| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500 |
8201. My personal tank event - in General Discussions [original thread]
Z9XERO wrote: Militia tankers they all think they're original........ possessing all of the OFFENCE capabilities of a tanker but lacking the Love ....... The connection between MAN and Vehicle .... The blood sweat n tears invested that of a cl...
- by Atiim - at 2013.12.19 19:38:00
|
8202. people who don't like tank spam.I know it must be fixed but meanwhile. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Commander Tzu wrote: Sica + 2 dmg mods = I will still kill your dumb Sica in two hits so keep giving me free WPs =) Not really a problem when I can still lose 5-10 of them and still go ISK positive.
- by Atiim - at 2013.12.19 19:32:00
|
8203. My personal tank event - in General Discussions [original thread]
Spkr4theDead wrote: R F Gyro wrote: Should be fun. The counter to this, of course, is.... ...oh, wait. There isn't one. LOL That's too bad.
- by Atiim - at 2013.12.19 19:30:00
|
8204. My personal tank event - in General Discussions [original thread]
Keep going, come on OP. You can do much better.
- by Atiim - at 2013.12.19 19:28:00
|
8205. FOR ALL YOU NAUGHTY FEMALE NEW TANKERS - in General Discussions [original thread]
Please Don't
- by Atiim - at 2013.12.19 18:21:00
|
8206. Opening the player market as a balancing tool for Factional Warfare - in General Discussions [original thread]
Lorhak Gannarsein wrote: Amarr has the crappiest rewards out of any faction. Your $#!tting me right?
- by Atiim - at 2013.12.19 15:43:00
|
8207. True Tankers aren't tank stomping - in General Discussions [original thread]
The true tankers aren't stomping now, but what happens when the MLT tanks go and they have nothing better to do? Tank 514. That's what.
- by Atiim - at 2013.12.19 15:17:00
|
8208. Tank Survey - in General Discussions [original thread]
NAV HIV wrote: Damn... Now i gotta give props to these two for something or some usefull contribution other than their usual QQ Not quite. Just because it was a better love story doesn't mean it was good
- by Atiim - at 2013.12.19 15:12:00
|
8209. Tank Survey - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ploo-Koon wrote: Was "Luekoplast"(Leukoplast? Leucoplast?) on your word of the day calendar? No, but Wiyrkomi was.
- by Atiim - at 2013.12.19 15:07:00
|
8210. Tank Survey - in General Discussions [original thread]
NAV HIV wrote: Atiim wrote: NAV HIV wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: But can't you see O'Dell? It's unfair to have to squad with just one tanker!!! Not fair at all! That spot in the squad could be used for another PRO stomper! Both of yo...
- by Atiim - at 2013.12.19 15:05:00
|
8211. Tank Survey - in General Discussions [original thread]
NAV HIV wrote: Atiim wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Tanks wouldn't be OP if you used one yourself. This is a joke, right? No he is serious. He wants you to use tanks like every other infantry who can afford a few isk. Eventhough all you...
- by Atiim - at 2013.12.19 14:55:00
|
8212. Tank Survey - in General Discussions [original thread]
NAV HIV wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: CharCharOdell wrote: Sgt Buttscratch wrote: Tanks are OP when you let them be. All it takes to stop OP MLT tank spam (the real problem) is bring 1 good tanker with you. They'll get you an orbital ...
- by Atiim - at 2013.12.19 14:52:00
|
8213. Tank Survey - in General Discussions [original thread]
Spkr4theDead wrote: Tanks wouldn't be OP if you used one yourself. This is a joke, right?
- by Atiim - at 2013.12.19 14:48:00
|
8214. NOT AGAIN - in General Discussions [original thread]
Not sure if like farm or dumbfluck OP
- by Atiim - at 2013.12.19 14:36:00
|
8215. The AV problem - in General Discussions [original thread]
Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Six 7 wrote: "Push Back" I don't expect to kill a tankGǪ Im using tanker logic, using av as a deterrent and tanks being the killers. Read Fine then if you cant survive pro av then its your problem FTFY
- by Atiim - at 2013.12.19 13:05:00
|
8216. The AV problem - in General Discussions [original thread]
Six 7 wrote: "Push Back" I don't expect to kill a tankGǪ Im using tanker logic, using av as a deterrent and tanks being the killers. Read If that was even logical, then wouldn't we have to re-tittle the descriptions for FGs/SLs/PLCs? Beca...
- by Atiim - at 2013.12.19 13:04:00
|
8217. The AV problem - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ghosts Chance wrote: Atiim wrote: Ghosts Chance wrote: i once had a guy randomly appear STANDING on my tank.... in the middle of a wide open field, were no infantry was (that i could tell) rendering ***** Well then there is a serious...
- by Atiim - at 2013.12.19 13:00:00
|
8218. The AV problem - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ghosts Chance wrote: i once had a guy randomly appear STANDING on my tank.... in the middle of a wide open field, were no infantry was (that i could tell) rendering ***** Well then there is a serious problem with your PS3, as that problem ...
- by Atiim - at 2013.12.19 12:54:00
|
8219. The AV problem - in General Discussions [original thread]
Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Atiim wrote: Ghosts Chance wrote: being insible 400 m away IS a crutch.... just like when the invisable shotgunners ran pampant You say that as if every SL user was always 400m away. Majority were 400m away...
- by Atiim - at 2013.12.19 12:52:00
|
8220. The AV problem - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ghosts Chance wrote: Atiim wrote: So you believe that a "crutch" is the problem with AV? What is your proficiency in Swarm Launchers again? Forge Guns? Total SP investment? My guess: 0-310,900SP please tell me how being invisable want a...
- by Atiim - at 2013.12.19 12:49:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |