DUST Search - Vet's word on HAVs

Scheneighnay McBob wrote:

Phazoid wrote:

now the only thing i find op on tanks is the numbers, there are many on the battlefield, and the maps makes targeting infantry easy, thats all i have against tanks

Now the only find I find OP on tanks are hardeners.

The rest is just AV stupidity-
I use a Soma with no hardeners whatsoever- it has a BPO heavy rep, a BPO light rep, a basic fuel injector, mCRU, and 2 mlt 20gj blasters (blueberries are more helpful than you would think)
In that fit, I survived an orbital and several swarm clips.

For the orbital, I just stayed right where I was- sitting under pipes. I went down to 400 armor, but I still survived.
For the swarms, I just moved behind a pillar, and watched while the AVers fired volley after volley at me, even though everything was hitting the pillar and not me.

The stacking penalty for active modules needs to be much harsher, and AVers need some way to get WP without destroying a vehicle- they're VERY effective area-denial, after all.

Pages: [1] 2 :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Scheneighnay McBob Bojo's School of the Trades 3318	Posted - 2013.12.23 20:57:00 - [1] - Quote I've played since there was skirmish 1.0, meaning I've seen the previous "tank 514"; so I just want to say this: Just have fun with it. Last time, I was one of those "not going to stoop to their level" guys. I just stuck in the buildings as a shotgun scout, and avoided the HAV spam altogether. And I regretted it. Up until today, I haven't realistically taken part on one of those huge tank battles that pops up now. We've already made it very clear to CCP that HAVs are currently broken. So while they change that (and I guarantee you they will), just sit back, relax, call in a MLT HAV, and join the chaos. It IS pretty fun We used to have a time machine
Flix Keptick Red Star. EoN. 1760	Posted - 2013.12.23 21:05:00 - [2] - Quote I must admit, destroying 2-4 tanks per game is satisfying. PS: lack of content make tanks "broken" as you would put it (webifiers, shield AV and stuff like that) Lack of content makes stuff broken... GÿåTank driverGÿå
Kane Fyea Scions of Athra 2452	Posted - 2013.12.23 21:07:00 - [3] - Quote Flix Keptick wrote: I must admit, destroying 2-4 tanks per game is satisfying. PS: lack of content make tanks "broken" as you would put it (webifiers, shield AV and stuff like that) If the plasma cannon was good then there would be Anti Shield AV
Darken-Sol BIG BAD W0LVES 1019	Posted - 2013.12.23 21:08:00 - [4] - Quote Scheneighnay McBob wrote: I've played since there was skirmish 1.0, meaning I've seen the previous "tank 514"; so I just want to say this: Just have fun with it. Last time, I was one of those "not going to stoop to their level" guys. I just stuck in the buildings as a shotgun scout, and avoided the HAV spam altogether. And I regretted it. Up until today, I haven't realistically taken part on one of those huge tank battles that pops up now. We've already made it very clear to CCP that HAVs are currently broken. So while they change that (and I guarantee you they will), just sit back, relax, call in a MLT HAV, and join the chaos. It IS pretty fun Get in on the joke. There was a time we fought good tankers. Now we just fight good tanks.
Valeryy Igunen Gummibaerenbande 514 108	Posted - 2013.12.23 21:10:00 - [5] - Quote Kane Fyea wrote: Flix Keptick wrote: I must admit, destroying 2-4 tanks per game is satisfying. PS: lack of content make tanks "broken" as you would put it (webifiers, shield AV and stuff like that) If the plasma cannon was good then there would be Anti Shield AV http://youtu.be/cJ50Sj58Uhg plasma cannon with flux nades works fine if the tank driver can't aim ;)
Kane Fyea Scions of Athra 2453	Posted - 2013.12.23 21:14:00 - [6] - Quote Valeryy Igunen wrote: Kane Fyea wrote: Flix Keptick wrote: I must admit, destroying 2-4 tanks per game is satisfying. PS: lack of content make tanks "broken" as you would put it (webifiers, shield AV and stuff like that) If the plasma cannon was good then there would be Anti Shield AV http://youtu.be/cJ50Sj58Uhg plasma cannon with flux nades works fine if the tank driver can't aim ;) Wow that tanker couldn't aim for shit lol.
Christiphoros von Poe Condotta Rouvenor Gallente Federation 37	Posted - 2013.12.23 21:18:00 - [7] - Quote I think they are fine as well. I am a little glad they aren't Sagaris's though... Haha. Who knows how beastly they would be. I fought at Caldari Prime Closed Beta Vet
DeathwindRising ROGUE SPADES 155	Posted - 2013.12.23 21:18:00 - [8] - Quote mlt railgun tanks redline sniping can be annoying... but then theyre not hacking or slaughtering troops either. blasters though... decrease the heat cool down and increase overheat duration. in return we need the heat sink modules back. missiles are fine. railguns... well nobody likes getting sniped, but i think there ok. just need to be more careful when theyre on the field and maybe decrease theyre tracking, so the absolutely suck up close. if we get those things done then, blasters will still be great against troops but suck against vehicles and installations. railguns will still be great at long range vehicle combat, but will suck against troops and vehicles up close. missiles are fine. just waiting for medium launchers now. PS. if small missiles blast radius is 2.5m and large missiles are 1.5, will mediums be 2m? will the launchers have 10 missiles per clip? and medium rof? i might like those :D
Harpyja DUST University Ivy League 951	Posted - 2013.12.23 21:25:00 - [9] - Quote More FOTMers in militia HAVs? Please no. Sure, I get more kills, but the infantry will QQ harder and will get tanks nerfed for EVERYONE. It's only the militia HAVs that need nerfing. They get too much power for 0 SP. "By His light, and His will" - The Scriptures, Gheinok the First, 12:32
taxi bastard Minor Trueblood 82	Posted - 2013.12.23 21:29:00 - [10] - Quote IMO at the least remove the large blaster turret. if you want to go tank vs tank then you can do it solo. for infantry aswell then you need 2 people.

Scheneighnay McBob Bojo's School of the Trades 3321	Posted - 2013.12.23 21:57:00 - [11] - Quote Btw, too the "real" tankers- my Soma destroyed a madrugar. I new I wouldn't be able to get away, so I just rammed them with a fuel injector active. Ended up flipping them, and surviving. We used to have a time machine
Flix Keptick Red Star. EoN. 1772	Posted - 2013.12.23 22:18:00 - [12] - Quote Scheneighnay McBob wrote: Btw, to the "real" tankers- my Soma destroyed a madrugar. I knew I wouldn't be able to get away, so I just rammed them with a fuel injector active. Ended up flipping them, and surviving. What is your point? I have destroyed dozens of mlt tanks with my gunnlogi. Lack of content makes stuff broken... GÿåTank driverGÿå
Lynn Beck Granite Mercenary Division Top Men. 395	Posted - 2013.12.23 22:25:00 - [13] - Quote We need to stop referring to the blaster as 'anti infantry only' It's the only gallente turret. The rail has splash damage, so to enforce it's 'anti tank' role we should remove ALL splash from rails? Small rails have splash as well, let's nerf it. /sarcasm end We need to stop lookin at this game like a bunch of dicklords and deeming anything that isn't instakillable as Op. Blasters are the CQC shield biased DPS machine. Rails are your long distance 'sniper' weapons, that are seriously -disadvantaged- in CQC, but doesn't mean you can't DIRECT HIT a few infantry, or use your flaylock level splash to pester people in cover. Under 28db Officially nerfproof (predicting CR nerf February '14) I have a God, His name is Dakka.
Luk Manag of Terror TRE GAFFEL 257	Posted - 2013.12.23 22:28:00 - [14] - Quote I wouldn't say they're broken. I remember when we had no redline to speak of, and our missle tanks would just camp under the enemy MCC and shoot guys as they jumped out. We could then pop up over the hill and snipe guys across the map with that same missile turret - it was OP. I think AV needs a bit of a buff - that's all it will take to thin the tank herd. There will be bullets. ACR+SMG
Flix Keptick Red Star. EoN. 1775	Posted - 2013.12.23 22:34:00 - [15] - Quote Kane Fyea wrote: Flix Keptick wrote: I must admit, destroying 2-4 tanks per game is satisfying. PS: lack of content make tanks "broken" as you would put it (webifiers, shield AV and stuff like that) If the plasma cannon was good then there would be Anti Shield AV True, plasma cannon is a joke... Lack of content makes stuff broken... GÿåTank driverGÿå
Scheneighnay McBob Bojo's School of the Trades 3323	Posted - 2013.12.23 23:35:00 - [16] - Quote Luk Manag wrote: I wouldn't say they're broken. I remember when we had no redline to speak of, and our missle tanks would just camp under the enemy MCC and shoot guys as they jumped out. We could then pop up over the hill and snipe guys across the map with that same missile turret - it was OP. I think AV needs a bit of a buff - that's all it will take to thin the tank herd. Well, when any piece of the system isn't working, it's broken. AV and HAVs are part of the same system We used to have a time machine
DeathwindRising ROGUE SPADES 158	Posted - 2013.12.24 07:01:00 - [17] - Quote Lynn Beck wrote: We need to stop referring to the blaster as 'anti infantry only' It's the only gallente turret. The rail has splash damage, so to enforce it's 'anti tank' role we should remove ALL splash from rails? Small rails have splash as well, let's nerf it. /sarcasm end We need to stop lookin at this game like a bunch of dicklords and deeming anything that isn't instakillable as Op. Blasters are the CQC shield biased DPS machine. Rails are your long distance 'sniper' weapons, that are seriously -disadvantaged- in CQC, but doesn't mean you can't DIRECT HIT a few infantry, or use your flaylock level splash to pester people in cover. blasters are shield biased, but railgun are also shield biased....
Phazoid The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar DARKSTAR ARMY 144	Posted - 2013.12.24 07:13:00 - [18] - Quote now the only thing i find op on tanks is the numbers, there are many on the battlefield, and the maps makes targeting infantry easy, thats all i have against tanks Dragons don't have friends. The nearest we can get to the idea is an enemy who is still alive.
Scheneighnay McBob Bojo's School of the Trades 3328	Posted - 2013.12.24 16:09:00 - [19] - Quote Phazoid wrote: now the only thing i find op on tanks is the numbers, there are many on the battlefield, and the maps makes targeting infantry easy, thats all i have against tanks Now the only find I find OP on tanks are hardeners. The rest is just AV stupidity- I use a Soma with no hardeners whatsoever- it has a BPO heavy rep, a BPO light rep, a basic fuel injector, mCRU, and 2 mlt 20gj blasters (blueberries are more helpful than you would think) In that fit, I survived an orbital and several swarm clips. For the orbital, I just stayed right where I was- sitting under pipes. I went down to 400 armor, but I still survived. For the swarms, I just moved behind a pillar, and watched while the AVers fired volley after volley at me, even though everything was hitting the pillar and not me. The stacking penalty for active modules needs to be much harsher, and AVers need some way to get WP without destroying a vehicle- they're VERY effective area-denial, after all. We used to have a time machine
CommanderBolt ACME SPECIAL FORCES 487	Posted - 2013.12.24 16:27:00 - [20] - Quote Valeryy Igunen wrote: Kane Fyea wrote: Flix Keptick wrote: I must admit, destroying 2-4 tanks per game is satisfying. PS: lack of content make tanks "broken" as you would put it (webifiers, shield AV and stuff like that) If the plasma cannon was good then there would be Anti Shield AV http://youtu.be/cJ50Sj58Uhg plasma cannon with flux nades works fine if the tank driver can't aim ;) Wow what a ham-fisted battle. I suppose you have a reason to be sloppy with the plasma cannon but that shield tank driver..... freshie!

