gotta be a bad troll.
CEO Fatal Absolution
B3RT > PFBHz > TP > MHPD > IMP > F4TAL
Skype me @ Zatara.Rought
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |