| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 |
11181. No railgun, no vehicle balance - in General Discussions [original thread]
You know I'm more inclinded to suggest a lot of this bulls **** is because neither side has been willing to sit down on skype and discuss it in a less biased manner. And before the AVers start yelling "I'm unbiased and the preacher of balance"......
- by True Adamance - at 2014.06.23 23:26:00
|
11182. Tanks and Dropships take the same damage. Explain CCP - in General Discussions [original thread]
Scheneighnay McBob wrote: I'm honestly not sure what you're trying to say is wrong. Are you saying HAVs should be harder to damage? No I think he is saying ADS need to be harder to damage by limiting the amount of damage AV options can do a...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.06.23 23:23:00
|
11183. Tanks and Dropships take the same damage. Explain CCP - in General Discussions [original thread]
Judge Rhadamanthus wrote: So a forge or swarm does the same damage to a dropship as it does to a tank. So CCP. Explain how you feel that two vehicles that have vastly different effective Hit Points should take the same damage from AV? I defies...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.06.23 23:12:00
|
11184. Why dont you just delete vehicles? - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Sequal Rise wrote: Ghost Kaisar wrote: BF3 Vet here. The problem with Vehicles right now (From an infantry standpoint) is our inability to DEFEND ourselves. In BF3, you could attack infantry easily, but you still had to watch out for Eng...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.06.23 22:59:00
|
11185. New Gallente weapon - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Lightning35 Delta514 wrote: Light plasma mg Make it long range( gallente doesn't really own any long range weapons ) Looks like an assault rifle with scope and extended barrel(like combat rifle), instead of a clip if ammo, add a 200 round doub...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.06.23 22:56:00
|
11186. CPM please help us vehicle specialists out. - in The Council's Chamber [original thread]
Pokey Dravon wrote: The primary issue at its very core is that vehicles have undergone a sort of tiericide, whereas AV weapons have not. What this means is that because vehicles are 'flat', but AV weapons are not, they're trying to balance a ti...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.06.23 22:48:00
|
11187. LOL, 2 weeks on Vacation and HotFix Bravo comes out... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Arkena Wyrnspire wrote: Eko Sol wrote: Vicious Minotaur wrote: Nerfed vehicle reppers All they had to do was increase efficacy for swarms against Incubus. Not really, because then you'd still have the triple rep Madrugars. And...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.06.23 22:42:00
|
11188. I see that JLAV's are still a thing - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
TheEnd762 wrote: You're just butt-hurt because people are popping your without an opportunity for your to flee and/or ultra rep. Sorry I interrupted you mowing people down with reckless abandon and running away once the swarms and FG blasts sta...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.06.23 22:36:00
|
11189. I see that JLAV's are still a thing - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Smoky Fingers wrote: Same argument as ramship vs ADS, groundwise . The tools are there, except countering such tactics is tough and require complete attention on the task. Most of the time , vehicle users have infantry kill farming as priority ...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.06.23 22:35:00
|
11190. Logistics boosting - in General Discussions [original thread]
Taurion Bruni wrote: True Adamance wrote: Taurion Bruni wrote: so now we have an inconsistency with the orbital strike. I wonder If we should give out orbitals for WP at all anymore not we have concrete ways of establishing a player-giv...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.06.23 21:56:00
|
11191. An interesting dust news article - in General Discussions [original thread]
GeneralButtNaked wrote: True Adamance wrote: Well if and when Legion is green lit I will consider purchasing a PC, until then I have no intent to do anything but look into the PS4. Good call, although the guys in PIE could always use a...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.06.23 21:55:00
|
11192. Officer Weapons - Recognising the Dust 514 Playerbase - in General Discussions [original thread]
John Demonsbane wrote: I have no choice but to place this in every thread regarding officer weapons. It's a terrible affliction, can't be helped. "Demonsbane's BTH-71 Laser Rifle" Anyway, if you ask me, it's good idea (no suprise there) b...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.06.23 21:52:00
|
11193. @ CCP Z - in General Discussions [original thread]
Iron Wolf Saber wrote: Maken Tosch wrote: I still like to see what his progress is so far on the proposed skill progression system he came up with and if any changes have been made since he first brought it up. I just like to reiterate wh...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.06.23 21:46:00
|
11194. I see that JLAV's are still a thing - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Really they should not be. CCP should not be condoning one broken mechanic to deal with another broken mechanic. If this is the case why can I not just fit a tormentor out with explosives and crash into an Typhoon. It'd certainly increase my EVE...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.06.23 21:43:00
|
11195. An interesting dust news article - in General Discussions [original thread]
GeneralButtNaked wrote: True Adamance wrote: Some of those screen shots looks nice, primarily the star map, over head view, and main menu. It's a real shame I'm going to have to get a PC for Legion. It is a real shame that you are going ...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.06.23 21:41:00
|
11196. Logistics boosting - in General Discussions [original thread]
Taurion Bruni wrote: so now we have an inconsistency with the orbital strike. I wonder If we should give out orbitals for WP at all anymore not we have concrete ways of establishing a player-given OB? CONCORD would never sanction space to ...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.06.23 21:39:00
|
11197. No railgun, no vehicle balance - in General Discussions [original thread]
I think what you have to realise Atiim is yes vehicle pilots called for buffs....... this iteration of HAV is not what we were expecting and, in hindsight, not what we wanted. We just wanted tanks to be more durable...... perhaps that could have ...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.06.23 21:36:00
|
11198. Logistics boosting - in General Discussions [original thread]
Taurion Bruni wrote: True Adamance wrote: Taurion Bruni wrote: True Adamance wrote: Okay so I understand your points and with the least amount of cynicism I can must I ask you..... Why are you opposed to seeing OB's readily in games. ...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.06.23 21:21:00
|
11199. large railguns - in General Discussions [original thread]
Pvt Numnutz wrote: True Adamance wrote: calisk galern wrote: Pvt Numnutz wrote: Dovallis Martan JenusKoll wrote: Also, I think rails now need about 15* more firing angle upwards since their range was cut in half, and all dropships ...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.06.23 21:18:00
|
11200. Logistics boosting - in General Discussions [original thread]
Taurion Bruni wrote: True Adamance wrote: Okay so I understand your points and with the least amount of cynicism I can must I ask you..... Why are you opposed to seeing OB's readily in games. For example if you ever fight an FW match again...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.06.23 21:12:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |