| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
1821. The only issue in Tank vs AV Balance is the Tanker Mentality - in General Discussions [original thread]
ReGnYuM wrote: Honestly, have Tankers ever come to the conclusion that AV might be a Hard Counter specifically designed to destroy them. I focus on infantry vs infantry, and when I see a tank you know what I do? I Do a complete 180 and make su...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2013.10.02 20:29:00
|
1822. If (when) there's a respec, why it should be a full respec instead of a part... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Bethhy wrote: Bethhy wrote: Respec's are stupid... I Won't say that I will not re-perfect skills for the current times if they are offered... but that really changes the game drastically... Respec's will only hurt new players more... and b...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2013.10.02 19:32:00
|
1823. Respecs in regards to Basic Content - in General Discussions [original thread]
Rogue Saint wrote: Jack McReady wrote: as mentioned ~500 players per month giving up dust due to the issues disagree with you, that is all I need to back up my claims... you just dont get that respec would speed up development till core stuf...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2013.10.02 18:13:00
|
1824. Respecs - tankers only! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Put respec in the title and everyone comes out of the woodwork! lol I was thinking just the skills affected, like I said I havent looked thoroughly thu the changes yet, just noticed we are getting some big changes to the tree, namely the Turrets....
- by Tebu Gan - at 2013.10.02 14:10:00
|
1825. Respecs - tankers only! - in General Discussions [original thread]
So with they changes to turrets and basically most of our skill tree, I wonder if they are going to let us redistribute our skill points in vehicles. Haven't throughly looked the numbers over, but I see the turrets tree is changing to match infant...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2013.10.02 14:00:00
|
1826. So no tank changes incomming - in General Discussions [original thread]
Very disappointed. I do wonder why they can't make small changes to our PG, Shield regan, Speed, ect, in the meantime. Is that too hard to implement without making huge changes to the code? The change to Nitro was awesome, why can't you guys do m...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2013.10.01 14:23:00
|
1827. No Turret removal :'( - in General Discussions [original thread]
Wow, just wow. I don't even know what to say. Been waiting on this for 3 months now. So now it's December, MAYBE. *sigh* This game keeps dwindling down further and further. Most everyone I have played with don't bother signing on. GtaV online t...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2013.10.01 14:11:00
|
1828. LAV Should All Have - in General Discussions [original thread]
ChromeBreaker wrote: Tebu Gan wrote: Thor Odinson42 wrote: I was discussing this last night in squad. I think LLAVs should have equipment slots just like dropsuits. I also think they should remove the turret damage reduction on them. ...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2013.09.30 13:57:00
|
1829. LAV Should All Have - in General Discussions [original thread]
calisk galern wrote: if I had vehicle skills I'd pimp my lav, unfortunately I don't for see that till like 35-40 million sp Spec far enough to get a scanner! Lav are not just meant for transportation. And next patch you get points for lighti...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2013.09.30 13:55:00
|
1830. LAV Should All Have - in General Discussions [original thread]
Thor Odinson42 wrote: I was discussing this last night in squad. I think LLAVs should have equipment slots just like dropsuits. I also think they should remove the turret damage reduction on them. LLAV need better driver protection, too ea...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2013.09.30 13:52:00
|
1831. LAV Should All Have - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sinboto Simmons wrote: on scout LAVs perhaps Naw, cheap Lav just to do some quick mobile scanning. Not like you are losing too much if it blows, and the range is huge.
- by Tebu Gan - at 2013.09.30 13:51:00
|
1832. Strange - in General Discussions [original thread]
calisk galern wrote: Tebu Gan wrote: calisk galern wrote: Tebu Gan wrote: Been running tanks for 4 months now. Put some points into logi suits, Caldari standard so far. I rack in those warpoints. Last game yesterday was 1900. I have...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2013.09.30 13:48:00
|
1833. LAV Should All Have - in General Discussions [original thread]
ChromeBreaker wrote: ok... put one on... I have 2 in fact on my Blood raider.
- by Tebu Gan - at 2013.09.30 13:43:00
|
1834. LAV Should All Have - in General Discussions [original thread]
Scanners! Pretty handy when you want to take an objective
- by Tebu Gan - at 2013.09.30 13:39:00
|
1835. Strange - in General Discussions [original thread]
calisk galern wrote: Tebu Gan wrote: Been running tanks for 4 months now. Put some points into logi suits, Caldari standard so far. I rack in those warpoints. Last game yesterday was 1900. I have very basic stuff for the most part. My ro...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2013.09.30 13:36:00
|
1836. Strange - in General Discussions [original thread]
Been running tanks for 4 months now. Put some points into logi suits, Caldari standard so far. I rack in those warpoints. Last game yesterday was 1900. I have very basic stuff for the most part. My role turns the tides of battle! Very rarely ...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2013.09.30 13:32:00
|
1837. Since glitching is now allowed, I am ruining FW by suiciding - in General Discussions [original thread]
This sounds fun actually. To hell with my KDR!
- by Tebu Gan - at 2013.09.30 12:32:00
|
1838. I know it's far out there but what are some other vehicles possibilities ? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Logi Heavy Vehicle. Nuff said.
- by Tebu Gan - at 2013.09.29 23:30:00
|
1839. CCP allows glitchers to win tourney, video proof inside - in General Discussions [original thread]
I don't think a CPM should be aggravating the situation. Not your place in the least bit, given your "position".
- by Tebu Gan - at 2013.09.29 23:03:00
|
1840. CCP allows glitchers to win tourney, video proof inside - in General Discussions [original thread]
This is a known glitch, that is being "Fixed". That fact alone should have disqualified its use. It's like somebody using auto aim. It breaks it for everyone else. And CCP has admitted it is a broken mechanic that requires fixing. Why wouldn't y...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2013.09.29 21:51:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |