|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Scheneighnay McBob
Bojo's School of the Trades
3282
   |
Posted - 2013.12.16 22:41:00 -
[1] - Quote
I suggested this multiple times in the past, so I can say this from experience:
Brace for a shitstorm, even though it makes complete sense.
We used to have a time machine
|
Scheneighnay McBob
Bojo's School of the Trades
3282
|
Posted - 2013.12.16 22:47:00 -
[2] - Quote
Rowdy Railgunner wrote:I was thinking that the tank would be better at stomping with the gunner only gunning and the driver only driving. As it stands now you need to target your enemy and lots of times you can see where you are going because of needing the main gun pointed at your target. Well with an independent driver and gunner you would be 100% more effective at both aspects of tanking.
But tankers will still oppose this until the end
We used to have a time machine
|
Scheneighnay McBob
Bojo's School of the Trades
3282
|
Posted - 2013.12.16 23:28:00 -
[3] - Quote
Roger Cordill wrote:Scheneighnay McBob wrote:I suggested this multiple times in the past, so I can say this from experience:
Brace for a shitstorm, even though it makes complete sense. message from Godin: I have to pay for it I have to build it I have to call it in I'm the only one risking ISK Bluedots can't be trusted to do anything right There's not enough good players to go around teams are too small Lore says that a custom merc HAV only requires one person to operate, and the rest is automated systems. Until all of these problems are solved, **** you, I refuse, never going to happen, no.
Guess what- all other vehicles have to deal with this, and they take a hell of a lot more practice than HAVs do.
If you need someone to point and shoot, you have a corp.
Btw, I have no reason to listen to someone with a forum ban, even if they're sharing an account.
We used to have a time machine
|
Scheneighnay McBob
Bojo's School of the Trades
3282
|
Posted - 2013.12.17 00:14:00 -
[4] - Quote
Jason Pearson wrote:Vulpes Dolosus wrote:Next you're going to want a passenger to man my Python's turret.
Where was this suggestion when AV was OP? You're just butthurt that you can't insta-pop vehicles anymore. Let CCP rebalance tanks and AV and stop with these outrageous ideas. ^ Oh and, I keep seeing this suggestion followed by "Dropships are team vehicles, requiring separate gunners" but if you fly, you fly an ADS and use your own turret. So if this suggestion is implemented I demand ADS get's removed immediately.
Hey dumbass, the thread is about changing the driver's control to that of the small turret.
In ADSes, the pilot already controls a single small turret. The real weapons are the crew and gunners.
If a serious dropship crew would get together, you would have a BIG problem.
We used to have a time machine
|
Scheneighnay McBob
Bojo's School of the Trades
3282
|
Posted - 2013.12.17 00:52:00 -
[5] - Quote
Alena Ventrallis wrote:As a tanker, I'm down for this. As long as I get a proper vehicle lock so only my squadmates can get in, and not any random blueberry.
As a dropship pilot, the current vehicle lock is really annoying.
Blueberries have to wait outside the dropship way too long before I can pick them up and take them to an objective; and this is when I'm not even in a squad!
We used to have a time machine
|
|
|
| |
|