Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
3521. Would you fight for and hold land if there was no passive ISK? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Himiko Kuronaga wrote: Holding territory must serve a purpose. If no isk is given passively in one form or another, then the territory holds no purpose. The fights do, but if all we're playing for is gudfights then we don't need a map with te...
- by Thor Odinson42 - at 2014.04.15 22:37:00
|
3522. Would you fight for and hold land if there was no passive ISK? - in General Discussions [original thread]
anaboop wrote: anaboop wrote: Reset isk Limit districts held per corp/alliance No ringers outside of alliance Alliances with to many districts must break from alliance In order to gain more disricts Thats all that comes to mind atm lol ...
- by Thor Odinson42 - at 2014.04.15 22:30:00
|
3523. Would you fight for and hold land if there was no passive ISK? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Kain Spero wrote: Thor Odinson42 wrote: Kain Spero wrote: Thor Odinson42 wrote: But if there is no passive ISK from the districts why would you lock them? If you are looking at 5 mil a lock but a match pays out 16 to 32 mil or more...
- by Thor Odinson42 - at 2014.04.15 21:21:00
|
3524. Would you fight for and hold land if there was no passive ISK? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Kain Spero wrote: Thor Odinson42 wrote: But if there is no passive ISK from the districts why would you lock them? If you are looking at 5 mil a lock but a match pays out 16 to 32 mil or more per mock battle then you could easily manage ...
- by Thor Odinson42 - at 2014.04.15 20:04:00
|
3525. Would you fight for and hold land if there was no passive ISK? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Kain Spero wrote: Thor Odinson42 wrote: But if there is no passive ISK from the districts why would you lock them? If you are looking at 5 mil a lock but a match pays out 16 to 32 mil or more per mock battle then you could easily manage ...
- by Thor Odinson42 - at 2014.04.15 20:03:00
|
3526. Would you fight for and hold land if there was no passive ISK? - in General Discussions [original thread]
I want to make something clear about my recent posts on this subject. I don't think any of this is a long term answer. I'm talking about a short term solution to prevent Dust's economy from being damaged beyond repair as well as stimulating some t...
- by Thor Odinson42 - at 2014.04.15 19:47:00
|
3527. Would you fight for and hold land if there was no passive ISK? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Kain Spero wrote: Django Quik wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Have a go? where it costs 50mil per attack? It means only the rich can wage war while the peasents are left to pubs I said that on page 1 and we have gone around in a full ...
- by Thor Odinson42 - at 2014.04.15 19:45:00
|
3528. Would you fight for and hold land if there was no passive ISK? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Again, I think we are talking about short term fixes to PC 1.0.
- by Thor Odinson42 - at 2014.04.15 19:16:00
|
3529. Would you fight for and hold land if there was no passive ISK? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Outlaw OneZero wrote: To answer OPs question, yes we would fight for and hold land in PC without passive ISK, IF the costs to do so were reasonable. PC is currently the only game mode that allows team deploy. Many of our members would emb...
- by Thor Odinson42 - at 2014.04.15 18:32:00
|
3530. Would you fight for and hold land if there was no passive ISK? - in General Discussions [original thread]
BrotherofHavok wrote: Thor Odinson42 wrote: It's not that I disagree with you. But would you be willing to pay $5000 to box Manny Pac in your first boxing match? If you factor in the donut, people aren't going to set their corp wallet's on...
- by Thor Odinson42 - at 2014.04.15 18:27:00
|
3531. Would you fight for and hold land if there was no passive ISK? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Kain Spero wrote: Thor Odinson42 wrote: I don't think anyone would fight with PC 1.0 mechanics if passive ISK was taken away. Why would someone spend 100 or so million taking a district if there was no return on investment? Now if clone pac...
- by Thor Odinson42 - at 2014.04.15 17:53:00
|
3532. Would you fight for and hold land if there was no passive ISK? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Django Quik wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Django Quik wrote: Can we please try to keep this discussion on topic - that is: Would you play PC if there were no passive isk? This is not about "what can be done...
- by Thor Odinson42 - at 2014.04.15 17:47:00
|
3533. Would you fight for and hold land if there was no passive ISK? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Exergonic wrote: Drop all passive isk gained by selling clones by 80%... Increase payout by 75% for win... Add a 20% isk payout for when you lose the game... Questions?? That would certainly boost participation, but only if you dropped clone...
- by Thor Odinson42 - at 2014.04.15 17:43:00
|
3534. Fun Fact... - in The War Room [original thread]
Roman837 wrote: Killar-12 wrote: DNS CAN be Beaten... even by those scrubs in Top Men... http://imgur.com/a/hVn3X To those not fighting https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kX8Qqu_WBIc So, DDB gets chirped for fielding a full team of the...
- by Thor Odinson42 - at 2014.04.15 17:42:00
|
3535. Would you fight for and hold land if there was no passive ISK? - in General Discussions [original thread]
I don't think anyone would fight with PC 1.0 mechanics if passive ISK was taken away. Why would someone spend 100 or so million taking a district if there was no return on investment? Now if clone packs were 5 or 10 million ISK AND passive ISK wa...
- by Thor Odinson42 - at 2014.04.15 17:33:00
|
3536. CCPs statement on PC pls - in General Discussions [original thread]
Odigos Ellinas wrote: Thor Odinson42 wrote: Soldner VonKuechle wrote: Odigos Ellinas wrote: Is there any statement from CCP about the current state of Planetary conquest ??? Will this be the mechanics with more solar systems ? Will the...
- by Thor Odinson42 - at 2014.04.15 17:27:00
|
3537. CCPs statement on PC pls - in General Discussions [original thread]
Soldner VonKuechle wrote: Odigos Ellinas wrote: Is there any statement from CCP about the current state of Planetary conquest ??? Will this be the mechanics with more solar systems ? Will they change the game mode ? What is the timeline? If ...
- by Thor Odinson42 - at 2014.04.15 15:44:00
|
3538. Would you fight for and hold land if there was no passive ISK? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ydubbs81 RND wrote: Thor Odinson42 wrote: I just can't wrap my head around wanting to increase the cost of entry for a game mode that is suffering from a lack of participation. It would be like a restaurant that is struggling increasing the...
- by Thor Odinson42 - at 2014.04.15 02:35:00
|
3539. Would you fight for and hold land if there was no passive ISK? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ydubbs81 RND wrote: Thor Odinson42 wrote: Ydubbs81 RND wrote: In fact, $80M is too low. The reason that CCP reduced the number of clones in the pack is because they wanted to limit the clone pack attacks. I agree with their intention but ...
- by Thor Odinson42 - at 2014.04.15 02:18:00
|
3540. Announcement:Unscheduled Reboot Of Tranquility - 22:45 UTC - 14/04/201... - in General Discussions [original thread]
REDBACK96USMC wrote: Julius Vindice wrote: can we git a courtesy 5,000 sp, can't blame a guy for trying. Oh and replace the hamsters with squirrels on steroids. You're half of the way there. They should be squirrels on steroids but at the...
- by Thor Odinson42 - at 2014.04.15 01:23:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |