Pages: 1 2 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Zero Harpuia
Turalyon 514
769
|
Posted - 2013.08.31 21:27:00 -
[1] - Quote
I was just curious if anyone remembered these and why we got them. We used to get 15 points for doing decent damage to a HAV, 10 for LAVs, 20 for the MCC (we used to Forge that so hard :p) etc.
I was thinking, if CCP would reinstate the feature, would the AV crowd consent to a buff to Vehicle HP across the board? You get WP for actively deterring the enemy vehicles, and a bonus bunch for securing their destruction/death of the pilot. The Vehicles get longer survivability and the ability to give points to the enemy without those points being too few for the invested time in killing them or being solely from their death (which leads to demented AV players rushing into redlines and getting killed just to get their WP). AVers get WP and can stop going all or nothing, Vehicles get less lost gear and greater survivability, everyone wins :D |
Logi Bro
Greatness Achieved Through Training EoN.
2145
|
Posted - 2013.08.31 21:32:00 -
[2] - Quote
Like it, want it, probably won't get it. |
Zero Harpuia
Turalyon 514
774
|
Posted - 2013.09.01 01:17:00 -
[3] - Quote
Logi Bro wrote:Like it, want it, probably won't get it. Don't give up yet fellow Logi Bro, we can still hope! |
Nguruthos IX
Vagina Bombers
1259
|
Posted - 2013.09.01 01:21:00 -
[4] - Quote
Yeah well if you get points for just damaging me with auto lock on swarms and the precision aim of forge guns then I'd better not die in 2-4 hits to AV.... |
Zero Harpuia
Turalyon 514
774
|
Posted - 2013.09.01 01:27:00 -
[5] - Quote
Nguruthos IX wrote:Yeah well if you get points for just damaging me with auto lock on swarms and the precision aim of forge guns then I'd better not die in 2-4 hits to AV....
I said you'd get more HP in the deal, please drop the venom a tad Mr. Nine. Also, Vehicles shoot at vehicles too, so you'd benefit from using a railgun on a SniperTank, but it retreating before you finish it off. Like I said, everyone wins :D |
Nguruthos IX
Vagina Bombers
1260
|
Posted - 2013.09.01 01:41:00 -
[6] - Quote
Zero Harpuia wrote:Nguruthos IX wrote:Yeah well if you get points for just damaging me with auto lock on swarms and the precision aim of forge guns then I'd better not die in 2-4 hits to AV.... I said you'd get more HP in the deal, please drop the venom a tad Mr. Nine. Also, Vehicles shoot at vehicles too, so you'd benefit from using a railgun on a SniperTank, but it retreating before you finish it off. Like I said, everyone wins :D
I'm just saying it would have to be pretty significant (hp boost) because you can imagine how many More people on the team would have and use AV were this the case. |
Zero Harpuia
Turalyon 514
775
|
Posted - 2013.09.01 01:47:00 -
[7] - Quote
Nguruthos IX wrote:Zero Harpuia wrote:Nguruthos IX wrote:Yeah well if you get points for just damaging me with auto lock on swarms and the precision aim of forge guns then I'd better not die in 2-4 hits to AV.... I said you'd get more HP in the deal, please drop the venom a tad Mr. Nine. Also, Vehicles shoot at vehicles too, so you'd benefit from using a railgun on a SniperTank, but it retreating before you finish it off. Like I said, everyone wins :D I'm just saying it would have to be pretty significant (hp boost) because you can imagine how many More people on the team would have and use AV were this the case.
True, but if more people use AV then the groundpounders have an easier time cloning the enemy because a Swarm can't touch an AR. I was thinking 1-3k HP for a tank, but its been SO long since I tanked I have no idea how much HP they have, should have, have if well fit, nor how much each HP matters. I'd need actual HAV/LAV/Derpship pilots to come in here and give me the numbers end of this. I'd also like the set Turrets to be effected by this as well. |
Meeko Fent
Seituoda Taskforce Command Caldari State
751
|
Posted - 2013.09.01 02:23:00 -
[8] - Quote
Yes. This was even an argument for the strong AV we have now. "If we can't kill a tank, the we get no WPs!"
Bring it back. Then make tanks ++bar again.
Bam. Satisfies everyone. |
Meeko Fent
Seituoda Taskforce Command Caldari State
751
|
Posted - 2013.09.01 03:10:00 -
[9] - Quote
De bump for de thoughtz. |
Jeremiah ambromot
Pro Hic Immortalis
38
|
Posted - 2013.09.01 03:19:00 -
[10] - Quote
And then we have people abuse it in fac war matches to gain sp. go sit in the distance away from everything and damage the tank slightly let it rep rinse and repeat. |
|
Nguruthos IX
Vagina Bombers
1262
|
Posted - 2013.09.01 03:19:00 -
[11] - Quote
Meeko Fent wrote:Yes. This was even an argument for the strong AV we have now. "If we can't kill a tank, the we get no WPs!"
Bring it back. Then make tanks ++bar again.
Bam. Satisfies everyone.
true true
|
Zero Harpuia
Turalyon 514
779
|
Posted - 2013.09.01 03:44:00 -
[12] - Quote
Jeremiah ambromot wrote:And then we have people abuse it in fac war matches to gain sp. go sit in the distance away from everything and damage the tank slightly let it rep rinse and repeat.
Boosters are going to boost nomatter what you do. Besides, that's 15 WP or so every minute? At least, if you don't want other AV to join in and wreck the tank. I'm sure there are better ways to get SP. We can't sit in fear over Booster asshats, only think of ways to counter them. |
Xender17
Ahrendee Mercenaries EoN.
517
|
Posted - 2013.09.01 04:48:00 -
[13] - Quote
There needs to be this AND a freakin damage based reward system. Not who got the one shot. The one who did the most work. Everyone feels this. Swarms when competing for a kill against something that kills faster. (FG) A sniper that loses his points because the last 10 hp is taken away by AR. or the other way around. HAVs that kill installations, but their turret operators wait last second to fire just to get more points. Whether it be exploiting or just players being donkeys, its broken or just needs polishing. |
Zero Harpuia
Turalyon 514
779
|
Posted - 2013.09.01 04:52:00 -
[14] - Quote
Xender17 wrote:There needs to be this AND a freakin damage based reward system. Not who got the one shot. The one who did the most work. Everyone feels this. Swarms when competing for a kill against something that kills faster. (FG) A sniper that loses his points because the last 10 hp is taken away by AR. or the other way around. HAVs that kill installations, but their turret operators wait last second to fire just to get more points. Whether it be exploiting or just players being donkeys, its broken or just needs polishing.
The practice is known as 'Last Hitting' and is the most immersion breaking metagaming irritant made popular by MOBAs since passing the blame. |
Spkr4theDead
International-Fleet
534
|
Posted - 2013.09.01 05:02:00 -
[15] - Quote
Zero Harpuia wrote:Nguruthos IX wrote:Zero Harpuia wrote:Nguruthos IX wrote:Yeah well if you get points for just damaging me with auto lock on swarms and the precision aim of forge guns then I'd better not die in 2-4 hits to AV.... I said you'd get more HP in the deal, please drop the venom a tad Mr. Nine. Also, Vehicles shoot at vehicles too, so you'd benefit from using a railgun on a SniperTank, but it retreating before you finish it off. Like I said, everyone wins :D I'm just saying it would have to be pretty significant (hp boost) because you can imagine how many More people on the team would have and use AV were this the case. True, but if more people use AV then the groundpounders have an easier time cloning the enemy because a Swarm can't touch an AR. I was thinking 1-3k HP for a tank, but its been SO long since I tanked I have no idea how much HP they have, should have, have if well fit, nor how much each HP matters. I'd need actual HAV/LAV/Derpship pilots to come in here and give me the numbers end of this. I'd also like the set Turrets to be effected by this as well. Tanks might as well be LAVs with 1000 total HP because of how easy it is for PRO AV to destroy them. |
Ludvig Enraga
KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION
429
|
Posted - 2013.09.01 05:16:00 -
[16] - Quote
If they gave it to us again, it would be so amazing. I would cap out my weekly SP in just two hours and would not have to play the game at all. All I would need is to get into a match with a corpie on the other side - with a cheap lav and a repair gun for the LAV. This would be even more awesome than just sitting in a MCC all day! |
Ludvig Enraga
KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION
429
|
Posted - 2013.09.01 05:19:00 -
[17] - Quote
Zero Harpuia wrote:Xender17 wrote:There needs to be this AND a freakin damage based reward system. Not who got the one shot. The one who did the most work. Everyone feels this. Swarms when competing for a kill against something that kills faster. (FG) A sniper that loses his points because the last 10 hp is taken away by AR. or the other way around. HAVs that kill installations, but their turret operators wait last second to fire just to get more points. Whether it be exploiting or just players being donkeys, its broken or just needs polishing. The practice is known as 'Last Hitting' and is the most immersion breaking metagaming irritant made popular by MOBAs since passing the blame.
Works fine in other FPS. in Dust though were difference in HP between a light and a heavy frame is an ! order of magnitude and installations take a full cache of ammo drom some weapons to drop - yeah, that one last shot wins it all policy is irritating. But hey, then again, 'welcom to new eden' biches! |
Zero Harpuia
Turalyon 514
780
|
Posted - 2013.09.01 05:41:00 -
[18] - Quote
Ludvig Enraga wrote:If they gave it to us again, it would be so amazing. I would cap out my weekly SP in just two hours and would not have to play the game at all. All I would need is to get into a match with a corpie on the other side - with a cheap lav and a repair gun for the LAV. This would be even more awesome than just sitting in a MCC all day!
Then we'd be rid of you that much faster :D
In all seriousness though, good luck getting that to work at all in a full match without someone on one side or the other either trying to stop you or trying to 'help' you kill the LAV. |
DeadlyAztec11
Chatelain Rapid Response Gallente Federation
2095
|
Posted - 2013.09.01 05:46:00 -
[19] - Quote
If the vehicle retreats I usually stop there. Deal is... Most of them are brave/dumb enough to keep going. |
Takahiro Kashuken
Red Star. EoN.
1169
|
Posted - 2013.09.01 10:17:00 -
[20] - Quote
But CCP reduced pts for everything
Like being a log you get so many pts then it stops even thos you are still repping ppl, when you kill some one or revive ppl the pts dont stop
Same with spider tanking and DS, no pts for anything |
|
Baal Omniscient
L.O.T.I.S.
568
|
Posted - 2013.09.01 12:28:00 -
[21] - Quote
Nguruthos IX wrote:Zero Harpuia wrote:Nguruthos IX wrote:Yeah well if you get points for just damaging me with auto lock on swarms and the precision aim of forge guns then I'd better not die in 2-4 hits to AV.... I said you'd get more HP in the deal, please drop the venom a tad Mr. Nine. Also, Vehicles shoot at vehicles too, so you'd benefit from using a railgun on a SniperTank, but it retreating before you finish it off. Like I said, everyone wins :D I'm just saying it would have to be pretty significant (hp boost) because you can imagine how many More people on the team would have and use AV were this the case. I must say Mr. Nine, if I get a constant stream of WP from NOT killing your tank, I'd be much happier with keeping you suppressed all match rather than trying suicide runs/hot drops/et al trying to kill your tank. You may be frustrated if I kill your tank early in the match, but then so will I since that means an early stop to my WP trust fund lol.
Basically what I'm saying is you wont see AV acting as desperate to kill your vehicle if they are rewarded for merely keeping you suppressed. You may not LIKE being suppressed, but I'm sure you like it a lot less when you lose a tank. |
Racro 01 Arifistan
The Surrogates Of War
29
|
Posted - 2013.09.01 13:42:00 -
[22] - Quote
Zero Harpuia wrote:I was just curious if anyone remembered these and why we got them. We used to get 15 points for doing decent damage to a HAV, 10 for LAVs, 20 for the MCC (we used to Forge that so hard :p) etc.
I was thinking, if CCP would reinstate the feature, would the AV crowd consent to a buff to Vehicle HP across the board? You get WP for actively deterring the enemy vehicles, and a bonus bunch for securing their destruction/death of the pilot. The Vehicles get longer survivability and the ability to give points to the enemy without those points being too few for the invested time in killing them or being solely from their death (which leads to demented AV players rushing into redlines and getting killed just to get their WP). AVers get WP and can stop going all or nothing, Vehicles get less lost gear and greater survivability, everyone wins :D
In fact, we could use a similar system to allow people to deter snipers as well, give 5 WP for depleting an enemy shield. I'm sure someone can put more thought into this facet than me, gotta go out in a minute, but just leaving it here to spark ideas.
then this becomes away to quickly farm the enemy vehicles to get an orbital strike quicker. why destroy vehicle for 150 wp whn we can continusly get slight point increments throught the entire match and get orbital stikes quicker. |
Zero Harpuia
Turalyon 514
788
|
Posted - 2013.09.01 15:42:00 -
[23] - Quote
Racro 01 Arifistan wrote:Zero Harpuia wrote:I was just curious if anyone remembered these and why we got them. We used to get 15 points for doing decent damage to a HAV, 10 for LAVs, 20 for the MCC (we used to Forge that so hard :p) etc.
I was thinking, if CCP would reinstate the feature, would the AV crowd consent to a buff to Vehicle HP across the board? You get WP for actively deterring the enemy vehicles, and a bonus bunch for securing their destruction/death of the pilot. The Vehicles get longer survivability and the ability to give points to the enemy without those points being too few for the invested time in killing them or being solely from their death (which leads to demented AV players rushing into redlines and getting killed just to get their WP). AVers get WP and can stop going all or nothing, Vehicles get less lost gear and greater survivability, everyone wins :D
In fact, we could use a similar system to allow people to deter snipers as well, give 5 WP for depleting an enemy shield. I'm sure someone can put more thought into this facet than me, gotta go out in a minute, but just leaving it here to spark ideas. then this becomes away to quickly farm the enemy vehicles to get an orbital strike quicker. why destroy vehicle for 150 wp whn we can continusly get slight point increments throught the entire match and get orbital stikes quicker.
Because the vehicle is killing your men if you do not kill it, and it takes vehicles a full minute to recharge their active modules. In that time, your useless butt sits on the mountain waiting for the vehicle to reappear, making your team lose because all the other vehicles are running amok. You cannot 'farm' something that cannot be domesticated. The enemy will sooner kill you. |
Princeps Marcellus
Expert Intervention Caldari State
186
|
Posted - 2013.09.01 15:45:00 -
[24] - Quote
Meeko Fent wrote:Yes. This was even an argument for the strong AV we have now. "If we can't kill a tank, the we get no WPs!"
Bring it back. Then make tanks ++bar again.
Bam. Satisfies everyone.
I want it! Gimme gimme! |
Zero Harpuia
Turalyon 514
805
|
Posted - 2013.09.01 23:44:00 -
[25] - Quote
Princeps Marcellus wrote:Meeko Fent wrote:Yes. This was even an argument for the strong AV we have now. "If we can't kill a tank, the we get no WPs!"
Bring it back. Then make tanks ++bar again.
Bam. Satisfies everyone. I want it! Gimme gimme!
Then speak to your local CPM today :D |
|
CCP Wolfman
C C P C C P Alliance
1751
|
Posted - 2013.09.02 01:31:00 -
[26] - Quote
They were removed because they were being used for farming. Once some of our new anti-farming stuff comes online and we've had a chance to see how the vehicle gameplay is developing we'll consider bringing them back. |
|
Zero Harpuia
Turalyon 514
806
|
Posted - 2013.09.02 01:43:00 -
[27] - Quote
CCP Wolfman wrote:They were removed because they were being used for farming. Once some of our new anti-farming stuff comes online and we've had a chance to see how the vehicle gameplay is developing we'll consider bringing them back.
Holy kittenz I got a BluePost!
I assumed that was the case, but I hoped it wasn't so. We lose so many cool features to Boosters... if only WP didn't give OBs :c
From all of us, AV and tanker alike, we would love to get points for suppression for all the reasons and viewpoints given in the thread. I do hope that these 'anti-farming' measures work as well as you want them to. |
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles
1031
|
Posted - 2013.09.02 03:26:00 -
[28] - Quote
a good tanker will get hit once or twice and bounce. Then hel come back shortly after and repeat. You would get so many warpoints so quickly you wont even want to kill the tank, youd farm the hell out of his tank for points |
Eurydice Itzhak
Militaires Sans Jeux
199
|
Posted - 2013.09.02 04:07:00 -
[29] - Quote
CCP Wolfman wrote:They were removed because they were being used for farming. Once some of our new anti-farming stuff comes online and we've had a chance to see how the vehicle gameplay is developing we'll consider bringing them back.
So when anti afk comes (a future date) and youve had a chance to review vehicle gameplay (a further date) then youll consider it? (Even more distant future)
three leaps into the future for something we already had at one point.
To prevent farming. Which is still done by afk and revive farming.
Genius. |
Godin Thekiller
Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy
434
|
Posted - 2013.09.02 04:12:00 -
[30] - Quote
Yes, it was 25 for MCC's, 20 for HAV's, 15 for DS's, and 10 for LAV's, and I think it was 2-4 hits during a 10-20 second time period. |
|
Zero Harpuia
Turalyon 514
808
|
Posted - 2013.09.02 04:37:00 -
[31] - Quote
Exmaple Core wrote:a good tanker will get hit once or twice and bounce. Then hel come back shortly after and repeat. You would get so many warpoints so quickly you wont even want to kill the tank, youd farm the hell out of his tank for points
There are already many farming methods, and all are way more effective than this. We can't live in fear of boosters best way to deal with it is to just seperate the relationship of WP and OB, then no one will care about farmers/boosters. |
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles
1032
|
Posted - 2013.09.02 04:42:00 -
[32] - Quote
Zero Harpuia wrote:Exmaple Core wrote:a good tanker will get hit once or twice and bounce. Then hel come back shortly after and repeat. You would get so many warpoints so quickly you wont even want to kill the tank, youd farm the hell out of his tank for points There are already many farming methods, and all are way more effective than this. We can't live in fear of boosters best way to deal with it is to just seperate the relationship of WP and OB, then no one will care about farmers/boosters.
i agree. but if WPs dont give orbitals then there is no purpose to collect warpoints |
Zero Harpuia
Turalyon 514
809
|
Posted - 2013.09.02 05:18:00 -
[33] - Quote
Exmaple Core wrote:Zero Harpuia wrote:Exmaple Core wrote:a good tanker will get hit once or twice and bounce. Then hel come back shortly after and repeat. You would get so many warpoints so quickly you wont even want to kill the tank, youd farm the hell out of his tank for points There are already many farming methods, and all are way more effective than this. We can't live in fear of boosters best way to deal with it is to just seperate the relationship of WP and OB, then no one will care about farmers/boosters. i agree. but if WPs dont give orbitals then there is no purpose to collect warpoints
That's the point. There is no purpose to collecting WP, they aren't trading cards. They are supposed to be a general view about how 'good' a person is, and as such should be rewarded when a player does a helpful action. There is an SP cap in place to prevent people from farming obscene SP, so the only reason we don't get WP for things like vehicular repair or vehivular damage, its because of OBs. Next time you lose a tank to a demented AV way in your redline, it is because he WANTS the few WP it allows. And if that AVer leaves you burning at 20 HP, you won't get repaired because noone gets points for repairing you. We need to make OBs work on something else so we can have all these points back and give people incentive to function in rolls other than 'pewpewpew50WPKILL pewpew25WPASSIST killstealer :c' |
Zero Harpuia
Turalyon 514
809
|
Posted - 2013.09.02 06:48:00 -
[34] - Quote
Takahiro Kashuken wrote:But CCP reduced pts for everything
Like being a log you get so many pts then it stops even thos you are still repping ppl, when you kill some one or revive ppl the pts dont stop
Same with spider tanking and DS, no pts for anything
See my other thread Taka, it's right up your alley. https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=106198&p=2 |
G Torq
ALTA B2O
210
|
Posted - 2013.09.02 08:11:00 -
[35] - Quote
CCP Wolfman wrote:They were removed because they were being used for farming. Once some of our new anti-farming stuff comes online and we've had a chance to see how the vehicle gameplay is developing we'll consider bringing them back.
Imagined Vehicle: 2000 HP Shield 6000 HP Armor 600 WP Potential (Armor_HP / 10)
1) Awarding WP: As vehicle takes shield damage, no WP is awarded. As vehicle takes armor damage, WP can be awarded: If Armor_HP drops below WP_Potential*10 WP_Award = WP_Potential - Armor_HP/10 WP_Potential = WP_Potential - WP_Award Owner_WP_Vehicle_Payout = Owner_WP_Vehicle_Payout + WP_Award
Purpose: Limit WP payout from damaging vehicles
2) Dealing with recalls If a user recalls a vehicle, the next vehicle shall have a limit to its WP_Potential: If Vehicle called WP_Potential = WP_Potential - Owner_WP_Vehicle_Payout If Vehicle destroyed Owner_WP_Vehicle_Payout = 0
Purpose: restrict WP payout in case vehicles are recalled
Alternative WP_Potential for vehicles: WP_Potential = Vehicle_ISK_Cost / 1000
Alternative to dealing with recalls: Only pay out Damage WPs upon the destruction of the vehicle... |
Takahiro Kashuken
Red Star. EoN.
1172
|
Posted - 2013.09.02 10:08:00 -
[36] - Quote
G Torq wrote:CCP Wolfman wrote:They were removed because they were being used for farming. Once some of our new anti-farming stuff comes online and we've had a chance to see how the vehicle gameplay is developing we'll consider bringing them back. restrict WP payout in case vehicles are recalled...
How about no
Infantry swap all the time at depot do they get WP payout restrictions? no
But because its a vehicle its okay
******* infantry |
Gelan Corbaine
Sebiestor Field Sappers Minmatar Republic
176
|
Posted - 2013.09.02 14:39:00 -
[37] - Quote
Bringing this back is the only way I would accept an AV damage nerf . As long as killing is the only way for the AV trooper to be compensated for his work , then he should be able to kill . Despite what tankers think AV is NOT cheap . |
MarasdF Loron
Ghost Wolf Industries Alpha Wolf Pack
108
|
Posted - 2013.09.02 14:49:00 -
[38] - Quote
Gelan Corbaine wrote:Bringing this back is the only way I would accept an AV damage nerf . As long as killing is the only way for the AV trooper to be compensated for his work , then he should be able to kill . Despite what tankers think AV is NOT cheap . Running proto AV on my alt I have to say AV is cheap. Other than that I completely agree with your post. But I don't agree with AV buffs in 1.4... |
steadyhand amarr
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
1179
|
Posted - 2013.09.02 15:33:00 -
[39] - Quote
Just make obs a deployed beacon that has to be defended but once it goes ODF it does huge damage in a wider area. So it can be used for intended purpose of shifting dug in defenders |
Zero Harpuia
Turalyon 514
821
|
Posted - 2013.09.02 17:59:00 -
[40] - Quote
G Torq wrote:CCP Wolfman wrote:They were removed because they were being used for farming. Once some of our new anti-farming stuff comes online and we've had a chance to see how the vehicle gameplay is developing we'll consider bringing them back. Imagined Vehicle: 2000 HP Shield 6000 HP Armor 600 WP Potential (Armor_HP / 10) 1) Awarding WP:As vehicle takes shield damage, no WP is awarded. As vehicle takes armor damage, WP can be awarded: If Armor_HP drops below WP_Potential*10 WP_Award = WP_Potential - Armor_HP/10 WP_Potential = WP_Potential - WP_Award Owner_WP_Vehicle_Payout = Owner_WP_Vehicle_Payout + WP_Award Purpose: Limit WP payout from damaging vehicles 2) Dealing with recallsIf a user recalls a vehicle, the next vehicle shall have a limit to its WP_Potential: If Vehicle called WP_Potential = WP_Potential - Owner_WP_Vehicle_Payout If Vehicle destroyed Owner_WP_Vehicle_Payout = 0 Purpose: restrict WP payout in case vehicles are recalled Alternative WP_Potential for vehicles: WP_Potential = Vehicle_ISK_Cost / 1000 Alternative to dealing with recalls: Only pay out Damage WPs upon the destruction of the vehicle...
So what, Caldari vehicles jusst don't give many WP because kitten you? Also, ISK cost will change rapidly from area to area once the market hits, so thjat's a slapjob fix at best. |
|
low genius
the sound of freedom Renegade Alliance
388
|
Posted - 2013.09.02 18:22:00 -
[41] - Quote
CCP Wolfman wrote:They were removed because they were being used for farming. Once some of our new anti-farming stuff comes online and we've had a chance to see how the vehicle gameplay is developing we'll consider bringing them back.
how would you feel about bringing back mcc damage points? |
nakaya indigene
0uter.Heaven
65
|
Posted - 2013.09.02 19:10:00 -
[42] - Quote
As a tank pilot , DS pilot , and av specialist. The idea of points for damage is great. Slight buff to tanks and DS more on the DS. Slight Nerf lavs. And fix missile trajectories and we are set for vehicles. |
Zero Harpuia
Turalyon 514
823
|
Posted - 2013.09.02 20:20:00 -
[43] - Quote
low genius wrote:CCP Wolfman wrote:They were removed because they were being used for farming. Once some of our new anti-farming stuff comes online and we've had a chance to see how the vehicle gameplay is developing we'll consider bringing them back. how would you feel about bringing back mcc damage points?
As like, a team thing? Everyone on the team gets points when the enemy MCC takes so much damage? That'd give people a reason to defend objectives, cap as many as possible, and to counterhack, all at once :D Great idea High Genius
Seriously, go make a thread about it, link this thread in it too :p Not gonna steal your idea for my own thread. |
Ludvig Enraga
KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION
434
|
Posted - 2013.09.02 21:49:00 -
[44] - Quote
Zero Harpuia wrote:Ludvig Enraga wrote:If they gave it to us again, it would be so amazing. I would cap out my weekly SP in just two hours and would not have to play the game at all. All I would need is to get into a match with a corpie on the other side - with a cheap lav and a repair gun for the LAV. This would be even more awesome than just sitting in a MCC all day! Then we'd be rid of you that much faster :D In all seriousness though, good luck getting that to work at all in a full match without someone on one side or the other either trying to stop you or trying to 'help' you kill the LAV.
I hope you are not serious. If you think ppl would have any difficulty boosting, you are deluded - ppl who are serious about squeezing SP out of the game in the shortest time possible are not noobs, they would have that scheme working like a well oiled clockwork in no time. |
Zero Harpuia
Turalyon 514
823
|
Posted - 2013.09.02 21:51:00 -
[45] - Quote
Ludvig Enraga wrote:Zero Harpuia wrote:Ludvig Enraga wrote:If they gave it to us again, it would be so amazing. I would cap out my weekly SP in just two hours and would not have to play the game at all. All I would need is to get into a match with a corpie on the other side - with a cheap lav and a repair gun for the LAV. This would be even more awesome than just sitting in a MCC all day! Then we'd be rid of you that much faster :D In all seriousness though, good luck getting that to work at all in a full match without someone on one side or the other either trying to stop you or trying to 'help' you kill the LAV. I hope you are not serious. If you think ppl would have any difficulty boosting, you are deluded - ppl who are serious about squeezing SP out of the game in the shortest time possible are not noobs, they would have that scheme working like a well oiled clockwork in no time.
And there is an SP cap so that all they are doing is draining their SP pool faster. Good for them. We'll be rid of their useless rears that much sooner. |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 :: [one page] |