Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
![DEZKA DIABLO DEZKA DIABLO](https://web.ccpgamescdn.com/dust/img/character_creator/female_caldari_128.jpg)
DEZKA DIABLO
Commando Perkone Caldari State
68
![View only posts by author View only posts by author](/images/icon_filter.gif) |
Posted - 2013.11.23 01:45:00 -
[121] - Quote
Seymor Krelborn wrote:Nguruthos IX wrote:Seymor Krelborn wrote:Oxskull Duncarino wrote:Bunch of crybabies. Just the bpos that are not an actual item in any format post 1.7 are being removed. There's no use having something that doesn't work! Feck sake, you still should have the bpos that CAN be used, and they've said that there is NO plan for their removal. Cop on, learn to read. Idiots ![Evil](https://forums.dust514.com/Images/Emoticons/ccp_evil.png) your a fool.... the point is real money was spent and real money should be refunded. don't be an idiot. but if you want to be dumb then you pay us back. Refunds seem reasonable though, or at least a credit BPO removed, AUR returned. Refunds for cash are a nightmare to pull off and probably not warranted I bought aur to buy bpo's... not to have aur. its false advertisement. its dishonest. and its bad business. Hellz yeah buddy, I'm not falling for the ol'baitnswitch!
Go make a ad saying " get your bpo's while you can" Two weeks later, " um how bout we keep your money an give you fake in game currency , not the real cash you spent; sound good to you?"
Man fuuuk that, gtfOUTTAHERE LMAO.
I mean for real, talk about snakes in the grass! |
![xLuca Brasi xLuca Brasi](https://web.ccpgamescdn.com/dust/img/character_creator/male_caldari_128.jpg)
xLuca Brasi
DUST University Ivy League
28
![View only posts by author View only posts by author](/images/icon_filter.gif) |
Posted - 2013.11.23 05:25:00 -
[122] - Quote
DEZKA DIABLO wrote:Seymor Krelborn wrote:Nguruthos IX wrote:Seymor Krelborn wrote:Oxskull Duncarino wrote:Bunch of crybabies. Just the bpos that are not an actual item in any format post 1.7 are being removed. There's no use having something that doesn't work! Feck sake, you still should have the bpos that CAN be used, and they've said that there is NO plan for their removal. Cop on, learn to read. Idiots ![Evil](https://forums.dust514.com/Images/Emoticons/ccp_evil.png) your a fool.... the point is real money was spent and real money should be refunded. don't be an idiot. but if you want to be dumb then you pay us back. Refunds seem reasonable though, or at least a credit BPO removed, AUR returned. Refunds for cash are a nightmare to pull off and probably not warranted I bought aur to buy bpo's... not to have aur. its false advertisement. its dishonest. and its bad business. Hellz yeah buddy, I'm not falling for the ol'baitnswitch! Go make a ad saying " get your bpo's while you can" Two weeks later, " um how bout we keep your money an give you fake in game currency , not the real cash you spent; sound good to you?" Man fuuuk that, gtfOUTTAHERE LMAO. I mean for real, talk about snakes in the grass!
sssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss
SAY NO TO BPO REMOVALS!
|
![Nova Knife Nova Knife](https://web.ccpgamescdn.com/dust/img/character_creator/male_caldari_128.jpg)
Nova Knife
Seituoda Taskforce Command Caldari State
2144
![View only posts by author View only posts by author](/images/icon_filter.gif) |
Posted - 2013.11.23 06:40:00 -
[123] - Quote
xLuca Brasi wrote: thankyou for warning them of this... but it shows what they think of the CPM's opinion.
they don't respect you, or us.
Not true.
They specifically added the "We have no plans to touch other BPO's at this time" bit because of the CPM feedback to the original posts.
And they're not going to touch those BPO's until whatever plan they come up with is solid, which they intend to talk to us about before they solidify it. (Which you can be pretty damn sure we're going to do everything we can to keep the purchase 'worth it')
Speaking personally out of speculation now : (Since CCP has not said anywhere in public or privately to the CPM that they are going to touch BPO's in people's inventories)
Going by how much CCP has always disliked how BPO's and T2 BPO's worked out in eve, I highly doubt that CCP is going to let these items continue to exist. They removed them from the market to stem the flow of a 'problem item', but permanent combat assets in a game that is largely driven by the concept of consumable goods..... are just never going to be healthy for the game.
One could argue that by creating a cost for use (IE: Manufacturing) that they would no longer be a problem, but this is not the case, as in order to make such a permanent item 'worth it' it would need to be somehow better or more attractive than a F2P manufactured item, unless CCP was going to do something -insanely stupid- such as create a paywall where only BPO owners could manufacture and BPO's could only be attained through Aur/Secondary market. (I don't see that happening, btw)
My gut tells me that the end result is going to be the removal of all BPOs. Therefore, rather than complain about an inevitable result, you should direct your efforts into telling CCP what WOULD make your purchase 'Worth it' if you can't have a permanent battle asset. This is a much more constructive approach to a problem that is very real. Without feedback to this end, it's -very- likely that the approach CCP takes will be un-ideal, if they don't have acceptable and attractive alternatives presented to them by the community.
(Personally, I think Suit & weapon vanity skins, and possibly weapon mods wouldn't be obtrusive as AUR BPO's, so long as you still required to pay full ISK price for the combat asset itself.)
You want CCP to give you your money's worth? Tell them how, instead of complaining about something neither you or I can change. |
![xLuca Brasi xLuca Brasi](https://web.ccpgamescdn.com/dust/img/character_creator/male_caldari_128.jpg)
xLuca Brasi
DUST University Ivy League
36
![View only posts by author View only posts by author](/images/icon_filter.gif) |
Posted - 2013.11.23 08:32:00 -
[124] - Quote
Nova Knife wrote:xLuca Brasi wrote: thankyou for warning them of this... but it shows what they think of the CPM's opinion.
they don't respect you, or us.
Not true. They specifically added the "We have no plans to touch other BPO's at this time" bit because of the CPM feedback to the original posts. And they're not going to touch those BPO's until whatever plan they come up with is solid, which they intend to talk to us about before they solidify it. (Which you can be pretty damn sure we're going to do everything we can to keep the purchase 'worth it') Speaking personally out of speculation now : (Since CCP has not said anywhere in public or privately to the CPM that they are going to touch BPO's in people's inventories) Going by how much CCP has always disliked how BPO's and T2 BPO's worked out in eve, I highly doubt that CCP is going to let these items continue to exist. They removed them from the market to stem the flow of a 'problem item', but permanent combat assets in a game that is largely driven by the concept of consumable goods..... are just never going to be healthy for the game. One could argue that by creating a cost for use (IE: Manufacturing) that they would no longer be a problem, but this is not the case, as in order to make such a permanent item 'worth it' it would need to be somehow better or more attractive than a F2P manufactured item, unless CCP was going to do something -insanely stupid- such as create a paywall where only BPO owners could manufacture and BPO's could only be attained through Aur/Secondary market. (I don't see that happening, btw) My gut tells me that the end result is going to be the removal of all BPOs. Therefore, rather than complain about an inevitable result, you should direct your efforts into telling CCP what WOULD make your purchase 'Worth it' if you can't have a permanent battle asset. This is a much more constructive approach to a problem that is very real. Without feedback to this end, it's -very- likely that the approach CCP takes will be un-ideal, if they don't have acceptable and attractive alternatives presented to them by the community. (Personally, I think Suit & weapon vanity skins, and possibly weapon mods wouldn't be obtrusive as AUR BPO's, so long as you still required to pay full ISK price for the combat asset itself.) You want CCP to give you your money's worth? Tell them how, instead of complaining about something neither you or I can change.
if ccp would have presented it the way you just did I may not be so salty...
instead they said we keep them encouraged people to buy them before their removal from the market, and then just announced they are removing a handful of militia module bpo's claiming they wont be useful after 1.7 but glazing over the part where they consciously decided to make the changes to make them useless.
it was dishonest.
how can I feel safe spending money on a company I cant trust?
2 things would make my purchase worth it...
a psn credit (refund)
a bpo of the new module to replace the ones they are removing
SAY NO TO BPO REMOVALS!
|
![Rowdy Railgunner Rowdy Railgunner](https://web.ccpgamescdn.com/dust/img/character_creator/male_gallente_128.jpg)
Rowdy Railgunner
Kang Lo Directorate Gallente Federation
191
![View only posts by author View only posts by author](/images/icon_filter.gif) |
Posted - 2013.11.23 08:33:00 -
[125] - Quote
Seymor Krelborn wrote:CCP you guys are going way to far with removing vehicle bpo's
you have no right!
I spent that money for the AUR to get the bp
not to have AUR...
so an AUR REFUND ISNT GOOD ENOUGH!
I never would have bought the aurum to start with were it not for the bpo's
so what kinda of screwed up business tactic is this?
lets put items on the market for aur so people buy aur to buy the item then we will remove the item and give the aur back that's now useless cause theres nothing those chumps who bought the aur have to spend it on now.....
ccp... ALL YOUR AUR ITEMS SUCK EXCEPT FOR BOOSTERS AND BPO'S!
and with 23 mil sp I don't need boosters.... https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=1524382#post1524382 |
![Fire of Prometheus Fire of Prometheus](https://web.ccpgamescdn.com/dust/img/character_creator/male_amarr_128.jpg)
Fire of Prometheus
DUST University Ivy League
1748
![View only posts by author View only posts by author](/images/icon_filter.gif) |
Posted - 2013.11.23 13:30:00 -
[126] - Quote
NomaDz 2K wrote:I feel it is within OUR rights to have a selection of items in EXCHANGE of the BPOs being removed.
![Idea](https://forums.dust514.com/Images/Emoticons/ccp_idea.png) ![Idea](https://forums.dust514.com/Images/Emoticons/ccp_idea.png) ![Idea](https://forums.dust514.com/Images/Emoticons/ccp_idea.png) EG Remove the stated Module BPOs and select Via Ticket to EXCHANGED them for the Following items: 1. A BPO which exists in game, modules, weapons etc - Since some of us Collect BPOS 2. A 30 Day Omega Passive or Active Booster - Yes it would cost more in terms of AURUM BUT taking into consideration Moral Damages It would seem of more of a fair deal. 3. A Full SP Refund and the AURUM Back.If CCP do not wish to do none of the above, then personally i'd rather have a PSN Credit Refund since I have no need whatsoever at this moment in time of AURUM - I have OVER 200,000 AUR. I Purchased DUST Packs to get the BPO Items with AUR using Real Life Cash, I had no other reason to purchase anything else on their market, therefore I see no need in being forced into an AUR refund. The Client/Player/PAYER should be allowed to concord the type of Refund desired - It's called Customer Care in most CIVILIZED Nations. Reaching an Agreement with CCP so both parties are content and thus CCP will save face and possibly still be supported . Example, when you purchase a shirt which you are not satisfied with, you can take it back, get it EXCHANGED for another shirt, money back or get something else of a similar value in return WHAT U WANT! and NOT WHAT THEY FORCE YOU INTO ACCEPTING! PURE GENIUS I TELL YOU!!!!!!! This person has the right idea!!!!
"It is the mark of an educated mind to entertain a thought without accepting it."
-Aristotle
I'll take your Iskies
|
![DEZKA DIABLO DEZKA DIABLO](https://web.ccpgamescdn.com/dust/img/character_creator/female_caldari_128.jpg)
DEZKA DIABLO
Commando Perkone Caldari State
70
![View only posts by author View only posts by author](/images/icon_filter.gif) |
Posted - 2013.11.23 13:36:00 -
[127] - Quote
Nova Knife wrote:First, I love all the internet lawyering going on in this thread. I know for a fact CCP has a legal department that they rely on pretty heavily for most decisions. They wouldn't have done this if you guys had any legal ground to stand on in terms of "If they remove this they must do X." I'm pretty sure they covered their asses as much as they're obliged to, by giving you an AUR refund.
That said, I'd like to point out that I totally warned CCP this would happen (Not that they didn't see it themselves, mind you) and that people would complain about the perceived value of the purchase. I warned them that it would be much safer to just render them unusuable and leave them as collector's items until they actually had a plan to deal with the rest of the blueprints collectively while maintaining the perceived value of those purchases.
Until CCP makes such a plan, I highly doubt they'll comment on these threads, as they've already taken as much of an official stance as they will, in the thread that announced the removal of the four BPO's.
I agree that this was handled poorly... But even as an owner of many BPOs, I can see how bad they are for the game and am glad to see them go. "Handed poorly" really dude that's the best you got?
How about they flat out robbed us!
You mean to tell us that in the month it took to plan a sale on bpo then revoke it a month later wasn't premeditated ? Wake up! |
![Ghosts Chance Ghosts Chance](https://web.ccpgamescdn.com/dust/img/character_creator/male_caldari_128.jpg)
Ghosts Chance
Inf4m0us
217
![View only posts by author View only posts by author](/images/icon_filter.gif) |
Posted - 2013.11.23 13:40:00 -
[128] - Quote
DEZKA DIABLO wrote: "Handed poorly" really dude that's the best you got?
How about they flat out robbed us!
You mean to tell us that in the month it took to plan a sale on bpo then revoke it a month later wasn't premeditated ? Wake up!
YAH! wake up sheeple!!!!
theres no such thing as incompetance theres no such thing as poor communication between departments theres no such thing as poor forsight
malisious intent is ALWAYS the ONLY answer |
![Nova Knife Nova Knife](https://web.ccpgamescdn.com/dust/img/character_creator/male_caldari_128.jpg)
Nova Knife
Seituoda Taskforce Command Caldari State
2149
![View only posts by author View only posts by author](/images/icon_filter.gif) |
Posted - 2013.11.23 15:34:00 -
[129] - Quote
xLuca Brasi wrote:
if ccp would have presented it the way you just did I may not be so salty...
instead they said we keep them encouraged people to buy them before their removal from the market, and then just announced they are removing a handful of militia module bpo's claiming they wont be useful after 1.7 but glazing over the part where they consciously decided to make the changes to make them useless.
it was dishonest.
how can I feel safe spending money on a company I cant trust?
2 things would make my purchase worth it...
a psn credit (refund)
a bpo of the new module to replace the ones they are removing
It wasn't dishonest. The sales were encouraged because at the time (And even now) they don't intend to remove the content that was pitched as a "Get it while you can." (My personal speculations from above likely won't happen for a good long while)
Rather than choosing to see malice in every decision, you need to accept that sometimes a reality of running a business or managing a product is that sometimes you need to make tough choices in order to preserve the health of that product. Keeping BPO's on the market was one of those choices. Removing the bulk of vehicle modules and variants in general is one of those choices.
As an unfortunate result of the latter, people would literally have a BPO that serves no function, or at worst... would be Pay2Win because there would be no isk variant. In the name of balance, they stripped the module availability to get it right at the most basic level before branching out again. (I don't necessarily agree with how this is being done, but I do agree it is necessary) Adding more modules back into the game just to accommodate & preserve the functions of the BPO's would have been adding an unneeded complication to that process.
A lack of trust in this case only stems from a sense of entitlement and paranoia. Though, One could make the argument that CCP has poor judgement in terms of offering value on their products, citing the hilariously overpriced boosters as a result. Which is why I said in my previous post, It would be most constructive for players to offer solutions and alternatives to removal & refund that are reasonable and would preserve the perceived value of the purchase.
As far as your suggestions go : CCP has no power to offer PSN credit. If you have a legitimate complaint (or even if you don't) if you complain to Sony on the phone for long enough they'll give you your money back and inform CCP to remove any goods purchased as a result.
In terms of your second suggestion : Do you seriously fail to see how harmful BPO's are to the game and its future, to the point where you do not realize how silly it is to ask to receive another problem item when one is taken from you? You can call it 'Bad business" all you like, but CCP made the right move in terms of removing them from the market this "early". (Personally I think they should've been off the market and out of the game months ago) Even if they don't end up touching existing blueprints at all in the future and all this worrying as for naught, removing them from the market was the right call.
One last point :
Since while I'm reading all of the threads on the subject, but have chosen this particular thread to post in regarding the "Issue" : I fully welcome and invite anyone who has grievances with this to contact me via skype if they are willing to have a proper discussion about this.
If you can provide me with a reasonable and well structured argument that amounts to more than "Bad business" or "I deserve it", You might be able to sway me to your point of view. Further, any such arguments that have merit will be passed on to CCP for consideration, regardless of my personal agreement or not.
Especially valuable would be well thought out, reasonable alternatives to complete removal from inventory, that will perserve the perceived value of the initial purchase, like I mentioned in my previous post above. These will absolutely be passed on to CCP, and I will personally hound CCP (and my CPM bros will /probably/ join me) with any solutions that will allow CCP to address BPO's in a way that still makes the money spent "worth it".
My skype is nova_knife , and if for whatever reason you prefer to talk to a different CPM member, all of our relevant contact info can be found here : link (Probably best to talk to me though, as I'm the one asking for the feedback/discussions here)
|
![xLuca Brasi xLuca Brasi](https://web.ccpgamescdn.com/dust/img/character_creator/male_caldari_128.jpg)
xLuca Brasi
DUST University Ivy League
41
![View only posts by author View only posts by author](/images/icon_filter.gif) |
Posted - 2013.11.23 18:23:00 -
[130] - Quote
Nova Knife wrote:[quote=xLuca Brasi]
It wasn't dishonest. The sales were encouraged because at the time (And even now) they don't intend to remove the content that was pitched as a "Get it while you can." (My personal speculations from above likely won't happen for a good long while)
Rather than choosing to see malice in every decision, you need to accept that sometimes a reality of running a business or managing a product is that sometimes you need to make tough choices in order to preserve the health of that product. Keeping BPO's on the market was one of those choices. Removing the bulk of vehicle modules and variants in general is one of those choices.
As an unfortunate result of the latter, people would literally have a BPO that serves no function, or at worst... would be Pay2Win because there would be no isk variant. In the name of balance, they stripped the module availability to get it right at the most basic level before branching out again. (I don't necessarily agree with how this is being done, but I do agree it is necessary) Adding more modules back into the game just to accommodate & preserve the functions of the BPO's would have been adding an unneeded complication to that process.
A lack of trust in this case only stems from a sense of entitlement and paranoia. Though, One could make the argument that CCP has poor judgement in terms of offering value on their products, citing the hilariously overpriced boosters as a result. Which is why I said in my previous post, It would be most constructive for players to offer solutions and alternatives to removal & refund that are reasonable and would preserve the perceived value of the purchase.
As far as your suggestions go : CCP has no power to offer PSN credit. If you have a legitimate complaint (or even if you don't) if you complain to Sony on the phone for long enough they'll give you your money back and inform CCP to remove any goods purchased as a result.
In terms of your second suggestion : Do you seriously fail to see how harmful BPO's are to the game and its future, to the point where you do not realize how silly it is to ask to receive another problem item when one is taken from you? You can call it 'Bad business" all you like, but CCP made the right move in terms of removing them from the market this "early". (Personally I think they should've been off the market and out of the game months ago) Even if they don't end up touching existing blueprints at all in the future and all this worrying as for naught, removing them from the market was the right call.
first off I want to thank you for engaging us in this conversation, and choosing my thread to do so in. if I used Skype I would be there but I hope this thread can still be our means to communicate.
I am still not seeing how BPO's are bad for the game now. maybe when they were still on the market, and if everyone bought them and only used them I could see the problem. but to be competitive you still have to use ADV and proto gear, and lets face it, the richest people in the game are the proto users in PC (which is a bigger isk farm with its broken mechanics than blueprints could ever be). Since bpo's were removed only a limited number in the community exist , as the community grows the bpo's impact continues to lessen (because a smaller portion of the player base will have them), just like t2 bpo's in eve a lucky few benefit and in spite of this the economy in eve thrives. I realize t2 bpo's require mats to make but they also make billions of isk where dust bpo's get you a few mil in the same time...
so giving the same people who already had bpo's a replacement for the new modules wont break the game or the economy.
we also must acknowledge starter fits, which are basically bpo's and can be used the same way to farm the same nominal amount of isk.
my lack of trust does not stem from paranoia if you look at this thread I posted months ago this is a similar issue:
https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=101211
they did this with aur gear already and now our bpo's they promised they wouldn't touch. a pattern is developing.
as for entitlement, well am I not entitled to the things I purchase? I find it dismissive to wave your hand at that, more so that ccp seems to. do they not respect those who buy in to their product? should we not buy anything from ccp since they don't seem to respect those purchases? the only reason these modules will be useless is because ccp chose to make them so... was there no other way to fix vehicles without removing bpo's? continued...
SAY NO TO BPO REMOVALS!
|
|
![xLuca Brasi xLuca Brasi](https://web.ccpgamescdn.com/dust/img/character_creator/male_caldari_128.jpg)
xLuca Brasi
DUST University Ivy League
41
![View only posts by author View only posts by author](/images/icon_filter.gif) |
Posted - 2013.11.23 18:24:00 -
[131] - Quote
Nova Knife wrote:It wasn't dishonest. The sales were encouraged because at the time (And even now) they don't intend to remove the content that was pitched as a "Get it while you can." (My personal speculations from above likely won't happen for a good long while) Rather than choosing to see malice in every decision, you need to accept that sometimes a reality of running a business or managing a product is that sometimes you need to make tough choices in order to preserve the health of that product. Keeping BPO's on the market was one of those choices. Removing the bulk of vehicle modules and variants in general is one of those choices. As an unfortunate result of the latter, people would literally have a BPO that serves no function, or at worst... would be Pay2Win because there would be no isk variant. In the name of balance, they stripped the module availability to get it right at the most basic level before branching out again. (I don't necessarily agree with how this is being done, but I do agree it is necessary) Adding more modules back into the game just to accommodate & preserve the functions of the BPO's would have been adding an unneeded complication to that process. A lack of trust in this case only stems from a sense of entitlement and paranoia. Though, One could make the argument that CCP has poor judgement in terms of offering value on their products, citing the hilariously overpriced boosters as a result. Which is why I said in my previous post, It would be most constructive for players to offer solutions and alternatives to removal & refund that are reasonable and would preserve the perceived value of the purchase. As far as your suggestions go : CCP has no power to offer PSN credit. If you have a legitimate complaint (or even if you don't) if you complain to Sony on the phone for long enough they'll give you your money back and inform CCP to remove any goods purchased as a result. In terms of your second suggestion : Do you seriously fail to see how harmful BPO's are to the game and its future, to the point where you do not realize how silly it is to ask to receive another problem item when one is taken from you? You can call it 'Bad business" all you like, but CCP made the right move in terms of removing them from the market this "early". (Personally I think they should've been off the market and out of the game months ago) Even if they don't end up touching existing blueprints at all in the future and all this worrying as for naught, removing them from the market was the right call. One last point : Since while I'm reading all of the threads on the subject, but have chosen this particular thread to post in regarding the "Issue" : I fully welcome and invite anyone who has grievances with this to contact me via skype if they are willing to have a proper discussion about this. If you can provide me with a reasonable and well structured argument that amounts to more than "Bad business" or "I deserve it", You might be able to sway me to your point of view. Further, any such arguments that have merit will be passed on to CCP for consideration, regardless of my personal agreement or not. Especially valuable would be well thought out, reasonable alternatives to complete removal from inventory, that will perserve the perceived value of the initial purchase, like I mentioned in my previous post above. These will absolutely be passed on to CCP, and I will personally hound CCP (and my CPM bros will /probably/ join me) with any solutions that will allow CCP to address BPO's in a way that still makes the money spent "worth it". My skype is nova_knife , and if for whatever reason you prefer to talk to a different CPM member, all of our relevant contact info can be found here : link (Probably best to talk to me though, as I'm the one asking for the feedback/discussions here)
SAY NO TO BPO REMOVALS!
|
![NomaDz 2K NomaDz 2K](https://web.ccpgamescdn.com/dust/img/character_creator/male_minmatar_128.jpg)
NomaDz 2K
DUTY FR33
77
![View only posts by author View only posts by author](/images/icon_filter.gif) |
Posted - 2013.11.23 22:19:00 -
[132] - Quote
xLuca Brasi wrote:Nova Knife wrote:xLuca Brasi wrote: thankyou for warning them of this... but it shows what they think of the CPM's opinion.
they don't respect you, or us.
Not true. They specifically added the "We have no plans to touch other BPO's at this time" bit because of the CPM feedback to the original posts. And they're not going to touch those BPO's until whatever plan they come up with is solid, which they intend to talk to us about before they solidify it. (Which you can be pretty damn sure we're going to do everything we can to keep the purchase 'worth it') Speaking personally out of speculation now : (Since CCP has not said anywhere in public or privately to the CPM that they are going to touch BPO's in people's inventories) Going by how much CCP has always disliked how BPO's and T2 BPO's worked out in eve, I highly doubt that CCP is going to let these items continue to exist. They removed them from the market to stem the flow of a 'problem item', but permanent combat assets in a game that is largely driven by the concept of consumable goods..... are just never going to be healthy for the game. One could argue that by creating a cost for use (IE: Manufacturing) that they would no longer be a problem, but this is not the case, as in order to make such a permanent item 'worth it' it would need to be somehow better or more attractive than a F2P manufactured item, unless CCP was going to do something -insanely stupid- such as create a paywall where only BPO owners could manufacture and BPO's could only be attained through Aur/Secondary market. (I don't see that happening, btw) My gut tells me that the end result is going to be the removal of all BPOs. Therefore, rather than complain about an inevitable result, you should direct your efforts into telling CCP what WOULD make your purchase 'Worth it' if you can't have a permanent battle asset. This is a much more constructive approach to a problem that is very real. Without feedback to this end, it's -very- likely that the approach CCP takes will be un-ideal, if they don't have acceptable and attractive alternatives presented to them by the community. (Personally, I think Suit & weapon vanity skins, and possibly weapon mods wouldn't be obtrusive as AUR BPO's, so long as you still required to pay full ISK price for the combat asset itself.) You want CCP to give you your money's worth? Tell them how, instead of complaining about something neither you or I can change. if ccp would have presented it the way you just did I may not be so salty... instead they said we keep them encouraged people to buy them before their removal from the market, and then just announced they are removing a handful of militia module bpo's claiming they wont be useful after 1.7 but glazing over the part where they consciously decided to make the changes to make them useless.
it was dishonest.
how can I feel safe spending money on a company I cant trust?2 things would make my purchase worth it... a psn credit (refund) a bpo of the new module to replace the ones they are removing
/\ The BOLD HIGHLIGHT SAYS IT ALL ![Twisted](https://forums.dust514.com/Images/Emoticons/ccp_twisted.png) AKA False advertising Even if they have a good lawyer they will have to settle for a mutual agreement , which means the client is considered the winner due to the fact the client agrees on the type of refund, whereas CCP say you get AUR back, we don't want AUR back we want a BETTER OFFER. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_advertising |
![DUST 514 Player 12345678914 DUST 514 Player 12345678914](https://web.ccpgamescdn.com/dust/img/character_creator/male_minmatar_128.jpg)
DUST 514 Player 12345678914
Forty-Nine Fedayeen Minmatar Republic
565
![View only posts by author View only posts by author](/images/icon_filter.gif) |
Posted - 2013.11.23 22:41:00 -
[133] - Quote
So when you boil it all down CCP is removing an infinite use item paid for with cash and replacing it with a once only use item.
That's just a terrible precedent to set, for people to accept and typical of CCP.
You definitely spend money on this game at your own risk. |
![STABBEY STABBEY](https://web.ccpgamescdn.com/dust/img/character_creator/male_gallente_128.jpg)
STABBEY
Ancient Exiles. Renegade Alliance
478
![View only posts by author View only posts by author](/images/icon_filter.gif) |
Posted - 2013.11.23 22:49:00 -
[134] - Quote
Umm I quit playing for a month and I am very confused on this topic. (Yes I have just about all BPO's Infantry and Vehicle)
Som1 have a link to were it details what BPO's are being removed and why?
At current I cant think of a BPO that would be useless just by some vehicles being removed.
I'm confused, enlighten me? ![Shocked](https://forums.dust514.com/Images/Emoticons/ccp_shocked.png)
Gÿú GÖ¦ Gÿñ Gäó © sç+(¬GÇ+¬)sç+ (-éGîú¦Ç_Gîú¦ü)ßòñ
Gû¼Gû¼+¦GòÉGòÉGòÉGòÉGòÉGòÉGòÉ-Vet-GòÉGòÉGòÉGòÉGòÉGòÉGòÉ+¦Gû¼Gû¼
+¬(GùŦ«¦âGÇó)¦¦ (GùúGùó)GöîGê¬GöÉ (a+ç'¦Ç-'¦ü)a+ç GöîGê¬GöÉ(Gùú_Gùó)GöîGê¬GöÉ
|
![xLuca Brasi xLuca Brasi](https://web.ccpgamescdn.com/dust/img/character_creator/male_caldari_128.jpg)
xLuca Brasi
DUST University Ivy League
64
![View only posts by author View only posts by author](/images/icon_filter.gif) |
Posted - 2013.11.23 23:19:00 -
[135] - Quote
STABBEY wrote:Umm I quit playing for a month and I am very confused on this topic. (Yes I have just about all BPO's Infantry and Vehicle) Som1 have a link to were it details what BPO's are being removed and why? At current I cant think of a BPO that would be useless just by some vehicles being removed. I'm confused, enlighten me? ![Shocked](https://forums.dust514.com/Images/Emoticons/ccp_shocked.png) https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=122274&find=unread
right there.
SAY NO TO BPO REMOVALS!
|
![STABBEY STABBEY](https://web.ccpgamescdn.com/dust/img/character_creator/male_gallente_128.jpg)
STABBEY
Ancient Exiles. Renegade Alliance
478
![View only posts by author View only posts by author](/images/icon_filter.gif) |
Posted - 2013.11.23 23:48:00 -
[136] - Quote
xLuca Brasi wrote:STABBEY wrote:Umm I quit playing for a month and I am very confused on this topic. (Yes I have just about all BPO's Infantry and Vehicle) Som1 have a link to were it details what BPO's are being removed and why? At current I cant think of a BPO that would be useless just by some vehicles being removed. I'm confused, enlighten me? ![Shocked](https://forums.dust514.com/Images/Emoticons/ccp_shocked.png) https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=122274&find=unreadright there.
I see.. They are removing Modules/skills from the game completely So the BPO module basicly wont exist. So why keep the BPO of a non existant module?
Got it. Atleast they arent taking any of the good 1's out ![Cool](https://forums.dust514.com/Images/Emoticons/ccp_cool.png)
Gÿú GÖ¦ Gÿñ Gäó © sç+(¬GÇ+¬)sç+ (-éGîú¦Ç_Gîú¦ü)ßòñ
Gû¼Gû¼+¦GòÉGòÉGòÉGòÉGòÉGòÉGòÉ-Vet-GòÉGòÉGòÉGòÉGòÉGòÉGòÉ+¦Gû¼Gû¼
+¬(GùŦ«¦âGÇó)¦¦ (GùúGùó)GöîGê¬GöÉ (a+ç'¦Ç-'¦ü)a+ç GöîGê¬GöÉ(Gùú_Gùó)GöîGê¬GöÉ
|
![xLuca Brasi xLuca Brasi](https://web.ccpgamescdn.com/dust/img/character_creator/male_caldari_128.jpg)
xLuca Brasi
DUST University Ivy League
66
![View only posts by author View only posts by author](/images/icon_filter.gif) |
Posted - 2013.11.23 23:50:00 -
[137] - Quote
STABBEY wrote:xLuca Brasi wrote:STABBEY wrote:Umm I quit playing for a month and I am very confused on this topic. (Yes I have just about all BPO's Infantry and Vehicle) Som1 have a link to were it details what BPO's are being removed and why? At current I cant think of a BPO that would be useless just by some vehicles being removed. I'm confused, enlighten me? ![Shocked](https://forums.dust514.com/Images/Emoticons/ccp_shocked.png) https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=122274&find=unreadright there. I see.. They are removing Modules/skills from the game completely So the BPO module basicly wont exist. So why keep the BPO of a non existant module? Got it. Atleast they arent taking any of the good 1's out ![Cool](https://forums.dust514.com/Images/Emoticons/ccp_cool.png)
not yet... this opens the door.
now all ccp has to do is make our other bpo's useless and everyone will agree with their removal, forgetting ccp chose to make them useless. then they can give us crap in return to replace it that isn't equal and all the cows will moo praise....
SAY NO TO BPO REMOVALS!
|
![STABBEY STABBEY](https://web.ccpgamescdn.com/dust/img/character_creator/male_gallente_128.jpg)
STABBEY
Ancient Exiles. Renegade Alliance
478
![View only posts by author View only posts by author](/images/icon_filter.gif) |
Posted - 2013.11.23 23:57:00 -
[138] - Quote
xLuca Brasi wrote:STABBEY wrote:xLuca Brasi wrote:STABBEY wrote:Umm I quit playing for a month and I am very confused on this topic. (Yes I have just about all BPO's Infantry and Vehicle) Som1 have a link to were it details what BPO's are being removed and why? At current I cant think of a BPO that would be useless just by some vehicles being removed. I'm confused, enlighten me? ![Shocked](https://forums.dust514.com/Images/Emoticons/ccp_shocked.png) https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=122274&find=unreadright there. I see.. They are removing Modules/skills from the game completely So the BPO module basicly wont exist. So why keep the BPO of a non existant module? Got it. Atleast they arent taking any of the good 1's out ![Cool](https://forums.dust514.com/Images/Emoticons/ccp_cool.png) not yet... this opens the door. now all ccp has to do is make our other bpo's useless and everyone will agree with their removal, forgetting ccp chose to make them useless. then they can give us crap in return to replace it that isn't equal and all the cows will moo praise....
To do that means people will have wasted 100's of $$$ Considering most people only spent money on the 100$ and 50$ packs for BPO's.
I personaly dont see how BPO's hurt the game, I do have most of them but I usually just proto stomp these days only use the BPO swarm and sniper so i dont have to spec into them.
My Toxin SMG would be the only BPO I would be REALLY mad about losing I've used it on every suit since way back in closed beta.
Gÿú GÖ¦ Gÿñ Gäó © sç+(¬GÇ+¬)sç+ (-éGîú¦Ç_Gîú¦ü)ßòñ
Gû¼Gû¼+¦GòÉGòÉGòÉGòÉGòÉGòÉGòÉ-Vet-GòÉGòÉGòÉGòÉGòÉGòÉGòÉ+¦Gû¼Gû¼
+¬(GùŦ«¦âGÇó)¦¦ (GùúGùó)GöîGê¬GöÉ (a+ç'¦Ç-'¦ü)a+ç GöîGê¬GöÉ(Gùú_Gùó)GöîGê¬GöÉ
|
![Dunk Mujunk Dunk Mujunk](https://web.ccpgamescdn.com/dust/img/character_creator/male_minmatar_128.jpg)
Dunk Mujunk
RestlessSpirits
274
![View only posts by author View only posts by author](/images/icon_filter.gif) |
Posted - 2013.11.24 00:06:00 -
[139] - Quote
Just got out of the other thread exactly like this one, so here you go-
Dunk Mujunk wrote:Problem is OP, the time to dispute the terms of a contract is not after you have signed it. Creating your character and loging in are as good as a signature, and unfortunately for you, you either did not read the EULA (I sure as hell didn't), or you saw something that you didn't like yet you signed anyway. There is no way around it, and you are going to have to suck it up and deal with it.
I'm no lawyer by any means, but if CCP is following the contract they had you sign, and you are the one attempting to wiggle your way out of a possibility that was pointed out and explained before you agreed to the contract, technically you are the one in the wrong, and if CCP wanted to be d*cks about it, they could probably come after you for breach of contract.
You told CCP whenever you started playing that you understood they would be fully within their legal rights to do what they are currently doing, and you became a part of a legal binding document. The time to fight this was before you agreed to the EULA, it's to late now man. Sorry.
|
![Chunky Munkey Chunky Munkey](https://web.ccpgamescdn.com/dust/img/character_creator/female_amarr_128.jpg)
Chunky Munkey
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
2271
![View only posts by author View only posts by author](/images/icon_filter.gif) |
Posted - 2013.11.24 00:10:00 -
[140] - Quote
Seymor Krelborn wrote:Jason Pearson wrote:See, I'd be a bad game developer because I'd just remove your **** without giving you a refund.. That said, I'd also walk around with god mode and insanely strong weapons using an arnie soundboard, while talking to the enemy team. Probably why I'm not a dev.. that's why youre a basement dweller instead of a game dev, or a person of any other employment...
Suggesting someone is a loser with nothing better to do, isn't the most enlightened opinion to post on a video game forum.
No.
|
|
![xLuca Brasi xLuca Brasi](https://web.ccpgamescdn.com/dust/img/character_creator/male_caldari_128.jpg)
xLuca Brasi
DUST University Ivy League
85
![View only posts by author View only posts by author](/images/icon_filter.gif) |
Posted - 2013.11.24 01:30:00 -
[141] - Quote
Chunky Munkey wrote:Seymor Krelborn wrote:Jason Pearson wrote:See, I'd be a bad game developer because I'd just remove your **** without giving you a refund.. That said, I'd also walk around with god mode and insanely strong weapons using an arnie soundboard, while talking to the enemy team. Probably why I'm not a dev.. that's why youre a basement dweller instead of a game dev, or a person of any other employment... Suggesting someone is a loser with nothing better to do, isn't the most enlightened opinion to post on a video game forum.
well said!
SAY NO TO BPO REMOVALS!
|
![xLuca Brasi xLuca Brasi](https://web.ccpgamescdn.com/dust/img/character_creator/male_caldari_128.jpg)
xLuca Brasi
DUST University Ivy League
98
![View only posts by author View only posts by author](/images/icon_filter.gif) |
Posted - 2013.11.24 08:35:00 -
[142] - Quote
STABBEY wrote:xLuca Brasi wrote:STABBEY wrote:xLuca Brasi wrote:STABBEY wrote:Umm I quit playing for a month and I am very confused on this topic. (Yes I have just about all BPO's Infantry and Vehicle) Som1 have a link to were it details what BPO's are being removed and why? At current I cant think of a BPO that would be useless just by some vehicles being removed. I'm confused, enlighten me? ![Shocked](https://forums.dust514.com/Images/Emoticons/ccp_shocked.png) https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=122274&find=unreadright there. I see.. They are removing Modules/skills from the game completely So the BPO module basicly wont exist. So why keep the BPO of a non existant module? Got it. Atleast they arent taking any of the good 1's out ![Cool](https://forums.dust514.com/Images/Emoticons/ccp_cool.png) not yet... this opens the door. now all ccp has to do is make our other bpo's useless and everyone will agree with their removal, forgetting ccp chose to make them useless. then they can give us crap in return to replace it that isn't equal and all the cows will moo praise.... To do that means people will have wasted 100's of $$$ Considering most people only spent money on the 100$ and 50$ packs for BPO's. I personaly dont see how BPO's hurt the game, I do have most of them but I usually just proto stomp these days only use the BPO swarm and sniper so i dont have to spec into them. My Toxin SMG would be the only BPO I would be REALLY mad about losing I've used it on every suit since way back in closed beta.
you should get your people to speak up if they care about this...
the louder they are the better ccp will hear us
SAY NO TO BPO REMOVALS!
|
![xLuca Brasi xLuca Brasi](https://web.ccpgamescdn.com/dust/img/character_creator/male_caldari_128.jpg)
xLuca Brasi
Onikanabo Brigade Caldari State
111
![View only posts by author View only posts by author](/images/icon_filter.gif) |
Posted - 2013.11.24 19:44:00 -
[143] - Quote
so ccp... you can change a thread title but not respond to it?
what are you afraid of?
SAY NO TO BPO REMOVALS!
|
![xLuca Brasi xLuca Brasi](https://web.ccpgamescdn.com/dust/img/character_creator/male_caldari_128.jpg)
xLuca Brasi
Onikanabo Brigade Caldari State
121
![View only posts by author View only posts by author](/images/icon_filter.gif) |
Posted - 2013.11.24 23:10:00 -
[144] - Quote
![Pirate](https://forums.dust514.com/Images/Emoticons/ccp_pirate.png)
SAY NO TO BPO REMOVALS!
|
![NomaDz 2K NomaDz 2K](https://web.ccpgamescdn.com/dust/img/character_creator/male_minmatar_128.jpg)
NomaDz 2K
DUTY FR33
80
![View only posts by author View only posts by author](/images/icon_filter.gif) |
Posted - 2013.11.25 17:35:00 -
[145] - Quote
A New Week of BPO Bumps due to the lack of responce from CCP - Tnx CCP for shoving it back into your faces ![Twisted](https://forums.dust514.com/Images/Emoticons/ccp_twisted.png) |
![Audrey2 Audrey2](https://web.ccpgamescdn.com/dust/img/character_creator/female_gallente_128.jpg)
Audrey2
Edimmu Warfighters Gallente Federation
3
![View only posts by author View only posts by author](/images/icon_filter.gif) |
Posted - 2013.11.26 00:01:00 -
[146] - Quote
still no blue tag?
......
SAY NO TO BPO REMOVALS!
|
![billy bloodbath2 billy bloodbath2](https://web.ccpgamescdn.com/dust/img/character_creator/male_minmatar_128.jpg)
billy bloodbath2
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
1
![View only posts by author View only posts by author](/images/icon_filter.gif) |
Posted - 2013.11.26 23:49:00 -
[147] - Quote
xLuca Brasi wrote:STABBEY wrote:xLuca Brasi wrote:STABBEY wrote:Umm I quit playing for a month and I am very confused on this topic. (Yes I have just about all BPO's Infantry and Vehicle) Som1 have a link to were it details what BPO's are being removed and why? At current I cant think of a BPO that would be useless just by some vehicles being removed. I'm confused, enlighten me? ![Shocked](https://forums.dust514.com/Images/Emoticons/ccp_shocked.png) https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=122274&find=unreadright there. I see.. They are removing Modules/skills from the game completely So the BPO module basicly wont exist. So why keep the BPO of a non existant module? Got it. Atleast they arent taking any of the good 1's out ![Cool](https://forums.dust514.com/Images/Emoticons/ccp_cool.png) not yet... this opens the door. now all ccp has to do is make our other bpo's useless and everyone will agree with their removal, forgetting ccp chose to make them useless. then they can give us crap in return to replace it that isn't equal and all the cows will moo praise....
I wonder what bpo's they will remove next.... and what about all those aur logi suits now, if you buy them and then they remove the side arm will it be like contact nades? just stuck with a nerfed pos? |
![Slag Emberforge Slag Emberforge](https://web.ccpgamescdn.com/dust/img/character_creator/male_minmatar_128.jpg)
Slag Emberforge
Immortal Retribution
159
![View only posts by author View only posts by author](/images/icon_filter.gif) |
Posted - 2013.11.27 06:00:00 -
[148] - Quote
Bump, we need a blue post, CCP.
Give us some feedback, at least acknowledge that people are upset about this. |
![NomaDz 2K NomaDz 2K](https://web.ccpgamescdn.com/dust/img/character_creator/male_minmatar_128.jpg)
NomaDz 2K
DUTY FR33
87
![View only posts by author View only posts by author](/images/icon_filter.gif) |
Posted - 2013.11.27 11:58:00 -
[149] - Quote
BUMP |
![Korvin Lomont Korvin Lomont](https://web.ccpgamescdn.com/dust/img/character_creator/male_gallente_128.jpg)
Korvin Lomont
United Pwnage Service RISE of LEGION
276
![View only posts by author View only posts by author](/images/icon_filter.gif) |
Posted - 2013.11.27 12:01:00 -
[150] - Quote
billy bloodbath2 wrote:xLuca Brasi wrote:STABBEY wrote:xLuca Brasi wrote:STABBEY wrote:Umm I quit playing for a month and I am very confused on this topic. (Yes I have just about all BPO's Infantry and Vehicle) Som1 have a link to were it details what BPO's are being removed and why? At current I cant think of a BPO that would be useless just by some vehicles being removed. I'm confused, enlighten me? ![Shocked](https://forums.dust514.com/Images/Emoticons/ccp_shocked.png) https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=122274&find=unreadright there. I see.. They are removing Modules/skills from the game completely So the BPO module basicly wont exist. So why keep the BPO of a non existant module? Got it. Atleast they arent taking any of the good 1's out ![Cool](https://forums.dust514.com/Images/Emoticons/ccp_cool.png) not yet... this opens the door. now all ccp has to do is make our other bpo's useless and everyone will agree with their removal, forgetting ccp chose to make them useless. then they can give us crap in return to replace it that isn't equal and all the cows will moo praise.... I wonder what bpo's they will remove next.... and what about all those aur logi suits now, if you buy them and then they remove the side arm will it be like contact nades? just stuck with a nerfed pos?
If they remove the LW slot things a more complicated this would make most fittings invalid and Logi could at least demand a refund for SPs they spend for LW's as there suit of choice can no longer use them. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |