DUST Search - I need an answer CCP. Is my spent money going be a waste?

All Channels

General Discussions

I need an answer CCP. Is my spent money going be a waste?

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 :: [one page]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Pete B The dyst0pian Corporation Zero-Day 58	Posted - 2013.12.07 02:05:00 - [1] - Quote Will your plans for blueprints involve getting rid of them completely from Dust and giving them to EvE just for them to make all the dosh. Its what this post says https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=1572476#post1572476 I know its from a random Dusty, but we have heard nothing but an ambiguous phrase saying something along the lines of "We are removing the trading of blueprint items as they are not functioning how we wish". That phrase could be open to debate on what you mean by it.
DUST 514 Player 12345678914 Forty-Nine Fedayeen Minmatar Republic 572	Posted - 2013.12.07 02:12:00 - [2] - Quote In before EULA fanboys. You would be wise to get an official stance from CCP before spending a dime on this game - for anything. Rubbish about it's something you take up with the Sony store, CCP have nothing to do with it, you're getting AUR back blah blah in no way takes away that people took money out of their pockets to buy BPOs. You have a lot to answer for.
Allah's Snackbar Forty-Nine Fedayeen Minmatar Republic 573	Posted - 2013.12.07 02:12:00 - [3] - Quote In before EULA fanboys. You would be wise to get an official stance from CCP before spending a dime on this game - for anything. Rubbish about it's something you take up with the Sony store, CCP have nothing to do with it, you're getting AUR back blah blah in no way takes away that people took money out of their pockets to buy BPOs. You have a lot to answer for.
Chunky Munkey Amarr Templars Amarr Empire 2451	Posted - 2013.12.07 02:14:00 - [4] - Quote Their actions so far, have expressed a sentiment to minimise the effect of BPOs as they currently are. This has been achieved by no longer selling them, and more importantly with the upcoming removal and failure to replace several vehicle module BPOs. In short, CCP will do whatever they can get away with to reduce the value of your BPOs. No.
Cat Merc Ahrendee Mercenaries EoN. 4467	Posted - 2013.12.07 02:22:00 - [5] - Quote I care more about the health of the game than some BPO's. Shield regeneration bonus for Gallente Assault is about as useful as Sharpshooter for Nova Knives. Tuna > Tacos
Chunky Munkey Amarr Templars Amarr Empire 2453	Posted - 2013.12.07 02:38:00 - [6] - Quote Cat Merc wrote: I care more about the health of the game than some BPO's. Treatment of people who spend money on the game is the health of the game. No.
nor asha Turbo Bros inc. 58	Posted - 2013.12.07 02:42:00 - [7] - Quote It's like dust is still in beta hint hint
Cosgar ParagonX 8440	Posted - 2013.12.07 02:50:00 - [8] - Quote Chunky Munkey wrote: Cat Merc wrote: I care more about the health of the game than some BPO's. Treatment of people who spend money on the game is the health of the game. One thing I'll consistently say CCP handles well is customer service. If development and community management get together on this we can reach a healthy compromise. Going to miss my SVER and Exile if they remove BPOs altogether. I tried to put a level into Amarr Commando once, but got a server notification saying "Why?"
Kane Fyea 2332	Posted - 2013.12.07 02:53:00 - [9] - Quote Chunky Munkey wrote: Cat Merc wrote: I care more about the health of the game than some BPO's. Treatment of people who spend money on the game is the health of the game. It's not like they're taking away ones you got in packs.
Roger Cordill The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar DARKSTAR ARMY 150	Posted - 2013.12.07 02:58:00 - [10] - Quote Nah. If anything, they could get BPC's from us through contracts (only way to get BPC's), which will make lots of ISK, or we could just sell the BPO to them and make lots. I will personally make BPC's and sell them if we can't make them ourselves, and use that ISK to make some friends, and buy an infinite supply of HAV's. Life would be sweet ^_^

Cat Merc Ahrendee Mercenaries EoN. 4468	Posted - 2013.12.07 03:05:00 - [11] - Quote Chunky Munkey wrote: Cat Merc wrote: I care more about the health of the game than some BPO's. Treatment of people who spend money on the game is the health of the game. If it breaks the game, it needs to GTFO. They wouldn't do it if there wasn't a good reason. CCP has two economists watching EVE's and Dust's economy, I think they know what they're doing. Shield regeneration bonus for Gallente Assault is about as useful as Sharpshooter for Nova Knives. Tuna > Tacos
GET ATMESON Dem Durrty Boyz Renegade Alliance 187	Posted - 2013.12.07 03:06:00 - [12] - Quote Sorry to say this but CCP doesnt know what they want to do with them. It will all be SOONtm. Just want to get this out there also so if a CCP member reads this they will know. CCP will make ALOT of players mad. Some even quit. Heavys only have 2 heavy guns. Please dont turn the NERF bat on them. Give heavys more suits or guns please :D
Cosgar ParagonX 8444	Posted - 2013.12.07 03:15:00 - [13] - Quote Just had a random thought on BPOs: Why not just give them a set number of uses like BPCs, but instead of them going away, you have to wait for them to replenish weekly or something? I tried to put a level into Amarr Commando once, but got a server notification saying "Why?"
Cat Merc Ahrendee Mercenaries EoN. 4472	Posted - 2013.12.07 03:30:00 - [14] - Quote Cosgar wrote: Just had a random thought on BPOs: Why not just give them a set number of uses like BPCs, but instead of them going away, you have to wait for them to replenish weekly or something? Would be a fair compromise. Shield regeneration bonus for Gallente Assault is about as useful as Sharpshooter for Nova Knives. Tuna > Tacos
Cosgar ParagonX 8444	Posted - 2013.12.07 03:42:00 - [15] - Quote Cat Merc wrote: Cosgar wrote: Just had a random thought on BPOs: Why not just give them a set number of uses like BPCs, but instead of them going away, you have to wait for them to replenish weekly or something? Would be a fair compromise. It makes so much sense, they'll never do it. I tried to put a level into Amarr Commando once, but got a server notification saying "Why?"
EXCUTIONR BRUTAL DUST University Ivy League 16	Posted - 2013.12.07 04:26:00 - [16] - Quote DUST 514 Player 12345678914 wrote: In before EULA fanboys. You would be wise to get an official stance from CCP before spending a dime on this game - for anything. Rubbish about it's something you take up with the Sony store, CCP have nothing to do with it, you're getting AUR back blah blah in no way takes away that people took money out of their pockets to buy BPOs. This is the truth. I understand that some BPO's were bought with aurum and if removed, aurum is ok to return to me for those items. However, some of my BPO items were included in packs sold through the PSN store. I did not go in my wallet and give aurum, I paid real cash at point of sale, was promised a certain product and expect that product. I don't accept anything but said product. Well that's between me and Sony?? Really?? So If I go to my local car dealership and buy an air conditioned Ford Focus, and then Ford decides they want the air conditioner back. then give me FORD BUCKS (I made them up to demonstrate) that are only spendable in their factory store for Ford Focus accessories that I personally don't want. So they tell me "To bad so sad" go try and get the price of the air conditioner option back from the dealer. Guess who'd never get a cent of my money again?
Maken Tosch DUST University Ivy League 5651	Posted - 2013.12.07 04:35:00 - [17] - Quote Guys we already talked about this hundreds of times. OK, CCP. When are knives finally going to be improved?
SILENTSAM 69 SONS of LEGION RISE of LEGION 609	Posted - 2013.12.07 04:40:00 - [18] - Quote If you lose any items you got you get refunded. Quit your worrying. Man you guys are funny, acting as if there is any reason to worry.
EXCUTIONR BRUTAL DUST University Ivy League 16	Posted - 2013.12.07 04:52:00 - [19] - Quote I'm not worried at all. Because their only removing aurum BPO"s right? Ever heard this one? They came and took my neighbor away but I said nothing. Then they came and took my other neighbor and I said nothing. Now they come for me and there is no one to speak for me.
Malkai Inos Onikanabo Brigade Caldari State 1053	Posted - 2013.12.07 04:58:00 - [20] - Quote EXCUTIONR BRUTAL wrote: I'm not worried at all. Because their only removing aurum BPO"s right? Ever heard this one? They came and took my neighbor away but I said nothing. Then they came and took my other neighbor and I said nothing. Now they come for me and there is no one to speak for me. Stealth Godwin detected? You can take a benign object, -you can take a cheeseburger and deconstruct it to its source...

EXCUTIONR BRUTAL DUST University Ivy League 16	Posted - 2013.12.07 05:02:00 - [21] - Quote Malkai Inos wrote: EXCUTIONR BRUTAL wrote: I'm not worried at all. Because their only removing aurum BPO"s right? Ever heard this one? They came and took my neighbor away but I said nothing. Then they came and took my other neighbor and I said nothing. Now they come for me and there is no one to speak for me. Stealth Godwin detected? +1 Those who forget history are destined to repeat it.
Malkai Inos Onikanabo Brigade Caldari State 1054	Posted - 2013.12.07 05:20:00 - [22] - Quote EXCUTIONR BRUTAL wrote: Malkai Inos wrote: EXCUTIONR BRUTAL wrote: I'm not worried at all. Because their only removing aurum BPO"s right? Ever heard this one? They came and took my neighbor away but I said nothing. Then they came and took my other neighbor and I said nothing. Now they come for me and there is no one to speak for me. Stealth Godwin detected? +1 Those who forget history are destined to repeat it. You do realize that invoking a Godwin is generally considered to be the instant death of whatever your argument was, right? I also do find this particular comparison somewhat "off". To put it nicely... You can take a benign object, -you can take a cheeseburger and deconstruct it to its source...
Sgt Kirk SyNergy Gaming EoN. 3312	Posted - 2013.12.07 05:30:00 - [23] - Quote Malkai Inos wrote: EXCUTIONR BRUTAL wrote: Malkai Inos wrote: EXCUTIONR BRUTAL wrote: I'm not worried at all. Because their only removing aurum BPO"s right? Ever heard this one? They came and took my neighbor away but I said nothing. Then they came and took my other neighbor and I said nothing. Now they come for me and there is no one to speak for me. Stealth Godwin detected? +1 Those who forget history are destined to repeat it. You do realize that invoking a Godwin is generally considered to be the instant death of whatever your argument was, right? I also do find this particular comparison somewhat "off". To put it nicely... It's ******* irrelevant that's what it is.
Darken-Sol BIG BAD W0LVES 757	Posted - 2013.12.07 05:37:00 - [24] - Quote Cat Merc wrote: Chunky Munkey wrote: Cat Merc wrote: I care more about the health of the game than some BPO's. Treatment of people who spend money on the game is the health of the game. If it breaks the game, it needs to GTFO. They wouldn't do it if there wasn't a good reason. CCP has two economists watching EVE's and Dust's economy, I think they know what they're doing. obviously you are talking about the economists
Allah's Snackbar Forty-Nine Fedayeen Minmatar Republic 573	Posted - 2013.12.07 07:12:00 - [25] - Quote Cat Merc wrote: Chunky Munkey wrote: Cat Merc wrote: I care more about the health of the game than some BPO's. Treatment of people who spend money on the game is the health of the game. If it breaks the game, it needs to GTFO. They wouldn't do it if there wasn't a good reason. CCP has two economists watching EVE's and Dust's economy, I think they know what they're doing. The same ones that got us here? You have a lot to answer for.
DUST 514 Player 12345678914 Forty-Nine Fedayeen Minmatar Republic 577	Posted - 2013.12.07 07:12:00 - [26] - Quote Cat Merc wrote: Chunky Munkey wrote: Cat Merc wrote: I care more about the health of the game than some BPO's. Treatment of people who spend money on the game is the health of the game. If it breaks the game, it needs to GTFO. They wouldn't do it if there wasn't a good reason. CCP has two economists watching EVE's and Dust's economy, I think they know what they're doing. The same ones that got us here? You have a lot to answer for.
Allah's Snackbar Forty-Nine Fedayeen Minmatar Republic 573	Posted - 2013.12.07 07:14:00 - [27] - Quote Kane Fyea wrote: Chunky Munkey wrote: Cat Merc wrote: I care more about the health of the game than some BPO's. Treatment of people who spend money on the game is the health of the game. It's not like they're taking away ones you got in packs. Filed away for reference. You have a lot to answer for.
DUST 514 Player 12345678914 Forty-Nine Fedayeen Minmatar Republic 577	Posted - 2013.12.07 07:14:00 - [28] - Quote Kane Fyea wrote: Chunky Munkey wrote: Cat Merc wrote: I care more about the health of the game than some BPO's. Treatment of people who spend money on the game is the health of the game. It's not like they're taking away ones you got in packs. Filed away for reference. You have a lot to answer for.
Chunky Munkey Amarr Templars Amarr Empire 2459	Posted - 2013.12.07 11:01:00 - [29] - Quote Cat Merc wrote: Chunky Munkey wrote: Cat Merc wrote: I care more about the health of the game than some BPO's. Treatment of people who spend money on the game is the health of the game. If it breaks the game, it needs to GTFO. They wouldn't do it if there wasn't a good reason. CCP has two economists watching EVE's and Dust's economy, I think they know what they're doing. How adorably naive. Please don't ever become a journalist. What kind of impact is an extra 300isk per fitting going to have on the economy when a weapon can cost nearly 80,000? CCP's number one concern is making money, making a better game second. If reducing the quality of the game makes them more profit, there's no way they won't go through with it. Apologists like you just make it easier for them to screw us. No.
Chunky Munkey Amarr Templars Amarr Empire 2459	Posted - 2013.12.07 11:03:00 - [30] - Quote SILENTSAM 69 wrote: If you lose any items you got you get refunded. Quit your worrying. Man you guys are funny, acting as if there is any reason to worry. Oh god I hope this is sarcasm. No.

8213 BIG BAD W0LVES 951	Posted - 2013.12.07 11:08:00 - [31] - Quote Oh, come now... CCP wasted their money making this game, it's only fair that we get our money wasted as well... Everybody loses
Aikuchi Tomaru Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore 1151	Posted - 2013.12.07 12:25:00 - [32] - Quote Chunky Munkey wrote: Cat Merc wrote: I care more about the health of the game than some BPO's. Treatment of people who spend money on the game is the health of the game. You can spend Aurum on more things than just BPOs. And if you're going to spend Aurum on BPOs because you want fits with unlimited uses then just don't. Because the devs clearly stated that they will either remove them completely or change the way they work.
neurol forever Brutor Vanguard Minmatar Republic 18	Posted - 2013.12.07 12:35:00 - [33] - Quote Cosgar wrote: Just had a random thought on BPOs: Why not just give them a set number of uses like BPCs, but instead of them going away, you have to wait for them to replenish weekly or something? Or BPOs( and starter fits) can be used only in public games. Sorry for my English.
Chunky Munkey Amarr Templars Amarr Empire 2460	Posted - 2013.12.07 17:11:00 - [34] - Quote Aikuchi Tomaru wrote: Chunky Munkey wrote: Cat Merc wrote: I care more about the health of the game than some BPO's. Treatment of people who spend money on the game is the health of the game. You can spend Aurum on more things than just BPOs. And if you're going to spend Aurum on BPOs because you want fits with unlimited uses then just don't. Because the devs clearly stated that they will either remove them completely or change the way they work. What an enlightened position. I wonder why people didn't think of that before CCP expressed any intention of removing them What worth is aurum if you can't buy what you want with it, and even if you can, it could be taken from you at any point? No.
Rusty Shallows 568	Posted - 2013.12.07 20:12:00 - [35] - Quote Cat Merc wrote: Chunky Munkey wrote: Cat Merc wrote: I care more about the health of the game than some BPO's. Treatment of people who spend money on the game is the health of the game. If it breaks the game, it needs to GTFO. They wouldn't do it if there wasn't a good reason. CCP has two economists watching EVE's and Dust's economy, I think they know what they're doing. If by that you mean they know what to do to push people into buying Disposable AUR items then you are right Cat Merc. After the Eve Online communities reaction towards Pay-to-win I'm surprised to see AUR on the battlefield outside boosters in Dust. If BPOs need to go then so do all AUR modules, vehicles, and weapons. MCC Lounge Lizard Forums > Game Fix the game CCP


Pages: 1 2 :: [one page]

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online/DUST514, the EVE/DUST514 logo, EVE/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to OMG Labs to use EVE Online/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, OMG Labs. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.