| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 |
4181. Yet another Hotfix Echo thread review: Sgt Kirk edition. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Sgt Kirk wrote: True Adamance wrote: Doc DDD wrote: I have no idea what point you are trying to make, shield blaster tanks should have a short window where they can beat an armor blaster tank Exactly why I want active armour reppers ...
- by True Adamance - at 2015.03.19 00:31:00
|
4182. Yet another Hotfix Echo thread review: Sgt Kirk edition. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Doc DDD wrote: True Adamance wrote: Doc DDD wrote: I have no idea what point you are trying to make, shield blaster tanks should have a short window where they can beat an armor blaster tank Exactly why I want active armour reppers a...
- by True Adamance - at 2015.03.19 00:22:00
|
4183. Yet another Hotfix Echo thread review: Sgt Kirk edition. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Doc DDD wrote: I have no idea what point you are trying to make, shield blaster tanks should have a short window where they can beat an armor blaster tank Exactly why I want active armour reppers and not passives. If armour HAV can repair ...
- by True Adamance - at 2015.03.19 00:11:00
|
4184. Tanker Squads: Before they were cool - in General Discussions [original thread]
I like my Blasters again....but I assume most others don't now that I'm actually free to aim properly again. Still don't feel Railgunning or using Missiles on Armour HAV though.
- by True Adamance - at 2015.03.19 00:08:00
|
4185. Yet another Hotfix Echo thread review: Sgt Kirk edition. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Doc DDD wrote: The problem is too many people are trying to convince everyone that ' armor should be CQC and shields should be ranged ' . This philosophy is flawed as whoever is better at CQC is also going to be better at range. The argument ...
- by True Adamance - at 2015.03.18 23:54:00
|
4186. No reason to ever use the Marduk Tank - in General Discussions [original thread]
DUST Fiend wrote: I slap an MCRU on my Maddy with 2 proto railguns and that definitely helps tip things in my favor. That's just the solo fit, if I ever run in a squad I can ditch the MCRU for a heat sink. Solo HAVs are such a random idea, an...
- by True Adamance - at 2015.03.18 23:49:00
|
4187. Yet another Hotfix Echo thread review: Sgt Kirk edition. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Sgt Kirk wrote: True Adamance wrote: But even the shameless Gal loyalist you are those constantly Heavy Rep values are rather..... powerful. Oh yeah I know, I hate the Idea of Constant Repairs and wish we never got them for vehicles like ...
- by True Adamance - at 2015.03.18 23:48:00
|
4188. No reason to ever use the Marduk Tank - in General Discussions [original thread]
Arkena Wyrnspire wrote: Complaining about selfish tankers is not an excuse to have an asset that is completely obsoleted by another one which is simply better. The SHAV is a tank that is designed to be the paradigm for solo play, aka if you ...
- by True Adamance - at 2015.03.18 23:31:00
|
4189. The discussion [RP] - in Intergalactic Summit [original thread]
Crownrule wrote: The night went on with the fellow immortals talking about their many war stories and some political views. They drank until Tenarius spotted three men wearing light armor underneath trench coats, he instantly went to his pistol...
- by True Adamance - at 2015.03.18 23:05:00
|
4190. Yet another Hotfix Echo thread review: Sgt Kirk edition. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Sgt Kirk wrote: True Adamance wrote: DarthJT5 wrote: True Adamance wrote: Soul Cairn wrote: Agree with the vehicle section. The only concern I have with it is I'm not yet too sure how a static boost to shield eHP will changing th...
- by True Adamance - at 2015.03.18 22:42:00
|
4191. Yet another Hotfix Echo thread review: Sgt Kirk edition. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
DarthJT5 wrote: True Adamance wrote: Soul Cairn wrote: Agree with the vehicle section. The only concern I have with it is I'm not yet too sure how a static boost to shield eHP will changing things a great deal.....might offer them 0.5s...
- by True Adamance - at 2015.03.18 22:26:00
|
4192. No reason to ever use the Marduk Tank - in General Discussions [original thread]
Patrick57 wrote: True Adamance wrote: Forlorn Destrier wrote: I don't remember all the details, but isn't the this the standard tank? If so, the advanced and proto scale up in CPU/PG, yes? The Marduk is the SHAV. Basically an HAV for i...
- by True Adamance - at 2015.03.18 22:19:00
|
4193. No reason to ever use the Marduk Tank - in General Discussions [original thread]
Forlorn Destrier wrote: I don't remember all the details, but isn't the this the standard tank? If so, the advanced and proto scale up in CPU/PG, yes? The Marduk is the SHAV. Basically an HAV for individuals (a silly mechanic IMO as tankers ...
- by True Adamance - at 2015.03.18 21:34:00
|
4194. What do you miss most about this game? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Well two things really. One were the active armour reppers and 180mm armour plates. The other was the pride and competitive spirit FW used to have before it became a grinding farmville. If anything else it would have been the old animations cer...
- by True Adamance - at 2015.03.18 21:20:00
|
4195. Yet another Hotfix Echo thread review: Sgt Kirk edition. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Soul Cairn wrote: Agree with the vehicle section. The only concern I have with it is I'm not yet too sure how a static boost to shield eHP will changing things a great deal.....might offer them 0.5sec greater longevity..... but that really d...
- by True Adamance - at 2015.03.18 21:17:00
|
4196. No reason to ever use the Marduk Tank - in General Discussions [original thread]
The benefits of using a tank with turrets and not being a selfish prick solely concerned with solo play in tanks.
- by True Adamance - at 2015.03.18 21:10:00
|
4197. The Ultimate Forum Passing-Time Meta-Game RPG Thing for Dust 514 V! - in The Locker Room [original thread]
(( Do it Crown! Start a War!))
- by True Adamance - at 2015.03.18 21:08:00
|
4198. Concerning Vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
Apocalyptic Destroyer wrote: As of today I am officially done with tanking. It's a useless ISK sink. The Devs who try to put some sort of effort into making vehicles vs AV viable and even have failed again and again on this matter. It's either ...
- by True Adamance - at 2015.03.18 06:54:00
|
4199. The Ultimate Forum Passing-Time Meta-Game RPG Thing for Dust 514 V! - in The Locker Room [original thread]
Spademan wrote: (Issue in regards to Crowns reappearance. Whoever he's taking land off is not going to be happy.) ((Fortunately it's not going to be me since I had to add the Isles to the Map. By and by I feel like starting a war soon/confl...
- by True Adamance - at 2015.03.18 01:20:00
|
4200. Vehicle Skills - Back to Basics. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Takahiro Kashuken wrote: True Adamance wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: True Adamance wrote: Would you ever consider a Shield and Armour Adaptation Skill....though rather than hull resistances is it contributes to both Passive and Activ...
- by True Adamance - at 2015.03.17 23:07:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |