Pages: 1 2 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
trollface dot jpg
The Bacon Corporation
148
|
Posted - 2014.01.30 16:09:00 -
[1] - Quote
And one last time, with GUSTO
Step 1. Increase the strength AND duration of STD hardners by 3%, ADV hardners by 5% & PRO hardners by 10%
Step 2. Stop hardner stacking.
Step 3. Make hardners have drawback effects. Armor hardners, when activated, should slow your movement speed by 80%. Shield hardners should cancel all shield regeneration until the hardner goes off.
Step 4. Slight damage buff to light AV and 'nades (around 10% for light AV, around 5% for AV grenades) to compensate for repair stacking fits (to ensure AV weapons are capable of keeping up with the rep cycle)
Results:
Tanks actually have waves of opportunity
Militia hardners are trash compared to good hardners
Hardners used intelligently are great but used poorly are worthless (hardner management becomes a "thing")
There are finally huge differences between shield and armor tanking besides just the fittings. Armor becomes "stand and deliver", shields become "hit and run".
4 changes, problem solved, crisis concluded. Tanks will be at around Chromosome levels of balance (Chromosome is considered "the golden age" of tank balance) with current Uprising price tags.
RIP MAG, you will be missed.
MAG Vet ~ Raven
|
Lucifalic
Nos Nothi
249
|
Posted - 2014.01.30 16:15:00 -
[2] - Quote
I would add. While hardeners are active and in cooldown there is absolutely NO repairing of armor or shields (depending on which hardener was used). This would make tanks have to retreat for longer not drive around a building and come back at full strength. And absolutely no recalling when hardeners are in cooldown |
ResistanceGTA
D.A.R.K L.E.G.I.O.N D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
134
|
Posted - 2014.01.30 16:19:00 -
[3] - Quote
Lucifalic wrote:I would add. While hardeners are active and in cooldown there is absolutely NO repairing of armor or shields (depending on which hardener was used). This would make tanks have to retreat for longer not drive around a building and come back at full strength. And absolutely no recalling when hardeners are in cooldown
I can't back this at all. You know, tanks aren't the only ones who use hardness, right everyone? Dropships also use them. You're taking people out of the battle for minutes at a time, nullifying the use of vehicles.
P.A.I.R.- Pilot Against Invisible RDVs.
|
Drapedup Drippedout
0uter.Heaven Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
257
|
Posted - 2014.01.30 16:20:00 -
[4] - Quote
Why would an active hardner slow your tank? How would you escape AV? -1
Stop hardener stacking? If you can fit it, you should be able to run it. Stop or severely penalize dual stacking armor&shield. +.5
Hardener drawback? How about its only good for ~1 min? then has a recharge. Working as intended. -1
Slight buff to AV nades +1, to compensate for dual hardeners.....(didn't you just say no dual hardeners?) -1
AV should take teamwork. Tanks are balanced in PC, pubs, who the **** cares. Git gud. Tanks are still ez mode with 1 forge gunner, or 2 swarm launchers.
You don't have to kill the tank, you just have to render it ineffective. The more time a tank spends recharging hardeners and retreating, the less time it spends wiping troops.
AV needs to stop thinking like they possess OHK weapons, and start to realize that you simply have area denial AV. (much like what the mass driver and laser rifle do to infantry currently)
I am in favor of turning swarms into a sidearm in their current form though.
PS - I have zero SP invested into tanks, I have alts who **** around with tanks, only so I understand the mechanics behind the role. I do have a PC forge gunner and IMO tanks are very close to balanced. |
LudiKure ninda
Black Phoenix Mercenaries Legacy Rising
60
|
Posted - 2014.01.30 16:23:00 -
[5] - Quote
+1 this is the first sugestion that is actualy pretty good |
trollface dot jpg
The Bacon Corporation
150
|
Posted - 2014.01.30 16:36:00 -
[6] - Quote
Lucifalic wrote:I would add. While hardeners are active and in cooldown there is absolutely NO repairing of armor or shields (depending on which hardener was used). This would make tanks have to retreat for longer not drive around a building and come back at full strength. And absolutely no recalling when hardeners are in cooldown I cannot agree to that, that's over doing it. I want tanks to be a force to be reckoned with, not an easy target. If they are fitted to be fast reppers, then let them fast rep. As long as they cannot out rep proto AV without finding cover, I'm fine with them repping up fast and coming back to the fight.
RIP MAG, you will be missed.
MAG Vet ~ Raven
|
TheD1CK
Dead Man's Game
498
|
Posted - 2014.01.30 16:37:00 -
[7] - Quote
I like the idea with hardeners... good stuff
Minmatar Demolitions Specialist
Plasma Cannon Pro
|
ANON Cerberus
Tiny Toons
226
|
Posted - 2014.01.30 16:38:00 -
[8] - Quote
80% speed reduction? Your even more stupid than CCP. |
Takahiro Kashuken
Red Star. EoN.
2333
|
Posted - 2014.01.30 16:49:00 -
[9] - Quote
No repair lol, no speed lol with hardeners either
That makes them way way too easy to kill, 2 shots from my breach FG kills all and since no regen that hardener is useless and they cant move either
Infantry and bad ideas go hand in hand or rarther foot in mouth
Intelligence is OP
|
trollface dot jpg
The Bacon Corporation
150
|
Posted - 2014.01.30 16:56:00 -
[10] - Quote
Drapedup Drippedout wrote:Why would an active hardner slow your tank? How would you escape AV? -1
Stop hardener stacking? If you can fit it, you should be able to run it. Stop or severely penalize dual stacking armor&shield. +.5
Hardener drawback? How about its only good for ~1 min? then has a recharge. Working as intended. -1
Slight buff to AV nades +1, to compensate for dual hardeners.....(didn't you just say no dual hardeners?) -1
AV should take teamwork. Tanks are balanced in PC, pubs, who the **** cares. Git gud. Tanks are still ez mode with 1 forge gunner, or 2 swarm launchers.
You don't have to kill the tank, you just have to render it ineffective. The more time a tank spends recharging hardeners and retreating, the less time it spends wiping troops.
AV needs to stop thinking like they possess OHK weapons, and start to realize that you simply have area denial AV. (much like what the mass driver and laser rifle do to infantry currently)
I am in favor of turning swarms into a sidearm in their current form though.
PS - I have zero SP invested into tanks, I have alts who **** around with tanks, only so I understand the mechanics behind the role. I do have a PC forge gunner and IMO tanks are very close to balanced. To your first remark: That's what boosters are for. Either activate it to compensate for your hardner's speed reduction, or use it to get the hell outta dodge once the hardner goes down.
To your "fitting" remark: If this were the case, then why can't tanks fit multiple nitro boosters? Oh... right.. for game balance....
To your "working as intended" remark: Except that we have hardner stacking, meaning the cooldown of one mod means nothing because another is activated immediately. Not working as intended, since "waves of opportunity and vulnerability" doesn't exist.
To your "AV deterrent" remark: AV is not a deterrent role as long as AV recieves no WP or ISK for partial damage. There is currently no incentive whatsoever to specc into light AV. You loose 12 suits trying to take out 2 tanks because your anti-infantry abilities are hampered by loosing your light weapon slot to an AV weapon, and your squad can't protect you properly from the infantry because the tank is hampering them. Light AV is still AV, and as such should be only slightly less effective than heavy AV. When used in conjunction with AV grenades, it should be just as effective if not moreso.
To your "render tanks ineffective" remark: And who the **** do you think finds it fun to spend millions of SP and ISK on AV just to "render a tank ineffective"?
To your "area denial" remark: MD's and lasers are better at what they do than light AV is at what it does. Also, no. If it WERE supposed to be area denial, it would have been area denial FOR THE LAST TWO YEARS. And it hasn't been.
To your last remark: They don't need to be sidearms, they need to work.
To your whole post: Your rating system means nothing to me, save your time and drop it. I don't even know who the **** you are, so why the **** would I care how well you rate my individual changes?
RIP MAG, you will be missed.
MAG Vet ~ Raven
|
|
trollface dot jpg
The Bacon Corporation
150
|
Posted - 2014.01.30 17:00:00 -
[11] - Quote
ANON Cerberus wrote:80% speed reduction? Your even more stupid than CCP. 80% reduction to speed with bonuses to strength and duration across all tiers, plus since this is for armor tanks your highs are clear for a nitro boost to make up for the speed drop or to use as soon as the hardner goes down.
Of course, I explained all of this in already. Your lack of reading comprehension is not my fault.
RIP MAG, you will be missed.
MAG Vet ~ Raven
|
trollface dot jpg
The Bacon Corporation
150
|
Posted - 2014.01.30 17:04:00 -
[12] - Quote
Takahiro Kashuken wrote:No repair lol, no speed lol with hardeners either
That makes them way way too easy to kill, 2 shots from my breach FG kills all and since no regen that hardener is useless and they cant move either
Infantry and bad ideas go hand in hand or rarther foot in mouth Since you are you, you'd be running a proto one. It would have a 10% longer duration than the current ones and also have 10% higher damage resistance. Meaning you run in while nearly invincible, hit the enemy, then get gone if you see they are breaking through your shields or when your timer is almost up so you can repp in safety for the next run. You know, the whole "waves of opportunity and vulnerability" that CCP was striving for.
As for the no speed, read my previous responses.
RIP MAG, you will be missed.
MAG Vet ~ Raven
|
Knight Soiaire
Fatal Absolution Covert Intervention
4818
|
Posted - 2014.01.30 17:07:00 -
[13] - Quote
I like how it is with hardeners now though, the new tankers have a chance against the experienced tankers, if anything, just increase the cooldown of MLT Hardeners, back before 1.7, it came down to which tanker had the better gear. At least newb HAVs stand a chance now.
Fatal Absolution Operation - LVL 5
Fatal Absolution Pro. - LVL 5
FOTM Abuser, outta mah way Nyain San!
|
Lucifalic
Nos Nothi
249
|
Posted - 2014.01.30 17:08:00 -
[14] - Quote
The hardeners would use a large amount of energy hence why they wouldn't rep while active or in cooldown. Only makes sense. My god it already gives you god mode...
As far as I'm concerned tankers all all Christians and durka durka jihad here comes my jeep. |
Drapedup Drippedout
0uter.Heaven Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
257
|
Posted - 2014.01.30 17:09:00 -
[15] - Quote
trollface dot jpg wrote:Drapedup Drippedout wrote:Why would an active hardner slow your tank? How would you escape AV? -1
Stop hardener stacking? If you can fit it, you should be able to run it. Stop or severely penalize dual stacking armor&shield. +.5
Hardener drawback? How about its only good for ~1 min? then has a recharge. Working as intended. -1
Slight buff to AV nades +1, to compensate for dual hardeners.....(didn't you just say no dual hardeners?) -1
AV should take teamwork. Tanks are balanced in PC, pubs, who the **** cares. Git gud. Tanks are still ez mode with 1 forge gunner, or 2 swarm launchers.
You don't have to kill the tank, you just have to render it ineffective. The more time a tank spends recharging hardeners and retreating, the less time it spends wiping troops.
AV needs to stop thinking like they possess OHK weapons, and start to realize that you simply have area denial AV. (much like what the mass driver and laser rifle do to infantry currently)
I am in favor of turning swarms into a sidearm in their current form though.
PS - I have zero SP invested into tanks, I have alts who **** around with tanks, only so I understand the mechanics behind the role. I do have a PC forge gunner and IMO tanks are very close to balanced. To your first remark: That's what boosters are for. Either activate it to compensate for your hardner's speed reduction, or use it to get the hell outta dodge once the hardner goes down. To your "fitting" remark: If this were the case, then why can't tanks fit multiple nitro boosters? Oh... right.. for game balance.... To your "working as intended" remark: Except that we have hardner stacking, meaning the cooldown of one mod means nothing because another is activated immediately. Not working as intended, since "waves of opportunity and vulnerability" doesn't exist. To your "AV deterrent" remark: AV is not a deterrent role as long as AV recieves no WP or ISK for partial damage. There is currently no incentive whatsoever to specc into light AV. You loose 12 suits trying to take out 2 tanks because your anti-infantry abilities are hampered by loosing your light weapon slot to an AV weapon, and your squad can't protect you properly from the infantry because the tank is hampering them. Light AV is still AV, and as such should be only slightly less effective than heavy AV. When used in conjunction with AV grenades, it should be just as effective if not moreso. To your "render tanks ineffective" remark: And who the **** do you think finds it fun to spend millions of SP and ISK on AV just to "render a tank ineffective"? To your "area denial" remark: MD's and lasers are better at what they do than light AV is at what it does. Also, no. If it WERE supposed to be area denial, it would have been area denial FOR THE LAST TWO YEARS. And it hasn't been. To your last remark: They don't need to be sidearms, they need to work. To your whole post: Your rating system means nothing to me, save your time and drop it. I don't even know who the **** you are, so why the **** would I care how well you rate my individual changes?
Because you are a whiney ****-ant scrublet who would rather ***** about how things used to be than actually try to adapt and git gud. They re-worked the ENTIRE vehicle skill tree, and as such the entire role of vehicles. You are clinging to an old ideal of what they 'used' to be, which is probably why you get ******* face-rolled every time.
And god forbid you actually have to call in a 50k isk Rail Sica....The stupidity of some players amazes me still |
trollface dot jpg
The Bacon Corporation
150
|
Posted - 2014.01.30 17:11:00 -
[16] - Quote
Knight Soiaire wrote:I like how it is with hardeners now though, the new tankers have a chance against the experienced tankers, if anything, just increase the cooldown of MLT Hardeners, back before 1.7, it came down to which tanker had the better gear. At least newb HAVs stand a chance now. These changes would in no way hamper the creation of militia tank fits that can take out high tiered tanks. If anything, it gives militia tanks a better chance if they can sneak up on it while it's hardners are down (currently they are almost NEVER down). Increasing the cooldown of militia hardners accomplishes nothing but making new tankers have a harder time, thus giving fully specced tankers an even bigger win button.
RIP MAG, you will be missed.
MAG Vet ~ Raven
|
trollface dot jpg
The Bacon Corporation
150
|
Posted - 2014.01.30 17:17:00 -
[17] - Quote
Drapedup Drippedout wrote:trollface dot jpg wrote:Drapedup Drippedout wrote:Why would an active hardner slow your tank? How would you escape AV? -1
Stop hardener stacking? If you can fit it, you should be able to run it. Stop or severely penalize dual stacking armor&shield. +.5
Hardener drawback? How about its only good for ~1 min? then has a recharge. Working as intended. -1
Slight buff to AV nades +1, to compensate for dual hardeners.....(didn't you just say no dual hardeners?) -1
AV should take teamwork. Tanks are balanced in PC, pubs, who the **** cares. Git gud. Tanks are still ez mode with 1 forge gunner, or 2 swarm launchers.
You don't have to kill the tank, you just have to render it ineffective. The more time a tank spends recharging hardeners and retreating, the less time it spends wiping troops.
AV needs to stop thinking like they possess OHK weapons, and start to realize that you simply have area denial AV. (much like what the mass driver and laser rifle do to infantry currently)
I am in favor of turning swarms into a sidearm in their current form though.
PS - I have zero SP invested into tanks, I have alts who **** around with tanks, only so I understand the mechanics behind the role. I do have a PC forge gunner and IMO tanks are very close to balanced. To your first remark: That's what boosters are for. Either activate it to compensate for your hardner's speed reduction, or use it to get the hell outta dodge once the hardner goes down. To your "fitting" remark: If this were the case, then why can't tanks fit multiple nitro boosters? Oh... right.. for game balance.... To your "working as intended" remark: Except that we have hardner stacking, meaning the cooldown of one mod means nothing because another is activated immediately. Not working as intended, since "waves of opportunity and vulnerability" doesn't exist. To your "AV deterrent" remark: AV is not a deterrent role as long as AV recieves no WP or ISK for partial damage. There is currently no incentive whatsoever to specc into light AV. You loose 12 suits trying to take out 2 tanks because your anti-infantry abilities are hampered by loosing your light weapon slot to an AV weapon, and your squad can't protect you properly from the infantry because the tank is hampering them. Light AV is still AV, and as such should be only slightly less effective than heavy AV. When used in conjunction with AV grenades, it should be just as effective if not moreso. To your "render tanks ineffective" remark: And who the **** do you think finds it fun to spend millions of SP and ISK on AV just to "render a tank ineffective"? To your "area denial" remark: MD's and lasers are better at what they do than light AV is at what it does. Also, no. If it WERE supposed to be area denial, it would have been area denial FOR THE LAST TWO YEARS. And it hasn't been. To your last remark: They don't need to be sidearms, they need to work. To your whole post: Your rating system means nothing to me, save your time and drop it. I don't even know who the **** you are, so why the **** would I care how well you rate my individual changes? Because you are a whiney ****-ant scrublet who would rather ***** about how things used to be than actually try to adapt and git gud. They re-worked the ENTIRE vehicle skill tree, and as such the entire role of vehicles. You are clinging to an old ideal of what they 'used' to be, which is probably why you get ******* face-rolled every time. Awww.... did I offend the poor tank scrub? Go stuff yourself. "Git gud"? What a cop out, why don't you "git gud" instead of relying on OP mechanics? Hmm? What's that? Oh, you need your FOTM safety blanket to keep you nice and warm and invulnerable to 99% of the weapons in the game and safe from all of the mean old infantry guys who touched you wrong?
Oh, ok. I understand.
RIP MAG, you will be missed.
MAG Vet ~ Raven
|
Dovallis Martan JenusKoll
Osmon Surveillance Caldari State
544
|
Posted - 2014.01.30 17:19:00 -
[18] - Quote
trollface dot jpg wrote:And one last time, with GUSTO Step 1. Increase the strength AND duration of STD hardners by 3%, ADV hardners by 5% & PRO hardners by 10% Step 2. Stop hardner stacking. Step 3. Make hardners have drawback effects. Armor hardners, when activated, should slow your movement speed by 80%. Shield hardners should cancel all shield regeneration until the hardner goes off. Step 4. Slight damage buff to light AV and 'nades (around 10% for light AV, around 5% for AV grenades) to compensate for repair stacking fits (to ensure AV weapons are capable of keeping up with the rep cycle) Results: Tanks actually have waves of opportunity Militia hardners are trash compared to good hardners Hardners used intelligently are great but used poorly are worthless (hardner management becomes a "thing") There are finally huge differences between shield and armor tanking besides just the fittings. Armor becomes "stand and deliver", shields become "hit and run". 4 changes, problem solved, crisis concluded. Tanks will be at around Chromosome levels of balance (Chromosome is considered "the golden age" of tank balance) with current Uprising price tags. 1-- really wouldn't do much of anything 2-- there are situations where the only way to survive is to double stack hardeners, such as against any competent team. If you use only one hardener and run into one you will be blown up in under 8 seconds. Conversely a horribly disorganized team has trouble vs a single hardener, and can't do anything vs a double hardener. 3-- this would literally make tanks useless- a swarm of cheap AV would catch up to the tank in no time once the hardener went up and would literally be a death sentence, not a defense of any kind. Imagine what would happen if this penalty was for an infantry module. You use a hardener, they just wait around the corner cause you can't catch up, someone runs all the way around the building and back up behind you, then shoots you in the head cause you can't turn to face them in time once the hardener wears off. 4-- because of the "Sitting Duck" mechanic higher damage would just be faster destruction
--as a response to the absolutely DAFT comment about the engine boosters, all they do is increase acceleration, not top speed... RESULT: Useless tanks that can be easily tagged, flagged, and discarded regardless of driver skill or ability. AKA---- REDLINE RAILS ONLY
If you can read this, it means you are reading.
Unless you are skimming
|
trollface dot jpg
The Bacon Corporation
150
|
Posted - 2014.01.30 17:22:00 -
[19] - Quote
Dovallis Martan JenusKoll wrote:trollface dot jpg wrote:And one last time, with GUSTO Step 1. Increase the strength AND duration of STD hardners by 3%, ADV hardners by 5% & PRO hardners by 10% Step 2. Stop hardner stacking. Step 3. Make hardners have drawback effects. Armor hardners, when activated, should slow your movement speed by 80%. Shield hardners should cancel all shield regeneration until the hardner goes off. Step 4. Slight damage buff to light AV and 'nades (around 10% for light AV, around 5% for AV grenades) to compensate for repair stacking fits (to ensure AV weapons are capable of keeping up with the rep cycle) Results: Tanks actually have waves of opportunity Militia hardners are trash compared to good hardners Hardners used intelligently are great but used poorly are worthless (hardner management becomes a "thing") There are finally huge differences between shield and armor tanking besides just the fittings. Armor becomes "stand and deliver", shields become "hit and run". 4 changes, problem solved, crisis concluded. Tanks will be at around Chromosome levels of balance (Chromosome is considered "the golden age" of tank balance) with current Uprising price tags. 1-- really wouldn't do much of anything 2-- there are situations where the only way to survive is to double stack hardeners, such as against any competent team. If you use only one hardener and run into one you will be blown up in under 8 seconds. Conversely a horribly disorganized team has trouble vs a single hardener, and can't do anything vs a double hardener. 3-- this would literally make tanks useless- a swarm of cheap AV would catch up to the tank in no time once the hardener went up and would literally be a death sentence, not a defense of any kind. Imagine what would happen if this penalty was for an infantry module. You use a hardener, they just wait around the corner cause you can't catch up, someone runs all the way around the building and back up behind you, then shoots you in the head cause you can't turn to face them in time once the hardener wears off. 4-- because of the "Sitting Duck" mechanic higher damage would just be faster destruction RESULT: Useless tanks that can be easily tagged, flagged, and discarded regardless of driver skill or ability. AKA---- REDLINE RAILS ONLY Went over ALL of this already, LTR.
RIP MAG, you will be missed.
MAG Vet ~ Raven
|
Drapedup Drippedout
0uter.Heaven Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
257
|
Posted - 2014.01.30 17:22:00 -
[20] - Quote
trollface dot jpg wrote:Drapedup Drippedout wrote:trollface dot jpg wrote:Drapedup Drippedout wrote:Why would an active hardner slow your tank? How would you escape AV? -1
Stop hardener stacking? If you can fit it, you should be able to run it. Stop or severely penalize dual stacking armor&shield. +.5
Hardener drawback? How about its only good for ~1 min? then has a recharge. Working as intended. -1
Slight buff to AV nades +1, to compensate for dual hardeners.....(didn't you just say no dual hardeners?) -1
AV should take teamwork. Tanks are balanced in PC, pubs, who the **** cares. Git gud. Tanks are still ez mode with 1 forge gunner, or 2 swarm launchers.
You don't have to kill the tank, you just have to render it ineffective. The more time a tank spends recharging hardeners and retreating, the less time it spends wiping troops.
AV needs to stop thinking like they possess OHK weapons, and start to realize that you simply have area denial AV. (much like what the mass driver and laser rifle do to infantry currently)
I am in favor of turning swarms into a sidearm in their current form though.
PS - I have zero SP invested into tanks, I have alts who **** around with tanks, only so I understand the mechanics behind the role. I do have a PC forge gunner and IMO tanks are very close to balanced. To your first remark: That's what boosters are for. Either activate it to compensate for your hardner's speed reduction, or use it to get the hell outta dodge once the hardner goes down. To your "fitting" remark: If this were the case, then why can't tanks fit multiple nitro boosters? Oh... right.. for game balance.... To your "working as intended" remark: Except that we have hardner stacking, meaning the cooldown of one mod means nothing because another is activated immediately. Not working as intended, since "waves of opportunity and vulnerability" doesn't exist. To your "AV deterrent" remark: AV is not a deterrent role as long as AV recieves no WP or ISK for partial damage. There is currently no incentive whatsoever to specc into light AV. You loose 12 suits trying to take out 2 tanks because your anti-infantry abilities are hampered by loosing your light weapon slot to an AV weapon, and your squad can't protect you properly from the infantry because the tank is hampering them. Light AV is still AV, and as such should be only slightly less effective than heavy AV. When used in conjunction with AV grenades, it should be just as effective if not moreso. To your "render tanks ineffective" remark: And who the **** do you think finds it fun to spend millions of SP and ISK on AV just to "render a tank ineffective"? To your "area denial" remark: MD's and lasers are better at what they do than light AV is at what it does. Also, no. If it WERE supposed to be area denial, it would have been area denial FOR THE LAST TWO YEARS. And it hasn't been. To your last remark: They don't need to be sidearms, they need to work. To your whole post: Your rating system means nothing to me, save your time and drop it. I don't even know who the **** you are, so why the **** would I care how well you rate my individual changes? Because you are a whiney ****-ant scrublet who would rather ***** about how things used to be than actually try to adapt and git gud. They re-worked the ENTIRE vehicle skill tree, and as such the entire role of vehicles. You are clinging to an old ideal of what they 'used' to be, which is probably why you get ******* face-rolled every time. Awww.... did I offend the poor tank scrub? Go stuff yourself. "Git gud"? What a cop out, why don't you "git gud" instead of relying on OP mechanics? Hmm? What's that? Oh, you need your FOTM safety blanket to keep you nice and warm and invulnerable to 99% of the weapons in the game and safe from all of the mean old infantry guys who touched you wrong? Oh, ok. I understand.
Lol, me? tank scrub? Bud, I literally have 0 points in tanks. Doesn't mean I don't have a MLT Sica on standby as AV. HTFU; adapt or die. All you seem to want to do is ***** about why you suck, while refusing to try any other playstyle. Tanks are balanced, and very powerful tanks are accessible to EVERY SINGLE MERC in New Eden.
EDIT: Before you scream tanks aren't balanced, try a PC. I'm not sure how active "Teh Bacon Corp" is, but if you are trying to base your argument for balance off of your experience in pubs, then wow, just wow. |
|
Dovallis Martan JenusKoll
Osmon Surveillance Caldari State
544
|
Posted - 2014.01.30 17:23:00 -
[21] - Quote
trollface dot jpg wrote: Went over ALL of this already, LTR.
You really should learn to read the comment before mindlessly posting.
If you can read this, it means you are reading.
Unless you are skimming
|
Drapedup Drippedout
0uter.Heaven Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
257
|
Posted - 2014.01.30 17:27:00 -
[22] - Quote
Dovallis Martan JenusKoll wrote:trollface dot jpg wrote: Went over ALL of this already, LTR.
You really should learn to read the comment before mindlessly posting.
Its just a crybaby posting about why he gets his**** pushed in by better players. Nothing more to see here folks...move along |
Alena Ventrallis
The Neutral Zone
556
|
Posted - 2014.01.30 17:30:00 -
[23] - Quote
trollface dot jpg wrote:And one last time, with GUSTO Step 1. Increase the strength AND duration of STD hardners by 3%, ADV hardners by 5% & PRO hardners by 10% Step 2. Stop hardner stacking. Step 3. Make hardners have drawback effects. Armor hardners, when activated, should slow your movement speed by 80%. Shield hardners should cancel all shield regeneration until the hardner goes off. Step 4. Slight damage buff to light AV and 'nades (around 10% for light AV, around 5% for AV grenades) to compensate for repair stacking fits (to ensure AV weapons are capable of keeping up with the rep cycle) Results: Tanks actually have waves of opportunity Militia hardners are trash compared to good hardners Hardners used intelligently are great but used poorly are worthless (hardner management becomes a "thing") There are finally huge differences between shield and armor tanking besides just the fittings. Armor becomes "stand and deliver", shields become "hit and run". 4 changes, problem solved, crisis concluded. Tanks will be at around Chromosome levels of balance (Chromosome is considered "the golden age" of tank balance) with current Uprising price tags. Step 1: I'm for this.
Step 2: I'm for this. One hardener per type per vehicle (one vehicle can have one shield and one armor hardener. No more.)
Step 3: No. No no no. LAVs and dropships shouldn't suffer because people are complaining about tanks. Tanks need a reduction in speed all their own, not tie it to a module everyone can use.
Step 4: I'm iffy on this, especially since we are limiting hardeners. A tank should be nigh indestructible while the hardener is up, especially at the proto level. But once that hardener goes into cooldown, AV shouldn't really have much of a problem taking them down. I am for a slight buff to swarms, which would allow them to kill/severely weaken a Madrugar with no hardeners up. AV nades are fine, especially if tanks get slower and they can't escape from them as fast.
LAVs aren't OP because even with high resistance hardeners, their HP is so low that it really doesn't make much of a difference, and dropships are exposed to everything under the sun, so it's not like it's hard to apply your DPS to them. This buff gives all vehicles their power while hardeners are up, but when they turn off, they must run or die. |
Pokey Dravon
OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention
1778
|
Posted - 2014.01.30 17:51:00 -
[24] - Quote
trollface dot jpg wrote:And one last time, with GUSTO Step 1. Increase the strength AND duration of STD hardners by 3%, ADV hardners by 5% & PRO hardners by 10% Step 2. Stop hardner stacking. Step 3. Make hardners have drawback effects. Armor hardners, when activated, should slow your movement speed by 80%. Shield hardners should cancel all shield regeneration until the hardner goes off. Step 4. Slight damage buff to light AV and 'nades (around 10% for light AV, around 5% for AV grenades) to compensate for repair stacking fits (to ensure AV weapons are capable of keeping up with the rep cycle) .
1 - I wouldn't mind seeing MLT moduls be less effective, but I've grown to be more accepting of them
2 - Burst tanking is extremely common in the EVE Universe and I should be allowed to stack hardners if I want. Now if you wanted to increase the resource cost of hardeners to make this more difficult to do, that's more reasonable. Besides this would basically make armor tanks have exactly 1 fit...as if fitting wasn't boring enough already.
3 - What you're basically describing in a Siege Module. In EVE, Siege Modules double resistances and repair/recharge rate but completely immobilize the ship. They are modules which are restricted to specific ships and if they were to exist in Dust (And I'd love to see them eventually) they should actually go on the Marauder HAV as a specialized module that can't be fit to other vehicles.
However to put such a speed reduction on a commonly used module such as a Hardener would completely kill the class. For one tanks would always get screwed, the standing way to kill them would be "Sit with charged Breach Forge from up high while the HAV limps along, and pop it the second its hardeners drop. It cant move away from you because its hardeners are up, and it cant drop them to move away because if it does its going to get insta-popped. Either way you're screwed. All this does is encourage long-range low-movement HAV gameplay. Do you like Redline Rail Snipers?
It would also completely murder LAVs and Dropships who rely on speed, and at an 80% speed reduction, a 30% fuel injector isn't going to help enough.
4 - I think AV damage is fine, though I'd give Swarms and increase to range and remove the recent increase in Forge charge time. Heavy rep fits are extremely weak to burst damage like forges, missiles, and railguns.
1.8 Sentinels
Damage Efficiency
Effective HP
|
trollface dot jpg
The Bacon Corporation
151
|
Posted - 2014.01.30 17:52:00 -
[25] - Quote
Dovallis Martan JenusKoll wrote:trollface dot jpg wrote: Went over ALL of this already, LTR.
You really should learn to read the comment before mindlessly posting. I have highlighted a key point now so that even the nearly blind can find it in my prior post. You know... the only point you removed from your quote?... I did read the comment, and every single point you made was either fully explained in the OP or referred to in another post. Also, I removed nothing. You may have edited it after I quoted you, but I removed nothing. Nice try though. Now let me spell it out, I'm about to have to sign off and I want to put this to bed before I go. I'll also respond to your edited-in part as well. In fact, I'll do that first:
Quote:as a response to the absolutely DAFT comment about the engine boosters, all they do is increase acceleration, not top speed. I was unclear in the Op as I was hurriedly jotting it down (at work atm). As you well know, acceleration speed is a huge thing for tanks. If you cut it by 80%, the tank now has to be careful which paths it takes and which areas it decides to set up shop since it cannot take off like a bullet at the first sign of trouble. To be crystal clear on the issue, I was referring to acceleration speed cut, not a top speed cut. I just said "movement" speed because my mind was racing trying to get it down so I could get back to work. I will go back and fix the OP before I log off.
1 & 3 answered here:
trollface dot jpg wrote: Since you are you, you'd be running a proto one. It would have a 10% longer duration than the current ones and also have 10% higher damage resistance. Meaning you run in while nearly invincible, hit the enemy, then get gone if you see they are breaking through your shields or when your timer is almost up so you can repp in safety for the next run. You know, the whole "waves of opportunity and vulnerability" that CCP was striving for.
4 is here:
trollface dot jpg wrote: Light AV is still AV, and as such should be only slightly less effective than heavy AV. When used in conjunction with AV grenades, it should be just as effective if not moreso.
^since this is not an EXACT response, let me be more clear. Light AV is pointless if it is not effective at killing tanks. Coupled with the increased duration and strength of hardners, this should be fine. Makes tanks more vulnerable in their cooldown period, but they are still less vulnerable during their hardened period than they are now and their hardned period lasts longer.
2 is answered elsewhere, but I can't quote any more this post, so I'll just re-answer it specifically tailored to how you phrased it: There are situations that tanks SHOULD NOT SURVIVE. Just like there are situations that everything else isn't supposed to survive, tanks are supposed to be the same. Just because you WANT your tank to live through everything doesn't mean it should.
RIP MAG, you will be missed.
MAG Vet ~ Raven
|
trollface dot jpg
The Bacon Corporation
151
|
Posted - 2014.01.30 17:59:00 -
[26] - Quote
Drapedup Drippedout wrote:Dovallis Martan JenusKoll wrote:trollface dot jpg wrote: Went over ALL of this already, LTR.
You really should learn to read the comment before mindlessly posting. Its just a crybaby posting about why he gets his **** pushed in by better players. Nothing more to see here folks...move along Are you still here? Who are you and why are you stalking me? I swear, if I catch you in my dumpster, I'm calling the cops.
RIP MAG, you will be missed.
MAG Vet ~ Raven
|
REDBACK96USMC
Chaotic-Intent General Tso's Alliance
2
|
Posted - 2014.01.30 18:02:00 -
[27] - Quote
Another tank hate thread. At least you were man enough to admit you just don't want to waste Isk or SP to have to neutralize tanks. Unfortunately even in fantasy land, tanks are supposed to interrupt and deny operations to infantry. You should have to skill into the available methods to neutralize tanks. They should be a major nuisance.
Now that being said, I am all for restoring the stats to swarm and forges. Tiered module stats brought back would reduce the MLT tank spam fest. Just as you should have to use Isk and SP, so should someone wanting to go vehicles. |
Takahiro Kashuken
Red Star. EoN.
2334
|
Posted - 2014.01.30 18:18:00 -
[28] - Quote
Drapedup Drippedout wrote:
AV should take teamwork. Tanks are balanced in PC, pubs, who the **** cares. Git gud. Tanks are still ez mode with 1 forge gunner, or 2 swarm launchers.
I do have a PC forge gunner and IMO tanks are very close to balanced.
Thats what i mostly care about
Stuff being balanced in a competitive gamemode
Pubs has ****** matchmaking thus its why sometimes we pull out 4 tanks and redline academy players, other times its against proto stompers who also have tanks but most of the time matchmaking is plain broken
You dont break balance to fix a ****** matchmaking system
Intelligence is OP
|
Spkr4theDead
Red Star. EoN.
1711
|
Posted - 2014.01.30 18:34:00 -
[29] - Quote
trollface dot jpg wrote:And one last time, with GUSTO Step 1. Increase the strength AND duration of STD hardners by 3%, ADV hardners by 5% & PRO hardners by 10% Step 2. Stop hardner stacking. Step 3. Make hardners have drawback effects. Armor hardners, when activated, should slow your (EDIT: acceleration)speed by 80%. Shield hardners should cancel all shield regeneration until the hardner goes off. Step 4. Slight damage buff to light AV and 'nades (around 10% for light AV, around 5% for AV grenades) to compensate for repair stacking fits (to ensure AV weapons are capable of keeping up with the rep cycle) Results: Tanks actually have waves of opportunity Militia hardners are trash compared to good hardners Hardners used intelligently are great but used poorly are worthless (hardner management becomes a "thing") There are finally huge differences between shield and armor tanking besides just the fittings. Armor becomes "stand and deliver", shields become "hit and run". 4 changes, problem solved, crisis concluded. Tanks will be at around Chromosome levels of balance (Chromosome is considered "the golden age" of tank balance) with current Uprising price tags. There absolutely was balance. A damage mod Soma with a compressed particle cannon could easily destroy the best fit Sagaris' and Suryas, before their pilots had time to react.
But that wasn't fair to infantry, because they must do everything, solo.
I may be missing something, but I'm pretty sure that I didn't call for a tank nerf before Uprising 1.7. - Atiim
|
Spkr4theDead
Red Star. EoN.
1711
|
Posted - 2014.01.30 18:47:00 -
[30] - Quote
Takahiro Kashuken wrote:No repair lol, no speed lol with hardeners either
That makes them way way too easy to kill, 2 shots from my breach FG kills all and since no regen that hardener is useless and they cant move either
Infantry and bad ideas go hand in hand or rarther foot in mouth More like something else in mouth.................
I may be missing something, but I'm pretty sure that I didn't call for a tank nerf before Uprising 1.7. - Atiim
|
|
Harpyja
Molon Labe. Public Disorder.
1149
|
Posted - 2014.01.30 19:01:00 -
[31] - Quote
trollface dot jpg wrote:And one last time, with GUSTO Step 1. Increase the strength AND duration of STD hardners by 3%, ADV hardners by 5% & PRO hardners by 10% Step 2. Stop hardner stacking. Step 3. Make hardners have drawback effects. Armor hardners, when activated, should slow your (EDIT: acceleration)speed by 80%. Shield hardners should cancel all shield regeneration until the hardner goes off. Step 4. Slight damage buff to light AV and 'nades (around 10% for light AV, around 5% for AV grenades) to compensate for repair stacking fits (to ensure AV weapons are capable of keeping up with the rep cycle) Results: Tanks actually have waves of opportunity Militia hardners are trash compared to good hardners Hardners used intelligently are great but used poorly are worthless (hardner management becomes a "thing") There are finally huge differences between shield and armor tanking besides just the fittings. Armor becomes "stand and deliver", shields become "hit and run". 4 changes, problem solved, crisis concluded. Tanks will be at around Chromosome levels of balance (Chromosome is considered "the golden age" of tank balance) with current Uprising price tags. Please tell me why I should take this post seriously on the basis of the OP's name.....
"By His light, and His will"
- The Scriptures, Gheinok the First, 12:32
|
Lucifalic
Nos Nothi
251
|
Posted - 2014.01.30 22:34:00 -
[32] - Quote
Durka durka |
Scheneighnay McBob
Learning Coalition College
3844
|
Posted - 2014.01.30 22:58:00 -
[33] - Quote
Chromosome tanks were too expensive to ever be balanced.
So no.
I am your scan error.
|
Atiim
Living Like Larry Schwag
4235
|
Posted - 2014.01.30 23:07:00 -
[34] - Quote
Drapedup Drippedout wrote:Why would an active hardner slow your tank? How would you escape AV? -1
We live in a universe where we can have our consciousness transferred to a clone wirelessly upon death. I'm sure we could think of something.
How would you escape AV? Simple. You plan ahead, and leave before your tank is in critical condition. This way, you have to actually be "gud" at tanking as opposed to just standing there and taking it effortlessly.
Stop hardener stacking? If you can fit it, you should be able to run it. Stop or severely penalize dual stacking armor&shield. +.5
No Comment
Hardener drawback? How about its only good for ~1 min? then has a recharge. Working as intended. -1
I love how you conveniently "forget to mention" how you can easily recall your tank before the cooldown expires. It's quite simple and easy in fact.
Slight buff to AV nades +1, to compensate for dual hardeners.....(didn't you just say no dual hardeners?) -1
No Comment.
AV should take teamwork. Tanks are balanced in PC, pubs, who the **** cares. Git gud. Tanks are still ez mode with 1 forge gunner, or 2 swarm launchers.
If AV should take teamwork, then so should HAVs.
Who the F*ck cares? The 99% of the playerbase who does not, could not, and would not participate in PC. Heck, most of Molden Heath is shutdown in protest anyways so what else are you gonna play? lolFW?
Your elitist opinion about how tank balance in anything but PC doesn't matter is both irrelevant, and shouldn't be taken seriously in a balance discussion. Heck, me even replying to this part leaves me puzzled.
You don't have to kill the tank, you just have to render it ineffective. The more time a tank spends recharging hardeners and retreating, the less time it spends wiping troops.
And that's profitable how exactly? When I'm only suppressing in 215k suits with no reward, the role is an nonviable ISK sink.
So now HAVs are like cancer tumors huh? Remove the problem without completely destroying it, and it'll come back even worse?
AV needs to stop thinking like they possess OHK weapons, and start to realize that you simply have area denial AV. (much like what the mass driver and laser rifle do to infantry currently)
So now you think that tanks shouldn't die to infantry, but merely pushed back? Priceless.
I am in favor of turning swarms into a sidearm in their current form though.
I wouldn't say no to it, but that'd be one huge sidearm...
PS - I have zero SP invested into tanks, I have alts who **** around with tanks, only so I understand the mechanics behind the role. I do have a PC forge gunner and IMO tanks are very close to balanced.
Want to know how to make a strike-through?
[s[Example[/s]
Now go my Forum Warriors. Use this new weapon for glory!
|
Yokal Bob
G.R.A.V.E INTERGALACTIC WARPIGS
331
|
Posted - 2014.01.30 23:28:00 -
[35] - Quote
Drapedup Drippedout wrote:Why would an active hardner slow your tank? How would you escape AV? -1
Stop hardener stacking? If you can fit it, you should be able to run it. Stop or severely penalize dual stacking armor&shield. +.5
Hardener drawback? How about its only good for ~1 min? then has a recharge. Working as intended. -1
Slight buff to AV nades +1, to compensate for dual hardeners.....(didn't you just say no dual hardeners?) -1
AV should take teamwork. Tanks are balanced in PC, pubs, who the **** cares. Git gud. Tanks are still ez mode with 1 forge gunner, or 2 swarm launchers.
You don't have to kill the tank, you just have to render it ineffective. The more time a tank spends recharging hardeners and retreating, the less time it spends wiping troops.
AV needs to stop thinking like they possess OHK weapons, and start to realize that you simply have area denial AV. (much like what the mass driver and laser rifle do to infantry currently)
I am in favor of turning swarms into a sidearm in their current form though.
PS - I have zero SP invested into tanks, I have alts who **** around with tanks, only so I understand the mechanics behind the role. I do have a PC forge gunner and IMO tanks are very close to balanced.
The only thing I disagree on is the last part about tanks being balanced. look at shield tanks compared to armour tanks. How is it that a shield tank can repair their shields at an insane rate whereas armour tanks cannot? It should be either both can do this or cannot.
CPM1 candidate
|
KING CHECKMATE
A.N.O.N.Y.M.O.U.S.
4207
|
Posted - 2014.01.30 23:31:00 -
[36] - Quote
trollface dot jpg wrote: Chromosome is considered "the golden age" of tank balance.
Yeah you stu*** di*** fu***.
Its considered the Golden age of tanks, BY TANKERS.....
AceOfJokers666 [ + ] AimBot / VALOR / MAG
|
True Adamance
Kameira Lodge Amarr Empire
6419
|
Posted - 2014.01.30 23:32:00 -
[37] - Quote
KING CHECKMATE wrote:trollface dot jpg wrote: Chromosome is considered "the golden age" of tank balance.
Yeah you stu*** di*** fu***. Its considered the Golden age of tanks, BY TANKERS..... Yet this is far better in terms of raw power than Chomosome ever was and no tanker ever says this is a golden age.
"My Faith in you is absolute; my sword is Yours, My God, and Your will guides me now and for all eternity."
|
Tebu Gan
Dem Durrty Boyz Renegade Alliance
510
|
Posted - 2014.01.30 23:48:00 -
[38] - Quote
In all honesty, I think you are missing the real issues by a mile there.
I wish it was this simple, as in only 4 things that need "fixed".
The only one that makes the most sense is the third one. Even then, your numbers are WAY off the mark.
I can also see this putting gunnlogis UP again, while maddies rule the battlefield.
The ONLY thing that infantry can possibly ***** about at this moment are blaster tanks. The other 2 types don't go 30 - 0, and make infantry cry.
I think the tank and infantry interaction needs to be lessened, IE blaster move away from an AI role and into an AV role. A putting small turrets as AI, or vice versa.
I mean let's be serious here. What kind of tank is it that all infantry hate. Infantry see tank and just think all tanks need a nerf. Do you ever once stop to consider what tanks really are. Do you ever look at the tank and think, oh this guy has a rail gun, he probably won't touch me. I mean do infantry ever stop to think about it. OR do they just want to drop everything back to the way it was, because then it was FAIR TO YOU.
And I heard tanks WERE NOT balanced in chrome. Golden age of tanks, much like this age will be remembered as the golden age of tanks. When tanks murdered everyone and considered themselves balanced.
Yup sounds pretty selfish.
Nuff Said
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 :: [one page] |