| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 |
481. I love strong boxes <3 - in General Discussions [original thread]
adultery 0.0
- by Yokal Bob - at 2015.01.13 23:35:00
|
482. Back after a hiatus - in General Discussions [original thread]
whatever you want, no need to follow the FoTM users now *wags a finger*
- by Yokal Bob - at 2015.01.13 20:12:00
|
483. Running Scout suits - in General Discussions [original thread]
none of my scout suits have cloaks, dont need em dont like em. *reminisces about the olden days*
- by Yokal Bob - at 2015.01.13 20:11:00
|
484. My next thread.... - in General Discussions [original thread]
We still need trees in this game, maybe a fight on an oasis. still want to storm an mcc in a domination type way
- by Yokal Bob - at 2015.01.13 06:05:00
|
485. How many APEX suits you have? - in General Discussions [original thread]
i got my first one a few days ago, but trying to beat those qsycing amarr is proving quite difficult o.0 they are litterally in every match now, with EVE support to boot.
- by Yokal Bob - at 2015.01.13 05:57:00
|
486. [Petition] Remove Advanced and proto AV till we have equivelent - in General Discussions [original thread]
Vitantur Nothus wrote: Kindly first remove vehicles from Ambush. Despite their being reportedly underpowered, they're used at every opportunity by stomp squads. A real head scratcher. they only show up in oms, fairness if you ask me. but may...
- by Yokal Bob - at 2015.01.13 00:47:00
|
487. [Petition] Remove Advanced and proto AV till we have equivelent - in General Discussions [original thread]
While were at it can we have racial vehicle variants Also change some of the damage types of AV, its too angled towards armour, and i hate the look of the caldari tanks. Not that im much of a tanker, i just like to bring one out every now and ...
- by Yokal Bob - at 2015.01.13 00:35:00
|
488. [Petition] Remove Advanced and proto AV till we have equivelent - in General Discussions [original thread]
Iron Wolf Saber wrote: Yokal Bob wrote: Iron Wolf Saber wrote: No. because? i want a valid argument for your rejection. otherwise it should be considered as i stated in the interest of fairness Sagaris. coming back? when? o.o
- by Yokal Bob - at 2015.01.13 00:27:00
|
489. [Petition] Remove Advanced and proto AV till we have equivelent - in General Discussions [original thread]
Iron Wolf Saber wrote: No. because? i want a valid argument for your rejection. otherwise it should be considered as i stated in the interest of fairness
- by Yokal Bob - at 2015.01.13 00:25:00
|
490. [Petition] Remove Advanced and proto AV till we have equivelent - in General Discussions [original thread]
Pocket Rocket Girl wrote: Yokal Bob wrote: Pocket Rocket Girl wrote: then remove proto and adv turrets in the name of fairness :) fine by me not what i was expecting lol, but really what issue are you having with AV? 1. min co...
- by Yokal Bob - at 2015.01.13 00:23:00
|
491. [Petition] Remove Advanced and proto AV till we have equivelent - in General Discussions [original thread]
Pocket Rocket Girl wrote: then remove proto and adv turrets in the name of fairness :) fine by me
- by Yokal Bob - at 2015.01.13 00:07:00
|
492. [Petition] Remove Advanced and proto AV till we have equivelent - in General Discussions [original thread]
LUGMOS wrote: Oh no... Here come the pitchforks. Why must it come to this? because a forgegun can take out more than half a tanks armour in one hit -_- not everyone likes shield tanking
- by Yokal Bob - at 2015.01.13 00:06:00
|
493. [Petition] Remove Advanced and proto AV till we have equivelent - in General Discussions [original thread]
In the interest of fairness
- by Yokal Bob - at 2015.01.13 00:00:00
|
494. Someone please explain to me how this happened - in General Discussions [original thread]
you were closest to it when it timed out in your redline, are you sure you didnt shoot it? or touch it?
- by Yokal Bob - at 2015.01.12 23:13:00
|
495. Petition to CCP: SImple fix to redline snipping - in General Discussions [original thread]
Timtron Victory wrote: Reduce the range of sniper rifles significantly. This is my argument Timtron Victory wrote: I still dont care for the range argument, even if sniper rifles had 50 m range they would still be very useful, just more tac...
- by Yokal Bob - at 2015.01.12 23:11:00
|
496. Sniping Dust 514 - Pre-1.8 vs. Post-1.8 - in General Discussions [original thread]
Shinobi MumyoSakanagare ZaShigurui wrote: I understand all of that , I have my SR tree maxed , reload and extra in the clips ... the CSR is such a gimmick gun it's ridiculous , not saying SYM is a bad sniper , we all know that's not true but no...
- by Yokal Bob - at 2015.01.12 22:54:00
|
497. Make Dust514 Sexy PETITION - in General Discussions [original thread]
Bri Bub wrote: Yokal Bob wrote: And this is why nothing gets done around here... back to work Says the guy whose forum signature reads: "If its not anime, its not real"... ah yeah, i used to change it regularly... thanks for the rem...
- by Yokal Bob - at 2015.01.12 22:16:00
|
498. Dust, Dust never changes... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Bright Cloud wrote: During the closed beta we enjoyed scrubbery till no tommorrow like sitting with dropships on top of towers or use RE's like frisbees and tanks where the most OP thing ever created. But Dust never changes... The rage and bl...
- by Yokal Bob - at 2015.01.12 22:13:00
|
499. YES! - in General Discussions [original thread]
lucky :D
- by Yokal Bob - at 2015.01.12 22:11:00
|
500. I'm done - in General Discussions [original thread]
DrewEon wrote: Everyone. Tanking with assualts. Tanking with heavies. Scouts with shotguns. That's all there is these days. And overpowered as can get assault rifles. DO SOMETHING CCP. What do you expect new players to do? Match making sucks, s...
- by Yokal Bob - at 2015.01.12 22:10:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |