| Pages: 1 2  :: [one page] | 
      
      
        | Author | Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) | 
      
      
        |  TREY Trey
 THE DOLLARS
 
 33
 
 
      | Posted - 2013.09.16 04:17:00 -
          [1] - Quote 
 Any plans on going 64 players like MAG or BF4?
 If this is already in the game, would somebody kindly direct me on how to access it. So far I been playing only faction battles and they seem to be 16 vs 16 (aka 32 players)
 
 I like the large scale feel of shooters like MAG and Resistance 2. But some game simply dont do it. Would be pretty cool. I wouldnt mind redownloading this game for the PS4 if it introduces 64 player battles.
 
 Great work BTW. I like the game so far. cant wait till its much better.
 | 
      
      
        |  Mac Dac
 Wraith Shadow Guards
 
 189
 
 
      | Posted - 2013.09.16 04:20:00 -
          [2] - Quote 
 of course. what else do you think were going to use the rest of the map for.
 | 
      
      
        |  TREY Trey
 THE DOLLARS
 
 33
 
 
      | Posted - 2013.09.16 04:24:00 -
          [3] - Quote 
 
 Mac Dac wrote:of course. what else do you think were going to use the rest of the map for. you have any link to official info on this?
 | 
      
      
        |  Viktor Hadah Jr
 Negative-Impact
 Cult of War
 
 188
 
 
      | Posted - 2013.09.16 04:29:00 -
          [4] - Quote 
 this use to be something i was interested in but not so much now, more players on one map would be nice, but it is not essential and there are some other updates i would like to see before this imo.
 | 
      
      
        |  Mac Dac
 Wraith Shadow Guards
 
 189
 
 
      | Posted - 2013.09.16 04:41:00 -
          [5] - Quote 
 
 TREY Trey wrote:Mac Dac wrote:of course. what else do you think were going to use the rest of the map for. you have any link to official info on this? the maps have always been huge it's just the play area we're curraled in is a lot smaller then the entire map. however CCP said something about raising the playercount in uprising but never did for some reason, but no eta has been announced only posts saying they're going to do something with all that space.
 
 but if your still curious here is a link
 
 ask around in the outposts fourm... logicloop is pretty good at answering your questions.
 | 
      
      
        |  Lance 2ballzStrong
 SyNergy Gaming
 EoN.
 
 3860
 
 
      | Posted - 2013.09.16 04:43:00 -
          [6] - Quote 
 Not gonna happen on PS3 anytime soon. I don't even think it's possible that DUST can do it even if the game is fully optimized.
 | 
      
      
        |  Cosgar
 ParagonX
 
 5291
 
 
      | Posted - 2013.09.16 04:46:00 -
          [7] - Quote 
 We're going to need to get 16 v 16 right first...
 | 
      
      
        |  Mossellia Delt
 Militaires Sans Jeux
 
 264
 
 
      | Posted - 2013.09.16 04:48:00 -
          [8] - Quote 
 
 Cosgar wrote:We're going to need to get 16 v 16 right first... 
 Didnt you uninstal.....
 | 
      
      
        |  Bright Cloud
 Namtar Elite
 Gallente Federation
 
 176
 
 
      | Posted - 2013.09.16 08:31:00 -
          [9] - Quote 
 
 TREY Trey wrote:Any plans on going 64 players like MAG or BF4?If this is already in the game, would somebody kindly direct me on how to access it. So far I been playing only faction battles and they seem to be 16 vs 16 (aka 32 players)
 
 I like the large scale feel of shooters like MAG and Resistance 2. But some game simply dont do it. Would be pretty cool. I wouldnt mind redownloading this game for the PS4 if it introduces 64 player battles.
 
 Great work BTW. I like the game so far. cant wait till its much better.
 MAG was 126vs126. Silly you
 | 
      
      
        |  Chibi Andy
 Forsaken Immortals
 Top Men.
 
 518
 
 
      | Posted - 2013.09.16 09:04:00 -
          [10] - Quote 
 and BF4 only has 64 players on the PS4, the PS3 a puny amount of 24 players
 | 
      
      
        |  Necandi Brasil
 Conspiratus Immortalis
 Covert Intervention
 
 337
 
 
      | Posted - 2013.09.16 09:28:00 -
          [11] - Quote 
 I would like a blue post about this... Yes they've said that the cap would be raised, but I want to know when ....
 | 
      
      
        |  CommanderBolt
 A.N.O.N.Y.M.O.U.S.
 
 294
 
 
      | Posted - 2013.09.16 09:32:00 -
          [12] - Quote 
 
 TREY Trey wrote:Any plans on going 64 players like MAG or BF4?If this is already in the game, would somebody kindly direct me on how to access it. So far I been playing only faction battles and they seem to be 16 vs 16 (aka 32 players)
 
 I like the large scale feel of shooters like MAG and Resistance 2. But some game simply dont do it. Would be pretty cool. I wouldnt mind redownloading this game for the PS4 if it introduces 64 player battles.
 
 Great work BTW. I like the game so far. cant wait till its much better.
 
 You know this game actually advertises as 24v24 for a total of 48 player matches. Its all over there page on the PSN store, as well as on the more information screen when you go to any download or such.
 
 This has to be false advertising? Are they going to make 24v24 player battles or just bullshit the world with there lies on the store?
 | 
      
      
        |  Macchi00
 Famous.OTF
 Only The Famous
 
 10
 
 
      | Posted - 2013.09.16 09:35:00 -
          [13] - Quote 
 It is difficult in the specifications of the PS3
 | 
      
      
        |  Dovallis Martan JenusKoll
 Osmon Surveillance
 Caldari State
 
 125
 
 
      | Posted - 2013.09.16 09:40:00 -
          [14] - Quote 
 
 Necandi Brasil wrote:I would like a blue post about this... Yes they've said that the cap would be raised, but I want to know when .... I raise my cap at you sir. *tips cap*
 Pun-ishment through loopholes in my Logicloop! Har har! Yaargh!
 | 
      
      
        |  Bendtner92
 Imperfects
 Negative-Feedback
 
 1068
 
 
      | Posted - 2013.09.16 09:46:00 -
          [15] - Quote 
 Current maps are better suited for 48 or 64 player battles than the current 32 player battles, so hopefully we'll get at least 48 players soon.
 
 Unless they want to wait until the PS4 version in 2015, although if that was the case it makes no sense to design maps for a different amount of players in battle than you will have for a while.
 
 Then again, CCP and logic don't usually go hand in hand.
 | 
      
      
        |  CommanderBolt
 A.N.O.N.Y.M.O.U.S.
 
 300
 
 
      | Posted - 2013.09.20 11:49:00 -
          [16] - Quote 
 False Advertising guys. CCP on the PSN store, DUST 514 game information SAYS " 2 - 48 players" then other places reads "48 player battles"
 
 Absolute BS. Most matches arent even 16 v 16!
 | 
      
      
        |  TREY Trey
 THE DOLLARS
 
 43
 
 
      | Posted - 2013.09.21 12:53:00 -
          [17] - Quote 
 Hopefully it comes by the end of the year when the ps4 comes out.
 | 
      
      
        |  grunt party
 Carbon 7
 CRONOS.
 
 40
 
 
      | Posted - 2013.09.21 13:17:00 -
          [18] - Quote 
 PS4
 | 
      
      
        |  Bright Cloud
 Namtar Elite
 Gallente Federation
 
 189
 
 
      | Posted - 2013.09.21 13:32:00 -
          [19] - Quote 
 
 Macchi00 wrote:It is difficult in the specifications of the PS3 Mag pulled off greater max player numbers then Dust on a much bigger map. You cant really tell me that the specs from the PS3 cant handle it.
 | 
      
      
        |  Jaysyn Larrisen
 OSG Planetary Operations
 Covert Intervention
 
 81
 
 
      | Posted - 2013.09.21 14:14:00 -
          [20] - Quote 
 I've been wondering about this for a while as well. I think if you upped the player cap to 48 and allowed team deploy you could score some major points with the player base. I'm not clear on what actually stops or constrains the game to 32 players...but onto e surface it seems like it should be a simple (but perhaps difficult to implement) fix.
 | 
      
      
        |  XOXOXOXOXOXOXOXOXOXOXOXO XOXOXOXOXOXO
 Storm Wind Strikeforce
 Caldari State
 
 312
 
 
      | Posted - 2013.09.21 14:17:00 -
          [21] - Quote 
 
 Bright Cloud wrote:TREY Trey wrote:Any plans on going 64 players like MAG or BF4?If this is already in the game, would somebody kindly direct me on how to access it. So far I been playing only faction battles and they seem to be 16 vs 16 (aka 32 players)
 
 I like the large scale feel of shooters like MAG and Resistance 2. But some game simply dont do it. Would be pretty cool. I wouldnt mind redownloading this game for the PS4 if it introduces 64 player battles.
 
 Great work BTW. I like the game so far. cant wait till its much better.
 MAG was 126vs126. Silly you silly you it was 128vs128
 | 
      
      
        |  DaddyKillsEmAll
 United Pwnage Service
 RISE of LEGION
 
 104
 
 
      | Posted - 2013.09.21 14:30:00 -
          [22] - Quote 
 
 Bright Cloud wrote:TREY Trey wrote:Any plans on going 64 players like MAG or BF4?If this is already in the game, would somebody kindly direct me on how to access it. So far I been playing only faction battles and they seem to be 16 vs 16 (aka 32 players)
 
 I like the large scale feel of shooters like MAG and Resistance 2. But some game simply dont do it. Would be pretty cool. I wouldnt mind redownloading this game for the PS4 if it introduces 64 player battles.
 
 Great work BTW. I like the game so far. cant wait till its much better.
 MAG was 126vs126. Silly you 
 
 128 vs 128^^
 | 
      
      
        |  Drifter MAGGOT
 KILL-EM-QUICK
 RISE of LEGION
 
 69
 
 
      | Posted - 2013.09.21 14:58:00 -
          [23] - Quote 
 +1 to MAG
 | 
      
      
        |  soulreaper73
 PFB Pink Fluffy Bunnies
 
 375
 
 
      | Posted - 2013.09.21 15:10:00 -
          [24] - Quote 
 
 TREY Trey wrote:Any plans on going 64 players like MAG or BF4?If this is already in the game, would somebody kindly direct me on how to access it. So far I been playing only faction battles and they seem to be 16 vs 16 (aka 32 players)
 
 I like the large scale feel of shooters like MAG and Resistance 2. But some game simply dont do it. Would be pretty cool. I wouldnt mind redownloading this game for the PS4 if it introduces 64 player battles.
 
 Great work BTW. I like the game so far. cant wait till its much better.
 
 trey trey you cray cray! they need to fix 16 vs 16 first
  | 
      
      
        |  ColdBlooded Max
 Dem Durrty Boyz
 Public Disorder.
 
 10
 
 
      | Posted - 2013.09.21 15:14:00 -
          [25] - Quote 
 They can't keep 16 vs 16 going! How are they going to do a 64?
 | 
      
      
        |  R F Gyro
 Clones 4u
 
 520
 
 
      | Posted - 2013.09.21 19:10:00 -
          [26] - Quote 
 As others have pointed out, the current limitation is likely due to PS3 constraints. When they release on PS4 or other more powerful platforms next year I'd expect to start to see larger individual battles.
 
 However, I really hope to see individual battles linked into larger multi-district battles. For example, a faction warfare fight over an entire planet with ten districts might have a single scoreboard for the whole thing, ending only when one side has 8 or more of the districts at the same time. Players/squads would by default move on to another battle on the same planet for the same faction on completing a battle.
 
 This would mean we would essentially have a 160 v 160 fight going on, but without putting any more stress on the game engine than it currently has.
 | 
      
      
        |  Avallo Kantor
 Paladin Survey Force
 Amarr Empire
 
 181
 
 
      | Posted - 2013.09.21 19:20:00 -
          [27] - Quote 
 If Skirmish 1.0 ever gets readded (As in 1 MCC vs defenders) then FW could take on a bit different play style:
 
 One faction owns a planet, and they occasionally get attacked by opposite faction who has X MCCs vs Defenders who has Y clones. (for example, 10 MCCs (And 800 clones) vs 1000 clones or something) at the end of each battle, Clone losses are tallied and subtracted from main score. MCC losses are similarly tallied. If Defender runs out of clones, then Attacker takes planet, like wise if Attacker loses all clones, he gets kicked off.
 
 However, if Attacker loses all MCCs but not all clones, the battle goes to Ambush game mode, but with Attackers taking X% extra casualties due to Logistical Losses.
 
 Battles would continue on the planet, and squads could have the option once a battle ends to continue in the same conflict. (Once the ability to join a fight from the end of battle screen is added)
 | 
      
      
        |  Delta 749
 Kestrel Reconnaissance
 
 1935
 
 
      | Posted - 2013.09.21 19:39:00 -
          [28] - Quote 
 I love the CCP apologists that blame the PS3 for this even though other games run with more players on large maps
 | 
      
      
        |  Skihids
 Bullet Cluster
 
 2143
 
 
      | Posted - 2013.09.21 19:49:00 -
          [29] - Quote 
 Maybe it is 24 vs. 24, but 16 are left behind each match...
 | 
      
      
        |  R F Gyro
 Clones 4u
 
 521
 
 
      | Posted - 2013.09.21 20:19:00 -
          [30] - Quote 
 
 Delta 749 wrote:I love the CCP apologists that blame the PS3 for this even though other games run with more players on large maps I think it is probably fair to say that CCP can't get more out of the PS3 with the effort they are willing to put in, rather than the PS3 can't support more. It is a cost/benefit thing: the effort required to support more than 32 players isn't worth the time they'd have to invest to achieve it.
 
 Of course, I strongly suspect Dust can operate just fine with more than 32 players in a battle most of the time. However, until their testing tells them that it is fine all of the time they are unlikely to change.
 | 
      
      
        |  Johnny Guilt
 Algintal Core
 Gallente Federation
 
 288
 
 
      | Posted - 2013.09.21 20:25:00 -
          [31] - Quote 
 30v30 example and this is a 2008 game
 | 
      
      
        |  DeadlyAztec11
 Chatelain Rapid Response
 Gallente Federation
 
 2146
 
 
      | Posted - 2013.09.21 23:27:00 -
          [32] - Quote 
 
 Johnny Guilt wrote:30v30example  and this is a 2008 game We can't even say that it's because of graphics, 'cause that game had the same graphics as Chromosome.
 | 
      
      
        |  Godin Thekiller
 Hellstorm Inc
 League of Infamy
 
 799
 
 
      | Posted - 2013.09.22 00:14:00 -
          [33] - Quote 
 I can't remember, but I'm pretty sure it was in the 200's for the highest player battle. They realized that there's no way in hell that will happen on the PS3, so we will have to wait until PS4.
 | 
      
      
        |  Shattered Mirage
 native warlords
 
 294
 
 
      | Posted - 2013.09.22 07:01:00 -
          [34] - Quote 
 
 Godin Thekiller wrote:I can't remember, but I'm pretty sure it was in the 200's for the highest player battle. They realized that there's no way in hell that will happen on the PS3, so we will have to wait until PS4. 
 Mag had ~254 I believe.....
 | 
      
      
        |  Necandi Brasil
 DUST BRASIL S.A
 Covert Intervention
 
 557
 
 
      | Posted - 2013.12.15 22:22:00 -
          [35] - Quote 
 64 players would be awesome
 
 A DUST BRASIL S.A precisa de você ! Junte-se a nós ! Hey CCP, give me PvE! | 
      
      
        |  Sgt Buttscratch
 
 1147
 
 
      | Posted - 2013.12.15 22:25:00 -
          [36] - Quote 
 This game lags too much!!! rawr rawr blaw blaw (32 player game complaints)
 
 CAN WE HAZ SIXTEE FOR PLEEZ?
 
 I stick my weiner in two buns and and then give it the gas
Sour cream from my spleen into Levi jeans | 
      
      
        |  Quill Killian
 Better Hide R Die
 
 274
 
 
      | Posted - 2013.12.15 22:27:00 -
          [37] - Quote 
 32 vs. 32 player matches would be nice, but part of me thinks CCP would have trouble consistently filling matches that large, what with the current estimated size of the player base.
 
 Besides, for the players who desire larger match sizes, there's always BF4 on the PS4 and, within the next several months, Planetside 2. Finally, I'm also sure there's more large player base games being designed that won't drop until the 4Q of 2014, if not a bit later.
 | 
      
      
        |  Minako Nakajima
 Vortex State Empire
 Dark Taboo
 
 54
 
 
      | Posted - 2013.12.15 22:33:00 -
          [38] - Quote 
 STILL WAITING
 
 "Looks can kill." // Terminally Insane | 
      
      
        |  CrotchGrab 360
 Caldari State
 
 550
 
 
      | Posted - 2013.12.15 22:40:00 -
          [39] - Quote 
 
 Bright Cloud wrote:TREY Trey wrote:Any plans on going 64 players like MAG or BF4?If this is already in the game, would somebody kindly direct me on how to access it. So far I been playing only faction battles and they seem to be 16 vs 16 (aka 32 players)
 
 I like the large scale feel of shooters like MAG and Resistance 2. But some game simply dont do it. Would be pretty cool. I wouldnt mind redownloading this game for the PS4 if it introduces 64 player battles.
 
 Great work BTW. I like the game so far. cant wait till its much better.
 MAG was 126vs126. Silly you 
 128v128
 256/2=128
 
 silly you
 
 You've Been Hit By
You've Been Struck By
A Smooth Criminal | 
      
      
        |  CrotchGrab 360
 Caldari State
 
 550
 
 
      | Posted - 2013.12.15 22:42:00 -
          [40] - Quote 
 It's nothing to do with the PS3, maybe the engine in conjunction with the PS3 but it is not the system itself.
 
 However you could then argue that we didn't get the DUST we wanted because the engine wouldn't
 even run on the PS3 so I guess it is the system's fault.
 
 However if we have 32v32 we will have MORE tank spam and very empty matches.
 
 You've Been Hit By
You've Been Struck By
A Smooth Criminal | 
      
        |  |  | 
      
      
        | Pages: 1 2  :: [one page] |