| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 |
541. Making PC More Active....only solution?? - in The War Room [original thread]
This wouldn't be a problem either, it'd be implemented For eve side, all that would change for us are our options. And being transported. Bare in mind that when your being transported its not you per se, its the clones, our consciousness would sim...
- by TechMechMeds - at 2014.01.20 17:14:00
|
542. Making PC More Active....only solution?? - in The War Room [original thread]
Now compare that in your mind to now, see how ridiculously stupid and childish what we have now is in comparison? Magic timers and mercs holding land generating isk that's worthless because of how fundamentally sht pc is itself.
- by TechMechMeds - at 2014.01.20 17:09:00
|
543. Making PC More Active....only solution?? - in The War Room [original thread]
You could also operate as pirates when you are a merc, you'd attack a district, if taken then all production of any kind would hault, you can then set an amount of ransom for the district or sell it on. Avass ye swine All of this would give peo...
- by TechMechMeds - at 2014.01.20 17:07:00
|
544. Making PC More Active....only solution?? - in The War Room [original thread]
Iv even said how we could!d gain standings with eve corps, these could be multipliers for interest on the contracts payout and higher standings would determine what equipment level you can use from their corp hangar, they'd obviously have to manuf...
- by TechMechMeds - at 2014.01.20 17:01:00
|
545. Making PC More Active....only solution?? - in The War Room [original thread]
Bear D'Grassi wrote: Why, as mercs, are we holding real estate anyway? Get rid of the ability to "own" a district. But, we need an income and not just pubs. Get EVE corps involved, expand PC out of MH and have it affect PI infrastructure deny...
- by TechMechMeds - at 2014.01.20 16:51:00
|
546. Making PC More Active....only solution?? - in The War Room [original thread]
Or was that oxymoron meme link your admittance that it is a rubbish idea?
- by TechMechMeds - at 2014.01.20 13:29:00
|
547. Making PC More Active....only solution?? - in The War Room [original thread]
Faquira Bleuetta wrote: Thor Odinson42 wrote: TechMechMeds wrote: But limiting the amount of matches players can do would screw smaller corps and favour mega corps. If I'm not getting this then please enlighten me. Limiting the amount...
- by TechMechMeds - at 2014.01.20 12:46:00
|
548. Making PC More Active....only solution?? - in The War Room [original thread]
Thor Odinson42 wrote: TechMechMeds wrote: Thor Odinson42 wrote: JL3Eleven wrote: I believe increasing the player count from 16v16 to 32v32 would increase participation and help other corps become more competitve by drawing from their s...
- by TechMechMeds - at 2014.01.20 04:32:00
|
549. Making PC More Active....only solution?? - in The War Room [original thread]
Thor Odinson42 wrote: TechMechMeds wrote: But limiting the amount of matches players can do would screw smaller corps and favour mega corps. If I'm not getting this then please enlighten me. Limiting the amount of matches per day isn't a...
- by TechMechMeds - at 2014.01.20 04:27:00
|
550. Making PC More Active....only solution?? - in The War Room [original thread]
But limiting the amount of matches players can do would screw smaller corps and favour mega corps. If I'm not getting this then please enlighten me.
- by TechMechMeds - at 2014.01.20 01:02:00
|
551. Making PC More Active....only solution?? - in The War Room [original thread]
DJINN Kujo wrote: We find giving districts up to corps that just lock their districts is pointless. So why give up land for a corp to be scared out of their minds enough to lock it and not even experience PC? It's a good idea, we've given up ...
- by TechMechMeds - at 2014.01.20 00:20:00
|
552. Making PC More Active....only solution?? - in The War Room [original thread]
Thor Odinson42 wrote: JL3Eleven wrote: I believe increasing the player count from 16v16 to 32v32 would increase participation and help other corps become more competitve by drawing from their size. I think you are on to something, but I t...
- by TechMechMeds - at 2014.01.20 00:19:00
|
553. How are tanks in pc? - in The War Room [original thread]
Charlotte O'Dell wrote: Well, tanks are working great in PC. The objective in PC is to keep objectives and tanks can't do that. Blaster tanks hold open ground and harass infantry. Rails and Missiles kill blaster tanks. Any team without tanks ...
- by TechMechMeds - at 2014.01.19 22:25:00
|
554. Making PC More Active....only solution?? - in The War Room [original thread]
I understand how you think that could be good but no, seriously get real lol.
- by TechMechMeds - at 2014.01.19 22:19:00
|
555. Making PC More Active....only solution?? - in The War Room [original thread]
Ydubbs81 RND wrote: LionTurtle91 wrote: Faquira Bleuetta wrote: Faquira Bleuetta wrote: i know the ******* way to balance pc , it clear that 16 vs 16 is extreme hard mode to high number count corp wit 95% useless low ,high sp player VS...
- by TechMechMeds - at 2014.01.19 22:18:00
|
556. Another district locking thread - in The War Room [original thread]
Feelings cloud logic and reason, power to the psychopaths.
- by TechMechMeds - at 2014.01.19 18:29:00
|
557. Making PC More Active....only solution?? - in The War Room [original thread]
Faquira Bleuetta wrote: i know the ******* way to balance pc , it clear that 16 vs 16 is extreme hard mode to high number count corp wit 95% useless low ,high sp player VS a small corp elite wit 100 % useful pro player shitload of sp , i have t...
- by TechMechMeds - at 2014.01.19 18:14:00
|
558. Making PC More Active....only solution?? - in The War Room [original thread]
Confligration wrote: One simple way to help fix PC is by limiting the amount of districts a corp can have at any given time. And furthermore how many of those districts may be locked at any given time. Abandon the thread mate quick lol
- by TechMechMeds - at 2014.01.19 09:07:00
|
559. Making PC More Active....only solution?? - in The War Room [original thread]
kiarbanor wrote: Ydubbs81 RND wrote: TechMechMeds wrote: Corp battles coming back would be ace, I preferred them over pc anyway. If they get implemented again, it'd be sweet to pick 6v6, 8v8 or 16v16. Only thing is....I remember having...
- by TechMechMeds - at 2014.01.19 02:18:00
|
560. Making PC More Active....only solution?? - in The War Room [original thread]
Ydubbs81 RND wrote: TechMechMeds wrote: Corp battles coming back would be ace, I preferred them over pc anyway. If they get implemented again, it'd be sweet to pick 6v6, 8v8 or 16v16. Only thing is....I remember having contracts out and n...
- by TechMechMeds - at 2014.01.19 01:33:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |