| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
1641. anyone still agree with infantry only ambush? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Fist Groinpunch wrote: Void Echo wrote: Tebu Gan wrote: Void Echo wrote: then make skirmish AV free. sorry void, tanks have no place in ambush. That is called an I win button. sorry tebu, AV has no place in skirmish, that's call...
- by Void Echo - at 2013.10.08 18:11:00
|
1642. anyone still agree with infantry only ambush? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Rusty Shallows wrote: Void Echo wrote: then make skirmish AV free. The converse of this is no vehicles in skirmish either. Fair trade. LAVs being an exception of course. No skin off my nose either way since the Forge Gun was classified a...
- by Void Echo - at 2013.10.08 18:08:00
|
1643. anyone still agree with infantry only ambush? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Fist Groinpunch wrote: Wow, really? So a guy gets tired of HAVs blowing him up, and asks for a vehicle free mode, and your "fair" counterpoint is to ask for mode where HAVs just blow up helpless infantry all day long. How does that even make se...
- by Void Echo - at 2013.10.08 18:07:00
|
1644. anyone still agree with infantry only ambush? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Tebu Gan wrote: Void Echo wrote: then make skirmish AV free. sorry void, tanks have no place in ambush. That is called an I win button. sorry tebu, AV has no place in skirmish, that's called an instant kill button.
- by Void Echo - at 2013.10.08 18:03:00
|
1645. Tomorrow... - in General Discussions [original thread]
this is going to be interesting.. hehehe bring it on slaver scum
- by Void Echo - at 2013.10.08 09:05:00
|
1646. Am i the only one that find OBs slightly illogical? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Heinrich Jagerblitzen wrote: Xender17 wrote: But just don't seem to fit in a competitive situation for a video game. That's probably why this who are you? iv never heard of you or seen you before.... how are you a cpm?
- by Void Echo - at 2013.10.08 09:02:00
|
1647. anyone still agree with infantry only ambush? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Fist Groinpunch wrote: Void Echo wrote: Lv2spd2 wrote: Void Echo wrote: then make skirmish AV free. No... a 3 man LAV mounted militia only AV squad in skirmish is way too much fun. Now, I know it's insanely easy to kill vehicles w...
- by Void Echo - at 2013.10.08 06:33:00
|
1648. Am i the only one that find OBs slightly illogical? - in General Discussions [original thread]
all of these changes wont be logical until we have eve/dust connection past 20% complete and we barely have it 2% complete.
- by Void Echo - at 2013.10.08 05:50:00
|
1649. anyone still agree with infantry only ambush? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Lv2spd2 wrote: Void Echo wrote: then make skirmish AV free. No... a 3 man LAV mounted militia only AV squad in skirmish is way too much fun. Now, I know it's insanely easy to kill vehicles with high level AV, but with 3 of you and milit...
- by Void Echo - at 2013.10.08 05:48:00
|
1650. anyone still agree with infantry only ambush? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Delta 749 wrote: Beld Errmon wrote: Delta 749 wrote: Shoot them with a swarm once and watch as they haul ass away to recall their tank and then hide the rest of the match Most tankers are cowards when they know AV is about so they arent t...
- by Void Echo - at 2013.10.08 05:46:00
|
1651. Your Favorite/Funniest Death - in General Discussions [original thread]
I was in a fw last week.... I was in my rail tank at the time, tearing everything up with psychotic and kim hehehe.... when I saw that they had a tank of their own psychotic and me were getting nailed by swarms, I darting over psychotic and ended...
- by Void Echo - at 2013.10.07 23:01:00
|
1652. anyone still agree with infantry only ambush? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Lv2spd2 wrote: Void Echo wrote: then make skirmish AV free. No... a 3 man LAV mounted militia only AV squad in skirmish is way too much fun. Now, I know it's insanely easy to kill vehicles with high level AV, but with 3 of you and milit...
- by Void Echo - at 2013.10.07 22:25:00
|
1653. Dont take it as complain - in General Discussions [original thread]
try upgrading your weapon.
- by Void Echo - at 2013.10.07 21:43:00
|
1654. anyone still agree with infantry only ambush? - in General Discussions [original thread]
then make skirmish AV free.
- by Void Echo - at 2013.10.07 21:02:00
|
1655. CCP's Universal "Equalizer" - The Weekly SP Cap - in General Discussions [original thread]
CrotchGrab 360 wrote: This is not COD. with the power hungry infantry group controlling how ccp works this game, its almost a cod
- by Void Echo - at 2013.10.07 17:49:00
|
1656. CCP's Universal "Equalizer" - The Weekly SP Cap - in General Discussions [original thread]
8213 wrote: SP cap only hinders new players. However, I see no point in removing it. That would hinder AURUM sales and make no differnce to a 10+million SP player. Hmm, that was short. I see no point in keeping it, it hinders everyone that...
- by Void Echo - at 2013.10.07 17:48:00
|
1657. Vehicle Changes and Respecs - in General Discussions [original thread]
iv put over 10 mil SP into tanks excluding the expensive militia tanks, id be surprised if we get any kind of respect from CCP in the from of sp refunds or anything at all.
- by Void Echo - at 2013.10.07 15:13:00
|
1658. What future feature Coming Soon (tm) are you most looking forward to? - in General Discussions [original thread]
for the soon staple to become " now "
- by Void Echo - at 2013.10.07 14:56:00
|
1659. In a recent video - in General Discussions [original thread]
I think that most game companies are taking the example from CCP and are creating more sandbox games, if there are more sandbox games in the market, dust wont survive the 1st week in the current state its in.
- by Void Echo - at 2013.10.07 14:55:00
|
1660. Why do people think logistics are suppose to be medics? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Athena Sentinel wrote: Tectonic Fusion wrote: Just because they can carry multiple equipment, doesn't mean they are suppose to carry a nano injector or repair tool. Uplinks and nanohives are just as important. Plus the ONLY logistics suit th...
- by Void Echo - at 2013.10.07 06:40:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |