DUST Search - The Rainbow Effect Public Relations, the first.

All Channels

General Discussions

The Rainbow Effect Public Relations, the first.

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
KingBabar The Rainbow Effect 1300	Posted - 2013.10.30 14:29:00 - [31] - Quote Zaria Min Deir wrote: So fluxes allowed, how about MD? Just to be clear on this... Fluxes are not allowed, MD is allowed but having entire teams spamming it will be frowned upon...
13ear MoIden Heath PoIice Department EoN. 57	Posted - 2013.10.30 14:30:00 - [32] - Quote Zaria Min Deir wrote: So fluxes allowed, how about MD? Just to be clear on this... TBD
Zaria Min Deir Ancient Exiles 215	Posted - 2013.10.30 14:33:00 - [33] - Quote KingBabar wrote: Zaria Min Deir wrote: So fluxes allowed, how about MD? Just to be clear on this... Fluxes are not allowed, MD is allowed but having entire teams spamming it will be frowned upon... Um, having the entire team using mass drivers would actually put that team at a huge disadvantage, so I think it would be unlikely anyway... Have you considered installing the improved keyboard to improve your forum posts?
13ear MoIden Heath PoIice Department EoN. 57	Posted - 2013.10.30 14:35:00 - [34] - Quote Zaria Min Deir wrote: KingBabar wrote: Zaria Min Deir wrote: So fluxes allowed, how about MD? Just to be clear on this... Fluxes are not allowed, MD is allowed but having entire teams spamming it will be frowned upon... Um, having the entire team using mass drivers would actually put that team at a huge disadvantage, so I think it would be unlikely anyway... So you've never played against GAC? Losing doesn't deter bad players from using easy weapons.
KingBabar The Rainbow Effect 1300	Posted - 2013.10.30 14:38:00 - [35] - Quote Is "I'm nursing a semi" the correct term for this entire endevour? I think it is... So cool that we can put up some gentlemans rules to combat CCPs horrid imbalance.
Zaria Min Deir Ancient Exiles 215	Posted - 2013.10.30 14:41:00 - [36] - Quote 13ear wrote: Zaria Min Deir wrote: KingBabar wrote: Zaria Min Deir wrote: So fluxes allowed, how about MD? Just to be clear on this... Fluxes are not allowed, MD is allowed but having entire teams spamming it will be frowned upon... Um, having the entire team using mass drivers would actually put that team at a huge disadvantage, so I think it would be unlikely anyway... So you've never played against GAC? Losing doesn't deter bad players from using easy weapons. That's the thing, you keep saying that, but when I think GAC, I think of heavies and tanks, not MDs... Now, WTF, on the other hand Have you considered installing the improved keyboard to improve your forum posts?
Zaria Min Deir Ancient Exiles 215	Posted - 2013.10.30 14:43:00 - [37] - Quote KingBabar wrote: Is "I'm nursing a semi" the correct term for this entire endevour? I think it is... TMI, Babar. Have you considered installing the improved keyboard to improve your forum posts?
KingBabar The Rainbow Effect 1300	Posted - 2013.10.30 14:46:00 - [38] - Quote Zaria Min Deir wrote: KingBabar wrote: Is "I'm nursing a semi" the correct term for this entire endevour? I think it is... TMI, Babar. Right right.
richiesutie 2 The Rainbow Effect 454	Posted - 2013.10.30 16:20:00 - [39] - Quote \o/
steadyhand amarr MoIden Heath PoIice Department EoN. 1646	Posted - 2013.10.30 16:35:00 - [40] - Quote \o\ /o/ \o/ "my faith is my shield, the empress's light my guide and my fury my sword"
richiesutie 2 The Rainbow Effect 455	Posted - 2013.10.31 16:27:00 - [41] - Quote KingBabar wrote: Zaria Min Deir wrote: So fluxes allowed, how about MD? Just to be clear on this... Fluxes are not allowed, MD is allowed but having entire teams spamming it will be frowned upon... Haha MDs will useless on my cal logi!
Soldiersaint Deepspace Digital 517	Posted - 2013.10.31 16:29:00 - [42] - Quote KingBabar wrote: So here we are, days away from the squad cup and you rustians must excuse my pressumtion, but I find it highly likely that our first battle will be against a very strong team, the Power Rangers. And its a game we're very much looking foreward to, we play each other all the time in EU ambush, and many of us have been in the same clan(s) before and know each othe pretty well by now. Besides, we all love Zaria... A common oppinion for most of us, indeed just about every player in Dust I respect, we are all really sick and tired of the constant nade spam that gradually has become the norm in Dust. I have indeed thrown my share of nades, we still use it against each other all the time, but I bet many of us find the deaths cheap, and the kills less rewarding. Nades are OP and thats that. Then it occures to me, we have two teams with seasoned players that more or less know each other well. Lets do something here and show the rest of the community how a de-nade-spammed Dust looks like. I can record and I bet more people can too. And honestly, it would be a blast to play against such great players in an actual tourney, with a removed mechanic resulting in a drastically changed combat environment. - I hereby challenge team Power Rangers to do this battle against us totally nade free. Well AV nades are ok. Lets play Dust with gungame and tactics, not the usual explosive spam, just this once... A kill is a kill it doesnt matter how you did it. Why waste a bunch of ammo for 50pts when you can do the exact same thing in half a second for wait for it.......50pts.
richiesutie 2 The Rainbow Effect 457	Posted - 2013.10.31 18:05:00 - [43] - Quote Soldiersaint wrote: KingBabar wrote: So here we are, days away from the squad cup and you rustians must excuse my pressumtion, but I find it highly likely that our first battle will be against a very strong team, the Power Rangers. And its a game we're very much looking foreward to, we play each other all the time in EU ambush, and many of us have been in the same clan(s) before and know each othe pretty well by now. Besides, we all love Zaria... A common oppinion for most of us, indeed just about every player in Dust I respect, we are all really sick and tired of the constant nade spam that gradually has become the norm in Dust. I have indeed thrown my share of nades, we still use it against each other all the time, but I bet many of us find the deaths cheap, and the kills less rewarding. Nades are OP and thats that. Then it occures to me, we have two teams with seasoned players that more or less know each other well. Lets do something here and show the rest of the community how a de-nade-spammed Dust looks like. I can record and I bet more people can too. And honestly, it would be a blast to play against such great players in an actual tourney, with a removed mechanic resulting in a drastically changed combat environment. - I hereby challenge team Power Rangers to do this battle against us totally nade free. Well AV nades are ok. Lets play Dust with gungame and tactics, not the usual explosive spam, just this once... A kill is a kill it doesnt matter how you did it. Why waste a bunch of ammo for 50pts when you can do the exact same thing in half a second for wait for it.......50pts. Same idea....only most of the players are against having the core locus as a crutch...even those with em!
CharCharOdell 1435	Posted - 2013.10.31 18:09:00 - [44] - Quote av nades are not okay! what would possible make av nades ok if regular nades arent!? Gùñ-é-º+¼+ò+¦GÖÑ+ú+ú+¡ GÖÑ'Ðe+ü+üGùÑ Gùú -ä>-üð+++Ç++§<-¡<-¡ Gùó Speaker of the Mangrove / King of QQ / Co-Founder of the Learning Coalition
KingBabar The Rainbow Effect 1308	Posted - 2013.10.31 18:30:00 - [45] - Quote CharCharOdell wrote: av nades are not okay! what would possible make av nades ok if regular nades arent!? Troll? Or one of those "special people?"
richiesutie 2 The Rainbow Effect 458	Posted - 2013.10.31 19:13:00 - [46] - Quote KingBabar wrote: CharCharOdell wrote: av nades are not okay! what would possible make av nades ok if regular nades arent!? Troll? Or one of those "special people?" Blame the Mangrove!
RevoItZ Core Locus Nade Spammer 278	Posted - 2013.11.02 21:37:00 - [47] - Quote GG Rainbow effect, brilliant match! 6v6 no nades and all gun game is the way forward. Throughly enjoyed the match.
steadyhand amarr MoIden Heath PoIice Department EoN. 1665	Posted - 2013.11.02 21:39:00 - [48] - Quote GG kept to word and guys are still raving about the match :D "my faith is my shield, the empress's light my guide and my fury my sword"
13ear MoIden Heath PoIice Department EoN. 59	Posted - 2013.11.02 21:47:00 - [49] - Quote GG o7
Arkena Wyrnspire Turalyon 514 Turalyon Alliance 4545	Posted - 2013.11.02 21:51:00 - [50] - Quote RevoItZ wrote: GG Rainbow effect, brilliant match! 6v6 no nades and all gun game is the way forward. Throughly enjoyed the match. That corp name. Level 4 Forum Warrior Lenin of the glorious armoured revolution
Bendtner92 Imperfects Negative-Feedback 1201	Posted - 2013.11.02 21:55:00 - [51] - Quote GG guys, was a good match. I wish all matches could be more like this.
Madlax Gen'ei Spectre II 0	Posted - 2013.11.02 23:10:00 - [52] - Quote GG , awesome without the nade spam.
Awry Barux Shining Flame Amarr Empire 205	Posted - 2013.11.02 23:20:00 - [53] - Quote Post the video :D I want to see what this looks like
richiesutie 2 The Rainbow Effect 474	Posted - 2013.11.02 23:35:00 - [54] - Quote How close was it? compilation of Patch/build notes Check it out! :)
RevoItZ Core Locus Nade Spammer 278	Posted - 2013.11.02 23:40:00 - [55] - Quote richiesutie 2 wrote: How close was it? Close, game ended with clones, it was either 21-0 or 27-0. I think we had more MCC armour, could have been even Right off the bat..... Balacs everywhere :P Fantastic game tbh, CCP needs to make a squad v squad game mode, its so intense, adrenaline was flowing lol
norttheantiv D3LTA FORC3 46	Posted - 2013.11.02 23:43:00 - [56] - Quote RevoItZ wrote: richiesutie 2 wrote: How close was it? Close, game ended with clones, it was either 21-0 or 27-0. I think we had more MCC armour, could have been even Right off the bat..... Balacs everywhere :P Fantastic game tbh, CCP needs to make a squad v squad game mode, its so intense, adrenaline was flowing lol Ha ha, ` I'm shaking after that`!
richiesutie 2 The Rainbow Effect 474	Posted - 2013.11.02 23:47:00 - [57] - Quote RevoItZ wrote: richiesutie 2 wrote: How close was it? Close, game ended with clones, it was either 21-0 or 27-0. I think we had more MCC armour, could have been even Right off the bat..... Balacs everywhere :P Fantastic game tbh, CCP needs to make a squad v squad game mode, its so intense, adrenaline was flowing lol AWW Sounds like a really fun match!Hope the orbies weren't one sided again.... ;) Perhaps we could organise one through pc with only 1 objective being allowed to hack! Anyway Good luck with the rest of the tourney! compilation of Patch/build notes Check it out! :)
RevoItZ Core Locus Nade Spammer 278	Posted - 2013.11.02 23:59:00 - [58] - Quote richiesutie 2 wrote: RevoItZ wrote: richiesutie 2 wrote: How close was it? Close, game ended with clones, it was either 21-0 or 27-0. I think we had more MCC armour, could have been even Right off the bat..... Balacs everywhere :P Fantastic game tbh, CCP needs to make a squad v squad game mode, its so intense, adrenaline was flowing lol AWW Sounds like a really fun match!Hope the orbies weren't one sided again.... ;) Perhaps we could organise one through pc with only 1 objective being allowed to hack! Anyway Good luck with the rest of the tourney! Surprisingly the obs wasn't much of a factor due to the map (IMO it was good, left everything to gun game and tactics) "Perhaps we could organise one through pc with only 1 objective being allowed to hack!" Sounds like fun tbh TY bud.
Scheherazade VII Expert Intervention Caldari State 28	Posted - 2013.11.03 00:06:00 - [59] - Quote 6v6 though? on maps which are too big for 16v16? GêÜGëêDUST VIDEOSGëêGêÜ
Bendtner92 Imperfects Negative-Feedback 1204	Posted - 2013.11.03 00:18:00 - [60] - Quote Scheherazade VII wrote: 6v6 though? on maps which are too big for 16v16? Read the rules maybe? It's Domination, so fighting is centered around that single objective.

Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page