Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Scheneighnay McBob
Bojo's School of the Trades
3282
|
Posted - 2013.12.17 00:14:00 -
[31] - Quote
Jason Pearson wrote:Vulpes Dolosus wrote:Next you're going to want a passenger to man my Python's turret.
Where was this suggestion when AV was OP? You're just butthurt that you can't insta-pop vehicles anymore. Let CCP rebalance tanks and AV and stop with these outrageous ideas. ^ Oh and, I keep seeing this suggestion followed by "Dropships are team vehicles, requiring separate gunners" but if you fly, you fly an ADS and use your own turret. So if this suggestion is implemented I demand ADS get's removed immediately. Hey dumbass, the thread is about changing the driver's control to that of the small turret.
In ADSes, the pilot already controls a single small turret. The real weapons are the crew and gunners. If a serious dropship crew would get together, you would have a BIG problem.
We used to have a time machine
|
Jason Pearson
3488
|
Posted - 2013.12.17 00:19:00 -
[32] - Quote
Scheneighnay McBob wrote:Jason Pearson wrote:Vulpes Dolosus wrote:Next you're going to want a passenger to man my Python's turret.
Where was this suggestion when AV was OP? You're just butthurt that you can't insta-pop vehicles anymore. Let CCP rebalance tanks and AV and stop with these outrageous ideas. ^ Oh and, I keep seeing this suggestion followed by "Dropships are team vehicles, requiring separate gunners" but if you fly, you fly an ADS and use your own turret. So if this suggestion is implemented I demand ADS get's removed immediately. Hey dumbass, the thread is about changing the driver's control to that of the small turret. In ADSes, the pilot already controls a single small turret. The real weapons are the crew and gunners. If a serious dropship crew would get together, you would have a BIG problem.
NOPE REMOVE ADS SHUT UP MCBAD.
King of the Forums // Vehicle Specialist for Hire.
Buffing or Debuffing Vehicles or AV will never fix anything.
|
Alena Ventrallis
The Neutral Zone
316
|
Posted - 2013.12.17 00:19:00 -
[33] - Quote
As a tanker, I'm down for this. As long as I get a proper vehicle lock so only my squadmates can get in, and not any random blueberry. |
Scheneighnay McBob
Bojo's School of the Trades
3282
|
Posted - 2013.12.17 00:52:00 -
[34] - Quote
Alena Ventrallis wrote:As a tanker, I'm down for this. As long as I get a proper vehicle lock so only my squadmates can get in, and not any random blueberry. As a dropship pilot, the current vehicle lock is really annoying.
Blueberries have to wait outside the dropship way too long before I can pick them up and take them to an objective; and this is when I'm not even in a squad!
We used to have a time machine
|
Alena Ventrallis
The Neutral Zone
317
|
Posted - 2013.12.17 00:54:00 -
[35] - Quote
Scheneighnay McBob wrote:Alena Ventrallis wrote:As a tanker, I'm down for this. As long as I get a proper vehicle lock so only my squadmates can get in, and not any random blueberry. As a dropship pilot, the current vehicle lock is really annoying. Blueberries have to wait outside the dropship way too long before I can pick them up and take them to an objective; and this is when I'm not even in a squad! I'm for a vehicle lock that I can decide if squadmates, corpmates, or anyone can enter my vehicle. Make it a setting in the options menu. I removed all extra turrets from all my vehicles because I'm tired of random blueberries hopping in and refusing to get out.
Best thing I've ever had happen is a squadmate shooting a blueberry out of my dropship in FW. That was awesome. |
Cosgar
ParagonX
8782
|
Posted - 2013.12.17 00:56:00 -
[36] - Quote
This is a horrible idea, like restricting logis to sidearms horrible.
I tried to put a level into Amarr Commando once, but got a server notification saying "Why?"
|
Rowdy Railgunner
Turalyon 514 Turalyon Alliance
283
|
Posted - 2013.12.17 01:14:00 -
[37] - Quote
People need reading comprehension 101 I believe. The word "allow" in no way promotes a restriction. It is actually an antonym of it. What I am suggesting is that CCP ALLOW us to choose where the driver seat goes. I am not saying for them to move it to the small turret. I am saying I want them to ALLOW us to put the driver seat where we want to.
So learn to read people and comprehend what it is you are actually reading. |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |