| Pages: 1 2 [3]  :: one page | 
      
      
        | Author | Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) | 
      
      
        |  Seymor Krelborn
 DUST University
 Ivy League
 
 622
 
 
      | Posted - 2013.08.26 10:38:00 -
          [61] - Quote 
 
 KingBlade82 wrote:Delta 749 wrote:Ive just been quitting battles over and over when I see that the otherside is obviously proto stacked and looking to stomp leaving a battle even in warbarge counts as loss I tested it.......sadly :( 
 
 not true... you have to gain 100 wp for it to COUNT towards the challenge... whether or not it still registers as a win/loss in your wallet is a different story.. I have noticed my wallet reflects wins/losses now with isk earnings of 10k or 15k isk, theres no way if I had participated in that battle I would get so little... I left these matches in the barge... but regardless of this, CCP said you MUST get 100 wp for it to count towards the challege
 | 
      
      
        |  Seymor Krelborn
 DUST University
 Ivy League
 
 622
 
 
      | Posted - 2013.08.26 10:45:00 -
          [62] - Quote 
 
 Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Silas Swakhammer wrote:I would like an update on this. I was under the impression that matches where I score less than 100 WPs did not count towards this event, win or lose.
 If what IWS says is true-
 "If you scored less than 100 WPs and your team won, they won despite you."
 "If you scored less than 100 WPs and your team lost, they lost because of you."
 
 This is beginning to feel like another mishandled DUST event.
 All matches count, if you fail to get 100 wp in a victory its counted as a non-win and against you.  aka afking this event won't work as well, I will say its going to suck for drop ship pilots, and that there is not a set of 'less than stellar' rewards for those who don't perform as well like 30% and 40% wins. 
 
 IWS you are wrong on this....you need to go talk to a dev get a straight answer and post here, since you've spread misinformation... as a CPM this is your responsibility now, since you've added to the confusion.
 | 
      
      
        |  Silas Swakhammer
 GamersForChrist
 Orion Empire
 
 80
 
 
      | Posted - 2013.08.26 10:49:00 -
          [63] - Quote 
 
 Seymor Krelborn wrote:Hey guys, let's not alienate the few people who are actually communicating with CCP.IWS you are wrong on this....you need to go talk to a dev get a straight answer and post here, since you've spread misinformation... as a CPM this is your responsibility now, since you've added to the confusion. 
 | 
      
      
        |  THE TRAINSPOTTER
 ROMANIA Renegades
 C0VEN
 
 222
 
 
      | Posted - 2013.08.26 10:51:00 -
          [64] - Quote 
 
 Seymor Krelborn wrote:KingBlade82 wrote:Delta 749 wrote:Ive just been quitting battles over and over when I see that the otherside is obviously proto stacked and looking to stomp leaving a battle even in warbarge counts as loss I tested it.......sadly :( not true... you have to gain 100 wp for it to COUNT towards the challenge... whether or not it still registers as a win/loss in your wallet is a different story.. I have noticed my wallet reflects wins/losses now with isk earnings of 10k or 15k isk, theres no way if I had participated in that battle I would get so little... I left these matches in the barge... but regardless of this, CCP said you MUST get 100 wp for it to count towards the challege 
 
 
 oh and once i quit a losing match and i had over 400WP , i search a game again , i enter , its the same match same team AND i still have 400WP
 | 
      
      
        |  Viktor Zokas
 High-Damage
 
 282
 
 
      | Posted - 2013.08.26 11:04:00 -
          [65] - Quote 
 Things people will do for scrub items.
 | 
      
      
        |  Seymor Krelborn
 DUST University
 Ivy League
 
 624
 
 
      | Posted - 2013.08.26 12:34:00 -
          [66] - Quote 
 
 Silas Swakhammer wrote:Seymor Krelborn wrote:IWS you are wrong on this....you need to go talk to a dev get a straight answer and post here, since you've spread misinformation... as a CPM this is your responsibility now, since you've added to the confusion. Hey guys, let's not alienate the few people who are actually communicating with CCP.  
 
 not trying to alienate anyone... just holding people accountable...
 
 truth is if they aren't reliable, accurate, and responsible, and cant take criticism they aren't worth much anyway...
 | 
      
      
        |  RKKR
 The Southern Legion
 The Umbra Combine
 
 335
 
 
      | Posted - 2013.08.26 12:40:00 -
          [67] - Quote 
 
 Silas Swakhammer wrote:Seymor Krelborn wrote:IWS you are wrong on this....you need to go talk to a dev get a straight answer and post here, since you've spread misinformation... as a CPM this is your responsibility now, since you've added to the confusion. Hey guys, let's not alienate the few people who are actually communicating with CCP.  
 Alienating? Explain yourself...It seems like Seymor Krelborn is 100% correct in his statement....
 
 This thread (and a second one) was bumped by me on purpose while IWS was active on the forums but it just seems to be another post-and-ignore-later-comments-CCP-style-thread. We're used to it now, but spreading misinformation is a no-go some of us just want to set it straight (and give a hint about how bad their communcation is).
 
 I don't feel that CPM needs to communicate with us on these issues and stuff, it's the job of CCP to do that. CPM should be too busy voicing the concerns,.... of the community to CCP. Sure they can communicate with us, but leave CCPs communication to CCP (hopefully they will learn one day)...what else is CPM going to say beside copy/paste from CCP, vague timelines or "we're under NDA"?
 
 
 | 
      
      
        |  Sgt Kirk
 SyNergy Gaming
 EoN.
 
 1318
 
 
      | Posted - 2013.08.26 12:42:00 -
          [68] - Quote 
 These prizes suck.
 
 That is all.
 | 
      
      
        |  MarasdF Loron
 Ghost Wolf Industries
 Alpha Wolf Pack
 
 81
 
 
      | Posted - 2013.08.26 12:47:00 -
          [69] - Quote 
 I just don't care at all about this event because the rewards are horrible and the 30 games at least required to play is ridiculous for tankers...
 | 
      
      
        |  SHANN da MAN
 D3LTA FORC3
 Inver Brass
 
 67
 
 
      | Posted - 2013.08.26 16:26:00 -
          [70] - Quote 
 
 Mobius Kaethis wrote:It seems like all of you who are complaining are doing so because you can't squad up. Why don't you join the LFSquad channel and group with some other folks. Remember to turn your mic on (or at least your ability to hear what others are saying) and have some fun. Remember its a game, fun is its only point. This from a guy in a corp who rolls full Proto Squads into Pub matches against newer players who can't hope to compete with their level of gear ... all to win rewards they will most likely never use, and keep those who Don't have high level SP/ISK/Gear from getting rewards they could actually Use.
 | 
      
      
        |  Cody Sietz
 Bullet Cluster
 
 808
 
 
      | Posted - 2013.08.26 16:40:00 -
          [71] - Quote 
 
 Delta 749 wrote:KingBlade82 wrote:Delta 749 wrote:Ive just been quitting battles over and over when I see that the otherside is obviously proto stacked and looking to stomp leaving a battle even in warbarge counts as loss I tested it.......sadly :( I believe they have said it doesnt count towards the event as long as you havent gotten 100 WP I think it depends if your team wins or not even if you leave.
 | 
      
      
        |  Silas Swakhammer
 GamersForChrist
 Orion Empire
 
 80
 
 
      | Posted - 2013.08.26 19:36:00 -
          [72] - Quote 
 
 RKKR wrote:My apologies. What I meant was that we shouldn't be backing members of CPM into a corner. Just because we're probably in the right (CCP Shanghai is known for changing the rules midway through an event, and there's been contradictions from them on this absurdly small event, take a second look at the GM response I received) doesn't justify our abrasiveness.Silas Swakhammer wrote:Seymor Krelborn wrote:IWS you are wrong on this....you need to go talk to a dev get a straight answer and post here, since you've spread misinformation... as a CPM this is your responsibility now, since you've added to the confusion. Hey guys, let's not alienate the few people who are actually communicating with CCP.  Alienating? Explain yourself...It seems like Seymor Krelborn is 100% correct in his statement.... This thread (and a second one) was bumped by me on purpose while IWS was active on the forums but it just seems to be another post-and-ignore-later-comments-CCP-style-thread. We're used to it now, but spreading misinformation is a no-go some of us just want to set it straight (and give a hint about how bad their communcation is). I don't feel that CPM needs to communicate with us on these issues and stuff, it's the job of CCP to do that. CPM should be too busy voicing the concerns,.... of the community to CCP. Sure they can communicate with us, but leave CCPs communication to CCP (hopefully they will learn one day)...what else is CPM going to say beside copy/paste from CCP, vague timelines or "we're under NDA"? | 
      
      
        |  Tallen Ellecon
 KILL-EM-QUICK
 RISE of LEGION
 
 625
 
 
      | Posted - 2013.08.26 19:42:00 -
          [73] - Quote 
 This event finally made me start wearing Proto in pubs, because I finally had an incentive to win. It will take some time before I get myself to stop, but at this rate, at least form an ISK perspective, I have no reason to stop.
 
 Sorry if my Freedom got in the way of your fun.
 (The mass driver, not the whole being Gallente thing)
 | 
      
      
        |  Shadow Of-Chaos
 Club Midnight
 
 38
 
 
      | Posted - 2013.08.26 23:38:00 -
          [74] - Quote 
 
 Silas Swakhammer wrote:RKKR wrote:Silas Swakhammer wrote:Seymor Krelborn wrote:IWS you are wrong on this....you need to go talk to a dev get a straight answer and post here, since you've spread misinformation... as a CPM this is your responsibility now, since you've added to the confusion. Hey guys, let's not alienate the few people who are actually communicating with CCP.  Alienating? Explain yourself...It seems like Seymor Krelborn is 100% correct in his statement.... This thread (and a second one) was bumped by me on purpose while IWS was active on the forums but it just seems to be another post-and-ignore-later-comments-CCP-style-thread. We're used to it now, but spreading misinformation is a no-go some of us just want to set it straight (and give a hint about how bad their communcation is). I don't feel that CPM needs to communicate with us on these issues and stuff, it's the job of CCP to do that. CPM should be too busy voicing the concerns,.... of the community to CCP. Sure they can communicate with us, but leave CCPs communication to CCP (hopefully they will learn one day)...what else is CPM going to say beside copy/paste from CCP, vague timelines or "we're under NDA"? My apologies. What I meant was that we shouldn't be backing members of CPM into a corner. Just because we're probably  in the right (CCP Shanghai is known for changing the rules midway through an event, and there's been contradictions from them on this absurdly small event, take a second look at the GM response I received) doesn't justify our abrasiveness.  it wouldnt be an issue if the rules were clear from the start. but IWS contradicted the Dev Blog, somewhat insulted my reading comprehension skills, and was then set straight by a GM. did this help? of course not, he was still posting the same crap the next day. when novaknife posted the letter that all the CPMs worked on about better communication, i was happy. thats what we need. looks like it was filled with the usual emptiness we are accustomed to getting at this point though. nothing has changed, communication is still lackluster, and IWS is still full of ****. save us CCP Wolfman, you're our only hope...
 | 
      
      
        |  fawkuima juggalo
 Pawns and Kings
 The Superpowers
 
 0
 
 
      | Posted - 2013.08.27 06:16:00 -
          [75] - Quote 
 so when and how you recieve the awards
 | 
      
        |  |  | 
      
      
        | Pages: 1 2 [3]  :: one page | 
      
      
        | First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |