| Pages: 1 2 [3] :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Kira Takizawa
Kira's Templars
170
   |
Posted - 2014.03.16 07:45:00 -
[61] - Quote
Viktor Hadah Jr wrote:As long as my current unlimited BPO's stay unlimited they can go ahead and introduce limited BPO's.
I agree with this because since I've paid money for the BPO's as they are now not for the BS they are trying to feed us... But if they change them either I'm quitting or going to run only starter fits.. Don't try to break what we have left CCP...
Story of the Merc
|
Sgt Kirk
Fatal Absolution
General Tso's Alliance
5169
|
Posted - 2014.03.16 07:49:00 -
[62] - Quote
Can I just trade the BPO suit for a similar different Racial suit/weapon sometime down the line.
I'd like to swap my Skinweave Amarr Sentinel suit for a Skinweave Gallente Sentinel.
1st Official Role Playing Gallente Asshole -Title Awarded by True Adamance
|
Lorhak Gannarsein
Science For Death
2114
|
Posted - 2014.03.16 10:19:00 -
[63] - Quote
Sgt Kirk wrote:Can I just trade the BPO suit for a similar different Racial suit/weapon sometime down the line.
I'd like to swap my Skinweave Amarr Sentinel suit for a Skinweave Gallente Sentinel.
This would be nice.
Assault ak.0 w/ScR+ScP 4LYFE
Forum Warrior Level Two. (GëºGêçGëª)/
|
Spectral Clone
Dust2Dust.
Top Men.
1702
|
Posted - 2014.03.16 10:50:00 -
[64] - Quote
Change how a BPO works, and I will easily claim my spent money on this game back. So will many others. Then use that money to buy more boosters. 
Drop it like its hat.
|
Asha Starwind
DUST University
Ivy League
499
|
Posted - 2014.03.16 10:53:00 -
[65] - Quote
They simply need to bring them back because it simply is unfair to allow them part of the user base and not the rest.
32db Mad Bomber.
|
DeadlyAztec11
Ostrakon Agency
Gallente Federation
4666
|
Posted - 2014.03.16 16:37:00 -
[66] - Quote
BPO's should be for personal use, should be regulated and should not be used for manufacturing.
Taco Cat backwards is still Taco Cat
|
KA24DERT
TeamPlayers
Negative-Feedback
535
|
Posted - 2014.03.16 17:09:00 -
[67] - Quote
Every idea that isn't an implementation of Eve-style BPOs is just asking the Dust development team to write code that is destined to be THROWN AWAY before they even hit save. |
Derpty Derp
It's All Gone Derp
132
|
Posted - 2014.03.16 17:26:00 -
[68] - Quote
Since all the unlimited Blueprints are of Militia level gear... How about releasing future blueprints of Proto-Gear that allow 1 per battle. |
Johnny Guilt
Algintal Core
586
|
Posted - 2014.03.16 17:35:00 -
[69] - Quote
Seems like a BPO noone would buy into because of how potentially fast you can waste through milita grade gear,why over complicate the BPO?
A strange game.
The only winning move is
not to play.
|
ADAM-OF-EVE
Dead Man's Game
1509
|
Posted - 2014.04.21 23:11:00 -
[70] - Quote
or any bpo's you have go into the market menu as a list.
you select desired bpo from the list and buy items for a 50-75% reduced price of the version its based on. this way isk and items are lost creating an isk sink for dust and also generating items for loot.
basically you are buying the item for mineral cost skipping the production and skills costs the other normal items would include. this way when eve production comes in the transfer of power wouldn't mean a drastic change. you simply transfer your bpo to eve and continue to send yourself the items for mineral costs only
I will logi the s* out of you
https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=99075&find
|
|
|
Takron Nistrom
Tinfoil Hatz
351
|
Posted - 2014.04.21 23:15:00 -
[71] - Quote
I would be pissed if they removed the Aur BPOs but I would get over it, because tech they can. But remove my collector edition BPOs and CCP will never see the light of my wallett again.
GÇ£Pulvis et umbra sumus. (We are but dust and shadow.)GÇ¥
GÇò Horace, The Odes of Horace
|
JoeShmoe From Kokomo
Third Rock From The Sun
1
|
Posted - 2014.06.08 23:13:00 -
[72] - Quote
Driftward wrote:The problem with the unlimited BPOs is that they are currently industry/market breaking. Removes any incentive to purchase those items/they never deplete which is completely opposite to one of the main features of this game (persistent with consequences to dying beyond "stats")
I would support turning all BPO's into a recharging type item that puts either BPC copies into your inventory or gives a limited amount of uses that doesn't rollover (though I think rollover would be fine, much better than the current mechanism)
If they really wanted anything bought with AUR can be refunded and the skinweaves just taken away. However anything part of a package are purchased item. Any changes are sticky legal ground.
The virtual market issue is an imaginary problem. The seriously messed up hidden mission-contract to determine payouts is a very real problem.[/quote]
Any changes are sticky legal ground. I paid for mine. Dont QQ because you didnt. I will sue if they change my BPO as it would be a breach of contract. They tried changin the BPOs once and that was fixxed within a day. CCP cant afford to lose players or anymore money. Its bad enough they are quiting PSN and movin to PC. |
Joseph Ridgeson
warravens
Final Resolution.
1979
|
Posted - 2014.06.09 01:32:00 -
[73] - Quote
JoeShmoe From Kokomo wrote:
Any changes are sticky legal ground. I paid for mine. Dont QQ because you didnt. I will sue if they change my BPO as it would be a breach of contract. They tried changin the BPOs once and that was fixxed within a day. CCP cant afford to lose players or anymore money. Its bad enough they are quiting PSN and movin to PC.
It is actually not sticky in a legal sense at all. Not the slightest bit. You know that EULA we all totally read to the letter, had our lawyers look through it, and accepted with trepidation? In there, it basically states that we don't own anything we have in the game. If CCP wanted to ban Joseph Ridgeson for "having a stupid name" or being a fat sloth of a manchild, they could and there would be nothing I would be able to do. "You are using CCP's property at our convenience. Anything you have paid to unlock is only buying a license that may be revoked at any time." Every EULA has the same thing and it is particularly necessary in Free to Play games where things are bought with real money. League of Legends, Lord of the Rings: Online, Hearthstone, Guild Wars 2, DUST 514; they all have that same EULA.
If a serious attempt was made to sue them, they would simply state "this user accepted to the End Users License Agreement; they were made well aware of our rights to the product."
We are all going to get screwed in some fashion through the switch over. It is just a matter of whether it is a microfastener or the industrial auger. The point to take away is that CCP is not under legal obligation; they ARE under customer loyalty obligation.
"This is B.S! This is B.S! I paid money! Cash money, dollars money, cash money!"
|
Atiim
Heaven's Lost Property
9241
|
Posted - 2014.06.09 01:34:00 -
[74] - Quote
How about a special BPO where you pay for it once in AUR, and then have to restock it with ISK upon destruction. It would basically serve to create an ISK variant of the BPOs?
It would be great for those who purchase AUR gear simply for the cosmetics.
Amarrians would prefer you be faithful. I'd rather you be logical.
Current Goal: Caldari Medium Dropsuits III
-HAND
|
TIGER SHARK1501
The Phoenix Federation
Dark Taboo
21
|
Posted - 2014.06.15 14:59:00 -
[75] - Quote
Viktor Hadah Jr wrote:As long as my current unlimited BPO's stay unlimited they can go ahead and introduce limited BPO's.
Agreed. I'm fine if they add limited BPO's but don't touch my BPO's that I purchased which are unlimited and were as such when I bought them. If CCP wishes to sell more Aurum suits why not make the Aurum version have a perk such as a bonus slot or more PG or CPU? |
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 [3] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |