| Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Arkena Wyrnspire
Turalyon 514
Turalyon Alliance
3671
   |
Posted - 2013.10.03 23:20:00 -
[1] - Quote
CCP Logibro wrote:
AV weapons should also be getting work done to them to bring them in line with the new numbers. Those will be posted at a later date. For now, try to focus on vehicle vs vehicle interactions.
Please stop comparing the new vehicles to the current proto AV.
I'm sure there'll be some clever comment here about how AV will inevitably be buffed but you can't really make any predictions as to how AV will interact with vehicles in 1.7 as you don't actually have any idea what it'll be like. |
Godin Thekiller
Hellstorm Inc
League of Infamy
1061
|
Posted - 2013.10.03 23:28:00 -
[2] - Quote
Yet there's no current proof that that is the case. |
Arkena Wyrnspire
Turalyon 514
Turalyon Alliance
3671
|
Posted - 2013.10.03 23:30:00 -
[3] - Quote
Godin Thekiller wrote:Yet there's no current proof that that is the case.
No current proof that what is the case? AV being changed? I suggest you actually read the post. |
Harpyja
Royal Uhlans
Amarr Empire
605
|
Posted - 2013.10.03 23:30:00 -
[4] - Quote
I hope AV gets a serious damage nerf. Because seriously, now a Gunnlogi with a prototype shield extender will barely scratch 4000 shields, with 0 passive resists, and we all know that an Ishy FG will eat 4000 shield in two shots.
Even now, with over 5.4k shield and 34% resists, my shields are gone with a single damage modded, max skilled Ishy FG clip (and who doesn't have max FG skills with stacked damage mods?).
I'll be content roaming around with 0 resists and less EHP if AV gets their damage to about, say, 1/3 of what it is now. |
Coleman Gray
GunFall Mobilization
Covert Intervention
750
|
Posted - 2013.10.03 23:35:00 -
[5] - Quote
At ths point I'd rather if vehicle mods where buffed up to be on par with AV rather than having the tanks themselves buffed or AV nerfed. |
Mac Dac
Wraith Shadow Guards
228
|
Posted - 2013.10.03 23:39:00 -
[6] - Quote
Arkena Wyrnspire wrote:CCP Logibro wrote:
AV weapons should also be getting work done to them to bring them in line with the new numbers. Those will be posted at a later date. For now, try to focus on vehicle vs vehicle interactions.
Please stop comparing the new vehicles to the current proto AV. I'm sure there'll be some clever comment here about how AV will inevitably be buffed but you can't really make any predictions as to how AV will interact with vehicles in 1.7 as you don't actually have any idea what it'll be like.
well if you were going to rework the whole vehicle segment of dust why would you leave out Anti vehicle.
AV is just as much a part of vehicle balance as HAVs. |
gbghg
L.O.T.I.S.
3604
|
Posted - 2013.10.03 23:41:00 -
[7] - Quote
Seriously, how did people believe that AV wouldn't be reworked?, you can't change Vehicles without changing AV, they're tied together. |
ladwar
Dead Six Initiative
Lokun Listamenn
1837
|
Posted - 2013.10.03 23:44:00 -
[8] - Quote
gbghg wrote:Seriously, how did people believe that AV wouldn't be reworked?, you can't change Vehicles without changing AV, they're tied together.
its ccp... they didn't have anything planned and if the community didn't rage about it then they would forget about it. |
gbghg
L.O.T.I.S.
3605
|
Posted - 2013.10.03 23:50:00 -
[9] - Quote
ladwar wrote:gbghg wrote:Seriously, how did people believe that AV wouldn't be reworked?, you can't change Vehicles without changing AV, they're tied together. its ccp... they didn't have anything planned and if the community didn't rage about it then they would forget about it.
No, that's taking an overly pessimistic view of things, CCP has their moments but they're not this stupid. |
ladwar
Dead Six Initiative
Lokun Listamenn
1838
|
Posted - 2013.10.03 23:58:00 -
[10] - Quote
gbghg wrote:ladwar wrote:gbghg wrote:Seriously, how did people believe that AV wouldn't be reworked?, you can't change Vehicles without changing AV, they're tied together. its ccp... they didn't have anything planned and if the community didn't rage about it then they would forget about it. No, that's taking an overly pessimistic view of things, CCP has their moments but they're not this stupid.
you know a thought just hit me... heavies will be able survive past more FG shots and im talking direct shots to the face.
the day when RPGs that are meant to kill tanks don't kill infantry with a direct hit has arrived. |
|
|
GVGMODE
WorstPlayersEver
71
|
Posted - 2013.10.04 00:15:00 -
[11] - Quote
We all know CCP loves AV, why do they keep lying to us? :( QQPEEWPEW |
Spkr4theDead
International-Fleet
962
|
Posted - 2013.10.04 00:24:00 -
[12] - Quote
Arkena Wyrnspire wrote:CCP Logibro wrote:
AV weapons should also be getting work done to them to bring them in line with the new numbers. Those will be posted at a later date. For now, try to focus on vehicle vs vehicle interactions.
Please stop comparing the new vehicles to the current proto AV. I'm sure there'll be some clever comment here about how AV will inevitably be buffed but you can't really make any predictions as to how AV will interact with vehicles in 1.7 as you don't actually have any idea what it'll be like.
But as has been said, we have no AV to compare future tanks to, so what do we all do? Compare future tanks to current AV.
You know what I'd like to do? Compare future tanks to a future PRO swarm that fires 4 missiles instead of 6, at 145 damage each instead of 330. A PRO assault forge that does 1200 with skills instead of almost 1700 base. PRO AV gre.... nah, take them out. |
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |