|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Spkr4theDead
Red Star.
EoN.
1569
   |
Posted - 2013.12.24 19:23:00 -
[1] - Quote
Scheneighnay McBob wrote:I've played since there was skirmish 1.0, meaning I've seen the previous "tank 514"; so I just want to say this:
Just have fun with it.
Last time, I was one of those "not going to stoop to their level" guys.
I just stuck in the buildings as a shotgun scout, and avoided the HAV spam altogether.
And I regretted it.
Up until today, I haven't realistically taken part on one of those huge tank battles that pops up now.
We've already made it very clear to CCP that HAVs are currently broken. So while they change that (and I guarantee you they will), just sit back, relax, call in a MLT HAV, and join the chaos.
It IS pretty fun
A reasonable response!! *faints*
Infantry cries for tank changes, and they don't like them. Tell them to use vehicles, they complain, and use cars anyway
|
Spkr4theDead
Red Star.
EoN.
1569
|
Posted - 2013.12.24 19:27:00 -
[2] - Quote
Kane Fyea wrote:Flix Keptick wrote:I must admit, destroying 2-4 tanks per game is satisfying.
PS: lack of content make tanks "broken" as you would put it (webifiers, shield AV and stuff like that) If the plasma cannon was good then there would be Anti Shield AV
I was 2-shot in my Madrugar by a permanent redline rail sniper real early this morning, sometime before downtime. I was a little upset about the quick loss, but I did it to him first, and I at least know I can handle my tank pretty well outside the redline, while that sorry punk has to sit behind his.
Infantry cries for tank changes, and they don't like them. Tell them to use vehicles, they complain, and use cars anyway
|
Spkr4theDead
Red Star.
EoN.
1569
|
Posted - 2013.12.24 19:29:00 -
[3] - Quote
Valeryy Igunen wrote:Kane Fyea wrote:Flix Keptick wrote:I must admit, destroying 2-4 tanks per game is satisfying.
PS: lack of content make tanks "broken" as you would put it (webifiers, shield AV and stuff like that) If the plasma cannon was good then there would be Anti Shield AV http://youtu.be/cJ50Sj58Uhg plasma cannon with flux nades works fine if the tank driver can't aim ;)
Oh wow, congratulations, you beat someone that has no clue how to aim while they're using all MLT.
How would you fare against me?
Infantry cries for tank changes, and they don't like them. Tell them to use vehicles, they complain, and use cars anyway
|
Spkr4theDead
Red Star.
EoN.
1569
|
Posted - 2013.12.24 19:30:00 -
[4] - Quote
Kane Fyea wrote:Valeryy Igunen wrote:Kane Fyea wrote:Flix Keptick wrote:I must admit, destroying 2-4 tanks per game is satisfying.
PS: lack of content make tanks "broken" as you would put it (webifiers, shield AV and stuff like that) If the plasma cannon was good then there would be Anti Shield AV http://youtu.be/cJ50Sj58Uhg plasma cannon with flux nades works fine if the tank driver can't aim ;) Wow that tanker couldn't aim for sh it lol.
That person isn't a "tanker."
Infantry cries for tank changes, and they don't like them. Tell them to use vehicles, they complain, and use cars anyway
|
Spkr4theDead
Red Star.
EoN.
1569
|
Posted - 2013.12.24 19:31:00 -
[5] - Quote
Jason Pearson wrote:DeathwindRising wrote:
blasters are shield biased, but railgun are also shield biased....
False, Railguns deal 110% to armor, 90% to shields.
I could much more easily survive a blaster in my Gunnlogi than a railgun.
Maybe CCP has something mixed up?
Infantry cries for tank changes, and they don't like them. Tell them to use vehicles, they complain, and use cars anyway
|
|
|
| |
|