Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 |
121. so... can we get assault lavs please? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Pokey Dravon wrote: I think a Scout LAV would be more appropriate, with bonuses to active vehicle scanners as well as reduced signature profile. Vehicle cloaks are....something we should not look at right now though. Scout lavs are useless....
- by Zekain K - at 2014.01.14 16:31:00
|
122. so... can we get assault lavs please? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Evolution-7 wrote: Both of the above posts are soo badly thought out. God..... I am known for putting minimal effort into the threads that I make.
- by Zekain K - at 2014.01.14 16:27:00
|
123. so... can we get assault lavs please? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Give them the same skill bonus as assault drop ships , but make them have the base HP, and slot layout as militia lavs? Give more cpu/pg to fit slightly better things though. Oh, they also need to be fast.
- by Zekain K - at 2014.01.14 15:56:00
|
124. NOTHING for Heavies in 1.8 ???? is this correct? - in General Discussions [original thread]
They're trying to get us all the missing suits.
- by Zekain K - at 2014.01.14 15:51:00
|
125. Fire has started a blaze!!!! (Caldari scout pics inside) - in General Discussions [original thread]
Fire of Prometheus wrote: Viktor Hadah Jr wrote: What weapon is it holding? rail rifle? That what I'm thinking....but it's missing the scope so it may be an AsRR Its the magsec smg.
- by Zekain K - at 2014.01.14 03:47:00
|
126. you see devs? this how we should work together. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Dreniella wrote: Errrr, you are aware that they can hotfix everything in even when patch is deployed? All numbers are changeable. It costs money to fix mistakes like that, so its always better to get it right the first time.
- by Zekain K - at 2014.01.14 02:57:00
|
127. you see devs? this how we should work together. - in General Discussions [original thread]
You create the plans on how you want to build the next update, release the stats and stuff of your draft on sisi. Then you talk to the cpm. You have the cpm talk to us. Then you come in and be apart of the conversations. You do this BEFORE yo...
- by Zekain K - at 2014.01.14 02:54:00
|
128. what if the cloak too a percentage of cpu/gp away? - in General Discussions [original thread]
And not a fixed amount? Say 80% cpu/pg consumption. Then the scouts gain bonuses that dramatically reduce that percentage?
- by Zekain K - at 2014.01.13 20:27:00
|
129. go play halo: 4/reach and use the active camo AA - in General Discussions [original thread]
Iron Wolf Saber wrote: Defiance PVP. Cloak in halo 4 about useless though with promy vision. Yea, promy vision is the ultimate wall haxs.
- by Zekain K - at 2014.01.13 17:11:00
|
130. go play halo: 4/reach and use the active camo AA - in General Discussions [original thread]
Because that is probably the closest thing I can think that is almost identical to the cloak ccp wants to add in. It isn't overpowdre because of one SIMPLE draw back. It scrambles the radars of everyone around them. If you see.a cluster of enemy...
- by Zekain K - at 2014.01.13 16:36:00
|
131. CPM: Petition to CCP Regarding Cloaks - in General Discussions [original thread]
commando biffle wrote: Kain Spero wrote: Firing while cloaked allows a player to alpha strike and get the upper hand in an engagement and deny the player under attack the ability to respond to the threat effectively. It essentially creates a...
- by Zekain K - at 2014.01.13 16:18:00
|
132. CPM: Petition to CCP Regarding Cloaks - in General Discussions [original thread]
I just want to point out that the current cloak method that cco wants to implement is actually almost identical to the active cloaking in halo: reach, and halo 4. If you move too much, you shimmer. If you fire your weapon, you de-cloak for a se...
- by Zekain K - at 2014.01.13 07:05:00
|
133. are there Devs disguised as us, arguing with us? - in General Discussions [original thread]
CCP Saberwing wrote: Haha - pretty unlikely! We're less covert than you guys might think :) We do have our own personal DUST accounts but I personally prefer playing under my Dev name because it gives me a chance to interact with you guys. Bu...
- by Zekain K - at 2014.01.13 06:32:00
|
134. are there Devs disguised as us, arguing with us? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Logi Bro wrote: I'm probably at the top of everyone's suspicion list. No people, I am NOT CCP Logibro. That would actually be too obvious. But that could be your plan! Logi bro is a spy!
- by Zekain K - at 2014.01.13 02:49:00
|
135. are there Devs disguised as us, arguing with us? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Has anyone ever wondered that? are there actual developers from CCp who are using NON DEV accounts to try and debate/ argue with, or against our own balance debates? Could some of our most known members actually be DEVs is disguise?! (looks at cat...
- by Zekain K - at 2014.01.13 02:45:00
|
136. To the rifle variant users, do you even use the prototype variants? - in General Discussions [original thread]
1) Do you use Advanced variants:Yes 2) Do you use Prototype variants:Yes 3) If yes to either, how often do you use them: I manly use the AVD types because going proto in a pub game is a waste of time. Ill use the proto gear in FW, or PC though...
- by Zekain K - at 2014.01.13 02:40:00
|
137. So you want to destroy a Tank? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Go through all the trouble to kill one tank to only have it be called back down 10 seconds later. Its easier to just kill it with another tank.
- by Zekain K - at 2014.01.13 01:26:00
|
138. the combat rifle is a better hybrid weapon. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Then the hybrid weapons. Just sayen.
- by Zekain K - at 2014.01.13 00:59:00
|
139. Dust 514 on PS4? Please...Please. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Lol nope. 10 year plan on the ps3
- by Zekain K - at 2014.01.13 00:56:00
|
140. Nice try Evolution-7 - in General Discussions [original thread]
Moo.
- by Zekain K - at 2014.01.12 17:22:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |