| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 |
501. Sticky:[Feedback] EWAR Concentric Circle Scan Falloff Design - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
I need sleep. But atm I'm much more interested in cat mercs spreadsheet TBH. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1DrCb0IiA3G3MjjnObKURzEQBl46sfzbtIOKN_4iJWdM/edit#gid=0 However...If we cannot get shared passive scanning removed...it's all ...
- by Zatara Rought - at 2014.11.19 05:52:00
|
502. Here here GD dwellers - in General Discussions [original thread]
Atiim wrote: Then you run into an issue with Assaults and Commandos stepping on each-others toes, that and the fact that 5% is akin to an Enhanced Damage Mod, which is very easy to fit and not very noteworthy. Personally I think that suit bon...
- by Zatara Rought - at 2014.11.19 05:05:00
|
503. Sticky:[Feedback] Equipment Bandwidth - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Piercing Serenity wrote: According to my understanding of the system, the statement above is false . In actuality, ifI start the match as a Logi with 24Bw (For the sake of argument) and use up all of my bandwidth to put down equipment in the ...
- by Zatara Rought - at 2014.11.19 01:56:00
|
504. Sticky:[Feedback] EWAR Concentric Circle Scan Falloff Design - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Vitantur Nothus wrote: Zatara Rought wrote: Vitantur Nothus wrote: Marauder and Roner ran plates and kincats; they didn't even bother with damps. Lol. Competitive shotgun scouts running under 500HP is news to me. That's OHK range if pitt...
- by Zatara Rought - at 2014.11.19 01:34:00
|
505. Sticky:[Feedback] EWAR Concentric Circle Scan Falloff Design - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Vitantur Nothus wrote: Marauder and Roner ran plates and kincats; they didn't even bother with damps. Lol. Competitive shotgun scouts running under 500HP is news to me. That's OHK range if pitted against another shotgunner. Sounds like it'd be...
- by Zatara Rought - at 2014.11.19 01:25:00
|
506. Sticky:[Feedback] EWAR Concentric Circle Scan Falloff Design - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Vitantur Nothus wrote: Marauder and Roner ran plates and kincats; they didn't even bother with damps. Lol. Competitive shotgun scouts running under 500HP is news to me. That's OHK range if pitted against another shotgunner. Sounds like it'd be...
- by Zatara Rought - at 2014.11.19 01:17:00
|
507. Scout Registry / Killboard - in General Discussions [original thread]
Cass Caul wrote: -snip- yes I totally support you needing 3 damps to get under lol gal logi focused scans. not 4 damps. that was part of what was dumb in 1.7. dunno why that was ever unclear. but that'd 3 damps...no dampening from cloa...
- by Zatara Rought - at 2014.11.19 01:05:00
|
508. Sticky:[Feedback] EWAR Concentric Circle Scan Falloff Design - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Vitantur Nothus wrote: The only minimal HP Shotgun Scouts I've seen in PC are the ones I've OHK'd. The very best Shotgun Scouts I've seen in PC (Marauder, Roner, Fusion) all stacked plates. I personally prefer a Gal w/2 damps, 2 plates and 2 ...
- by Zatara Rought - at 2014.11.19 00:39:00
|
509. Thanks FA :D - in The War Room [original thread]
Shiyou Hidiyoshi wrote: The district wasn't an FA district though :) Hence why I encouraged Shep to attack it. But semantics really. =)
- by Zatara Rought - at 2014.11.19 00:26:00
|
510. Sticky:[Feedback] EWAR Concentric Circle Scan Falloff Design - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Vitantur Nothus wrote: True Adamance wrote: More cloak nerfs Problem: 600+ HP "Assault Lite" Scouts are OP. Complaint: Assault Lite are out-assaulting Assault. Solution: Nerf cloak and remove Scout scans. Outcome: Problem Scouts ar...
- by Zatara Rought - at 2014.11.19 00:23:00
|
511. Sticky:[Feedback] EWAR Concentric Circle Scan Falloff Design - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: Zatara Rought wrote: Cat Merc wrote: Honestly, just removing cloaks would help balance so much. I honestly don't think so. And I don't want that to happen. The BEST part about cloaking is that it allows their use...
- by Zatara Rought - at 2014.11.19 00:14:00
|
512. Sticky:[Feedback] EWAR Concentric Circle Scan Falloff Design - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
post is having issues.
- by Zatara Rought - at 2014.11.19 00:00:00
|
513. Sticky:[Feedback] EWAR Concentric Circle Scan Falloff Design - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Cat Merc wrote: Honestly, just removing cloaks would help balance so much. I honestly don't think so. And I don't want that to happen. The BEST part about cloaking is that it allows their users to actively influence their e-war. We don't...
- by Zatara Rought - at 2014.11.18 23:39:00
|
514. Here here GD dwellers - in General Discussions [original thread]
Atiim wrote: Zatara Rought wrote: Imagine 50% reload speed....just you lose 10% damage in that first clip...but sustained DPS goes WAAAY up. I use min mando and I salivate at having 50% reload speed...it's already very fast. Or you coul...
- by Zatara Rought - at 2014.11.18 23:37:00
|
515. Here here GD dwellers - in General Discussions [original thread]
hfderrtgvcd wrote: Let commandos keep the damage bonus, but give assaults a bonus to rof. it sounds solid in your mind bud...but no. trust me.
- by Zatara Rought - at 2014.11.18 23:35:00
|
516. Here here GD dwellers - in General Discussions [original thread]
Booby Tuesdays wrote: Leave the Assault Damage bonus to Legion. Keep the Commando damage bonus for Dust. I specced Commando for the sole purpose of it being a badass AV fit. Throwing only more HP at it makes it a true heavy frame scrub fit imho...
- by Zatara Rought - at 2014.11.18 23:31:00
|
517. Here here GD dwellers - in General Discussions [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: Zatara Rought wrote: That's what i'm asking you. I suggested them getting 1.5x the ehp, a grenade, and more stamina. But I don't know what might be an appropriate bonus to replace the damage bonus. Commando are s...
- by Zatara Rought - at 2014.11.18 23:29:00
|
518. Here here GD dwellers - in General Discussions [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: Zatara Rought wrote: True Adamance wrote: Commando's do not need more EHP. If people genuinely believe they do they are whining sods who can't ******* handle their role correctly. What would you prefer they get...
- by Zatara Rought - at 2014.11.18 23:18:00
|
519. Here here GD dwellers - in General Discussions [original thread]
Atiim wrote: After checking out some fits it would appear as if I was wrong. Currently my MinAssault can only gain an extra 21HP than the Commando if I dedicate both fits to pure eHP. However my other points still stand firm. You don't even n...
- by Zatara Rought - at 2014.11.18 23:17:00
|
520. Here here GD dwellers - in General Discussions [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: Commando's do not need more EHP. If people genuinely believe they do they are whining sods who can't ******* handle their role correctly. What would you prefer they get if the assaults were given the damage bonus? ...
- by Zatara Rought - at 2014.11.18 23:14:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |