| Pages: 1 2 [3] :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Atiim
Living Like Larry Schwag
1111
   |
Posted - 2013.11.17 18:43:00 -
[61] - Quote
GeneralButtNaked wrote:Atiim wrote:Tank Missile wrote:This thread is filled with stupid ideas. Do you people seriously think that something that can kill infantry shouldn't be able to be killed back by infantry? This is coming from a Gunnlogi pilot, the biggest joke this game has to offer right now.
As a part-time Charybdis pilot, I approve of the OP. (Hey weren't you in that PC last night?) I agree. Why should I be forced to use an HAV to destroy an HAV? That's broken Right now you can very easily demolish a tank with swarms, forge or AV grenades. What are you complaining about?
Idiots saying that tanks should be the best and/or only counter to tanks.
A well, properly fit Gunnlogi or Madrugar is not easily demolished by PRO AV.
Check out my corp's new website here :D
-HAND
|
Spkr4theDead
Red Star.
EoN.
1246
|
Posted - 2013.11.18 02:19:00 -
[62] - Quote
Atiim wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:ZeHealingHurts HurtingHeals wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:This is why you're not a tanker. We don't care that we don't get WP for using remote modules. I don't even know where to begin. Take away tanker WP for killing and destroying things. Apparently they don't care if they get WP for doing what they're supposed to. No, they do it because they love to tank. That should be reward enough. Great way to take tanks off the battlefield without having to actually remove them and their skill tree. Well he was using your logic.
It was an absence of logic. I brought up specific modules for a specific task, and he said we shouldn't get WP for anything at all. That's quite literally removing tanking, because if you don't get WP for everything, that's a problem. Why, we should get WP for successfully using the inertial dampener to prevent fall damage!
Teamwork for thee, but no teamwork for me, such is the motto of the anti vehicle infantry.
|
Spkr4theDead
Red Star.
EoN.
1246
|
Posted - 2013.11.18 02:22:00 -
[63] - Quote
Atiim wrote:GeneralButtNaked wrote:Atiim wrote:Tank Missile wrote:This thread is filled with stupid ideas. Do you people seriously think that something that can kill infantry shouldn't be able to be killed back by infantry? This is coming from a Gunnlogi pilot, the biggest joke this game has to offer right now.
As a part-time Charybdis pilot, I approve of the OP. (Hey weren't you in that PC last night?) I agree. Why should I be forced to use an HAV to destroy an HAV? That's broken Right now you can very easily demolish a tank with swarms, forge or AV grenades. What are you complaining about? Idiots saying that tanks should be the best and/or only counter to tanks. A well, properly fit Gunnlogi or Madrugar is not easily demolished by PRO AV.
It's not our fault you're terrible at attempting to tank. Of course you won't understand that a tank should be its own best counter. God forbid tanks should ever be made viable again, why, those sly tankers will figure out a way to deploy 16 tanks for one team! The horror of nobody hacking objectives!
Like we've been saying. There's games out there where you don't have to deal with vehicles at all. Why must you ruin the game for some people just because you don't like what they use?
Teamwork for thee, but no teamwork for me, such is the motto of the anti vehicle infantry.
|
SgtDoughnut
Red Star Jr.
EoN.
379
|
Posted - 2013.11.18 02:35:00 -
[64] - Quote
Seems I need to get the extra buttery popcorn for this trainwreck. Its like watching a fight on a elementary school playground. |
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 [3] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |