naw i'll just AFK till they fix the reward system. but the point stands a LAV going that fast hitting infantry should kill that infantry without question and caving in was bad move on CCP to do. they messed up on this one by using a band aid rather then fixing the problem that has been stated to them repeatedly.

3. its removing depth and skill from the game, its also removing WP from a already low WP gain role.

I read somewhere that the devs have put a mechanic in patch 1.4 or 1.5 that is meant to kick AFKers from the match after a set time.

if you put nitro on a vehicle maybe that would increase the damage at max speeds.

I took 18M damage from a murdertaxi once, thank you CCP for the LAV bumber damage BALANCE. a heavy should get stuck on the hood, get pissed, pull a sidearm and pop that dumb@ss driver for dragging him along. a smart driver is gonna go out looking for scouts to bumber mash, cause an assaulter should survive too and do the same thing just more beat up afterwards.

"New vehicle/infantry collision system & damage tuning to lower the effect of the 'murder taxi' deals to low of damage."

full speed run over only deal around 300-400 damage. a base MLT suit can live past that, is this really intended or did you just go overboard with things like you guys normally do.

i guess dropsuits are going to get the next round of nerfs then.

*shrug* oh well NERF 514.

You really have to ask WHY a person who is defending Murder taxis is requesting a nerf for dropsuits? SRSLY ? LOL

clearly you support this or you would not keep bumping it, so just come out and say im right like you know it.

my oppinion on the murder taxi problem would be this: why not let the taxi do a ton of damage (maybe a heavy can withstand it) BUT the LAV takes damage equal to say whatever the infantry has left in hp or at least armour. in real life if u hit someone incased in armour in sure youd smash the front of the vehical up enough to cause serious damage.

1. they put the turret on for self defense that is different from an attack role. look at assault dropship if you need a better example of a small turret meant to kill and the small turrets on tanks for self defense.

2. you want to treat the symptoms and not the reason.
I HATE BAND AIDS TO PROBLEMS, THEY JUST COME BACK.
you can look around and see the real problem is in the base 30% resistance that LLAVs have. fix that, that should not be there, it makes them harder to kill then HAVs for no reason.
another case of a band aid rather then fixing is in the AFK vs reward system. it rewards players for just showing up and not getting kicked off the game greater then actually playing. that is why people AFK in this game and you don't see it much if at all in other games.

3. its removing depth and skill from the game, its also removing WP from a already low WP gain role.

Depth and skill? So in your opinion tearing around in a jeep and slamming into people adds "depth and skill"? They statement is so backward and absurd I cannot even think of an argument if that is truly what you think.
Btw, the defined role of an LAV is a means of conveyance to carry friendly troops to areas that would take to long to get to on foot, with a turret to protect from attack and provide suppression in areas of skirmish.
Nowhere in that role does it make sense to haul ass around the field the whole match trying to run people over, you just **** people off, friendlies and enemies alike as you are providing no subtantial worth to your team.

"New vehicle/infantry collision system & damage tuning to lower the effect of the 'murder taxi' deals to low of damage."

full speed run over only deal around 300-400 damage. a base MLT suit can live past that, is this really intended or did you just go overboard with things like you guys normally do.

Get out of the car scrub. Shoot like a real man. Hell you don't even need to shoot, the aimbot will do that for you.

Just hold r1 baby girl.