Jason Pearson 3627	Posted - 2013.12.24 16:35:00 - [21] - Quote DeathwindRising wrote: blasters are shield biased, but railgun are also shield biased.... False, Railguns deal 110% to armor, 90% to shields. King of the Forums // Vehicle Specialist for Hire. Buffing or Debuffing Vehicles or AV will never fix anything.
pegasis prime BIG BAD W0LVES 1512	Posted - 2013.12.24 16:40:00 - [22] - Quote Scheneighnay McBob wrote: Phazoid wrote: now the only thing i find op on tanks is the numbers, there are many on the battlefield, and the maps makes targeting infantry easy, thats all i have against tanks Now the only find I find OP on tanks are hardeners. The rest is just AV stupidity- I use a Soma with no hardeners whatsoever- it has a BPO heavy rep, a BPO light rep, a basic fuel injector, mCRU, and 2 mlt 20gj blasters (blueberries are more helpful than you would think) In that fit, I survived an orbital and several swarm clips. For the orbital, I just stayed right where I was- sitting under pipes. I went down to 400 armor, but I still survived. For the swarms, I just moved behind a pillar, and watched while the AVers fired volley after volley at me, even though everything was hitting the pillar and not me. The stacking penalty for active modules needs to be much harsher, and AVers need some way to get WP without destroying a vehicle- they're VERY effective area-denial, after all. im sure CCP nullabor said something in a thread that inferred that it would be a simple thing to implement wp for inflicting damage to vehicles, he also mentioned that he would bring it to the attention to the brass and see if it was hot fixable as now we have a wp hard cap per time unit it would be less farmable Its gone from suck .....to blow level 1 forum warrior
Scheneighnay McBob Bojo's School of the Trades 3331	Posted - 2013.12.24 16:59:00 - [23] - Quote Jason Pearson wrote: DeathwindRising wrote: blasters are shield biased, but railgun are also shield biased.... False, Railguns deal 110% to armor, 90% to shields. Meanwhile, projectiles deal 110% to armor 95% to shields, which is why minmatar are statistically the best. Totally called that the CBR would be the best AR. We used to have a time machine
Darken-Sol BIG BAD W0LVES 1030	Posted - 2013.12.24 17:03:00 - [24] - Quote Scheneighnay McBob wrote: Jason Pearson wrote: DeathwindRising wrote: blasters are shield biased, but railgun are also shield biased.... False, Railguns deal 110% to armor, 90% to shields. Meanwhile, projectiles deal 110% to armor 95% to shields, which is why minmatar are statistically the best. Totally called that the CBR would be the best AR. the dovolle is still by far the best AR. They rip shitup all day long. There was a time we fought good tankers. Now we just fight good tanks.
Zekain K Expert Intervention Caldari State 903	Posted - 2013.12.24 17:30:00 - [25] - Quote Luk Manag wrote: I wouldn't say they're broken. I remember when we had no redline to speak of, and our missle tanks would just camp under the enemy MCC and shoot guys as they jumped out. We could then pop up over the hill and snipe guys across the map with that same missile turret - it was OP. I think AV needs a bit of a buff - that's all it will take to thin the tank herd. We have always had a red line you dumb **. CALDARI not so MASTER RACE** Forum Warrior Level: 10
Jason Pearson 3628	Posted - 2013.12.24 17:41:00 - [26] - Quote Zekain K wrote: Luk Manag wrote: I wouldn't say they're broken. I remember when we had no redline to speak of, and our missle tanks would just camp under the enemy MCC and shoot guys as they jumped out. We could then pop up over the hill and snipe guys across the map with that same missile turret - it was OP. I think AV needs a bit of a buff - that's all it will take to thin the tank herd. We have always had a red line you dumb ****. So hostile. King of the Forums // Vehicle Specialist for Hire. Buffing or Debuffing Vehicles or AV will never fix anything.
Vrain Matari ZionTCD Public Disorder. 1395	Posted - 2013.12.24 17:44:00 - [27] - Quote Flix Keptick wrote: I must admit, destroying 2-4 tanks per game is satisfying. PS: lack of content make tanks "broken" as you would put it (webifiers, shield AV and stuff like that) This is a good point. We kinda need to wait and see. Praying to all the gods that CCP is smart enough to have prepared those items ahead of time for release with 1.8 - it's the only thing that makes sense. I support SP rollover.
Vrain Matari ZionTCD Public Disorder. 1395	Posted - 2013.12.24 17:46:00 - [28] - Quote Zekain K wrote: Luk Manag wrote: I wouldn't say they're broken. I remember when we had no redline to speak of, and our missle tanks would just camp under the enemy MCC and shoot guys as they jumped out. We could then pop up over the hill and snipe guys across the map with that same missile turret - it was OP. I think AV needs a bit of a buff - that's all it will take to thin the tank herd. We have always had a red line you dumb ****. But he's exactly right in his description. Kinda makes you look like a foll, dunnit'? I support SP rollover.
Scheneighnay McBob Bojo's School of the Trades 3332	Posted - 2013.12.24 19:06:00 - [29] - Quote Zekain K wrote: Luk Manag wrote: I wouldn't say they're broken. I remember when we had no redline to speak of, and our missle tanks would just camp under the enemy MCC and shoot guys as they jumped out. We could then pop up over the hill and snipe guys across the map with that same missile turret - it was OP. I think AV needs a bit of a buff - that's all it will take to thin the tank herd. We have always had a red line you dumb ****. I'm not sure sure if the attackers in skirmish 1.0 had one (I was literally always an attacker for some odd reason), and after that, the redline was either MUCH farther back or nonexistent. I remember people just sitting under the MCC with HMGs and tanks. We used to have a time machine
Spkr4theDead Red Star. EoN. 1569	Posted - 2013.12.24 19:23:00 - [30] - Quote Scheneighnay McBob wrote: I've played since there was skirmish 1.0, meaning I've seen the previous "tank 514"; so I just want to say this: Just have fun with it. Last time, I was one of those "not going to stoop to their level" guys. I just stuck in the buildings as a shotgun scout, and avoided the HAV spam altogether. And I regretted it. Up until today, I haven't realistically taken part on one of those huge tank battles that pops up now. We've already made it very clear to CCP that HAVs are currently broken. So while they change that (and I guarantee you they will), just sit back, relax, call in a MLT HAV, and join the chaos. It IS pretty fun A reasonable response!! faints Infantry cries for tank changes, and they don't like them. Tell them to use vehicles, they complain, and use cars anyway



Pages: [1] 2 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page