Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Harpyja
Molon Labe. Public Disorder.
1149
|
Posted - 2014.01.30 19:01:00 -
[31] - Quote
trollface dot jpg wrote:And one last time, with GUSTO Step 1. Increase the strength AND duration of STD hardners by 3%, ADV hardners by 5% & PRO hardners by 10% Step 2. Stop hardner stacking. Step 3. Make hardners have drawback effects. Armor hardners, when activated, should slow your (EDIT: acceleration)speed by 80%. Shield hardners should cancel all shield regeneration until the hardner goes off. Step 4. Slight damage buff to light AV and 'nades (around 10% for light AV, around 5% for AV grenades) to compensate for repair stacking fits (to ensure AV weapons are capable of keeping up with the rep cycle) Results: Tanks actually have waves of opportunity Militia hardners are trash compared to good hardners Hardners used intelligently are great but used poorly are worthless (hardner management becomes a "thing") There are finally huge differences between shield and armor tanking besides just the fittings. Armor becomes "stand and deliver", shields become "hit and run". 4 changes, problem solved, crisis concluded. Tanks will be at around Chromosome levels of balance (Chromosome is considered "the golden age" of tank balance) with current Uprising price tags. Please tell me why I should take this post seriously on the basis of the OP's name.....
"By His light, and His will"
- The Scriptures, Gheinok the First, 12:32
|
Lucifalic
Nos Nothi
251
|
Posted - 2014.01.30 22:34:00 -
[32] - Quote
Durka durka |
Scheneighnay McBob
Learning Coalition College
3844
|
Posted - 2014.01.30 22:58:00 -
[33] - Quote
Chromosome tanks were too expensive to ever be balanced.
So no.
I am your scan error.
|
Atiim
Living Like Larry Schwag
4235
|
Posted - 2014.01.30 23:07:00 -
[34] - Quote
Drapedup Drippedout wrote:Why would an active hardner slow your tank? How would you escape AV? -1
We live in a universe where we can have our consciousness transferred to a clone wirelessly upon death. I'm sure we could think of something.
How would you escape AV? Simple. You plan ahead, and leave before your tank is in critical condition. This way, you have to actually be "gud" at tanking as opposed to just standing there and taking it effortlessly.
Stop hardener stacking? If you can fit it, you should be able to run it. Stop or severely penalize dual stacking armor&shield. +.5
No Comment
Hardener drawback? How about its only good for ~1 min? then has a recharge. Working as intended. -1
I love how you conveniently "forget to mention" how you can easily recall your tank before the cooldown expires. It's quite simple and easy in fact.
Slight buff to AV nades +1, to compensate for dual hardeners.....(didn't you just say no dual hardeners?) -1
No Comment.
AV should take teamwork. Tanks are balanced in PC, pubs, who the **** cares. Git gud. Tanks are still ez mode with 1 forge gunner, or 2 swarm launchers.
If AV should take teamwork, then so should HAVs.
Who the F*ck cares? The 99% of the playerbase who does not, could not, and would not participate in PC. Heck, most of Molden Heath is shutdown in protest anyways so what else are you gonna play? lolFW?
Your elitist opinion about how tank balance in anything but PC doesn't matter is both irrelevant, and shouldn't be taken seriously in a balance discussion. Heck, me even replying to this part leaves me puzzled.
You don't have to kill the tank, you just have to render it ineffective. The more time a tank spends recharging hardeners and retreating, the less time it spends wiping troops.
And that's profitable how exactly? When I'm only suppressing in 215k suits with no reward, the role is an nonviable ISK sink.
So now HAVs are like cancer tumors huh? Remove the problem without completely destroying it, and it'll come back even worse?
AV needs to stop thinking like they possess OHK weapons, and start to realize that you simply have area denial AV. (much like what the mass driver and laser rifle do to infantry currently)
So now you think that tanks shouldn't die to infantry, but merely pushed back? Priceless.
I am in favor of turning swarms into a sidearm in their current form though.
I wouldn't say no to it, but that'd be one huge sidearm...
PS - I have zero SP invested into tanks, I have alts who **** around with tanks, only so I understand the mechanics behind the role. I do have a PC forge gunner and IMO tanks are very close to balanced.
Want to know how to make a strike-through?
[s[Example[/s]
Now go my Forum Warriors. Use this new weapon for glory!
|
Yokal Bob
G.R.A.V.E INTERGALACTIC WARPIGS
331
|
Posted - 2014.01.30 23:28:00 -
[35] - Quote
Drapedup Drippedout wrote:Why would an active hardner slow your tank? How would you escape AV? -1
Stop hardener stacking? If you can fit it, you should be able to run it. Stop or severely penalize dual stacking armor&shield. +.5
Hardener drawback? How about its only good for ~1 min? then has a recharge. Working as intended. -1
Slight buff to AV nades +1, to compensate for dual hardeners.....(didn't you just say no dual hardeners?) -1
AV should take teamwork. Tanks are balanced in PC, pubs, who the **** cares. Git gud. Tanks are still ez mode with 1 forge gunner, or 2 swarm launchers.
You don't have to kill the tank, you just have to render it ineffective. The more time a tank spends recharging hardeners and retreating, the less time it spends wiping troops.
AV needs to stop thinking like they possess OHK weapons, and start to realize that you simply have area denial AV. (much like what the mass driver and laser rifle do to infantry currently)
I am in favor of turning swarms into a sidearm in their current form though.
PS - I have zero SP invested into tanks, I have alts who **** around with tanks, only so I understand the mechanics behind the role. I do have a PC forge gunner and IMO tanks are very close to balanced.
The only thing I disagree on is the last part about tanks being balanced. look at shield tanks compared to armour tanks. How is it that a shield tank can repair their shields at an insane rate whereas armour tanks cannot? It should be either both can do this or cannot.
CPM1 candidate
|
KING CHECKMATE
A.N.O.N.Y.M.O.U.S.
4207
|
Posted - 2014.01.30 23:31:00 -
[36] - Quote
trollface dot jpg wrote: Chromosome is considered "the golden age" of tank balance.
Yeah you stu*** di*** fu***.
Its considered the Golden age of tanks, BY TANKERS.....
AceOfJokers666 [ + ] AimBot / VALOR / MAG
|
True Adamance
Kameira Lodge Amarr Empire
6419
|
Posted - 2014.01.30 23:32:00 -
[37] - Quote
KING CHECKMATE wrote:trollface dot jpg wrote: Chromosome is considered "the golden age" of tank balance.
Yeah you stu*** di*** fu***. Its considered the Golden age of tanks, BY TANKERS..... Yet this is far better in terms of raw power than Chomosome ever was and no tanker ever says this is a golden age.
"My Faith in you is absolute; my sword is Yours, My God, and Your will guides me now and for all eternity."
|
Tebu Gan
Dem Durrty Boyz Renegade Alliance
510
|
Posted - 2014.01.30 23:48:00 -
[38] - Quote
In all honesty, I think you are missing the real issues by a mile there.
I wish it was this simple, as in only 4 things that need "fixed".
The only one that makes the most sense is the third one. Even then, your numbers are WAY off the mark.
I can also see this putting gunnlogis UP again, while maddies rule the battlefield.
The ONLY thing that infantry can possibly ***** about at this moment are blaster tanks. The other 2 types don't go 30 - 0, and make infantry cry.
I think the tank and infantry interaction needs to be lessened, IE blaster move away from an AI role and into an AV role. A putting small turrets as AI, or vice versa.
I mean let's be serious here. What kind of tank is it that all infantry hate. Infantry see tank and just think all tanks need a nerf. Do you ever once stop to consider what tanks really are. Do you ever look at the tank and think, oh this guy has a rail gun, he probably won't touch me. I mean do infantry ever stop to think about it. OR do they just want to drop everything back to the way it was, because then it was FAIR TO YOU.
And I heard tanks WERE NOT balanced in chrome. Golden age of tanks, much like this age will be remembered as the golden age of tanks. When tanks murdered everyone and considered themselves balanced.
Yup sounds pretty selfish.
Nuff Said
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |