DUST Search - INSTANT FIX FOR TANKS

All Channels

General Discussions

INSTANT FIX FOR TANKS

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] 2 :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Yelhsa Jin-Mao PROTO RETRIBUTION 227	Posted - 2013.12.19 17:48:00 - [1] - Quote 1. Remove Blaster Turrets from Main Turret for all tanks 2. Have Blaster Turrets reserved only for passenger slots RESULT: No more OP Anti Infantry Tanks dishing out 200dps to anyone who dares stand in their way. I can has ISK
Yagihige Crux Special Tasks Group Gallente Federation 497	Posted - 2013.12.19 17:53:00 - [2] - Quote That idea is so ridiculous i should sue you. em ta kool t'nod
THEAMAZING POTHEAD Nyain San Renegade Alliance 687	Posted - 2013.12.19 18:02:00 - [3] - Quote personally i agree as long as railguns had a huge buff to splash radius w/ a nerf to splash damage. Gimme a 8m radius like an assault MD but gimme 150 damage w/ it, so i can blast peeps easy but not kill them, instead soften em up for infantry. idc really though, i hit infantry easy already w/ direct rail shots. and the bonus vs tanks means i run rails most of the time anyways. But ccp aint gonna remove content for balance.... wait nvm, they already have w/ racial variants.
Yelhsa Jin-Mao PROTO RETRIBUTION 227	Posted - 2013.12.19 18:15:00 - [4] - Quote I think it is a reasonable suggestion. I can has ISK
CommanderBolt ACME SPECIAL FORCES 438	Posted - 2013.12.19 18:28:00 - [5] - Quote Yelhsa Jin-Mao wrote: 1. Remove Blaster Turrets from Main Turret for all tanks 2. Have Blaster Turrets reserved only for passenger slots RESULT: No more OP Anti Infantry Tanks dishing out 200dps to anyone who dares stand in their way. So then when I want to shoot I just switch position in the tank. Hardly a change at all.....
Coleman Gray GunFall Mobilization Covert Intervention 959	Posted - 2013.12.19 18:36:00 - [6] - Quote Or AV could stop being lazy, back when it was easy to kill tanks when one tank was called in at least 4-6 people went AV and hunted the tank. Now it's not of a case of 2-3 shotting a tank anymore they realise their not free points no more or worth "trolling" So they gave up If Preparation is half of the battle and knowing is the other half, Then there is no need to fight.
Yelhsa Jin-Mao PROTO RETRIBUTION 227	Posted - 2013.12.19 22:06:00 - [7] - Quote CommanderBolt wrote: Yelhsa Jin-Mao wrote: 1. Remove Blaster Turrets from Main Turret for all tanks 2. Have Blaster Turrets reserved only for passenger slots RESULT: No more OP Anti Infantry Tanks dishing out 200dps to anyone who dares stand in their way. So then when I want to shoot I just switch position in the tank. Hardly a change at all..... Oh believe me it is. Firstly equipping a blaster turret as a passenger turret increases the PG&CPU requirement Secondly Small blaster turrets do less damage against Infantry than the large blaster turret Thirdly switching seats consumes time and gives AV and opportunity to get into position or maybe even get the first shot off Finally passenger turrets have a limited radius in which they can turn, providing blindspots for AV users to exploit and leaves a tank just that little bit more vulnerable This suggestion is all about balance, and I'd recommend you support a suggestion like this and get CCPs attention with it before they bring down the NERF hammer on HAVs in 1.8, or BUFF AV back to the way it was in 1.6 so they can compete again. I can has ISK
Roger Cordill The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar DARKSTAR ARMY 290	Posted - 2013.12.19 22:11:00 - [8] - Quote Yelhsa Jin-Mao wrote: I think it is a reasonable suggestion. message from Godin: Weren't you the guy who was suing CCP? Of course you would
Yelhsa Jin-Mao PROTO RETRIBUTION 227	Posted - 2013.12.19 22:15:00 - [9] - Quote Roger Cordill wrote: Yelhsa Jin-Mao wrote: I think it is a reasonable suggestion. message from Godin: Weren't you the guy who was suing CCP? Of course you would Message from Godin: You must be mistaking me for someone who gives a F*** about your opinion, let alone your pitiful existence. I can has ISK
Stinker Butt Ostrakon Agency Gallente Federation 210	Posted - 2013.12.19 22:19:00 - [10] - Quote THEAMAZING POTHEAD wrote: personally i agree as long as railguns had a huge buff to splash radius w/ a nerf to splash damage. Gimme a 8m radius like an assault MD but gimme 150 damage w/ it, so i can blast peeps easy but not kill them, instead soften em up for infantry. idc really though, i hit infantry easy already w/ direct rail shots. and the bonus vs tanks means i run rails most of the time anyways. But ccp aint gonna remove content for balance.... wait nvm, they already have w/ racial variants. Rail guns are already too affective against infantry. They need more dispersion. Tanks for Listening...

Ivy Zalinto Lo-Tech Solutions Ltd 197	Posted - 2013.12.19 22:21:00 - [11] - Quote This idea is bad and you should feel bad. Blaster tanks are no real threat if you are smart person. Avoid the tank sound and you will live more, until then you are points to them and thats it. Enjoy being eaten alive by blaster tanks and watch out for the the ar players you probably think are op. <3 whiskey fueled gaming Dedicated scout. New player tutor; scout instructor Scrambler Pistol dedication
Yelhsa Jin-Mao PROTO RETRIBUTION 228	Posted - 2013.12.19 22:25:00 - [12] - Quote Ivy Zalinto wrote: This idea is bad and you should feel bad. Blaster tanks are no real threat if you are smart person. Avoid the tank sound and you will live more, until then you are points to them and thats it. Enjoy being eaten alive by blaster tanks and watch out for the the ar players you probably think are op. <3 whiskey fueled gaming Don't worry, once my Active booster runs out in 2 weeks I'm off DUST for good until 1.8 is released alongside the impending nerf Tanks are in for, and the substantial AV buff CCP will throw in just to rub it in. I can has ISK
Patrick57 Fatal Absolution 2219	Posted - 2013.12.19 22:26:00 - [13] - Quote Immediate fix for QQers- Oh, wait..... When I'm depressed, I cut myself......A BIG SLICE OF CHOCOLATE CAKE! nú+
Yelhsa Jin-Mao PROTO RETRIBUTION 228	Posted - 2013.12.19 22:28:00 - [14] - Quote Patrick57 wrote: Immediate fix for QQers- Oh, wait..... Did you QQ your way out of Gunfall, or did someone rustle your Jimmies just like I did in the chat channel. I can has ISK
Pvt Numnutz Black Phoenix Mercenaries 445	Posted - 2013.12.19 22:33:00 - [15] - Quote People will just switch to missiles
IrishWebster Molon Labe. Public Disorder. 101	Posted - 2013.12.19 22:34:00 - [16] - Quote Roger Cordill wrote: Yelhsa Jin-Mao wrote: I think it is a reasonable suggestion. message from Godin: Weren't you the guy who was suing CCP? Of course you would What the hell is it with you and this "Message from Godin:" crap? You do realize that by putting that phrase before everything you post makes you THE most obnoxious as+íhat on the forums, yes?
Roger Cordill The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar DARKSTAR ARMY 290	Posted - 2013.12.19 22:36:00 - [17] - Quote IrishWebster wrote: Roger Cordill wrote: Yelhsa Jin-Mao wrote: I think it is a reasonable suggestion. message from Godin: Weren't you the guy who was suing CCP? Of course you would What the hell is it with you and this "Message from Godin:" crap? You do realize that by putting that phrase before everything you post makes you THE most obnoxious as+íhat on the forums, yes? So people knows when I'm talking for Godin, and when I'm talking myself.
Patrick57 Fatal Absolution 2219	Posted - 2013.12.19 22:41:00 - [18] - Quote Yelhsa Jin-Mao wrote: Patrick57 wrote: Immediate fix for QQers- Oh, wait..... Did you QQ your way out of Gunfall, or did someone rustle your Jimmies just like I did in the chat channel. Lolz I wasn't in Gunfall when that happened, and from what I heard you left the channel once everyone ganged up on you....but that's another topic, and you bringing it up out of the blue is just a poor attempt at trolling. You are the biggest QQer in this game (Besides maybe Charlotte), and all that hype over suing CCP (Look at the ******* terms of agreement, it plainly says that they have the right to change anything, does it say anywhere that they don't have the right to take your **** away?) was unnecessary. When I'm depressed, I cut myself......A BIG SLICE OF CHOCOLATE CAKE! nú+
Cosgar ParagonX 8920	Posted - 2013.12.19 22:44:00 - [19] - Quote 1. Wait for tanks to stop glowing to kill them and work with other AV 2. Harden the **** up. I tried to put a level into Amarr Commando once, but got a server notification saying "Why?"
Our Deepest Regret L.O.T.I.S. Public Disorder. 416	Posted - 2013.12.19 22:44:00 - [20] - Quote Yelhsa Jin-Mao wrote: 1. Remove Blaster Turrets from Main Turret for all tanks 2. Have Blaster Turrets reserved only for passenger slots RESULT: No more OP Anti Infantry Tanks dishing out 200dps to anyone who dares stand in their way. Blaster turrets don't need anything except a shorter clip. Their current OP against infantry status is derived entirely from being able to rain bullets.

Roger Cordill The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar DARKSTAR ARMY 291	Posted - 2013.12.19 22:45:00 - [21] - Quote Yelhsa Jin-Mao wrote: Roger Cordill wrote: Yelhsa Jin-Mao wrote: I think it is a reasonable suggestion. message from Godin: Weren't you the guy who was suing CCP? Of course you would Message from Godin: You must be mistaking me for someone who gives a F*** about your opinion, let alone your pitiful existence. message from Godin: Did I strike a nerve sir? Or rather, child?
KING CHECKMATE Scions of Athra 3376	Posted - 2013.12.19 22:46:00 - [22] - Quote Yelhsa Jin-Mao wrote: 1. Remove Blaster Turrets from Main Turret for all tanks 2. Have Blaster Turrets reserved only for passenger slots RESULT: No more OP Anti Infantry Tanks dishing out 200dps to anyone who dares stand in their way. The best fix is right here, in my sig.... AV-TANK BALANCE = https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=1612446#post1612446
Ecub dunbar Death by Disassociation Zero-Day 1	Posted - 2013.12.19 22:48:00 - [23] - Quote Yelhsa Jin-Mao wrote: 1. Remove Blaster Turrets from Main Turret for all tanks 2. Have Blaster Turrets reserved only for passenger slots RESULT: No more OP Anti Infantry Tanks dishing out 200dps to anyone who dares stand in their way. The whole point of blaster tanks is for anti infantry, if you don't want the tank there get a railgun tank.Also blaster guns on passenger seats are way to useless that is why most people use missile launchers as passenger guns. From a blueberry to a warrior, that's what everyone will be with enough training.
Yelhsa Jin-Mao PROTO RETRIBUTION 229	Posted - 2013.12.20 01:01:00 - [24] - Quote Patrick57 wrote: Yelhsa Jin-Mao wrote: Patrick57 wrote: Immediate fix for QQers- Oh, wait..... Did you QQ your way out of Gunfall, or did someone rustle your Jimmies just like I did in the chat channel. Lolz I wasn't in Gunfall when that happened, and from what I heard you left the channel once everyone ganged up on you....but that's another topic, and you bringing it up out of the blue is just a poor attempt at trolling. You are the biggest QQer in this game (Besides maybe Charlotte), and all that hype over suing CCP (Look at the ******* terms of agreement, it plainly says that they have the right to change anything, does it say anywhere that they don't have the right to take your ** away?) was unnecessary. Lol 'ganged up on me', after I tore 'you' a new assholes in the chat and made you 'ragequit', from a chat, there was no one left to taunt, no one left to troll, he'll I couldn't even get an acknowledgment from the rest of Gunfall so I left to make room for another chat channel. You can tell yourself whatever lies you want, I really don't give a **, I rustled your Jimmies and could do so whenever I please. He'll, I fought in a FW match yesterday alongside an entire squad of Gunfall and I came in 3RD using only my BPO fits, bested only by two protostompers in tankers. I can has ISK
Yelhsa Jin-Mao PROTO RETRIBUTION 229	Posted - 2013.12.20 01:04:00 - [25] - Quote Ecub dunbar wrote: Yelhsa Jin-Mao wrote: 1. Remove Blaster Turrets from Main Turret for all tanks 2. Have Blaster Turrets reserved only for passenger slots RESULT: No more OP Anti Infantry Tanks dishing out 200dps to anyone who dares stand in their way. The whole point of blaster tanks is for anti infantry, if you don't want the tank there get a railgun tank.Also blaster guns on passenger seats are way to useless that is why most people use missile launchers as passenger guns. So if the turrets are useless and people only use those which they can exploit because they are OP, how does that make tanks balanced again? I can has ISK
Lynn Beck Granite Mercenary Division Top Men. 386	Posted - 2013.12.20 01:08:00 - [26] - Quote 'Remove the only gallente turret for it is a Cqc DPS machine, and is working as intended' If this is your Qq against a medium Rof, high damage turret, imagine a insanely high Rof turret, with low damage a shot(autocannons) Under 28db Officially nerfproof (predicting CR nerf February '14) I have a God, His name is Dakka.
wripple WarRavens League of Infamy 113	Posted - 2013.12.20 01:12:00 - [27] - Quote Yelhsa Jin-Mao wrote: 1. Remove Blaster Turrets from Main Turret for all tanks 2. Have Blaster Turrets reserved only for passenger slots RESULT: No more OP Anti Infantry Tanks dishing out 200dps to anyone who dares stand in their way. Better Fix: Lower the damage and speed of all tanks but give bonuses to damage and speed in skill tree. Too many matches have I seen someone go 10 / 0 just by spending 165,000 ISK in the Militia store.
Yelhsa Jin-Mao PROTO RETRIBUTION 229	Posted - 2013.12.20 01:13:00 - [28] - Quote Lynn Beck wrote: 'Remove the only gallente turret for it is a Cqc DPS machine, and is working as intended' If this is your Qq against a medium Rof, high damage turret, imagine a insanely high Rof turret, with low damage a shot(autocannons) CQC, I can snipe a scout 50M up from 100M-200M away with my Soma and Militia Blaster Turret that costs less than his entire suit. Tell me how that is even remotely CQC or balanced? I can has ISK
Patrick57 Fatal Absolution 2222	Posted - 2013.12.20 02:32:00 - [29] - Quote Yelhsa Jin-Mao wrote: Lol 'ganged up on me', after I tore 'you' a new assholes in the chat and made you 'ragequit', from a chat, there was no one left to taunt, no one left to troll, he'll I couldn't even get an acknowledgment from the rest of Gunfall so I left to make room for another chat channel. You can tell yourself whatever lies you want, I really don't give a **, I rustled your Jimmies and could do so whenever I please. He'll, I fought in a FW match yesterday alongside an entire squad of Gunfall and I came in 3RD using only my BPO fits, bested only by two protostompers in tankers. Why do you tell me a whole bunch of about yourself that I don't give a single ** about? That's a completely different topic, and you shouldn't of brought it up. When I'm depressed, I cut myself......A BIG SLICE OF CHOCOLATE CAKE! nú+
dogmanpig black market bank 82	Posted - 2013.12.20 02:38:00 - [30] - Quote Lynn Beck wrote: 'Remove the only gallente turret for it is a Cqc DPS machine, and is working as intended' If this is your Qq against a medium Rof, high damage turret, imagine a insanely high Rof turret, with low damage a shot(autocannons) i can't wait for auto cannons You hate me, I hate you. Lets keep it that way. Level 8 1/10 Forum alt. "Its worth half a penny and a reach around"



Pages: [1] 2 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online/DUST514, the EVE/DUST514 logo, EVE/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to OMG Labs to use EVE Online/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, OMG Labs. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.